Articles | Volume 7, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2411-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2411-2014
Development and technical paper
 | 
16 Oct 2014
Development and technical paper |  | 16 Oct 2014

Improved simulation of fire–vegetation interactions in the Land surface Processes and eXchanges dynamic global vegetation model (LPX-Mv1)

D. I. Kelley, S. P. Harrison, and I. C. Prentice

Related authors

A comprehensive benchmarking system for evaluating global vegetation models
D. I. Kelley, I. C. Prentice, S. P. Harrison, H. Wang, M. Simard, J. B. Fisher, and K. O. Willis
Biogeosciences, 10, 3313–3340, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-3313-2013,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-3313-2013, 2013

Related subject area

Biogeosciences
Parameterization toolbox for a physical–biogeochemical model compatible with FABM – a case study: the coupled 1D GOTM–ECOSMO E2E for the Sylt–Rømø Bight, North Sea
Hoa Nguyen, Ute Daewel, Neil Banas, and Corinna Schrum
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2961–2982, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2961-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2961-2025, 2025
Short summary
H2MV (v1.0): global physically constrained deep learning water cycle model with vegetation
Zavud Baghirov, Martin Jung, Markus Reichstein, Marco Körner, and Basil Kraft
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2921–2943, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2921-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2921-2025, 2025
Short summary
NN-TOC v1: global prediction of total organic carbon in marine sediments using deep neural networks
Naveenkumar Parameswaran, Everardo González, Ewa Burwicz-Galerne, Malte Braack, and Klaus Wallmann
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2521–2544, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2521-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2521-2025, 2025
Short summary
China Wildfire Emission Dataset (ChinaWED v1) for the period 2012–2022
Zhengyang Lin, Ling Huang, Hanqin Tian, Anping Chen, and Xuhui Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2509–2520, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2509-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2509-2025, 2025
Short summary
Process-based modeling of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence with VISIT-SIF version 1.0
Tatsuya Miyauchi, Makoto Saito, Hibiki M. Noda, Akihiko Ito, Tomomichi Kato, and Tsuneo Matsunaga
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2329–2347, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2329-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2329-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Albini, F. A.: Estimating wildfire behavior and effects, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture, 1976.
Anderson, D. H., Catchpole, E. A., De Mestre, N. J., and Parkes, T.: Modelling the spread of grass fires, J. Aust. Math. Soc., 23, 451–466, 1982.
Archibald, S., Roy, D. P., van Wilgen, B. W., and Scholes, R. J.: What limits fire?, an examination of drivers of burnt area in southern Africa, Glob. Change Biol., 15, 613–630, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01754.x, 2009.
Archibald, S., Staver, A. C., and Levin, S. A.: Evolution of human-driven fire regimes in Africa, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 847–852, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1118648109, 2012.
Arora, V. K., and Boer, G. J.: Fire as an interactive component of dynamic vegetation models, J. Geophys. Res., 110, G02008, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JG000042, 2005.
Download
Share