Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 19, issue 19
Articles | Volume 19, issue 19
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-9627-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-9627-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 19, issue 19
Model evaluation paper
 | 
12 Oct 2026
Model evaluation paper |  | 12 Oct 2026

Towards high-fidelity simulations of coastal submesoscale baroclinic instabilities with MPAS–O (vE3SM3.0.0) – Part 2: Realistic experiments

Dylan R. Schlichting, Katherine M. Smith, Mark R. Petersen, Robert D. Hetland, Kyle E. Hinson, and Darren Engwirda

Viewed

Total article views: 507 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
295 167 45 507 31 29
  • HTML: 295
  • PDF: 167
  • XML: 45
  • Total: 507
  • BibTeX: 31
  • EndNote: 29
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 May 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 May 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 507 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 482 with geography defined and 25 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 12 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
River plumes can strongly influence coastal dynamics but are poorly resolved in global ocean models. Building on a companion study, we perform high-resolution simulations of the Mississippi–Atchafalaya (M–A) plume with the Model for Prediction Across Scales–Ocean (MPAS–O), a global model, and compare with a limited-domain Regional Ocean Modeling System configuration. MPAS–O qualitatively captures the M–A plume seasonality but fails to generate realistic eddies on the Texas–Louisiana shelf.
Read more
Share