Articles | Volume 6, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1601-2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1601-2013
Development and technical paper
 | 
25 Sep 2013
Development and technical paper |  | 25 Sep 2013

A method to represent ozone response to large changes in precursor emissions using high-order sensitivity analysis in photochemical models

G. Yarwood, C. Emery, J. Jung, U. Nopmongcol, and T. Sakulyanontvittaya

Related authors

Incorporation of multi-phase halogen chemistry into Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model
Kiyeon Kim, Chul Han Song, Kyung Man Han, Greg Yarwood, Ross Beardsley, and Saewung Kim
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-23,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-23, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
An investigation into atmospheric nitrous acid (HONO) processes in South Korea
Kiyeon Kim, Kyung Man Han, Chul Han Song, Hyojun Lee, Ross Beardsley, Jinhyeok Yu, Greg Yarwood, Bonyoung Koo, Jasper Madalipay, Jung-Hun Woo, and Seogju Cho
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 12575–12593, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12575-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12575-2024, 2024
Short summary
Recommendations on benchmarks for chemical transport model applications in China – Part 2: Ozone and Uncertainty Analysis
Ling Huang, Xinxin Zhang, Chris Emery, Qing Mu, Greg Yarwood, Hehe Zhai, Zhixu Sun, Shuhui Xue, Yangjun Wang, Joshua S. Fu, and Li Li
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2199,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2199, 2024
Short summary
Comprehensive Air Quality Model With Extensions, v7.20: Formulation and Evaluation for Ozone and Particulate Matter Over the US
Christopher A. Emery, Kirk R. Baker, Gary M. Wilson, and Greg Yarwood
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-48,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-48, 2024
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
An intercomparison of satellite, airborne, and ground-level observations with WRF–CAMx simulations of NO2 columns over Houston, Texas, during the September 2021 TRACER-AQ campaign
M. Omar Nawaz, Jeremiah Johnson, Greg Yarwood, Benjamin de Foy, Laura Judd, and Daniel L. Goldberg
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 6719–6741, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6719-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6719-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Accurate space-based NOx emission estimates with the flux divergence approach require fine-scale model information on local oxidation chemistry and profile shapes
Felipe Cifuentes, Henk Eskes, Enrico Dammers, Charlotte Bryan, and Folkert Boersma
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 621–649, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-621-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-621-2025, 2025
Short summary
Exploring a high-level programming model for the NWP domain using ECMWF microphysics schemes
Stefano Ubbiali, Christian Kühnlein, Christoph Schär, Linda Schlemmer, Thomas C. Schulthess, Michael Staneker, and Heini Wernli
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 529–546, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-529-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-529-2025, 2025
Short summary
Quantifying uncertainties in satellite NO2 superobservations for data assimilation and model evaluation
Pieter Rijsdijk, Henk Eskes, Arlene Dingemans, K. Folkert Boersma, Takashi Sekiya, Kazuyuki Miyazaki, and Sander Houweling
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 483–509, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-483-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-483-2025, 2025
Short summary
ML-AMPSIT: Machine Learning-based Automated Multi-method Parameter Sensitivity and Importance analysis Tool
Dario Di Santo, Cenlin He, Fei Chen, and Lorenzo Giovannini
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 433–459, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-433-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-433-2025, 2025
Short summary
Coupling the urban canopy model TEB (SURFEXv9.0) with the radiation model SPARTACUS-Urbanv0.6.1 for more realistic urban radiative exchange calculation
Robert Schoetter, Robin James Hogan, Cyril Caliot, and Valéry Masson
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 405–431, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-405-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-405-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Coe-Sullivan, D., Raffuse, S. M., Pryden, D. A., Craig, K. J., Reid, S. B., Wheeler, N. J. M, Chinkin, L. R., Larkin, N. K., Solomon, R., and Strand T.: Development and applications of Systems for Modeling Emissions and Smoke from Fires: The BlueSky Smoke Modeling Framework and SMARTFIRE, Presentation at the EPA 17th Annual International Emission Inventory Conference "Inventory Evolution – Portal to Improved Air Quality", Portland, OR, 2–5 June, 2008.
Cohan, D. S., Koo, B., and Yarwood, G.: Influence of uncertain reaction rates on ozone sensitivity to emissions, Atmos. Environ., 44, 3101–3109, 2010.
Dunker, A. M.: Efficient calculation of sensitivity coefficients for complex atmospheric models, Atmos. Environ., Part A, 15, 1155–1161, 1981.
Dunker, A. M., Yarwood, G., Ortmann, J. P., and Wilson, G. M.: The decoupled direct method for sensitivity analysis in a three-dimensional air quality model – Implementation, accuracy, and efficiency, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 2965–2976, 2002.
Emery, C., Jung, J., Downey, N., Johnson, J., Jimenez, J., Yarwood, G., and Morris, R.: Regional and global modeling estimates of policy relevant background ozone over the United States, Atmos. Environ., 47, 206–217, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.11.012, 2012.
Download
Share