60 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Projected Global Loss of Mammal Habitat Due to Land-Use and Climate Change D. Baisero et al. 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.05.015
2. Harmonization of global land use change and management for the period 850–2100 (LUH2) for CMIP6 G. Hurtt et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-5425-2020
3. Towards a better future for biodiversity and people: Modelling Nature Futures H. Kim et al. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102681
4. Ongoing over-exploitation and delayed responses to environmental change highlight the urgency for action to promote vertebrate recoveries by 2030 R. Cornford et al. 10.1098/rspb.2023.0464
5. Future projections of biodiversity and ecosystem services in Europe with two integrated assessment models C. Veerkamp et al. 10.1007/s10113-020-01685-8
6. Increasing the uptake of ecological model results in policy decisions to improve biodiversity outcomes S. Weiskopf et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105318
7. Investigating biodiversity trends in different mitigation scenarios with a national integrated assessment model A. Oliveira Fiorini et al. 10.1080/1943815X.2023.2239323
8. Assessment of the ecological role of historic centres based on the relationship between biodiversity and urban composition C. Buenaño et al. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20135
9. Engaging with the science and politics of biodiversity futures: a literature review C. Wyborn et al. 10.1017/S037689292000048X
10. Classification of agricultural land management systems for global modeling of biodiversity and ecosystem services S. López Rodríguez et al. 10.1016/j.agee.2023.108795
11. Including the subsurface in ecosystem services P. Dennedy-Frank 10.1038/s41893-019-0312-4
12. What ecologists should know before using land use/cover change projections for biodiversity and ecosystem service assessments C. Albert et al. 10.1007/s10113-020-01675-w
13. Current and future distribution of a parasite with complex life cycle under global change scenarios: Echinococcus multilocularis in Europe L. Cenni et al. 10.1111/gcb.16616
14. Diverging land-use projections cause large variability in their impacts on ecosystems and related indicators for ecosystem services A. Bayer et al. 10.5194/esd-12-327-2021
15. Biodiversity loss reduces global terrestrial carbon storage S. Weiskopf et al. 10.1038/s41467-024-47872-7
16. Transformative scenarios for biodiversity conservation and sustainability C. Lundquist et al. 10.1111/conl.12772
17. Projecting LUCC dynamics and ecosystem services in an emerging urban agglomeration under SSP-RCP scenarios and their management implications Q. Chen & Y. Ning 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175100
18. Wilderness areas halve the extinction risk of terrestrial biodiversity M. Di Marco et al. 10.1038/s41586-019-1567-7
19. Biodiversity policy beyond economic growth I. Otero et al. 10.1111/conl.12713
20. Integrated modeling of nature’s role in human well-being: A research agenda R. Chaplin-Kramer et al. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102891
21. Land management and climate change determine second‐generation bioenergy potential of the US Northern Great Plains K. Dolan et al. 10.1111/gcbb.12686
22. Monitoring biodiversity in the Anthropocene using remote sensing in species distribution models C. Randin et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111626
23. Equilibrium Modeling for Environmental Science: Exploring the Nexus of Economic Systems and Environmental Change M. Cantele et al. 10.1029/2020EF001923
24. Global biodiversity assessments need to consider mixed multifunctional land-use systems R. Alkemade et al. 10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101174
25. Identifying uncertainties in scenarios and models of socio-ecological systems in support of decision-making M. Rounsevell et al. 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.06.003
26. Linking SDG 7 to assess the renewable energy footprint of nations by 2030 J. He et al. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119167
27. Degrowth scenarios for biodiversity? Key methodological steps and a call for collaboration I. Otero et al. 10.1007/s11625-024-01483-9
28. Projecting terrestrial biodiversity intactness with GLOBIO 4 A. Schipper et al. 10.1111/gcb.14848
29. Near-term ecological forecasting for climate change action M. Dietze et al. 10.1038/s41558-024-02182-0
30. BILBI: Supporting global biodiversity assessment through high-resolution macroecological modelling A. Hoskins et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104806
31. Mapping co-benefits for carbon storage and biodiversity to inform conservation policy and action C. Soto-Navarro et al. 10.1098/rstb.2019.0128
32. Biodiversity modeling advances will improve predictions of nature’s contributions to people J. Kass et al. 10.1016/j.tree.2023.10.011
33. Impact of cucurbit crop management techniques on the foraging behavior of honeybees and hoverflies in Morogoro, Tanzania E. Rweyemamu et al. 10.1186/s12862-024-02202-9
34. A New Approach to Evaluate and Reduce Uncertainty of Model-Based Biodiversity Projections for Conservation Policy Formulation B. Myers et al. 10.1093/biosci/biab094
35. A globally applicable indicator of the capacity of terrestrial ecosystems to retain biological diversity under climate change: The bioclimatic ecosystem resilience index S. Ferrier et al. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106554
36. Predicting nature recovery for river restoration planning and ecological assessment: A case study from England, 1991–2042 M. Wilkes et al. 10.1002/rra.4282
37. Advancing a toolkit of diverse futures approaches for global environmental assessments L. Pereira et al. 10.1080/26395916.2021.1901783
38. Linking biodiversity into national economic accounting S. King et al. 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.10.020
39. Spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem services trade‐offs among ecosystem service bundles in an alpine mountainous region: A case‐ study in the Qilian Mountains, Northwest China Y. Teng et al. 10.1002/ldr.4266
40. Assessment of probable health risk of potentially toxic metals in irrigable wetland soils from Ogun and Lagos States, Southwestern Nigeria A. Taiwo et al. 10.1016/j.jtemin.2024.100179
41. Challenges in producing policy-relevant global scenarios of biodiversity and ecosystem services I. Rosa et al. 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00886
42. Comparing three spatial modeling tools for assessing urban ecosystem services C. Veerkamp et al. 10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101500
43. A Conceptual Framework to Integrate Biodiversity, Ecosystem Function, and Ecosystem Service Models S. Weiskopf et al. 10.1093/biosci/biac074
44. Changing risk of arboviral emergence in Catalonia due to higher probability of autochthonous outbreaks L. López et al. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110258
45. Global trends and scenarios for terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem services from 1900 to 2050 H. Pereira et al. 10.1126/science.adn3441
46. The undetectability of global biodiversity trends using local species richness J. Valdez et al. 10.1111/ecog.06604
47. Adapting global shared socio-economic pathways for national scenarios in Japan H. Chen et al. 10.1007/s11625-019-00780-y
48. Global projections of the soil microbiome in the Anthropocene C. Guerra et al. 10.1111/geb.13273
49. A fractional land use change model for ecological applications S. Kapitza et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105258
50. A framework for nitrogen futures in the shared socioeconomic pathways D. Kanter et al. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102029
51. Land-use harmonization datasets for annual global carbon budgets L. Chini et al. 10.5194/essd-13-4175-2021
52. Projecting impacts of global climate and land‐use scenarios on plant biodiversity using compositional‐turnover modelling M. Di Marco et al. 10.1111/gcb.14663
53. The proportion of soil-borne pathogens increases with warming at the global scale M. Delgado-Baquerizo et al. 10.1038/s41558-020-0759-3
54. Scenario archetypes reveal risks and opportunities for global mountain futures J. Thorn et al. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102291
55. Downscaling Global Land-Use Scenario Data to the National Level: A Case Study for Belgium P. Rashidi et al. 10.3390/land12091740
56. Operationalizing the Nature Futures Framework for ecological infrastructure P. Mayer et al. 10.1007/s11625-023-01380-7
57. IPBES Promotes Integration of Multiple Threats to Biodiversity N. Titeux et al. 10.1016/j.tree.2019.07.017
58. A Paris-like agreement for biodiversity needs IPCC-like science G. Wilhere 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01617
59. Process-explicit models reveal the structure and dynamics of biodiversity patterns J. Pilowsky et al. 10.1126/sciadv.abj2271
60. Global habitat loss and extinction risk of terrestrial vertebrates under future land-use-change scenarios R. Powers & W. Jetz 10.1038/s41558-019-0406-z