Articles | Volume 10, issue 8
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3145–3165, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3145-2017
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3145–3165, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3145-2017
Model description paper
28 Aug 2017
Model description paper | 28 Aug 2017

MicroHH 1.0: a computational fluid dynamics code for direct numerical simulation and large-eddy simulation of atmospheric boundary layer flows

Chiel C. van Heerwaarden et al.

Related authors

Ten years of 1 Hz solar irradiance observations at Cabauw, the Netherlands, with cloud observations, variability classifications, and statistics
Wouter Bastiaan Mol, Wouter H. Knap, and Chiel C. van Heerwaarden
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2022-456,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2022-456, 2023
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Understanding wind-driven melt of patchy snow cover
Luuk D. van der Valk, Adriaan J. Teuling, Luc Girod, Norbert Pirk, Robin Stoffer, and Chiel C. van Heerwaarden
The Cryosphere, 16, 4319–4341, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4319-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4319-2022, 2022
Short summary
A new accurate low-cost instrument for fast synchronized spatial measurements of light spectra
Bert G. Heusinkveld, Wouter B. Mol, and Chiel C. van Heerwaarden
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-726,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-726, 2022
Short summary
Evaluation of two common source estimation measurement strategies using large-eddy simulation of plume dispersion under neutral atmospheric conditions
Anja Ražnjević, Chiel van Heerwaarden, and Maarten Krol
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3611–3628, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3611-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3611-2022, 2022
Short summary
Technical note: Interpretation of field observations of point-source methane plume using observation-driven large-eddy simulations
Anja Ražnjević, Chiel van Heerwaarden, Bart van Stratum, Arjan Hensen, Ilona Velzeboer, Pim van den Bulk, and Maarten Krol
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 6489–6505, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6489-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6489-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
A modern-day Mars climate in the Met Office Unified Model: dry simulations
Danny McCulloch, Denis E. Sergeev, Nathan Mayne, Matthew Bate, James Manners, Ian Boutle, Benjamin Drummond, and Kristzian Kohary
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 621–657, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-621-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-621-2023, 2023
Short summary
The AirGAM 2022r1 air quality trend and prediction model
Sam-Erik Walker, Sverre Solberg, Philipp Schneider, and Cristina Guerreiro
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 573–595, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-573-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-573-2023, 2023
Short summary
Evaluation of a cloudy cold-air pool in the Columbia River basin in different versions of the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model
Bianca Adler, James M. Wilczak, Jaymes Kenyon, Laura Bianco, Irina V. Djalalova, Joseph B. Olson, and David D. Turner
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 597–619, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-597-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-597-2023, 2023
Short summary
Comparing Sentinel-5P TROPOMI NO2 column observations with the CAMS regional air quality ensemble
John Douros, Henk Eskes, Jos van Geffen, K. Folkert Boersma, Steven Compernolle, Gaia Pinardi, Anne-Marlene Blechschmidt, Vincent-Henri Peuch, Augustin Colette, and Pepijn Veefkind
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 509–534, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-509-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-509-2023, 2023
Short summary
Cross-evaluating WRF-Chem v4.1.2, TROPOMI, APEX, and in situ NO2 measurements over Antwerp, Belgium
Catalina Poraicu, Jean-François Müller, Trissevgeni Stavrakou, Dominique Fonteyn, Frederik Tack, Felix Deutsch, Quentin Laffineur, Roeland Van Malderen, and Nele Veldeman
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 479–508, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-479-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-479-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Bannon, P. R.: On the anelastic approximation for a compressible atmosphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 3618–3628, 1996.
Beare, R. J., Macvean, M. K., Holtslag, A. A., Cuxart, J., Esau, I., Golaz, J. C., Jimenez, M. A., Khairoutdinov, M., Kosovic, B., Lewellen, D., and Lund, T. S.: An intercomparison of large-eddy simulations of the stable boundary layer, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 118, 247–272, 2006.
Betts, A. K.: Non-precipitating cumulus convection and its parameterization, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 99, 178–196, 1973.
Boing, S. J.: The interaction of deep convective clouds and their environment, TU Delft, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands, 2014.
Bou-Zeid, E., Meneveau, C., and Parlange, M.: A scale-dependent Lagrangian dynamic model for large eddy simulation of complex turbulent flows, Phys. Fluids, 17, 025105, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1839152, 2005.
Download
Short summary
MicroHH (www.microhh.org) is a new and open-source computational fluid dynamics code for the simulation of turbulent flows in the atmosphere. It is made to simulate atmospheric flows up to the finest detail levels at very high resolution. It has been designed from scratch in C++ in order to use a modern design that allows the code to run on more than 10 000 cores, as well as on a graphical processing unit.