Articles | Volume 11, issue 11
Model evaluation paper
13 Nov 2018
Model evaluation paper |  | 13 Nov 2018

Evaluation of Monte Carlo tools for high-energy atmospheric physics II: relativistic runaway electron avalanches

David Sarria, Casper Rutjes, Gabriel Diniz, Alejandro Luque, Kevin M. A. Ihaddadene, Joseph R. Dwyer, Nikolai Østgaard, Alexander B. Skeltved, Ivan S. Ferreira, and Ute Ebert


Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by David Sarria on behalf of the Authors (13 Sep 2018)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (17 Sep 2018) by Josef Koller
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (26 Sep 2018)
RR by Ashot Chilingarian (05 Oct 2018)
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (12 Oct 2018) by Josef Koller
AR by David Sarria on behalf of the Authors (15 Oct 2018)  Author's response    Manuscript
Short summary
We evaluate three models (Geant4, REAM, GRRR) used in the field of high-energy atmospheric physics that are able to simulate relativistic runaway electron avalanches. Several models have been used by the community, but there was, up until now, no study evaluating their consistency in this context. We conclude that there are no major differences to report, and we discuss minor ones. We also provide advice on how to properly set up the general purpose code (Geant4) in this context.