Articles | Volume 6, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1109-2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1109-2013
Model evaluation paper
 | 
02 Aug 2013
Model evaluation paper |  | 02 Aug 2013

Evaluation of WRF-SFIRE performance with field observations from the FireFlux experiment

A. K. Kochanski, M. A. Jenkins, J. Mandel, J. D. Beezley, C. B. Clements, and S. Krueger

Related authors

Recent advances and applications of WRF–SFIRE
J. Mandel, S. Amram, J. D. Beezley, G. Kelman, A. K. Kochanski, V. Y. Kondratenko, B. H. Lynn, B. Regev, and M. Vejmelka
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2829–2845, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2829-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2829-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Selecting CMIP6 global climate models (GCMs) for Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX) dynamical downscaling over Southeast Asia using a standardised benchmarking framework
Phuong Loan Nguyen, Lisa V. Alexander, Marcus J. Thatcher, Son C. H. Truong, Rachael N. Isphording, and John L. McGregor
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7285–7315, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7285-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7285-2024, 2024
Short summary
Improved definition of prior uncertainties in CO2 and CO fossil fuel fluxes and its impact on multi-species inversion with GEOS-Chem (v12.5)
Ingrid Super, Tia Scarpelli, Arjan Droste, and Paul I. Palmer
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7263–7284, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7263-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7263-2024, 2024
Short summary
RASCAL v1.0: an open-source tool for climatological time series reconstruction and extension
Álvaro González-Cervera and Luis Durán
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7245–7261, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7245-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7245-2024, 2024
Short summary
Introducing graupel density prediction in Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) double-moment 6-class (WDM6) microphysics and evaluation of the modified scheme during the ICE-POP field campaign
Sun-Young Park, Kyo-Sun Sunny Lim, Kwonil Kim, Gyuwon Lee, and Jason A. Milbrandt
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7199–7218, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7199-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7199-2024, 2024
Short summary
Enabling high-performance cloud computing for the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model (CMAQ) version 5.3.3: performance evaluation and benefits for the user community
Christos I. Efstathiou, Elizabeth Adams, Carlie J. Coats, Robert Zelt, Mark Reed, John McGee, Kristen M. Foley, Fahim I. Sidi, David C. Wong, Steven Fine, and Saravanan Arunachalam
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7001–7027, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7001-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7001-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson, H.: Aids to determining fuel models for estimating fire behavior, USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-122, 22 pp., 1982.
Andrews, P. L., Bevins, C. D., and Seli, R. C.: BehavePlus fire modeling system, version 4.0: User's guide revised. General Tech. Report RMRS-GTR-106WWW Revised, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT, 132 pp., 2008.
Balbi, J.-H., Rossi, J.-L., Marcelli, T., and Santoni, P.-A. : A 3D Physical Real-Time Model of Surface Fires Across Fuel Beds, Combusion Sci. Tech., 179, 2511–2537, https://doi.org/10.1080/00102200701484449, 2007.
Banta, R., Olivier, L., Holloway, E., Kropfli, R., Bartram, B., Cupp, R., and Post, M.: Smoke-column observations from two forest fires using Doppler lidar and Doppler radar, J. Appl. Meteor., 31, 1328–1349, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1992)031<1328:SCOFTF>2.0.CO;2, 1992.
Beer T.: The interaction of wind and fire, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 54, 287–308, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183958, 1991.
Download