Articles | Volume 11, issue 11
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4515–4535, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4515-2018
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4515–4535, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4515-2018
Model evaluation paper
13 Nov 2018
Model evaluation paper | 13 Nov 2018

Evaluation of Monte Carlo tools for high-energy atmospheric physics II: relativistic runaway electron avalanches

David Sarria et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 2,142 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,440 663 39 2,142 145 57 48
  • HTML: 1,440
  • PDF: 663
  • XML: 39
  • Total: 2,142
  • Supplement: 145
  • BibTeX: 57
  • EndNote: 48
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Jun 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 14 Jun 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,912 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,896 with geography defined and 16 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Discussed (final revised paper)

Latest update: 08 Aug 2022
Download
Short summary
We evaluate three models (Geant4, REAM, GRRR) used in the field of high-energy atmospheric physics that are able to simulate relativistic runaway electron avalanches. Several models have been used by the community, but there was, up until now, no study evaluating their consistency in this context. We conclude that there are no major differences to report, and we discuss minor ones. We also provide advice on how to properly set up the general purpose code (Geant4) in this context.