Articles | Volume 11, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4069-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4069-2018
Model evaluation paper
 | 
10 Oct 2018
Model evaluation paper |  | 10 Oct 2018

Comparison of dealiasing schemes in large-eddy simulation of neutrally stratified atmospheric flows

Fabien Margairaz, Marco G. Giometto, Marc B. Parlange, and Marc Calaf

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Fabien Margairaz on behalf of the Authors (02 May 2018)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (02 May 2018) by Simone Marras
RR by Elie Bou-Zeid (20 May 2018)
ED: Publish as is (05 Jun 2018) by Simone Marras
AR by Fabien Margairaz on behalf of the Authors (14 Jun 2018)

Post-review adjustments

AA: Author's adjustment | EA: Editor approval
AA by Fabien Margairaz on behalf of the Authors (23 Jul 2018)   Author's adjustment   Manuscript
EA: Adjustments approved (30 Jul 2018) by Simone Marras
Download
Short summary
In this project, we compare three different approaches to integrate the fluid-motion equations when applied to solve atmospheric flow dynamics. Differences between the three methods reside in accuracy as well as computational cost. The results illustrate that there is an intermediate solution that performs well in terms of computational cost while at the same time producing good enough results, as long one is not interested in the smallest turbulent scales.