Articles | Volume 9, issue 2
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 875–898, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-875-2016
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 875–898, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-875-2016

Methods for assessment of models 01 Mar 2016

Methods for assessment of models | 01 Mar 2016

Representativeness errors in comparing chemistry transport and chemistry climate models with satellite UV–Vis tropospheric column retrievals

K. F. Boersma et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Folkert Boersma on behalf of the Authors (18 Dec 2015)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (26 Jan 2016) by Fiona O'Connor
Download
Short summary
Satellite measurements of pollutants and greenhouse gases are useful to test and improve atmospheric models. But this requires that modellers account for the spatial and temporal representativeness and the vertical sensitivity of the satellite measurements. This paper provides guidelines on how to carry out a faithful model-satellite comparison for species such as nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and formaldehyde that play a key role in air pollution studies.