Articles | Volume 11, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1909-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1909-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Modeling soil CO2 production and transport with dynamic source and diffusion terms: testing the steady-state assumption using DETECT v1.0
Edmund M. Ryan
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
Kiona Ogle
School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
School of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona
University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
Center for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University,
Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University,
Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
Heather Kropp
Department of Geography, Colgate University, Hamilton, New York, USA
Kimberly E. Samuels-Crow
School of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona
University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
Yolima Carrillo
Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University,
NSW, Australia
Elise Pendall
Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University,
NSW, Australia
Viewed
Total article views: 4,258 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 10 Oct 2017)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,807 | 1,287 | 164 | 4,258 | 545 | 166 | 212 |
- HTML: 2,807
- PDF: 1,287
- XML: 164
- Total: 4,258
- Supplement: 545
- BibTeX: 166
- EndNote: 212
Total article views: 3,377 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 28 May 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,292 | 942 | 143 | 3,377 | 325 | 156 | 189 |
- HTML: 2,292
- PDF: 942
- XML: 143
- Total: 3,377
- Supplement: 325
- BibTeX: 156
- EndNote: 189
Total article views: 881 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 10 Oct 2017)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 515 | 345 | 21 | 881 | 220 | 10 | 23 |
- HTML: 515
- PDF: 345
- XML: 21
- Total: 881
- Supplement: 220
- BibTeX: 10
- EndNote: 23
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 4,258 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,064 with geography defined
and 194 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,377 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,221 with geography defined
and 156 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 881 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 843 with geography defined
and 38 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
16 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Estimation of diurnal greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from unfertilized coffee soils using recurrent neural networks (RNN). A case study for Chirinos, San Ignacio Province, Cajamarca, Peru W. Díaz Saavedra et al.
- Temporal Coupling of Subsurface and Surface Soil CO2 Fluxes: Insights From a Nonsteady State Model and Cross‐Wavelet Coherence Analysis K. Samuels-Crow et al.
- A review on mathematical modeling of microbial and plant induced permafrost carbon feedback N. Fasaeiyan et al.
- Soil Organic Matter Temperature Sensitivity Cannot be Directly Inferred From Spatial Gradients R. Abramoff et al.
- Incorporation of carbon dioxide production and transport module into a Soil-Plant-Atmosphere continuum model S. Beegum et al.
- MATERIA ORGÁNICA Y ACTIVIDAD BIOLÓGICA DEL SUELO O. Sánchez-Gómez et al.
- Multiscale Legacy Responses of Soil Gas Concentrations to Soil Moisture and Temperature Fluctuations A. Parolari et al.
- Combined effects of site and model parameterization for soil respiration components in a Canadian wildfire chronosequence J. Zobitz et al.
- Temporal patterns of fine‐root dynamics have little influence on seasonal soil CO2 efflux in a mixed, mesic forest E. Primka et al.
- The scale of influence: how different drivers determine CO2 production at event, daily, and seasonal scales B. Saccardi et al.
- Seasonality of soil respiration under gypsum and straw amendments in an arid saline-alkali soil X. Wang et al.
- Long-term carbon dioxide removal potential from the application of wood biochar and basanite rock powder in sandy soil using the LiDELSv2 process-based modeling approach M. Maslouski et al.
- Bagazo y composta de bagazo de agave tequilero en suelos contrastantes: 3. Respiración del suelo y emisiones de gases efecto invernadero L. Acosta Sotelo et al.
- Soil and vegetation responses to biochar application in terms of its feedback on carbon sequestration under different environmental conditions—LiDELS model overview M. Maslouski et al.
- Environmental and Management Factors Affecting Greenhouse Gas Fluxes From Soils in Mixed Crop–Livestock Systems: A Meta‐Analysis A. Berdjour et al.
- Comparative performance of tristimulus and color appearance models in low-cost smartphone digital colorimetry for soil CO2 detection C. Ichsan et al.
16 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Estimation of diurnal greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from unfertilized coffee soils using recurrent neural networks (RNN). A case study for Chirinos, San Ignacio Province, Cajamarca, Peru W. Díaz Saavedra et al.
- Temporal Coupling of Subsurface and Surface Soil CO2 Fluxes: Insights From a Nonsteady State Model and Cross‐Wavelet Coherence Analysis K. Samuels-Crow et al.
- A review on mathematical modeling of microbial and plant induced permafrost carbon feedback N. Fasaeiyan et al.
- Soil Organic Matter Temperature Sensitivity Cannot be Directly Inferred From Spatial Gradients R. Abramoff et al.
- Incorporation of carbon dioxide production and transport module into a Soil-Plant-Atmosphere continuum model S. Beegum et al.
- MATERIA ORGÁNICA Y ACTIVIDAD BIOLÓGICA DEL SUELO O. Sánchez-Gómez et al.
- Multiscale Legacy Responses of Soil Gas Concentrations to Soil Moisture and Temperature Fluctuations A. Parolari et al.
- Combined effects of site and model parameterization for soil respiration components in a Canadian wildfire chronosequence J. Zobitz et al.
- Temporal patterns of fine‐root dynamics have little influence on seasonal soil CO2 efflux in a mixed, mesic forest E. Primka et al.
- The scale of influence: how different drivers determine CO2 production at event, daily, and seasonal scales B. Saccardi et al.
- Seasonality of soil respiration under gypsum and straw amendments in an arid saline-alkali soil X. Wang et al.
- Long-term carbon dioxide removal potential from the application of wood biochar and basanite rock powder in sandy soil using the LiDELSv2 process-based modeling approach M. Maslouski et al.
- Bagazo y composta de bagazo de agave tequilero en suelos contrastantes: 3. Respiración del suelo y emisiones de gases efecto invernadero L. Acosta Sotelo et al.
- Soil and vegetation responses to biochar application in terms of its feedback on carbon sequestration under different environmental conditions—LiDELS model overview M. Maslouski et al.
- Environmental and Management Factors Affecting Greenhouse Gas Fluxes From Soils in Mixed Crop–Livestock Systems: A Meta‐Analysis A. Berdjour et al.
- Comparative performance of tristimulus and color appearance models in low-cost smartphone digital colorimetry for soil CO2 detection C. Ichsan et al.
Saved (final revised paper)
Latest update: 25 Apr 2026
Short summary
Our work evaluated the appropriateness of the common steady-state (SS) assumption, for example when partitioning soil respiration of CO2 into recently photosynthesized carbon (C) and older C. Using a new model of soil CO2 production and transport we found that the SS assumption is valid most of the time, especially in sand/silt soils. Non-SS conditions occurred mainly for the few days following large rain events in all soil types, but the non-SS period was prolonged and magnified in clay soils.
Our work evaluated the appropriateness of the common steady-state (SS) assumption, for example...