200 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Atmospheric-methane source and sink sensitivity analysis using Gaussian process emulation A. Stell et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1717-2021
2. Understanding nighttime methane signals at the Amazon Tall Tower Observatory (ATTO) S. Botía et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6583-2020
3. Atmospheric observations consistent with reported decline in the UK's methane emissions (2013–2020) M. Lunt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16257-2021
4. Revising the coal mining CH4 emission factor based on multiple inventories and atmospheric inversion approach at one of the world's largest coal production areas: Shanxi province, China X. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178616
5. An assessment of natural methane fluxes simulated by the CLASS-CTEM model V. Arora et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-4683-2018
6. Estimation of Anthropogenic CH4 and CO2 Emissions in Taiyuan‐Jinzhong Region: One of the World's Largest Emission Hotspots C. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037915
7. Methane emissions in the United States, Canada, and Mexico: evaluation of national methane emission inventories and 2010–2017 sectoral trends by inverse analysis of in situ (GLOBALVIEWplus CH4 ObsPack) and satellite (GOSAT) atmospheric observations X. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-395-2022
8. Satellite quantification of oil and natural gas methane emissions in the US and Canada including contributions from individual basins L. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11203-2022
9. RadWet-L: A Novel Approach for Mapping of Inundation Dynamics of Forested Wetlands Using ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 L-Band Radar Imagery G. Oakes et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16122078
10. Regional Sources and CH4 Seasonal Cycle in Central Siberia and the Arctic: Observations and Numerical Calculations K. Moiseenko et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1024856023700100
11. Satellite-based modeling of wetland methane emissions on a global scale (SatWetCH4 1.0) J. Bernard et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-863-2025
12. Areal extent of vegetative cover: A challenge to regional upscaling of methane emissions J. Melack & L. Hess https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2022.103592
13. Bacterial community composition in soils covered by different vegetation types in the Yancheng tidal marsh J. Fang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08629-z
14. Tropical methane emissions explain large fraction of recent changes in global atmospheric methane growth rate L. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28989-z
15. Ensemble estimates of global wetland methane emissions over 2000–2020 Z. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-305-2025
16. Decreasing seasonal cycle amplitude of methane in the northern high latitudes being driven by lower-latitude changes in emissions and transport E. Dowd et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7363-2023
17. Global methane budget and trend, 2010–2017: complementarity of inverse analyses using in situ (GLOBALVIEWplus CH4 ObsPack) and satellite (GOSAT) observations X. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4637-2021
18. Spatiotemporal Methane Emission From Global Reservoirs M. Johnson et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JG006305
19. FLUXNET-CH4: a global, multi-ecosystem dataset and analysis of methane seasonality from freshwater wetlands K. Delwiche et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3607-2021
20. Quantifying methane emissions from natural gas production in north-eastern Pennsylvania Z. Barkley et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13941-2017
21. The added value of satellite observations of methane forunderstanding the contemporary methane budget P. Palmer et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0106
22. Methane Emissions Show Recent Decline but Strong Seasonality in Two US Northeastern Cities A. Karion et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c05050
23. Amazon methane budget derived from multi-year airborne observations highlights regional variations in emissions L. Basso et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00314-4
24. Quantifying Methane Emissions Using Satellite Data: Application of the Integrated Methane Inversion (IMI) Model to Assess Danish Emissions A. Vara-Vela et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16234554
25. Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements F. Langot et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-5955-2025
26. Bottom‐Up Evaluation of the Methane Budget in Asia and Its Subregions A. Ito et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GB007723
27. Evaluation of the Stratospheric Contribution to the Inter‐Annual Variabilities of Tropospheric Methane Growth Rates P. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL103350
28. High concentrations of dissolved biogenic methane associated with cyanobacterial blooms in East African lake surface water S. Fazi et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-02365-x
29. Carbon budgets of wetland ecosystems in China D. Xiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14621
30. Anthropogenic impact on arctic near-surface methane: observations and model simulations Y. Shtabkin et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1040/1/012033
31. Retrieving the Vertical Profile of Greenhouse Gas Using Fourier Transform Spectrometer (FTS) - Part II: Methane (CH4) M. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2024.40.3.361
32. Spatiotemporal Assessment of GHG Emissions and Nutrient Sequestration Linked to Agronutrient Runoff in Global Wetlands C. Pasut et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GB006816
33. Comparative analysis of low-Earth orbit (TROPOMI) and geostationary (GeoCARB, GEO-CAPE) satellite instruments for constraining methane emissions on fine regional scales: application to the Southeast US J. Sheng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6379-2018
34. Satellite Constraints on the Latitudinal Distribution and Temperature Sensitivity of Wetland Methane Emissions S. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021AV000408
35. Meteorology and Climate Influences on Tropospheric Ozone: a Review of Natural Sources, Chemistry, and Transport Patterns X. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-019-00118-3
36. Country-Scale Analysis of Methane Emissions with a High-Resolution Inverse Model Using GOSAT and Surface Observations R. Janardanan et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030375
37. Methane Emissions from Estuarine Coastal Wetlands: Implications for Global Change Effect L. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2018.12.0472
38. Reconstructing and quantifying methane emissions from the full duration of a 38-day natural gas well blowout using space-based observations J. Maasakkers et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112755
39. Global warming will largely increase waste treatment CH4 emissions in Chinese megacities: insight from the first city-scale CH4 concentration observation network in Hangzhou, China C. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4501-2023
40. Long-term trace gas and black carbon measurements at the high-altitude station Mount Kenya: tropical atmospheric variability and the influence of African emissions L. Bernet et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-6741-2026
41. Quantifying sources of Brazil's CH4 emissions between 2010 and 2018 from satellite data R. Tunnicliffe et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13041-2020
42. Satellite data reveal how Sudd wetland dynamics are linked with globally-significant methane emissions A. Hardy et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ace272
43. The underappreciated importance of small wetlands in global methane emissions F. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-026-02609-w
44. Methane Growth Rate Estimation and Its Causes in Western Canada Using Satellite Observations S. Islam et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033948
45. Quantification of oil and gas methane emissions in the Delaware and Marcellus basins using a network of continuous tower-based measurements Z. Barkley et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6127-2023
46. Improving Representation of Tropical Wetland Methane Emissions With CYGNSS Inundation Maps C. Gerlein‐Safdi et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GB006890
47. Evaluation of wetland CH4 in the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES) land surface model using satellite observations R. Parker et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5779-2022
48. Estimating 2010–2015 anthropogenic and natural methane emissions in Canada using ECCC surface and GOSAT satellite observations S. Baray et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18101-2021
49. Assimilation of GOSAT Methane in the Hemispheric CMAQ; Part I: Design of the Assimilation System S. Voshtani et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14020371
50. Global Estimates of Daily Gapless Atmospheric XCH4 Concentrations From Satellite and Reanalysis Data During 2003–2020 Y. Qu et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2025.3593486
51. Integrated Methane Inversion (IMI 1.0): a user-friendly, cloud-based facility for inferring high-resolution methane emissions from TROPOMI satellite observations D. Varon et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5787-2022
52. Estimates of North African Methane Emissions from 2010 to 2017 Using GOSAT Observations L. Western et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00327
53. Source Partitioning of Methane Emissions and its Seasonality in the U.S. Midwest Z. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JG004356
54. Influences of hydroxyl radicals (OH) on top-down estimates of the global and regional methane budgets Y. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9525-2020
55. Large Methane Emission Fluxes Observed From Tropical Wetlands in Zambia J. Shaw et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GB007261
56. Methane budget of East Asia, 1990–2015: A bottom-up evaluation A. Ito et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.263
57. A gridded inventory of Canada’s anthropogenic methane emissions T. Scarpelli et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac40b1
58. Quantification of Central and Eastern China's atmospheric CH4 enhancement changes and its contributions based on machine learning approach X. Ai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2023.03.010
59. Effects of wetland disturbance on methane emissions and influential factors: A global meta-analysis of field studies S. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178325
60. Monthly gridded data product of northern wetland methane emissions based on upscaling eddy covariance observations O. Peltola et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1263-2019
61. Unraveling the dynamics of atmospheric methane: the impact of anthropogenic and natural emissions B. Fu et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad4617
62. Spatial and temporal patterns of atmospheric column-averaged methane (XCH4) over tropical Thailand from Sentinel-5P TROPOMI satellite observations W. Kanchanachat et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2026.122139
63. Estimation of Canada's methane emissions: inverse modelling analysis using the Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) measurement network M. Ishizawa et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10013-2024
64. The large role of declining atmospheric sulfate deposition and rising CO 2 concentrations in stimulating future wetland CH 4 emissions L. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adn1056
65. Challenges Regionalizing Methane Emissions Using Aquatic Environments in the Amazon Basin as Examples J. Melack et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.866082
66. Upscaling Wetland Methane Emissions From the FLUXNET‐CH4 Eddy Covariance Network (UpCH4 v1.0): Model Development, Network Assessment, and Budget Comparison G. McNicol et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023AV000956
67. Spaceborne GNSS-R Bistatic Radar Remote Sensing, CYGNSS, and Future Missions C. Ruf & S. Gleason https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2025.3583997
68. Exploring constraints on a wetland methane emission ensemble (WetCHARTs) using GOSAT observations R. Parker et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5669-2020
69. Attribution of the 2020 surge in atmospheric methane by inverse analysis of GOSAT observations Z. Qu et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac8754
70. Methane intensity and emissions across major oil and gas basins and individual jurisdictions using MethaneSAT observations J. Williams et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-5961-2026
71. Underestimated Dry Season Methane Emissions from Wetlands in the Pantanal M. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c09250
72. A high-resolution satellite-based map of global methane emissions reveals missing wetland, fossil fuel, and monsoon sources X. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3325-2023
73. Linking Biogeochemical and Hydrodynamic Processes to Model Methane Fluxes in Shallow, Tropical Floodplain Lakes M. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022MS003385
74. Vegetation dynamics and methane emissions: insights from East African wetlands K. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ae7d9d
75. The Role of Emission Sources and Atmospheric Sink in the Seasonal Cycle of CH4 and δ13-CH4: Analysis Based on the Atmospheric Chemistry Transport Model TM5 V. Kangasaho et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13060888
76. Cold‐Season Methane Fluxes Simulated by GCP‐CH4 Models A. Ito et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL103037
77. Assessing methane emissions from collapsing Venezuelan oil production using TROPOMI B. Nathan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6845-2024
78. Simultaneous shipborne measurements of CO2, CH4 and CO and their application to improving greenhouse-gas flux estimates in Australia B. Bukosa et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7055-2019
79. An integrated analysis of contemporary methane emissions and concentration trends over China using in situ and satellite observations and model simulations H. Tan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1229-2022
80. Observational constraints reduce model spread but not uncertainty in global wetland methane emission estimates K. Chang et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16755
81. Unravelling a large methane emission discrepancy in Mexico using satellite observations L. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112461
82. Updated Global Fuel Exploitation Inventory (GFEI) for methane emissions from the oil, gas, and coal sectors: evaluation with inversions of atmospheric methane observations T. Scarpelli et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3235-2022
83. Use of Assimilation Analysis in 4D-Var Source Inversion: Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs) with GOSAT Methane and Hemispheric CMAQ S. Voshtani et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14040758
84. Verifying Methane Inventories and Trends With Atmospheric Methane Data J. Worden et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023AV000871
85. Global emissions and abundances of chemically and radiatively important trace gases from the AGAGE network L. Western et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-6557-2025
86. WETMETH 1.0: a new wetland methane model for implementation in Earth system models C. Nzotungicimpaye et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6215-2021
87. Sustained methane emissions from China after 2012 despite declining coal production and rice-cultivated area J. Sheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac24d1
88. A Regional Earth System Data Lab for Understanding Ecosystem Dynamics: An Example from Tropical South America L. Estupinan-Suarez et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.613395
89. A Coupled CH4, CO and CO2 Simulation for Improved Chemical Source Modeling B. Bukosa et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14050764
90. Greenhouse gas column observations from a portable spectrometer in Uganda N. Humpage et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5679-2024
91. 2010–2016 methane trends over Canada, the United States, and Mexico observed by the GOSAT satellite: contributions from different source sectors J. Sheng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12257-2018
92. The Role of Hydrocarbons in the Global Energy Agenda: The Focus on Liquefied Natural Gas V. Litvinenko https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9050059
93. High-Resolution Estimation of Methane Emissions from Boreal and Pan-Arctic Wetlands Using Advanced Satellite Data Y. Albuhaisi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15133433
94. Bottom-up evaluation of the regional methane budget of northern lands from 1980 to 2015 A. Ito https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2020.100558
95. Implementing methane dynamics into the LPJmL6 model S. Schaphoff et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-7615-2026
96. Decadal Methane Emission Trend Inferred from Proxy GOSAT XCH4 Retrievals: Impacts of Transport Model Spatial Resolution S. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-022-1434-6
97. Spatiotemporal forecasting of methane emissions in Africa using time-series models (1990–2030) M. Abdullahi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-026-00727-4
98. The Greenhouse gas Emission Monitoring network to Inform Net-zero Initiatives UK (GEMINI-UK): network design, theoretical performance, and initial data A. Kurganskiy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-7525-2025
99. Analysis of Oil and Gas Ethane and Methane Emissions in the Southcentral and Eastern United States Using Four Seasons of Continuous Aircraft Ethane Measurements Z. Barkley et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034194
100. The consolidated European synthesis of CH4 and N2O emissions for the European Union and United Kingdom: 1990–2017 A. Petrescu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-2307-2021
101. Detection of Fossil and Biogenic Methane at Regional Scales Using Atmospheric Radiocarbon H. Graven et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF001064
102. Rain-fed pulses of methane from East Africa during 2018–2019 contributed to atmospheric growth rate M. Lunt et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd8fa
103. Upper tropospheric CH4 and CO affected by the South Asian summer monsoon during the Oxidation Mechanism Observations mission L. Tomsche et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1915-2019
104. Anthropogenic emission is the main contributor to the rise of atmospheric methane during 1993–2017 Z. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwab200
105. Global distribution of methane emissions: a comparative inverse analysis of observations from the TROPOMI and GOSAT satellite instruments Z. Qu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14159-2021
106. Global atmospheric carbon monoxide budget 2000–2017 inferred from multi-species atmospheric inversions B. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1411-2019
107. High-Resolution Global Methane Mapping: Advances in Satellite Remote Sensing, Machine Learning, and Policy Frameworks A. Singh & . Madhubala https://doi.org/10.3390/methane5030021
108. 煤炭行业甲烷排放卫星遥感研究进展与展望 秦. Qin Kai et al. https://doi.org/10.3788/AOS231293
109. Towards tracking wetland methane emissions over India using multi-satellite measurements and modeling: part A (natural wetlands) M. Yadav et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/ae4b5f
110. Tidal Wetland Inundated Volume Estimates Using L-Band Radar Imagery and Synthetic Tide Gauging B. Lamb et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18081172
111. Quantifying Regional Methane Emissions Using Airborne Transects and a Measurement-Model Fusion Approach A. Gonzalez et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.3c00072
112. Nongrowing season methane emissions–a significant component of annual emissions across northern ecosystems C. Treat et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14137
113. Using satellite data to identify the methane emission controls of South Sudan's wetlands S. Pandey et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-557-2021
114. Reviews and syntheses: Variable inundation across Earth's terrestrial ecosystems J. Stegen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-995-2025
115. Modeling Wetland Functions: Is Space-to-Time Substitution of the Perimeter–Area Relationship Appropriate? J. Park et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15193445
116. High-resolution US methane emissions inferred from an inversion of 2019 TROPOMI satellite data: contributions from individual states, urban areas, and landfills H. Nesser et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5069-2024
117. Attribution of the accelerating increase in atmospheric methane during 2010–2018 by inverse analysis of GOSAT observations Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3643-2021
118. A Review of City-Scale Methane Flux Inversion Based on Top-Down Methods X. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17183152
119. Seasonality of inundation in geographically isolated wetlands across the United States J. Park et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac6149
120. Methane emissions are predominantly responsible for record-breaking atmospheric methane growth rates in 2020 and 2021 L. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4863-2023
121. Validation and assessment of satellite-based columnar CO2 and CH4 mixing ratios from GOSAT and OCO-2 satellites over India H. Gadhavi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4497-2025
122. Investigation of the global methane budget over 1980–2017 using GFDL-AM4.1 J. He et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-805-2020
123. Meteorological Control of Subtropical South American Methane Emissions Estimated from GOSAT Observations H. Takagi et al. https://doi.org/10.2151/sola.2021-037
124. 2019–2024 trends in African livestock and wetland emissions as contributors to the global methane rise N. Balasus et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-4601-2026
125. Methane and carbon dioxide evasion from a mosaic of Amazon lakes, river channels, and inundated forests J. Amaral et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/20442041.2024.2432804
126. Continuous CH4 and δ13CH4 measurements in London demonstrate under-reported natural gas leakage E. Saboya et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3595-2022
127. Reduced-cost construction of Jacobian matrices for high-resolution inversions of satellite observations of atmospheric composition H. Nesser et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5521-2021
128. Detection of inland water bodies under dense biomass by CYGNSS H. Carreno-Luengo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113896
129. RadWet: An Improved and Transferable Mapping of Open Water and Inundated Vegetation Using Sentinel-1 G. Oakes et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15061705
130. Spatio-Temporal Patterns of Methane Emissions from 2019 Onwards: A Satellite-Based Comparison of High- and Low-Emission Regions E. Wójcik-Gront et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16060670
131. Spatial and temporal patterns of methane uptake in the urban environment Y. Bezyk et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101073
132. An Assessment of the Carbon Budget of the Passively Restored Willow Forests Along the Miho River, Central South Korea B. Lim et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12110182
133. The 2019 methane budget and uncertainties at 1° resolution and each country through Bayesian integration Of GOSAT total column methane data and a priori inventory estimates J. Worden et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6811-2022
134. Quantifying large methane emissions from the Nord Stream pipeline gas leak of September 2022 using IASI satellite observations and inverse modelling C. Wilson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10639-2024
135. An increase in methane emissions from tropical Africa between 2010 and 2016 inferred from satellite data M. Lunt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-14721-2019
136. How well can inverse analyses of high-resolution satellite data resolve heterogeneous methane fluxes? Observing system simulation experiments with the GEOS-Chem adjoint model (v35) X. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7775-2021
137. Data driven analysis of atmospheric methane concentrations as function of geographic, land cover type and season C. Karoff & A. Vara-Vela https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1119977
138. Unveiling cascading lag effects of wetland methane emissions: Evidence from Lake Chad in Africa R. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adx9866
139. WetCH4: a machine-learning-based upscaling of methane fluxes of northern wetlands during 2016–2022 Q. Ying et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2507-2025
140. Surface-observation-constrained high-frequency coal mine methane emissions in Shanxi, China, reveal more emissions than inventories, consistent with satellite inversion F. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5837-2025
141. Investigating Wetland and Nonwetland Soil Methane Emissions and Sinks Across the Contiguous United States Using a Land Surface Model S. Shu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GB006251
142. The Importance of Spatial Resolution in the Modeling of Methane Emissions from Natural Wetlands Y. Albuhaisi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15112840
143. The NASA Carbon Monitoring System Phase 2 synthesis: scope, findings, gaps and recommended next steps G. Hurtt et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac7407
144. National quantifications of methane emissions from fuel exploitation using high resolution inversions of satellite observations L. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40671-6
145. Prototype of a global model for regulating ecosystem services of inland wetlands J. de Klein et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2026.181899
146. Observed changes in China’s methane emissions linked to policy drivers Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2202742119
147. Methane Concentration in the Atmosphere over Seas of the Western Sector of Russian Arctic in the Late Autumn Season in 2023 N. Pankratova et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433825701063
148. Emissions of methane in Europe inferred by total column measurements D. Wunch et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3963-2019
149. Quantification of methane emissions from hotspots and during COVID-19 using a global atmospheric inversion J. McNorton et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5961-2022
150. Seasonal Variations of CH4 Emissions in the Yangtze River Delta Region of China Are Driven by Agricultural Activities W. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-0383-9
151. Atmospheric Carbon and Transport – America (ACT‐America) Data Sets: Description, Management, and Delivery Y. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001634
152. Regional estimation of methane emissions over the peninsular India using atmospheric inverse modelling A. Raju et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10323-1
153. Unveiling the drivers of atmospheric methane variability in Iran: A 20-year exploration using spatiotemporal modeling and machine learning S. Mousavi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2024.100946
154. Disturbance alters soil organic carbon content and stability in Carex tussock wetland, Northeast China Y. Xin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175417
155. Using satellites to uncover large methane emissions from landfills J. Maasakkers et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abn9683
156. Incorporating methane isotopologues alters tropical and subtropical methane emission estimates X. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-72668-2
157. Aircraft-based inversions quantify the importance of wetlands and livestock for Upper Midwest methane emissions X. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-951-2021
158. Eight-Year Estimates of Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas Operations in Western Canada Are Nearly Twice Those Reported in Inventories E. Chan et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c04117
159. Relevant methane emission to the atmosphere from a geological gas manifestation A. Mazzini et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83369-9
160. 2010–2015 North American methane emissions, sectoral contributions, and trends: a high-resolution inversion of GOSAT observations of atmospheric methane J. Maasakkers et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4339-2021
161. Greenhouse gas observation network design for Africa A. Nickless et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/16000889.2020.1824486
162. Continuous weekly monitoring of methane emissions from the Permian Basin by inversion of TROPOMI satellite observations D. Varon et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7503-2023
163. Atmospheric data support a multi-decadal shift in the global methane budget towards natural tropical emissions A. Drinkwater et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8429-2023
164. Characterizing Methane Emission Hotspots From Thawing Permafrost C. Elder et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GB006922
165. Urban methane emission monitoring across North America using TROPOMI data: an analytical inversion approach M. Hemati et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58995-8
166. Analysis of atmospheric CH4 in Canadian Arctic and estimation of the regional CH4 fluxes M. Ishizawa et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4637-2019
167. Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane A. Turner et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814297116
168. Advancing Scientific Understanding of the Global Methane Budget in Support of the Paris Agreement A. Ganesan et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB006065
169. Warming Induces High Environmental Pressure in the Lakeshore Wetland, Promoting Interactions Among Carbon-Fixing Microorganisms N. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15060580
170. Large increases in methane emissions expected from North America’s largest wetland complex S. Bansal et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.ade1112
171. CH4 Fluxes Derived from Assimilation of TROPOMI XCH4 in CarbonTracker Europe-CH4: Evaluation of Seasonality and Spatial Distribution in the Northern High Latitudes A. Tsuruta et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15061620
172. Inverse modeling of 2010–2022 satellite observations shows that inundation of the wet tropics drove the 2020–2022 methane surge Z. Qu et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2402730121
173. East Asian methane emissions inferred from high-resolution inversions of GOSAT and TROPOMI observations: a comparative and evaluative analysis R. Liang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8039-2023
174. Reactive halogens increase the global methane lifetime and radiative forcing in the 21st century Q. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30456-8
175. Quantifying methane emissions from the global scale down to point sources using satellite observations of atmospheric methane D. Jacob et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9617-2022
176. Seasonally Resolved Excess Urban Methane Emissions from the Baltimore/Washington, DC Metropolitan Region Y. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b02782
177. Emissions of methane from coal fields, thermal power plants, and wetlands and their implications for atmospheric methane across the south Asian region M. Dangeti et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12843-2024
178. Atmospheric CH4 and Its Isotopic Composition (δ13C) in Urban Environment in the Example of Moscow, Russia E. Berezina et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14050830
179. Monitoring global tropospheric OH concentrations using satellite observations of atmospheric methane Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15959-2018
180. Large and increasing methane emissions from eastern Amazonia derived from satellite data, 2010–2018 C. Wilson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10643-2021
181. Advancements and opportunities to improve bottom–up estimates of global wetland methane emissions Q. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/adad02
182. High-resolution inversion of methane emissions in the Southeast US using SEAC4RS aircraft observations of atmospheric methane: anthropogenic and wetland sources J. Sheng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6483-2018
183. The tropical forest carbon cycle and climate change E. Mitchard https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0300-2
184. Studies of atmospheric climate forcers in the Arctic during the ArCS II project M. Koike et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2025.101216
185. Global distribution of methane emissions, emission trends, and OH concentrations and trends inferred from an inversion of GOSAT satellite data for 2010–2015 J. Maasakkers et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7859-2019
186. Methane emissions from global wetlands: An assessment of the uncertainty associated with various wetland extent data sets B. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.07.001
187. A New Divergence Method to Quantify Methane Emissions Using Observations of Sentinel‐5P TROPOMI M. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094151
188. Leveraging TROPOMI observations and WRF-GHG modeling towards improving methane emission assessments in India T. Mathew et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-4453-2026
189. Evaluating year-to-year anomalies in tropical wetland methane emissions using satellite CH4 observations R. Parker et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.02.011
190. Geomorphological patterns of remotely sensed methane hot spots in the Mackenzie Delta, Canada L. Baskaran et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac41fb
191. State of the Art in Monitoring Methane Emissions from Arctic–boreal Wetlands and Lakes M. Mahdianpari et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18060926
192. Forward Modeling and Optimization of Methane Emissions in the South Central United States Using Aircraft Transects Across Frontal Boundaries Z. Barkley et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL084495
193. A measurement-based upstream oil and gas methane inventory for Alberta, Canada reveals higher emissions and different sources than official estimates B. Conrad et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01081-0
194. Analysis of CO2, CH4, and CO surface and column concentrations observed at Réunion Island by assessing WRF-Chem simulations S. Callewaert et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7763-2022
195. Saskatchewan’s oil and gas methane: how have underestimated emissions in Canada impacted progress toward 2025 climate goals? S. Seymour et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ace271
196. Limited evidence that tropical inundation and precipitation powered the 2020–2022 methane surge Y. Xiong et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02438-3
197. Why methane surged in the atmosphere during the early 2020s P. Ciais et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adx8262
198. Satellite-Based Monitoring of Methane Emissions from China’s Rice Hub R. Liang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c09822
199. Methane emissions from subtropical wetlands: An evaluation of the role of data filtering on annual methane budgets C. Staudhammer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.108972
200. Potential of Clumped Isotopes in Constraining the Global Atmospheric Methane Budget E. Chung & T. Arnold https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GB006883