Articles | Volume 7, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-3059-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-3059-2014
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
18 Dec 2014
Methods for assessment of models |  | 18 Dec 2014

Using the UM dynamical cores to reproduce idealised 3-D flows

N. J. Mayne, I. Baraffe, D. M. Acreman, C. Smith, N. Wood, D. S. Amundsen, J. Thuburn, and D. R. Jackson

Related authors

Potential based Thermodynamics with Consistent Conservative Cascade Transport for Implicit Large Eddy Simulation: PTerodaC3TILES version 1.0
John Thuburn
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-153,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-153, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Winds and tides of the Extended Unified Model in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere validated with meteor radar observations
Matthew J. Griffith, Shaun M. Dempsey, David R. Jackson, Tracy Moffat-Griffin, and Nicholas J. Mitchell
Ann. Geophys., 39, 487–514, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-487-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-487-2021, 2021
Short summary
Stratospheric gravity waves over the mountainous island of South Georgia: testing a high-resolution dynamical model with 3-D satellite observations and radiosondes
Neil P. Hindley, Corwin J. Wright, Alan M. Gadian, Lars Hoffmann, John K. Hughes, David R. Jackson, John C. King, Nicholas J. Mitchell, Tracy Moffat-Griffin, Andrew C. Moss, Simon B. Vosper, and Andrew N. Ross
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 7695–7722, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7695-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7695-2021, 2021
Short summary
Introduction to the SPARC Reanalysis Intercomparison Project (S-RIP) and overview of the reanalysis systems
Masatomo Fujiwara, Jonathon S. Wright, Gloria L. Manney, Lesley J. Gray, James Anstey, Thomas Birner, Sean Davis, Edwin P. Gerber, V. Lynn Harvey, Michaela I. Hegglin, Cameron R. Homeyer, John A. Knox, Kirstin Krüger, Alyn Lambert, Craig S. Long, Patrick Martineau, Andrea Molod, Beatriz M. Monge-Sanz, Michelle L. Santee, Susann Tegtmeier, Simon Chabrillat, David G. H. Tan, David R. Jackson, Saroja Polavarapu, Gilbert P. Compo, Rossana Dragani, Wesley Ebisuzaki, Yayoi Harada, Chiaki Kobayashi, Will McCarty, Kazutoshi Onogi, Steven Pawson, Adrian Simmons, Krzysztof Wargan, Jeffrey S. Whitaker, and Cheng-Zhi Zou
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1417–1452, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1417-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1417-2017, 2017
Short summary
A mimetic, semi-implicit, forward-in-time, finite volume shallow water model: comparison of hexagonal–icosahedral and cubed-sphere grids
J. Thuburn, C. J. Cotter, and T. Dubos
Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 909–929, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-909-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-909-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology (IITM) High-Resolution Global Forecast Model version 1: an attempt to resolve monsoon prediction deadlock
R. Phani Murali Krishna, Siddharth Kumar, A. Gopinathan Prajeesh, Peter Bechtold, Nils Wedi, Kumar Roy, Malay Ganai, B. Revanth Reddy, Snehlata Tirkey, Tanmoy Goswami, Radhika Kanase, Sahadat Sarkar, Medha Deshpande, and Parthasarathi Mukhopadhyay
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1879–1894, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1879-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1879-2025, 2025
Short summary
Cell-tracking-based framework for assessing nowcasting model skill in reproducing growth and decay of convective rainfall
Jenna Ritvanen, Seppo Pulkkinen, Dmitri Moisseev, and Daniele Nerini
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1851–1878, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1851-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1851-2025, 2025
Short summary
NeuralMie (v1.0): an aerosol optics emulator
Andrew Geiss and Po-Lun Ma
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1809–1827, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1809-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1809-2025, 2025
Short summary
Simulation performance of planetary boundary layer schemes in WRF v4.3.1 for near-surface wind over the western Sichuan Basin: a single-site assessment
Qin Wang, Bo Zeng, Gong Chen, and Yaoting Li
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1769–1784, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1769-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1769-2025, 2025
Short summary
FootNet v1.0: development of a machine learning emulator of atmospheric transport
Tai-Long He, Nikhil Dadheech, Tammy M. Thompson, and Alexander J. Turner
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1661–1671, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1661-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1661-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Arakawa, A. and Lamb, V. R.: Computational Design of the Basic Dynamical Processes of the {UCLA} General Circulation Model, in: General Circulation Models of the Atmosphere, edited by CHANG, J., vol. 17 of Methods in Computational Physics: Advances in Research and Applications\/, 173– 265, Elsevier, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-460817-7.50009-4, 1977.
Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., and Barman, T.: The physical properties of extra-solar planets, Reports on Progress in Physics, 73, 016901, https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/73/1/016901, 2010.
Charney, J. G. and Phillips, N. A.: Numerical integration of the quasi-geostrophic equations for barotropic and simple baroclinic flows, Journal of Meteorology, 10, 71–99, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1953)010<0071:NIOTQG>2.0.CO;2, 1953.
Cho, J. Y.-K., Menou, K., Hansen, B. M. S., and Seager, S.: Atmospheric Circulation of Close-in Extrasolar Giant Planets. I. Global, Barotropic, Adiabatic Simulations, ApJ, 675, 817–845, https://doi.org/10.1086/524718, 2008.
Davies, T., Cullen, M. J. P., Malcolm, A. J., Mawson, M. H., Staniforth, A., White, A. A., and Wood, N.: A new dynamical core for the Met Office's global and regional modelling of the atmosphere, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 131, 1759–1782, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.101, 2005.
Download
Share