Articles | Volume 6, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1601-2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1601-2013
Development and technical paper
 | 
25 Sep 2013
Development and technical paper |  | 25 Sep 2013

A method to represent ozone response to large changes in precursor emissions using high-order sensitivity analysis in photochemical models

G. Yarwood, C. Emery, J. Jung, U. Nopmongcol, and T. Sakulyanontvittaya

Related authors

An investigation into atmospheric nitrous acid (HONO) processes in South Korea
Kiyeon Kim, Kyung Man Han, Chul Han Song, Hyojun Lee, Ross Beardsley, Jinhyeok Yu, Greg Yarwood, Bonyoung Koo, Jasper Madalipay, Jung-Hun Woo, and Seogju Cho
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 12575–12593, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12575-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12575-2024, 2024
Short summary
Recommendations on benchmarks for chemical transport model applications in China – Part 2: Ozone and Uncertainty Analysis
Ling Huang, Xinxin Zhang, Chris Emery, Qing Mu, Greg Yarwood, Hehe Zhai, Zhixu Sun, Shuhui Xue, Yangjun Wang, Joshua S. Fu, and Li Li
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2199,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2199, 2024
Short summary
Comprehensive Air Quality Model With Extensions, v7.20: Formulation and Evaluation for Ozone and Particulate Matter Over the US
Christopher A. Emery, Kirk R. Baker, Gary M. Wilson, and Greg Yarwood
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-48,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-48, 2024
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
An intercomparison of satellite, airborne, and ground-level observations with WRF–CAMx simulations of NO2 columns over Houston, Texas, during the September 2021 TRACER-AQ campaign
M. Omar Nawaz, Jeremiah Johnson, Greg Yarwood, Benjamin de Foy, Laura Judd, and Daniel L. Goldberg
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 6719–6741, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6719-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6719-2024, 2024
Short summary
Insights into soil NO emissions and the contribution to surface ozone formation in China
Ling Huang, Jiong Fang, Jiaqiang Liao, Greg Yarwood, Hui Chen, Yangjun Wang, and Li Li
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 14919–14932, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14919-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14919-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
The impact of cloud microphysics and ice nucleation on Southern Ocean clouds assessed with single-column modeling and instrument simulators
Andrew Gettelman, Richard Forbes, Roger Marchand, Chih-Chieh Chen, and Mark Fielding
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8069–8092, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8069-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8069-2024, 2024
Short summary
An updated aerosol simulation in the Community Earth System Model (v2.1.3): dust and marine aerosol emissions and secondary organic aerosol formation
Yujuan Wang, Peng Zhang, Jie Li, Yaman Liu, Yanxu Zhang, Jiawei Li, and Zhiwei Han
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7995–8021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7995-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7995-2024, 2024
Short summary
Exploring ship track spreading rates with a physics-informed Langevin particle parameterization
Lucas A. McMichael, Michael J. Schmidt, Robert Wood, Peter N. Blossey, and Lekha Patel
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7867–7888, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7867-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7867-2024, 2024
Short summary
Do data-driven models beat numerical models in forecasting weather extremes? A comparison of IFS HRES, Pangu-Weather, and GraphCast
Leonardo Olivetti and Gabriele Messori
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7915–7962, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7915-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7915-2024, 2024
Short summary
Development of the MPAS-CMAQ coupled system (V1.0) for multiscale global air quality modeling
David C. Wong, Jeff Willison, Jonathan E. Pleim, Golam Sarwar, James Beidler, Russ Bullock, Jerold A. Herwehe, Rob Gilliam, Daiwen Kang, Christian Hogrefe, George Pouliot, and Hosein Foroutan
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7855–7866, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7855-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7855-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Coe-Sullivan, D., Raffuse, S. M., Pryden, D. A., Craig, K. J., Reid, S. B., Wheeler, N. J. M, Chinkin, L. R., Larkin, N. K., Solomon, R., and Strand T.: Development and applications of Systems for Modeling Emissions and Smoke from Fires: The BlueSky Smoke Modeling Framework and SMARTFIRE, Presentation at the EPA 17th Annual International Emission Inventory Conference "Inventory Evolution – Portal to Improved Air Quality", Portland, OR, 2–5 June, 2008.
Cohan, D. S., Koo, B., and Yarwood, G.: Influence of uncertain reaction rates on ozone sensitivity to emissions, Atmos. Environ., 44, 3101–3109, 2010.
Dunker, A. M.: Efficient calculation of sensitivity coefficients for complex atmospheric models, Atmos. Environ., Part A, 15, 1155–1161, 1981.
Dunker, A. M., Yarwood, G., Ortmann, J. P., and Wilson, G. M.: The decoupled direct method for sensitivity analysis in a three-dimensional air quality model – Implementation, accuracy, and efficiency, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 2965–2976, 2002.
Emery, C., Jung, J., Downey, N., Johnson, J., Jimenez, J., Yarwood, G., and Morris, R.: Regional and global modeling estimates of policy relevant background ozone over the United States, Atmos. Environ., 47, 206–217, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.11.012, 2012.
Download