Articles | Volume 6, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-533-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.How should sparse marine in situ measurements be compared to a continuous model: an example
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 25 Apr 2013)
- Preprint (discussion started on 20 Aug 2012)
Interactive discussion
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29098/2909836493cfb3dee24124acfef77c89c0bdd495" alt="Printer-friendly Version"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd3cc/dd3cc704c3c2be517856155322e655f8f0166cce" alt="Supplement"
-
SC C646: '"If a direct comparison validation is performed without some kind of matching, the predictive power of the model could be seriously misjudged"', Hella Riede, 05 Sep 2012
-
RC C703: 'Review', Anonymous Referee #1, 24 Sep 2012
-
RC C1050: 'Review of paper: “How should sparse in situ measurements be compared to continuous model data? ”', Anonymous Referee #2, 14 Dec 2012
-
AC C1322: 'gmdd-5-2311-2012: Author reply to comments - please see attached pdf.', Lee de Mora, 22 Jan 2013