Articles | Volume 7, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-3059-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-3059-2014
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
18 Dec 2014
Methods for assessment of models |  | 18 Dec 2014

Using the UM dynamical cores to reproduce idealised 3-D flows

N. J. Mayne, I. Baraffe, D. M. Acreman, C. Smith, N. Wood, D. S. Amundsen, J. Thuburn, and D. R. Jackson

Related authors

Potential based Thermodynamics with Consistent Conservative Cascade Transport for Implicit Large Eddy Simulation: PTerodaC3TILES version 1.0
John Thuburn
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-153,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-153, 2024
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Winds and tides of the Extended Unified Model in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere validated with meteor radar observations
Matthew J. Griffith, Shaun M. Dempsey, David R. Jackson, Tracy Moffat-Griffin, and Nicholas J. Mitchell
Ann. Geophys., 39, 487–514, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-487-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-487-2021, 2021
Short summary
Stratospheric gravity waves over the mountainous island of South Georgia: testing a high-resolution dynamical model with 3-D satellite observations and radiosondes
Neil P. Hindley, Corwin J. Wright, Alan M. Gadian, Lars Hoffmann, John K. Hughes, David R. Jackson, John C. King, Nicholas J. Mitchell, Tracy Moffat-Griffin, Andrew C. Moss, Simon B. Vosper, and Andrew N. Ross
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 7695–7722, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7695-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7695-2021, 2021
Short summary
Introduction to the SPARC Reanalysis Intercomparison Project (S-RIP) and overview of the reanalysis systems
Masatomo Fujiwara, Jonathon S. Wright, Gloria L. Manney, Lesley J. Gray, James Anstey, Thomas Birner, Sean Davis, Edwin P. Gerber, V. Lynn Harvey, Michaela I. Hegglin, Cameron R. Homeyer, John A. Knox, Kirstin Krüger, Alyn Lambert, Craig S. Long, Patrick Martineau, Andrea Molod, Beatriz M. Monge-Sanz, Michelle L. Santee, Susann Tegtmeier, Simon Chabrillat, David G. H. Tan, David R. Jackson, Saroja Polavarapu, Gilbert P. Compo, Rossana Dragani, Wesley Ebisuzaki, Yayoi Harada, Chiaki Kobayashi, Will McCarty, Kazutoshi Onogi, Steven Pawson, Adrian Simmons, Krzysztof Wargan, Jeffrey S. Whitaker, and Cheng-Zhi Zou
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1417–1452, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1417-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1417-2017, 2017
Short summary
A mimetic, semi-implicit, forward-in-time, finite volume shallow water model: comparison of hexagonal–icosahedral and cubed-sphere grids
J. Thuburn, C. J. Cotter, and T. Dubos
Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 909–929, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-909-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-909-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Accurate space-based NOx emission estimates with the flux divergence approach require fine-scale model information on local oxidation chemistry and profile shapes
Felipe Cifuentes, Henk Eskes, Enrico Dammers, Charlotte Bryan, and Folkert Boersma
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 621–649, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-621-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-621-2025, 2025
Short summary
Exploring a high-level programming model for the NWP domain using ECMWF microphysics schemes
Stefano Ubbiali, Christian Kühnlein, Christoph Schär, Linda Schlemmer, Thomas C. Schulthess, Michael Staneker, and Heini Wernli
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 529–546, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-529-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-529-2025, 2025
Short summary
Quantifying uncertainties in satellite NO2 superobservations for data assimilation and model evaluation
Pieter Rijsdijk, Henk Eskes, Arlene Dingemans, K. Folkert Boersma, Takashi Sekiya, Kazuyuki Miyazaki, and Sander Houweling
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 483–509, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-483-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-483-2025, 2025
Short summary
ML-AMPSIT: Machine Learning-based Automated Multi-method Parameter Sensitivity and Importance analysis Tool
Dario Di Santo, Cenlin He, Fei Chen, and Lorenzo Giovannini
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 433–459, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-433-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-433-2025, 2025
Short summary
Coupling the urban canopy model TEB (SURFEXv9.0) with the radiation model SPARTACUS-Urbanv0.6.1 for more realistic urban radiative exchange calculation
Robert Schoetter, Robin James Hogan, Cyril Caliot, and Valéry Masson
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 405–431, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-405-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-405-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Arakawa, A. and Lamb, V. R.: Computational Design of the Basic Dynamical Processes of the {UCLA} General Circulation Model, in: General Circulation Models of the Atmosphere, edited by CHANG, J., vol. 17 of Methods in Computational Physics: Advances in Research and Applications\/, 173– 265, Elsevier, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-460817-7.50009-4, 1977.
Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., and Barman, T.: The physical properties of extra-solar planets, Reports on Progress in Physics, 73, 016901, https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/73/1/016901, 2010.
Charney, J. G. and Phillips, N. A.: Numerical integration of the quasi-geostrophic equations for barotropic and simple baroclinic flows, Journal of Meteorology, 10, 71–99, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1953)010<0071:NIOTQG>2.0.CO;2, 1953.
Cho, J. Y.-K., Menou, K., Hansen, B. M. S., and Seager, S.: Atmospheric Circulation of Close-in Extrasolar Giant Planets. I. Global, Barotropic, Adiabatic Simulations, ApJ, 675, 817–845, https://doi.org/10.1086/524718, 2008.
Davies, T., Cullen, M. J. P., Malcolm, A. J., Mawson, M. H., Staniforth, A., White, A. A., and Wood, N.: A new dynamical core for the Met Office's global and regional modelling of the atmosphere, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 131, 1759–1782, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.101, 2005.
Download
Share