113 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Modified Parameterization Scheme of Orographic Gravity Waves in the SOCOL Chemistry-Climate Model A. Koval et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-024-03619-5
2. A fully coupled solid-particle microphysics scheme for stratospheric aerosol injections within the aerosol–chemistry–climate model SOCOL-AERv2 S. Vattioni et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7767-2024
3. Effects of Arctic ozone on the stratospheric spring onset and its surface impact M. Friedel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13997-2022
4. Stratospheric aerosol evolution after Pinatubo simulated with a coupled size-resolved aerosol–chemistry–climate model, SOCOL-AERv1.0 T. Sukhodolov et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2633-2018
5. In situ observation of new particle formation (NPF) in the tropical tropopause layer of the 2017 Asian monsoon anticyclone – Part 1: Summary of StratoClim results R. Weigel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11689-2021
6. Surface ozone interannual variability, trends, and extremes in CCMI models L. Zhang & Y. Cui https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118841
7. The changing ozone depletion potential of N2O in a future climate L. Revell et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065702
8. Clear-sky ultraviolet radiation modelling using output from the Chemistry Climate Model Initiative K. Lamy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10087-2019
9. Global atmospheric sulfur budget under volcanically quiescent conditions: Aerosol‐chemistry‐climate model predictions and validation J. Sheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021985
10. Improved tropospheric and stratospheric sulfur cycle in the aerosol–chemistry–climate model SOCOL-AERv2 A. Feinberg et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3863-2019
11. Atmospheric Modeling for Controlling the Motion of a Return Vehicle A. Vyazankin et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0038094620070230
12. Variability and Trends in Ozone and Ozone-Related Stratospheric Trace Gases over St. Petersburg (Russia) Y. Virolainen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/earth7050167
13. Forcing of stratospheric chemistry and dynamics during the Dalton Minimum J. Anet et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10951-2013
14. Isotopic source signatures: Impact of regional variability on the δ13CH4 trend and spatial distribution A. Feinberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.037
15. Review of the global models used within phase 1 of the Chemistry–Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) O. Morgenstern et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-639-2017
16. Arctic Stratosphere Circulation Changes in the 21st Century in Simulations of INM CM5 P. Vargin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13010025
17. Response of the AMOC to reduced solar radiation – the modulating role of atmospheric chemistry S. Muthers et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-877-2016
18. Analysis of the global atmospheric background sulfur budget in a multi-model framework C. Brodowsky et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5513-2024
19. Ozone Layer Evolution in the Early 20th Century T. Egorova et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11020169
20. The Upper Stratospheric Solar Cycle Ozone Response W. Ball et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081501
21. The impact of different CO2 and ODS levels on the mean state and variability of the springtime Arctic stratosphere J. Kult-Herdin et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acb0e6
22. Full dynamical model (SOCOL:14C-Ex) of 14C atmospheric production and transport in application to Miyake events K. Golubenko et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2026.10236
23. Solar geoengineering as part of an overall strategy for meeting the 1.5°C Paris target D. MacMartin et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0454
24. Tropospheric ozone in CCMI models and Gaussian process emulation to understand biases in the SOCOLv3 chemistry–climate model L. Revell et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16155-2018
25. Numerical Simulation of Variations in Ozone Content, Erythemal Ultraviolet Radiation, and Ultraviolet Resources over Northern Eurasia in the 21st Century A. Pastukhova et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433819030058
26. Troposphere–Stratosphere–Mesosphere Coupling and Ozone Response to Arctic Stratospheric Variability during the 2024/25 Winter Season P. Vargin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-026-5764-7
27. Reactive nitrogen (NOy) and ozone responses to energetic electron precipitation during Southern Hemisphere winter P. Arsenovic et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9485-2019
28. The Response of the Ozone Layer to Quadrupled CO2 Concentrations: Implications for Climate G. Chiodo & L. Polvani https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0086.1
29. Modeling Climate Changes and Atmospheric Ozone Variations from 1980 to 2020 Using the Chemistry-Climate Model SOCOLv3 M. Usacheva et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1024856024700519
30. The influence of future changes in springtime Arctic ozone on stratospheric and surface climate G. Chiodo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10451-2023
31. Evidence for a continuous decline in lower stratospheric ozone offsetting ozone layer recovery W. Ball et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1379-2018
32. Large-scale tropospheric transport in the Chemistry–Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) simulations C. Orbe et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7217-2018
33. The Asian tropopause aerosol layer within the 2017 monsoon anticyclone: microphysical properties derived from aircraft-borne in situ measurements C. Mahnke et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15259-2021
34. Global impacts of an extreme solar particle event under different geomagnetic field strengths P. Arsenović et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2321770121
35. An upper-branch Brewer–Dobson circulation index for attribution of stratospheric variability and improved ozone and temperature trend analysis W. Ball et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15485-2016
36. The coupled atmosphere–chemistry–ocean model SOCOL-MPIOM S. Muthers et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2157-2014
37. Stratospheric Injection of Brominated Very Short‐Lived Substances: Aircraft Observations in the Western Pacific and Representation in Global Models P. Wales et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD027978
38. Long-Term Volcanic Signal in 21st-Century Climate Projections with a 25-Member Stochastic Ensemble Using SOCOL-MPIOM M. Tkachenko & E. Rozanov https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17060577
39. The representation of solar cycle signals in stratospheric ozone – Part 2: Analysis of global models A. Maycock et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11323-2018
40. The influence of Middle Range Energy Electrons on atmospheric chemistry and regional climate P. Arsenovic et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2016.04.008
41. The influence of mixing on the stratospheric age of air changes in the 21st century R. Eichinger et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-921-2019
42. The role of methane in projections of 21st century stratospheric water vapour L. Revell et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13067-2016
43. Temperature and Ozone Response to Different Forcing in the Lower Troposphere and Stratosphere M. Usacheva et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15111289
44. Exploring accumulation-mode H2SO4 versus SO2 stratospheric sulfate geoengineering in a sectional aerosol–chemistry–climate model S. Vattioni et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4877-2019
45. Evaluating the Response of Global Column Resistance to a Large Volcanic Eruption by an Aerosol-Coupled Chemistry Climate Model Y. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.673808
46. Springtime arctic ozone depletion forces northern hemisphere climate anomalies M. Friedel et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00974-7
47. Modeling of the middle atmosphere response to 27-day solar irradiance variability T. Sukhodolov et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2016.12.004
48. The response of mesospheric H2O and CO to solar irradiance variability in models and observations A. Karagodin-Doyennel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-201-2021
49. Iodine chemistry in the chemistry–climate model SOCOL-AERv2-I A. Karagodin-Doyennel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6623-2021
50. Impact of geomagnetic excursions on atmospheric chemistry and dynamics I. Suter et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-1183-2014
51. Multi-model comparison of the volcanic sulfate deposition from the 1815 eruption of Mt. Tambora L. Marshall et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2307-2018
52. Constraining Atmospheric Selenium Emissions Using Observations, Global Modeling, and Bayesian Inference A. Feinberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c01408
53. The effect of atmospheric nudging on the stratospheric residual circulation in chemistry–climate models A. Chrysanthou et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11559-2019
54. Climate and chemistry effects of a regional scale nuclear conflict A. Stenke et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9713-2013
55. The impacts of volcanic aerosol on stratospheric ozone and the Northern Hemisphere polar vortex: separating radiative-dynamical changes from direct effects due to enhanced aerosol heterogeneous chemistry S. Muthers et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11461-2015
56. Study of Ozone Variability over Russia by Means of Measurements and Modeling Y. Virolainen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17030265
57. Modeling the Sulfate Aerosol Evolution After Recent Moderate Volcanic Activity, 2008–2012 C. Brodowsky et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035472
58. Evaluation of simulated photolysis rates and their response to solar irradiance variability T. Sukhodolov et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024277
59. An interactive stratospheric aerosol model intercomparison of solar geoengineering by stratospheric injection of SO2 or accumulation-mode sulfuric acid aerosols D. Weisenstein et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2955-2022
60. Evaluation of stratospheric transport in three generations of Chemistry-Climate Models M. Abalos et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-5249-2026
61. Effects of Ozone and Clouds on Temporal Variability of Surface UV Radiation and UV Resources over Northern Eurasia Derived from Measurements and Modeling N. Chubarova et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11010059
62. Study of the dependence of long-term stratospheric ozone trends on local solar time E. Maillard Barras et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8453-2020
63. Impacts of Mt Pinatubo volcanic aerosol on the tropical stratosphere in chemistry–climate model simulations using CCMI and CMIP6 stratospheric aerosol data L. Revell et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13139-2017
64. Stratospheric dynamics modulates ozone layer response to molecular oxygen variations I. Józefiak et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1239325
65. Inter-model comparison of global hydroxyl radical (OH) distributions and their impact on atmospheric methane over the 2000–2016 period Y. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13701-2019
66. Signal‐To‐Noise Calculations of Emergence and De‐Emergence of Stratospheric Ozone Depletion F. Robertson et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104246
67. Multidecadal variations of the effects of the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation on the climate system S. Brönnimann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15529-2016
68. Impact of solar versus volcanic activity variations on tropospheric temperatures and precipitation during the Dalton Minimum J. Anet et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-921-2014
69. HEPPA-II model–measurement intercomparison project: EPP indirect effects during the dynamically perturbed NH winter 2008–2009 B. Funke et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3573-2017
70. New SOCOL:14C-Ex model reveals that the Late-Glacial radiocarbon spike in 12350 BC was caused by the record-strong extreme solar storm K. Golubenko et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2025.119383
71. Seasonal Cycle of the Total Ozone Content over Southern High Latitudes in the CCM SOCOLv3 A. Imanova et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16101172
72. Revisiting the Mystery of Recent Stratospheric Temperature Trends A. Maycock et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078035
73. Analysis of recent lower-stratospheric ozone trends in chemistry climate models S. Dietmüller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6811-2021
74. Quantifying the effect of mixing on the mean age of air in CCMVal-2 and CCMI-1 models S. Dietmüller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6699-2018
75. Atmosphere–ocean–aerosol–chemistry–climate model SOCOLv4.0: description and evaluation T. Sukhodolov et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5525-2021
76. A New Version of Parametrization of Orographic Waves: Dynamic and Thermal Effects in the SOCOL3 Model A. Koval' et al. https://doi.org/10.2205/2025es001027
77. Tropospheric Ozone at Northern Mid-Latitudes: Modeled and Measured Long-Term Changes J. Staehelin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos8090163
78. Arctic Ozone Anomalies and the Associated UV Radiation Increase in the 21st Century in Simulations with CCM SOCOLv3 P. Vargin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17070674
79. Assessing the stratospheric temperature response to volcanic sulfate injections by Mt. Pinatubo: insights from the Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol Model Intercomparison Project K. Perny et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-10997-2026
80. A perturbed parameter model ensemble to investigate Mt. Pinatubo's 1991 initial sulfur mass emission J. Sheng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11501-2015
81. Reductions in the deposition of sulfur and selenium to agricultural soils pose risk of future nutrient deficiencies A. Feinberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00172-0
82. On the Possibility of Modeling the IMF By-Weather Coupling through GEC-Related Effects on Cloud Droplet Coalescence Rate A. Karagodin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13060881
83. High solar cycle spectral variations inconsistent with stratospheric ozone observations W. Ball et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2640
84. Chemical Impact of Stratospheric Alumina Particle Injection for Solar Radiation Modification and Related Uncertainties S. Vattioni et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105889
85. Contributions of Natural and Anthropogenic Forcing Agents to the Early 20th Century Warming T. Egorova et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2018.00206
86. Application of CCM SOCOL-AERv2-BE to cosmogenic beryllium isotopes: description and validation for polar regions K. Golubenko et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7605-2021
87. Implications of potential future grand solar minimum for ozone layer and climate P. Arsenovic et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3469-2018
88. Chemistry module for the Earth system model S. Smyshlyaev et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/rnam-2024-0030
89. Model physics and chemistry causing intermodel disagreement within the VolMIP-Tambora Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol ensemble M. Clyne et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3317-2021
90. Polar Stratospheric Clouds: Satellite Observations, Processes, and Role in Ozone Depletion I. Tritscher et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020RG000702
91. Attribution of Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) ozone radiative flux bias from satellites L. Kuai et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-281-2020
92. The influence of energetic particle precipitation on Antarctic stratospheric chlorine and ozone over the 20th century V. Maliniemi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8137-2022
93. Ozone sensitivity to varying greenhouse gases and ozone-depleting substances in CCMI-1 simulations O. Morgenstern et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1091-2018
94. The role of sulfur dioxide in stratospheric aerosol formation evaluated by using in situ measurements in the tropical lower stratosphere A. Rollins et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072754
95. Zonal Mean Distribution of Cosmogenic Isotope (7Be, 10Be, 14C, and 36Cl) Production in Stratosphere and Troposphere K. Golubenko et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036726
96. Exploring the link between austral stratospheric polar vortex anomalies and surface climate in chemistry-climate models N. Bergner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13915-2022
97. On the aliasing of the solar cycle in the lower stratospheric tropical temperature A. Kuchar et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026948
98. Weakening of springtime Arctic ozone depletion with climate change M. Friedel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10235-2023
99. Evidence for Hunga-Tonga eruption influence on the anomalously strong Northern-Hemisphere stratospheric polar vortex in 2024/2025 A. Kuchar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-15479-2026
100. Mapping the drivers of uncertainty in atmospheric selenium deposition with global sensitivity analysis A. Feinberg et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1363-2020
101. In situ measurements of perturbations to stratospheric aerosol and modeled ozone and radiative impacts following the 2021 La Soufrière eruption Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15351-2023
102. Atmospheric impacts of the strongest known solar particle storm of 775 AD T. Sukhodolov et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45257
103. Effects of Energetic Particle Precipitation on Stratospheric Temperature During Disturbed Stratospheric Polar Vortex Conditions J. Edvartsen et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038010
104. Drivers of the tropospheric ozone budget throughout the 21st century under the medium-high climate scenario RCP 6.0 L. Revell et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5887-2015
105. Climate implications of the sun transition to higher activity mode T. Egorova et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2023.106020
106. Tropical tropopause ozone modulated by tropopause height S. Bourguet https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-2691-2026
107. Investigation and forecast of Sudden Stratospheric Warming events with chemistry climate model SOCOL N. Tsvetkova et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/606/1/012062
108. Evaluation of polar stratospheric clouds in the global chemistry–climate model SOCOLv3.1 by comparison with CALIPSO spaceborne lidar measurements M. Steiner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-935-2021
109. Formaldehyde in the Tropical Western Pacific: Chemical Sources and Sinks, Convective Transport, and Representation in CAM‐Chem and the CCMI Models D. Anderson et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026121
110. The Response of the Ozone Layer to Quadrupled CO2 Concentrations G. Chiodo et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0492.1
111. Near-Surface Ozone Variations in East Asia during Boreal Summer J. Wie et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11020206
112. Stratospheric injection of solid particles reduces side effects on circulation and climate compared to SO2 injections F. Stefanetti et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/ad9f93
113. Importance of microphysical settings for climate forcing by stratospheric SO2 injections as modeled by SOCOL-AERv2 S. Vattioni et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4181-2024