Articles | Volume 8, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1097-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1097-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Modelling climate change responses in tropical forests: similar productivity estimates across five models, but different mechanisms and responses
L. Rowland
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
A. Harper
College of Engineering, Mathematics, and Physical Science, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
B. O. Christoffersen
School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
D. R. Galbraith
School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
H. M. A. Imbuzeiro
Grupo de Pesquisas em Interação Atmosfera-Biosfera, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Minas Gerias, Brazil
T. L. Powell
Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
C. Doughty
Environmental Change Institute, School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
N. M. Levine
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Y. Malhi
Environmental Change Institute, School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
S. R. Saleska
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
P. R. Moorcroft
Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
P. Meir
School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
M. Williams
School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Viewed
Total article views: 5,480 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 19 Nov 2014)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,377 | 1,869 | 234 | 5,480 | 456 | 250 | 334 |
- HTML: 3,377
- PDF: 1,869
- XML: 234
- Total: 5,480
- Supplement: 456
- BibTeX: 250
- EndNote: 334
Total article views: 4,768 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 21 Apr 2015)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,986 | 1,564 | 218 | 4,768 | 240 | 221 | 304 |
- HTML: 2,986
- PDF: 1,564
- XML: 218
- Total: 4,768
- Supplement: 240
- BibTeX: 221
- EndNote: 304
Total article views: 712 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 19 Nov 2014)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 391 | 305 | 16 | 712 | 29 | 30 |
- HTML: 391
- PDF: 305
- XML: 16
- Total: 712
- BibTeX: 29
- EndNote: 30
Latest update: 06 Dec 2025
Short summary
This study evaluates the capability of five vegetation models to simulate the response of forest productivity to changes in temperature and drought, using data collected from an Amazonian forest. This study concludes that model consistencies in the responses of net canopy carbon production to temperature and precipitation change were the result of inconsistently modelled leaf-scale process responses and substantial variation in modelled leaf area responses.
This study evaluates the capability of five vegetation models to simulate the response of forest...