Articles | Volume 10, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4285-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4285-2017
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
27 Nov 2017
Methods for assessment of models |  | 27 Nov 2017

The Cloud Feedback Model Intercomparison Project (CFMIP) Diagnostic Codes Catalogue – metrics, diagnostics and methodologies to evaluate, understand and improve the representation of clouds and cloud feedbacks in climate models

Yoko Tsushima, Florent Brient, Stephen A. Klein, Dimitra Konsta, Christine C. Nam, Xin Qu, Keith D. Williams, Steven C. Sherwood, Kentaroh Suzuki, and Mark D. Zelinka

Viewed

Total article views: 4,403 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,752 1,496 155 4,403 432 149 154
  • HTML: 2,752
  • PDF: 1,496
  • XML: 155
  • Total: 4,403
  • Supplement: 432
  • BibTeX: 149
  • EndNote: 154
Views and downloads (calculated since 21 Apr 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 21 Apr 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,403 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,152 with geography defined and 251 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Discussed (preprint)

Latest update: 22 May 2024
Short summary
Cloud feedback is the largest uncertainty associated with estimates of climate sensitivity. Diagnostics have been developed to evaluate cloud processes in climate models. For this understanding to be reflected in better estimates of cloud feedbacks, it is vital to continue to develop such tools and to exploit them fully during the model development process. Code repositories have been created to store and document the programs which will allow climate modellers to compute these diagnostics.