Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 11, issue 10
Articles | Volume 11, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4069-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4069-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 11, issue 10
Model evaluation paper
 | 
10 Oct 2018
Model evaluation paper |  | 10 Oct 2018

Comparison of dealiasing schemes in large-eddy simulation of neutrally stratified atmospheric flows

Fabien Margairaz, Marco G. Giometto, Marc B. Parlange, and Marc Calaf

Viewed

Total article views: 4,748 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
3,226 1,372 150 4,748 186 275
  • HTML: 3,226
  • PDF: 1,372
  • XML: 150
  • Total: 4,748
  • BibTeX: 186
  • EndNote: 275
Views and downloads (calculated since 17 Nov 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 17 Nov 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,748 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,498 with geography defined and 250 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 22 Sep 2026
Download
Short summary
In this project, we compare three different approaches to integrate the fluid-motion equations when applied to solve atmospheric flow dynamics. Differences between the three methods reside in accuracy as well as computational cost. The results illustrate that there is an intermediate solution that performs well in terms of computational cost while at the same time producing good enough results, as long one is not interested in the smallest turbulent scales.
Read more
Share