Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 11, issue 5
Articles | Volume 11, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1909-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1909-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 11, issue 5
Model description paper
 | 
28 May 2018
Model description paper |  | 28 May 2018

Modeling soil CO2 production and transport with dynamic source and diffusion terms: testing the steady-state assumption using DETECT v1.0

Edmund M. Ryan, Kiona Ogle, Heather Kropp, Kimberly E. Samuels-Crow, Yolima Carrillo, and Elise Pendall

Viewed

Total article views: 3,342 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,208 1,027 107 3,342 426 112 122
  • HTML: 2,208
  • PDF: 1,027
  • XML: 107
  • Total: 3,342
  • Supplement: 426
  • BibTeX: 112
  • EndNote: 122
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Oct 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 10 Oct 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,342 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,152 with geography defined and 190 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 11 May 2025
Download
Short summary
Our work evaluated the appropriateness of the common steady-state (SS) assumption, for example when partitioning soil respiration of CO2 into recently photosynthesized carbon (C) and older C. Using a new model of soil CO2 production and transport we found that the SS assumption is valid most of the time, especially in sand/silt soils. Non-SS conditions occurred mainly for the few days following large rain events in all soil types, but the non-SS period was prolonged and magnified in clay soils.
Read more
Share