the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A simplified isoprene oxidation mechanism for fast formaldehyde-based emission inversion of isoprene
Glenn-Michael Oomen
Jean-François Müller
Trissevgeni Stavrakou
Isabelle De Smedt
Vincent Huijnen
Flora Kluge
Antje Inness
Johannes Flemming
We introduce the Simplified Isoprene Chemistry for MAGRITTE (SICMA), a compact chemical mechanism designed for computationally efficient global chemistry transport modeling of formaldehyde (HCHO) and adjoint-based emission inversions. The scheme reduces the isoprene oxidation network of the MAGRITTEv1.2 model from 93 organic species and 243 reactions to four organic species and six lumped reactions. The SICMA parameters (rate coefficients and product yields) are optimized using box-model simulations across multiple NOx regimes to reproduce cumulative HCHO production and HOx concentrations from the full mechanism. The optimization employs idealized diurnal biogenic emissions with a fixed monoterpene-to-isoprene emission ratio of 0.1 typical of tropical source regions. The simplified scheme successfully captures the NOx-dependent branching of isoprene oxidation and reproduces HCHO production and oxidant recycling with high fidelity. Implemented in the global MAGRITTE chemistry transport model, SICMA reproduces the monthly HCHO vertical columns from the full chemistry run within 5 % over most continental regions. Larger discrepancies occur over boreal forests and remote oceans, mainly due to the assumed monoterpene-to-isoprene ratio and the absence of organic nitrate chemistry. Despite these simplifications, the seasonal cycle and spatial distribution of HCHO columns remain in close agreement with both the full chemistry simulation and TROPOMI observations. Inversions of isoprene emissions constrained by TROPOMI HCHO columns yield similar global totals when using SICMA or the full chemistry (568 and 574 Tg yr−1, respectively). SICMA therefore provides a robust and computationally efficient alternative to detailed isoprene mechanisms for large-scale modeling of HCHO and isoprene emission inversion applications.
- Article
(9806 KB) - Full-text XML
-
Supplement
(3248 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Terrestrial vegetation is the largest source of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) without methane emitted into the atmosphere, with an estimated total emission source of about 1000 Tg yr−1 (Guenther et al., 2012). The most important biogenic VOC is isoprene (C5H8), which accounts for roughly half of the total biogenic VOC emissions globally, followed by monoterpenes (∼15 %), methanol (∼10 %), acetone, and other compounds. Due to their strong reactivity, biogenic VOCs play a central role in tropospheric chemistry by influencing ozone formation, hydroxyl radical (OH) recycling, and secondary organic aerosol production (Atkinson and Arey, 2003; Claeys et al., 2004). Among the oxidation products of isoprene, formaldehyde (HCHO) is of particular importance, as it is a major intermediate in the oxidation of VOCs and an observable tracer for constraining isoprene emissions from space.
In the last two decades, satellite observations of HCHO have been extensively used for top-down estimates of isoprene emissions (e.g. Palmer et al., 2006; Millet et al., 2008; Stavrakou et al., 2009b, 2015; Bauwens et al., 2016; Kaiser et al., 2018; Stavrakou et al., 2018; Müller et al., 2024; Oomen et al., 2024; Li et al., 2026). Additionally, space-borne isoprene column measurements from the Cross-track Infrared Sounder (CrIS) have been used to constrain isoprene emissions (Wells et al., 2020; Li et al., 2025; Sun et al., 2025). However, the interpretation of these observations is critically dependent on the accuracy of the chemical mechanisms used to represent isoprene oxidation. Despite significant advances in laboratory and theoretical studies, the chemical complexity of isoprene oxidation remains challenging to capture in global models. Current detailed mechanisms involve hundreds of reactions and species (Jenkin et al., 2015; Wennberg et al., 2018), leading to high computational costs that restrict their use in long-term simulations, ensemble studies, and inverse modelling frameworks. As a result, most global chemistry-transport models employ reduced or lumped chemical schemes (Archibald et al., 2010). These simplified mechanisms aim to improve computational efficiency while reproducing key features of isoprene oxidation, including HCHO yields, HOx recycling, and the sensitivity to NOx regimes (Wennberg et al., 2018). In particular, biases in simulated HCHO columns can propagate directly into errors in inferred isoprene emissions, limiting the reliability of satellite-based constraints. Several reduced chemical schemes have been proposed in recent years, each aiming to balance chemical realism with numerical efficiency (Müller et al., 2018b; Jenkin et al., 2019; Wiser et al., 2023, see Table 1).
Jenkin et al. (2015)Wennberg et al. (2018)Bates and Jacob (2019)Wennberg et al. (2018)Müller et al. (2019)Jenkin et al. (2019)Williams et al. (2022)Wiser et al. (2023)In this work, we introduce the Simplified Isoprene Chemistry for MAGRITTE (SICMA), a compact chemical mechanism designed to efficiently represent isoprene and monoterpene oxidation and its impact on HCHO and oxidant budgets. SICMA is highly simplified, featuring only six lumped reactions involving four organic species with parameterized yield coefficients and reaction rates. The reaction parameters are optimized by using box-model simulations, which allows for a strong reduction of the full scheme while maintaining realistic HCHO production and HOx recycling across different NOx regimes.
The performance of SICMA is evaluated for isoprene and monoterpene oxidation using both box-model experiments and global simulations. The analysis focuses on the ability of the simplified chemistry to reproduce key chemical diagnostics, including OH, HO2, and HCHO. The main goal of SICMA is to mimic the HCHO vertical column distribution of full chemistry simulations with the Model of Atmospheric composition at Global and Regional scales using Inversion Techniques for Trace gas Emissions (MAGRITTEv1.2, Müller et al., 2019) chemistry transport model (CTM) without the need for a large number of reactions and intermediate species, such that comparisons with space-based HCHO columns and isoprene emission inversions can be performed at lower computational cost. Furthermore, we assess the realism of simulated HCHO columns through comparison with TROPOMI HCHO satellite observations, thus providing an observational benchmark for the simplified chemistry.
We describe the TROPOMI HCHO data used for model evaluation and as constraints for VOC emission inversion in Sect. 2. Section 3 introduces the MAGRITTEv1.2 chemistry scheme used for optimizing the SICMA chemistry and the forward model and inversion setup of the CTM. Section 4 describes the SICMA scheme and the box-model experiments for parameter optimization. The SICMA chemistry skill in the MAGRITTE CTM is evaluated in Sect. 5. We summarize the implications of our findings for satellite-based constraints on isoprene emissions and future model development in the concluding section.
The TROPOMI HCHO product used in this study has been developed within the European Space Agency Climate Change Initiative (CCI) Precursors for Aerosols and Ozone project. Compared to the operational product, the retrieval includes several improvements in the air mass factor (AMF) calculation. In particular, a priori vertical profiles are taken from the CAMS global reanalysis (EAC4, Inness et al., 2019), ensuring temporal consistency and leading to higher HCHO columns over emission regions and lower values over background areas, thereby improving agreement with independent observations. Surface albedo is based on the high-resolution TROPOMI minimum Lambertian equivalent reflectivity climatology (Tilstra et al., 2024). The main product used here is the tropospheric HCHO column without cloud altitude correction, applying only cloud fraction filtering, as cloud corrections have limited impact on HCHO retrievals and may introduce inter-sensor inconsistencies. Updates have also been applied to the background correction and Level-2 quality assurance parameters.
The Level-3 (L3) product is provided on a 0.25°×0.25° grid with daily global coverage (De Smedt et al., 2025). Level-2 retrievals are filtered using the recommended quality threshold (𝚚𝚊_𝚟𝚊𝚕𝚞𝚎>0.5), and an additional L3 quality flag is used to exclude grid cells with insufficient valid observations. For each grid cell, the dataset provides the tropospheric HCHO column (tropospheric_HCHO_ column_number_density_clear) together with intermediate quantities, including slant columns, background-corrected slant columns, AMFs (with and without cloud correction), averaging kernels, and auxiliary parameters such as a priori vertical profiles, surface albedo and cloud properties. Mean random and systematic uncertainties are reported, along with statistical indicators such as intra-cell standard deviations. Averaging kernels are used in this work to apply vertical smoothing when comparing model simulations with satellite observations.
The dataset has been evaluated against ground-based Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) measurements, leading to a global-scale bias correction based on the regression relationship (y=1.315x−0.934). In addition to the quality flag applied to the L3 data, we require a minimum of 4 d with valid data per grid cell per month, and we filter low HCHO columns . The resulting ground-based bias-corrected HCHO columns, depicted in Fig. 1, are used both for model evaluation and as observational constraints in the inversion system. Further details on the product and its validation are provided in the CCI Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (Van Roozendael et al., 2026) and Product Validation and Intercomparison Report (Compernolle et al., 2025).
Figure 1Average TROPOMI HCHO columns for the year 2019 from the ESA CCI HCHO product. White rectangles denote regions that will be used for model comparisons in Sect. 5.
3.1 Chemical reaction network
The simplified chemistry scheme with parametrized reaction rates and coefficients is based on the chemical reaction mechanism of the MAGRITTEv1.2 CTM (see Müller et al., 2019, for an in-depth description), which has an extensive, up-to-date isoprene oxidation chemistry primarily based on the Leuven Isoprene Model (LIM, Peeters et al., 2009, 2014) and the Caltech oxidation mechanism (Wennberg et al., 2018). As in Oomen et al. (2024), the isomerization rates of the δ-hydroxyperoxy radicals from isoprene oxidation by OH are enhanced, relative to the MAGRITTEv1.1 mechanism, in order to provide a better match with chamber data (Novelli et al., 2020). The reaction network comprising the oxidation of isoprene and its intermediate products contains 243 reactions and uses 93 different compounds (Table 1). The oxidation reactions of monoterpenes (i.e. α-pinene) adds another 14 reactions to this number.
3.2 Forward simulation setup
The MAGRITTE CTM calculates the chemical interactions and transport of chemical compounds in the atmosphere based on a priori emission information. The model can be run in global (2°×2.5°) or regional configuration (0.5°×0.5°) using lateral boundary conditions from the global model run. The vertical resolution of the model consists of 40 levels from the surface up to the lower stratosphere at 44 hPa following a σ-level coordinate system.
Meteorological fields used in the model are taken from ERA5 reanalysis data (Hersbach et al., 2020). The aerosol optical depth data is obtained from the CAMS global reanalysis (Inness et al., 2019). The model uses gridded emission data from bottom-up inventories: MEGAN-MOHYCAN for biogenic emissions (Stavrakou et al., 2018), CAMS-GLOB-ANTv5.3 for anthropogenic emissions (Soulie et al., 2024), and QFEDv2.4 for biomass burning emissions (Darmenov and da Silva, 2015), with emission factors from Andreae (2019). The annual global NMVOC emission estimates for 2019 amount to 439 Tg for isoprene, 108 Tg for monoterpenes, 112 Tg for biogenic methanol, 193 Tg for anthropogenic VOCs, and 93 Tg for biomass burning VOCs. The model also includes oceanic emissions of methanol, acetone and acetaldehyde (Müller et al., 2019), and accounts for both wet scavenging by cloud and rain droplets (Stavrakou et al., 2009a) and dry deposition (Müller et al., 2018a).
The MAGRITTE model is run for the year 2019 with a 6-month spin-up time. It accounts for diel variations in chemical compounds through correction factors on the chemical reaction rates, photolysis rates, convective fluxes, and boundary layer diffusion coefficients computed by a simulation using a time step of 20 min (Stavrakou et al., 2009b). The model is run with a time step of 24 h using daily averaged chemical and dynamical parameters adjusted for the diurnal cycle using the pre-calculated correction factors.
3.3 Inversion setup
The inversion system of MAGRITTE relies on the adjoint-based approach to optimize the gridded emissions of biogenic, anthropogenic, and pyrogenic sources, constrained by TROPOMI HCHO data over land. The setup has been described in detail in previous publications (e.g. Oomen et al., 2024; Müller et al., 2024; Opacka et al., 2025; Sfendla et al., 2026). Here we perform a global emission inversion, in which continental emissions are optimized per emission category (biogenic, anthropogenic, pyrogenic), per grid cell, per month, for a total of emission parameters. Grid cells with NMVOC emissions below 1010 throughout the year are not optimized. Additionally, we require at least 10 valid satellite observations per 2°×2.5° grid cell per month. Consequently, the total number of optimized emission parameters is reduced to approximately 76 000.
Model columns are computed by running MAGRITTE in forward mode for a given set of emission parameters f. The cost function J is calculated as
where H(f) are the model columns, y are the observed TROPOMI HCHO columns, and E and B are the error covariance matrices of the emissions and observations, respectively. As in other emission inversion studies, this formulation implicitly assumes that systematic model-observation discrepancies can be reduced by adjusting the optimized emissions. Consequently, errors in the chemical mechanism or other model parameterizations may propagate into the inferred top-down emissions. In the comparison of model columns to observations, the vertical sensitivity of the satellite is taken into account by applying averaging kernels to the model profiles. Additionally, the modeled monthly columns are based on daily values at the satellite overpass time (∼ 13:30 LT), while accounting for the number of observations for each day.
The cost function in Eq. (1) is minimized using a quasi-Newtonian algorithm, in which its gradient with respect to the emission parameters is calculated using the adjoint of the MAGRITTE model (Müller and Stavrakou, 2005). The convergence criterion is reached when the norm of the gradient of the cost function is reduced by a factor of 100 with respect to its initial value. This typically occurs after around 30 iterations.
4.1 Isoprene oxidation scheme
One of the limitations of adjoint-based inversions of isoprene emissions is the complex chemistry involved and its associated high computational cost. Here we simplify the chemical degradation of isoprene from 93 species and 243 reactions in the MAGRITTEv1.2 mechanism to a strongly reduced network. The structure we propose is shown in Table 2 and consists of six reactions. The first reaction, i.e. the oxidation of isoprene by OH (Reaction R1), produces a short-lived peroxy radical, ISOPO2, and its reaction rate (k1) is well constrained from experimental data (Burkholder et al., 2015). Next, we include three reactions that represent the three main channels through which the peroxy radical can react: ISOPO2+HO2 (Reaction R2), ISOPO2+NO (Reaction R3), and an isomerization Reaction (R4). The HO2-pathway and isomerization are important in low-NOx environments, whereas the NO-pathway prevails in high-NOx conditions.
Table 2Simplified reaction scheme for the chemical oxidation of isoprene. All parameters in Reactions (R2) to (R5) (i.e. α to ζ, as well as HOx recycling) and the reaction rate k5 are optimized using box model simulations. Reaction rates k1–k4 and k6 are taken from the MAGRITTEv1.2 mechanism as shown in Table 3.
In the full MAGRITTE mechanism, the reaction channels highlighted above produce a variety of intermediate oxidation products. Here, we lump all intermediate oxidation products (besides HCHO) into a unique intermediate oxidation compound (IOX). The yields of HCHO and IOX from the reactions of ISOPO2 are parameterized using the adjustable parameters α, β, γ, δ, ϵ, and ζ (see Table 2). Among these parameters, β and δ account for primary HCHO production, whereas the other parameters quantify the delayed HCHO production via IOX. The reaction rates k2 and k3 are taken from the recommendations of Wennberg et al. (2018). The rate of the isomerization (k4) is derived from the bulk 1,6 H-shift rates of the pool of isoprene peroxy radicals adopted in the MAGRITTEv1.2 mechanism (Müller et al., 2019), with a similar temperature dependence. The weighted average at 298 K and typical conditions for the Amazon (30 ppt NO and 20 ppt HO2) is 0.0089 s−1. Next is the oxidation of IOX by OH (Reaction R5), to form HCHO, representing the secondary, delayed HCHO production from isoprene. The reaction rate k5, together with the coefficients α to ζ, will be optimized based on comparisons with the full MAGRITTEv1.2 chemistry model.
The final reaction, Reaction (R6), is the ozonolysis of isoprene. This reaction is the dominant isoprene sink at night, whereas it is near-negligible during daytime. Since the ozonolysis reaction only weakly affects the cumulative HCHO production and daytime HOx concentrations, we do not optimize its coefficients and rate, but estimate these based on their products and rate in the MAGRITTEv1.2 chemistry.
For simplicity, SICMA does not include an explicit representation of monoterpene oxidation. Instead, the reference box model simulations include emission sources of both isoprene and monoterpenes, whereas only isoprene emissions are represented in the SICMA parameter optimization (see Sect. 4.2). The optimized SICMA parameters should therefore be interpreted as effective reaction yields that incorporate the contribution of monoterpene oxidation for a monoterpene-to-isoprene molar emission ratio of 10 %.
An important aspect in isoprene oxidation chemistry is its feedback on the oxidizing capacity of the atmosphere. Isoprene and monoterpene emissions have a strong impact on OH and HO2 concentrations. However, the reactions of OH and HO2 with the organic peroxy radicals generated in the mechanism are numerous, and also a significant amount of recycling takes place. In order to tackle this problem, we include a production of OH and HO2 in Reactions (R2)–(R5), with adjustable coefficients. For the ozonolysis Reaction (R6), the yields of OH and HO2 are derived from the MAGRITTEv1.2 mechanism.
4.2 Parameter optimization
In order to optimize the parameters of the chemistry network shown in Table 2, we use box model simulations with the kinetic pre-processor (KPP) package (version 3.0.2, Sandu et al., 2023). The list of reactions of MAGRITTEv1.2 chemistry is loaded into the KPP system, which runs the chemical evolution over time.
The setup of the box model simulations focuses on typical Amazon conditions in terms of solar radiation, temperature, and ozone concentrations, since the majority of global BVOC emissions is released by tropical ecosystems. As such, we adopt Master Chemical Mechanism (MCM) photolysis rates based on solar zenith angles in typical Amazonian conditions (i.e., 10° S, on the 15 July), and the temperature is fixed to 298 K. The initial volume mixing ratios for H2O, CO, and ozone are set to 1 %, 150 ppb, and 15 ppb, respectively. Other initial concentrations (2 % H2O, 30 ppb O3) have been tested, but do not significantly impact the parameter optimization outcome. To avoid HCHO production from methane, its concentration is set to zero. Since isoprene oxidation pathways are NOx-dependent, we perform box model simulations at three different initial NOx concentrations: 0.03, 0.3, and 3 ppb. At every 6 min time step, we require the total NOx () to remain constant. Finally, we introduce an isoprene emission source varying diurnally with a maximum at noon and zero emissions during the night (06:30 LT sunrise and 17:30 LT sunset). The amplitude of the emission source is set to 107 , which corresponds to a surface emission of 1012 averaged over a height of 1 km, representative of tropical isoprene source regions.
In box model simulations of the MAGRITTEv1.2 full chemistry, we include an emission flux for monoterpenes that is 10 times lower than that of isoprene, corresponding to the average monoterpene-to-isoprene molar emission ratio for Amazonia (Sindelarova et al., 2022). Given the similarly short atmospheric lifetimes of isoprene and monoterpenes, the simplified chemistry scheme will therefore represent the total yield of HCHO from combined isoprene and monoterpene emissions, for the typical case of a 10 % monoterpene-to-isoprene molar emission ratio. This representation is necessarily simplified and does not explicitly account for differences in emission patterns or chemical degradation pathways between isoprene and individual monoterpene species.
We first perform box model calculations with the MAGRITTEv1.2 chemistry. The simulation starts at 06:00 a.m. LT and runs for 108 h with a time step of 6 min. We track the total HCHO production from both isoprene and monoterpenes, illustrated in Fig. 2, for different NOx concentrations. The cumulative HCHO production (Fig. 2a) increases with increasing NOx. This is mainly due to higher HCHO yields from isoprene oxidation at high NOx (e.g. Marais et al., 2012), and to a lesser extent due to higher OH concentrations in the model, increasing VOC reactivity.
Figure 2Comparison of box model simulations of MAGRITTEv1.2 (blue) and SICMA (orange) chemistry for cumulative HCHO production (a), instantaneous HCHO production (b), concentration of HCHO (c), isoprene (d), OH (e), HO2 (f), NO (g) and O3 (h). Each panel shows runs with 0.03 ppb (solid line), 0.3 ppb (dashed line), and 3 ppb (dotted line) total NOx concentrations. Nighttime is defined as 17:30–06:30 LT and is denoted by the shaded area. Panels (a), (e), and (f) are used for optimizing the parameters as described in Sect. 4.2.
The optimization of the parameters of Table 2 is constrained by the MAGRITTEv1.2 chemistry run based on the HCHO production (Fig. 2a) and the concentrations of OH and HO2 (Fig. 2e and f). These parameters account for the chemical feedbacks between the organic and inorganic chemistry. Indeed, the OH concentration has a strong impact on the rates of Reactions (R1) and (R5), whereas the HO2 and NO concentrations determine the dominant reaction pathway of ISOPO2 in Reactions (R2) and (R3). The NO2 yield from the reaction of ISOPO2 with NO (Reaction R3) is set to 0.87, in order to account for organic nitrate formation (Müller et al., 2019). The precise value of this yield is unimportant in the box model runs with fixed NOx levels, but it will play an important role in the chemistry-transport model simulations. For OH and HO2, regeneration occurs in each reaction, hence this needs to be accounted for in Reactions (R2)–(R6). These yields are constrained in the optimization by the OH and HO2 concentrations of the full MAGRITTEv1.2 chemistry box-model simulations, and through their feedback on the HCHO chemistry (Fig. 2). Likewise, the IOX production impacts the OH budget.
We used a Nelder-Mead simplex optimization method (Gao and Han, 2012) from the SciPy library to determine the minimum of the total normalized least squares difference in the cumulative HCHO distributions, OH concentrations, and HO2 concentrations simulated by MAGRITTEv1.2 and SICMA (Fig. 2a, e, and f). The initial values of the organic reaction coefficients (α to ζ) were set to 1.0, while the rate coefficient of the IOX oxidation reaction (k5) was initialized to 10−11 s−1. The initial OH and HO2 stoichiometric yields were both set to 0.5. The convergence tolerances in the minimization algorithm are set to 0.01 in absolute values for the parameters.
Owing to the relatively large number of free parameters and correlations between several of them, the cost function exhibits a broad minimum rather than a sharply defined optimum. Convergence was typically reached after 1000–2000 simplex iterations. A 14 d box model simulation required on average 2831 ms using the full MAGRITTEv1.2 chemistry, compared with 489 ms using SICMA, corresponding to a reduction in computational cost of approximately 83 %. Several optimizations with different initial parameter values were performed to reduce sensitivity to local minima and to identify consistently well-performing parameter sets. The existence of multiple well-performing solutions indicates that several parameter combinations can reproduce the key characteristics of the full chemistry, namely HCHO production and HOx recycling. We present the optimized isoprene chemistry of SICMA in Table 3.
Table 3Same as Table 2, but with the optimized parameter values, including the HOx production stoichiometric coefficients. T in the rate expressions denotes the temperature in Kelvin.
Figure 2 shows the comparison of key compounds in the box model simulations. The cumulative HCHO productions of the two chemistry schemes are in excellent agreement, considering the low complexity of the SICMA scheme. The instantaneous HCHO production in Fig. 2b shows slight differences, with a higher HCHO production in SICMA around noontime and lower production during mornings and evenings. During the night, the absence of a formaldehyde sink highlights a small difference in nighttime HCHO production, which results in a slightly different HCHO diurnal profile shape as shown in Fig. 2c. However, the magnitude of HCHO concentrations is well reproduced.
The parameter optimization is also constrained by OH and HO2 concentrations. The simplified chemistry scheme performs well in reproducing the OH and HO2 concentrations. In the low-NOx regime, OH is recycled through the ISOPO2 + HO2 reaction. At high NOx, however, very little OH recycling takes place (besides HO2+NO) in the full MAGRITTEv1.2 chemistry, hence no OH recycling is needed from Reaction (R3) (Table 3). Instead, the high IOX yield (4.55) in the reaction with NO (Reaction R3) leads to more OH titration, which depletes OH and forms HCHO and HO2 via Reaction (R5). As a result, the simplified chemistry scheme succeeds well in reproducing the evolution of key species of isoprene oxidation like HCHO, OH, and HO2. Also during nighttime, HOx concentrations and HCHO production in SICMA closely follows MAGRITTEv1.2, mainly through generation of HOx radicals by the ozonolysis Reaction (R6). The NO concentration is also well reproduced, except for a small overestimation due to the lower number of organic peroxy radicals considered in SICMA compared to the full chemistry. The reduced organic peroxy radical abundance results in less efficient conversion of NO to NO2 through organic peroxy radical + NO reactions, which contributes to lower ozone production (Fig. 2h). The resulting lower ozone concentration further reduces NO removal through the O3 + NO reaction, thereby reinforcing the higher NO-to-NO2 ratio in SICMA.
The goal of the simplified chemistry is to reproduce HCHO columns generated using a comprehensive isoprene emission chemistry, in order to improve computational performance of chemistry transport modelling and data assimilation approaches. Here, we explore the use of SICMA (Table 3) within the chemistry transport model MAGRITTE. We replace the suite of reactions related to the oxidation of isoprene and monoterpenes by the six parameterized reactions, and evaluate its performance against full chemistry simulations for 2019. In simulations using SICMA, we remove monoterpene emissions since they are implicitly accounted for in the parameter optimization with a fixed 0.1 monoterpene-to-isoprene molar emission ratio, as described in Sect. 4. We note that this value is mainly representative for tropical regions, whereas higher ratios our found in boreal latitudes. Reactions related to other VOCs are identical in the two simulations. Similarly, the inorganic chemistry and photolysis rates are taken from the full chemistry.
In the MAGRITTEv1.2 full model run, roughly 25 % of emitted isoprene carbon is deposited via intermediate species. To simulate this sink in the SICMA run, we assign IOX the deposition characteristics of hydroxyacetone, a common VOC oxidation product of isoprene. More precisely, we adopt a Henry's law constant of , in at 298 K (Sander, 2015; Müller et al., 2018a). Using this approach, we find a similar IOX global deposition flux in the SICMA CTM simulation as compared to the deposition flux of the ensemble of intermediate oxidation species from isoprene of the reference chemistry simulation.
5.1 Diurnal cycles
We evaluate the diurnal cycles for HCHO, isoprene, OH, HO2, NO, and NO2 in Fig. 3. We have selected three prominent isoprene emitting regions depicted in Fig. 1: the Western Amazon rain forest, the Congo Basin, and South-East US. Western Amazonia is characterized by high isoprene emissions and columns paired with generally low NOx concentrations. The Congo Basin presents a similar environment (evergreen broadleaf rain forest) but with generally higher NOx levels and therefore higher OH and lower isoprene columns. Finally, the South-East US is characterized by a strong seasonality and by the presence of anthropogenic emissions leading to high NOx and OH concentrations.
Figure 3Monthly-averaged diurnal cycles of HCHO (a), isoprene (b), OH (c), HO2 (d), NO (e), and NO2 (f) mixing ratios. Each panel depicts hourly concentrations vertically-averaged from the surface up to 1 km altitude, for July 2019. Three regions are considered (see Fig. 1): Western Amazon (0–10° S, 60–75° W) in green, the Congo Basin (6° S–6° N, 15–25° E) in pink, and South-East US (30–36° N, 80–95° W) in purple. Solid and dotted lines denote results obtained using respectively the full MAGRITTE chemistry and the SICMA scheme. Values shown inset each panel correspond to the monthly-averaged relative difference of the daytime (09:00–15:00 LT) concentrations for the three regions, calculated as (in %).
For HCHO, there is good agreement in the magnitude of the concentration in the planetary boundary layer for the different regions, especially around noon time, but with on average slightly lower concentrations using SICMA. The largest difference occurs during the evening and night. In the morning, the OH increase leads to a new equilibrium between HCHO sources and sinks, and the two chemistry schemes produce similar HCHO concentrations within several percent. The HOx and NOx concentrations show similar patterns across the regions shown in Fig. 3, with OH and NO generally overestimated and HO2 and NO2 underestimated. The largest differences occur in low-NOx Amazonia, with overestimations of 15 % for OH and NO. This difference is caused by the larger number of organic peroxy radicals in the full mechanism, leading to a stronger conversion of NO to NO2. This enhances the conversion of HO2 to OH through the HO2+NO reaction and contributes to the higher OH-to-HO2 ratio in SICMA. Nevertheless, the overall performance of the SICMA chemistry is adequate to replicate the full MAGRITTE results, especially during the day, despite its simplicity.
5.2 Evaluation of the global model
Figure 4 shows a comparison of annually-averaged HCHO column distributions from global model simulations using either the full or simplified chemistry. The distributions agree very well in biogenic source regions, where the isoprene chemistry matters most, as well as in anthropogenically dominated and remote regions, where isoprene plays a negligible role. The magnitude of HCHO columns are in good agreement (<10 %) over continents. Over oceans, the HCHO columns of the simplified chemistry are up to 15 % too low due to the neglect of organic nitrate and peroxynitrate formation in the SICMA mechanism. In particular, peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN) is formed from the oxidation of many hydrocarbons including isoprene. PAN and other organic NOx reservoirs act as carriers of NOx away from the emission sources. The average westward outflow from trade winds leads to higher NOx levels over the ocean in the full chemistry run (see Fig. 5e and f). This in turn leads to higher OH concentrations over remote regions, and hence to larger background HCHO production from methane oxidation, which is reflected by a lower mean methane life time in the reference model (8.1 years) as compared to the SICMA simulation (8.4 years). However, the absolute difference in HCHO columns between the two models is small ( ).
Figure 4Simulated HCHO columns of forward MAGRITTE CTM runs using either the full MAGRITTEv1.2 isoprene chemistry (a) or the simplified SICMA scheme (b). The HCHO columns have been collocated with TROPOMI HCHO observations and averaging kernels have been accounted for in the comparisons between the model and the observations of Fig. 1. Panel (c) shows the relative difference between the top panels, in %.
Figure 5Differences (in %) between MAGRITTE and SICMA chemistry runs for HCHO (a), isoprene (b), OH (c), HO2 (d), NO (e), and NO2 (f). For HCHO and isoprene, the differences are shown for the total vertical column, at 13:30 LT, and TROPOMI averaging kernels have been applied for HCHO. For isoprene, pixels with columns below 3×1012 have been omitted for clarity. The other panels show differences for the averaged daytime (09:00–17:00 LT) concentrations below 1 km altitude.
To evaluate the differences between the two chemical schemes in the CTM, we show difference maps for key compounds in Fig. 5. Over continents, the differences in OH concentrations are relatively small, generally of the order of 10 % or less. The OH concentrations of the simplified chemistry are slightly higher than those of the full chemistry, the exception being the remote desert areas where the long-range transport of NOx reservoirs leads to higher NOx levels in the MAGRITTE simulation. However, an important difference arises in boreal forests, where the SICMA OH overestimation ranges between 10 % to 20 %. This difference can be explained by the fact that monoterpene chemistry is omitted in the SICMA mechanism. Over needleleaf boreal forests, characterized by high monoterpene emissions, the isoprene-to-monoterpene emission ratio is a factor of 3 to 10 lower than assumed in SICMA. The oxidation of monoterpenes represents a significant NOx sink due to organic nitrate formation (Müller et al., 2019), estimated at about 1.5 Tg N yr−1 globally in the MAGRITTE model run. A large fraction of the formed organic nitrate is lost through aerosol uptake or deposition, or transported away from source regions, resulting in reduced NOx and OH levels, in particular over eastern Siberia and boreal America. Moreover, the large monoterpene source in MAGRITTEv1.2 reacts directly with OH, further reducing its concentration. The general impact of using the SICMA mechanism in HCHO columns in the region is limited (Fig. 5a) due to competition between the lower formation of HCHO through monoterpene oxidation and the increased background source from methane due to higher concentrations of OH in SICMA. However, the higher OH concentrations also reduce the lifetime of isoprene, leading to lower isoprene columns using the SICMA chemistry in the boreal forests.
The ratio of isoprene-to-monoterpene also plays an important role in tropical regions, which are the main source of biogenic volatile organic compounds worldwide. A clear spatial correlation is found between the emission ratio of the MEGAN-MOHYCAN inventory (Fig. S1 in the Supplement), which is used as input for forward simulations, and the HCHO column discrepancy between MAGRITTE and SICMA displayed on Fig. 5a. In areas with high monoterpene emissions, the SICMA HCHO columns are generally underestimated, and vice versa. However, the differences are generally much lower than 10 % locally.
The differences in isoprene columns, illustrated in Fig. 5b, are mainly driven by differences in OH concentration, since reaction with OH is by far the main sink of isoprene (Wennberg et al., 2018). A higher OH concentration therefore increases the reactivity of isoprene and lowers the isoprene columns. The changes in isoprene columns and in OH concentrations (averaged below 1 km) are generally of opposite sign and display the same patterns, especially in high-emission areas (Fig. 5b and c). The correspondence is not perfect, because the isoprene column is mostly sensitive to OH levels close to the surface, such that the 1 km average might not always reflect the isoprene reactivity. In areas with low isoprene columns, like central US and the North China Plain, the impact of the SICMA mechanism is almost negligible on the 1 km OH average but might be significant near the surface, leading to large relative differences in the isoprene columns. However, the absolute difference between the two chemical schemes in these areas is small ( ).
The modeled HCHO columns using the two mechanisms exhibit very similar seasonality, as shown in Fig. 6. The monthly variability is mainly driven by the emissions and meteorology, which are identical for both simulations. The impact of isoprene chemistry on the temporal evolution is small. Both model results show also a good agreement in temporal variation with TROPOMI HCHO observations, consistent with previous comparisons of MAGRITTE columns with TROPOMI data (Sfendla et al., 2026). In the Congo basin, both models consistently underestimate the HCHO columns by about 20 %. In Amazonia, the magnitude of the columns is very well reproduced, except for a ∼10 % underestimation during the dry season in August and September. In South-East US, we observe a clear separation of summer and winter seasons, with an amplitude of about factor of five. In North China Plain and South-East Asia, the observed HCHO columns are higher during summer/dry season conditions compared to the model. Although this is arguably caused by uncertainties in the bias correction applied to the satellite HCHO product (Sect. 2), the high summertime HCHO columns are corroborated by ground-based validation campaigns, such as FTIR (Vigouroux et al., 2020), MAX-DOAS (De Smedt et al., 2021), and Pandora stations. During winter/wet season, the bias between model and satellite observations is much smaller.
Figure 6Monthly time series of HCHO columns for Western Amazon, South-East US, Congo Basin, North China Plain, and South-East Asia (from top to bottom) in the year 2019. The large regions are defined in Fig. 1. The lines correspond to TROPOMI HCHO columns (black), full chemistry HCHO model columns (blue), and simplified chemistry model HCHO columns (orange).
5.3 Evaluation of the emission inversion
In this section, we show the results of emission inversions constrained by TROPOMI data (Fig. 1) using either the full MAGRITTEv1.2 chemistry as reference or the simplified isoprene oxidation chemistry described in Table 3 in the MAGRITTE model. The emissions are constrained by the TROPOMI HCHO columns shown in Fig. 6. In areas where the modeled HCHO columns are higher than the observations, we can expect an emission increase, and vice versa. Consequently, the top-down emissions are sensitive to the observed HCHO columns.
In the majority of source regions, the a priori model columns are on average lower than the observed TROPOMI HCHO columns shown in Fig. 6. Both inversions consistently suggest a large increase of the a priori MEGAN-MOHYCAN isoprene emissions from 439 to 568 Tg (MAGRITTEv1.2) and 574 Tg (SICMA) on global scale (Fig. 7 and Table 4). The largest emission increases are inferred in Southern Africa, in agreement with previous inversion studies (e.g. Müller et al., 2024; Opacka et al., 2025). The inversion suggests increased isoprene emission fluxes in most source regions, except the Yucatan peninsula, Paraguay, Central African Republic and South Sudan, and northern Australia.
Figure 7Isoprene emissions from the MEGAN-MOHYCAN biogenic emission inventory (a), and derived from an emission inversion using the MAGRITTEv1.2 chemistry (b) and SICMA chemistry (c), averaged for the year 2019. Panels (d) and (e) show the emission enhancement maps, calculated as the ratio of panels (b) and (c) over panel (a), respectively. The isoprene emissions and emission enhancement ratios are depicted in logarithmic scales. The relative difference between the top-down MAGRITTEv1.2 (b) and SICMA (c) isoprene emissions is shown in Fig. 8.
Table 4Global annual emissions in Tg yr−1 of isoprene, biomass burning, and anthropogenic VOC emissions in the bottom-up inventory (a priori) and according to the optimizations using either MAGRITTEv1.2 or SICMA chemistry for 2019.
Although the inversion suggests a large increase of the fluxes (+30 % globally), the annual emission total is well within the typical range for isoprene emissions from both bottom-up and top-down inventories (300–600 Tg, Sindelarova et al., 2022). Bottom-up emissions suffer from large uncertainties, mainly due to the assumed emission factors for different plant functional types. Top-down emissions also have large uncertainties, e.g. due to the presence of other contributing VOCs and due to biases in the satellite products (e.g., Oomen et al., 2024). A global inversion using the MAGRITTE CTM framework constrained by bias-corrected TROPOMI HCHO columns resulted in a top-down isoprene emission flux of 490 Tg yr−1 for 2021 (Sfendla et al., 2026).
Figure 8 shows the relative difference in top-down emissions between the inversion using the MAGRITTEv1.2 and SICMA isoprene chemistry. The overall difference is small, although locally both over- and underestimations of isoprene emissions are found, reaching up to 15 %. The relative difference of the top-down isoprene emissions is similar but of opposite sign to the relative difference in the HCHO column simulated using bottom-up isoprene emissions (Fig. 5a). In regions where the SICMA chemistry produces lower HCHO columns, the isoprene emission change is stronger after inversion, and vice versa, compared to the MAGRITTEv1.2 chemistry. The regional differences in the top-down emissions are therefore the direct result of the differences in the modeled HCHO columns. As discussed in Sect. 5.2, these can largely be attributed to the assumption of constant monoterpene-to-isoprene molar emission ratio in SICMA, and the absence of organic nitrates leading to differences in the NOx and HOx concentrations.
These differences can also be seen in the isoprene emission time series shown in Fig. 9 for selected regions. In Western Amazon, HCHO columns from SICMA are slightly lower during wet season (November to May, Fig. 6). As a result, top-down isoprene emissions from SICMA are slightly higher during this period (by 4 %). In South-East US, a priori HCHO columns during summer (May to September) are lower than TROPOMI HCHO, which leads to an overall increase in isoprene emissions, and an excellent agreement between the results of the simplified and the full chemistry. In the Congo basin the emissions inferred from both inversions agree very well (Fig. 9c) across the seasons, and are enhanced compared to the a priori estimates. Similar conclusions are drawn for the North China Plain, a region dominated by anthropogenic VOC emissions (Fig. 6d). For South-East Asia, the high TROPOMI HCHO columns observed during the dry season (March to May, Fig. 6e) drive the strong increases of top-down isoprene emissions, which are a factor of two higher than the a priori. Biomass burning VOC emissions are also increased in this area (Fig. S2 in the Supplement). Overall, for all selected regions, the inferred isoprene emissions from the inversion using SICMA or the MAGRITTEv1.2 chemistry show a very close agreement, both in terms of magnitude and seasonal variability.
Figure 9Monthly isoprene emissions for Western Amazon, South-East US, Congo Basin, North China Plain, and South-East Asia (from top to bottom) in 2019. The regions are defined in Figs. 1 and 6. The lines correspond to a priori emissions from MEGAN-MOHYCAN (gray), and top-down isoprene emissions from the MAGRITTE (blue) and SICMA (orange) chemistry inversion runs.
Globally, the inversion leads to a large biogenic emission enhancement of 30 % for both inversions (Table 4). In spite of the small differences between the predictions of the two model simulations (Fig. 4) for HCHO and isoprene columns, the difference in top-down isoprene totals is negligible (1 %). There is also good agreement with respect to biomass burning VOC emissions, both regionally and globally. The anthropogenic VOC emissions inferred from the SICMA inversions are 7 % higher compared to the full chemistry results (Table 4). This can be attributed to the moderately lower a priori HCHO columns of the SICMA simulation in northern mid-latitudes, and in particular over Europe and eastern China (Fig. 4), where anthropogenic VOCs are an important HCHO source. Consequently, the derived anthropogenic VOCs in SICMA are higher to compensate for the lower biogenic contribution.
We developed SICMA, a highly reduced representation of isoprene oxidation for the MAGRITTE chemistry-transport model. The impact of monoterpenes is also crudely accounted for in the parameterization, by assuming a 10 % molar ratio relative to isoprene abundance. The mechanism condenses 93 organic species and 243 reactions into four organic species and six lumped reactions in which HCHO production and HOx recycling is parameterized. The computational cost of the compact SICMA isoprene chemistry is approximately 83 % lower than that of the full MAGRITTEv1.2 mechanism under identical box-model conditions. Box-model optimization across low-, intermediate-, and high-NOx conditions demonstrates that SICMA reproduces cumulative HCHO production and the evolution of OH and HO2 with good accuracy.
In global simulations for 2019, SICMA reproduces annual mean HCHO columns from the full chemistry within 5 % over most continental regions. Differences are largest over remote oceans, where reduced NOx reservoir formation lowers background HCHO production, and over regions where emissions differ strongly from the assumed 10 % monoterpene-to-isoprene molar ratio. Nevertheless, the seasonal cycle and regional patterns of HCHO columns are very similar between the two schemes and consistent with TROPOMI observations.
Adjoint-based inversions of isoprene emissions constrained by TROPOMI HCHO columns show low sensitivity to the chemical complexity of the mechanism. Both schemes increase global isoprene emissions from 439 Tg yr−1 (a priori) to approximately 570 Tg yr−1 in 2019, with regional differences generally below 15 %. SICMA thus retains the essential chemical behavior required for HCHO-based emission inversions while drastically reducing mechanism size. The scheme also shows promise for inversions constrained by satellite observations of isoprene. However, further improvements in the representation of OH would be desirable because OH is the dominant photochemical sink of isoprene and therefore strongly influences its atmospheric lifetime. More generally, the current version of SICMA is not intended for applications requiring accurate ozone chemistry, as the oversimplifications of the mechanism (e.g., omission of explicit organic nitrate and lack of peroxy radicals) lead to underestimated ozone concentrations. Nevertheless, SICMA provides an efficient alternative to detailed isoprene chemistry for ensemble simulations, sensitivity analyses, and data assimilation applications in global chemistry transport models.
The scope of SICMA could be further broadened by extending its chemical representation beyond the processes included in the present mechanism. In particular, an explicit representation of monoterpene oxidation would remove the need for the fixed monoterpene-to-isoprene emission ratio used during parameter optimization, while including organic nitrate formation could improve the representation of NOx and its coupling to HOx and ozone chemistry. These extensions could reduce the remaining discrepancies with respect to the reference chemistry, especially in regions where monoterpene and organic nitrate chemistry are important. Improved representation of OH and the resulting isoprene lifetime would also be desirable for applications directly constrained by satellite observations of isoprene, for which the isoprene concentration is more sensitive to OH than HCHO. The present mechanism, however, already reproduces the key chemical behavior required for HCHO-based isoprene emission inversions, while offering a substantial reduction in chemical complexity.
As part of this work, the KPP-based optimization framework used to derive SICMA is made publicly available (Oomen, 2026). This framework enables the systematic derivation of reduced chemical mechanisms by optimizing stoichiometric coefficients and reaction rates against a chosen reference scheme. For applications in other chemistry-transport models, users can recalibrate the simplified mechanism by constraining the optimization with box-model simulations from their own reference chemistry. This allows the construction of tailored simplified isoprene mechanisms that preserve key chemical features under different conditions and has been applied to IFS-COMPO chemistry (Williams et al., 2022) for the purpose of data assimilation of HCHO and isoprene emission inversion in the Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring System (CAMS).
The current version of the SICMA optimization software is available from https://gitlab.aeronomie.be/ae/d23/kpp-based-optimization-of-simplified-chemistry-models (last access: 14 September 2026). The exact version of the model used to produce the results in this paper (version 1.1.0) is archived on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21838936, Oomen, 2026). The ESA CCI L3 TROPOMI HCHO dataset is available at https://doi.org/10.18758/Y591KDA5 (De Smedt et al., 2025).
The supplement related to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-8959-2026-supplement.
GMO designed the optimization software, carried out the analysis, and wrote the manuscript. JFM and TS designed the MAGRITTE chemistry-transport model and its inversion scheme. IDS produced the TROPOMI HCHO dataset and wrote Sect. 2. VH, FK, AI, and JF provided valuable feedback and tested the simplified chemistry in CAMS. All authors read and commented on the manuscript.
The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
We thank the three anonymous referees and the editor for their valuable feedback regarding the chemical mechanism and this paper.
This research was performed as part of the CAMEO project funded by the European Union (grant agreement no. 101082125, 2023–2025) and as part of the PIRAMID project funded by the European Space Agency (contract no. 4000147434/24/I-LR). The CCI+P L3 HCHO dataset was funded by the European Space Agency (contract no. 4000138243/22/I-NB).
This paper was edited by Benjamin Gaubert and reviewed by three anonymous referees.
Andreae, M. O.: Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning – an updated assessment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8523–8546, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8523-2019, 2019. a
Archibald, A. T., Jenkin, M. E., and Shallcross, D. E.: An isoprene mechanism intercomparison, Atmos. Environ., 44, 5356–5364, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.09.016, 2010. a
Atkinson, R. and Arey, J.: Gas-phase tropospheric chemistry of biogenic volatile organic compounds: a review, Atmos. Environ., 37, 197–219, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00391-1, 2003. a
Bates, K. H. and Jacob, D. J.: A new model mechanism for atmospheric oxidation of isoprene: global effects on oxidants, nitrogen oxides, organic products, and secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 9613–9640, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9613-2019, 2019. a
Bauwens, M., Stavrakou, T., Müller, J.-F., De Smedt, I., Van Roozendael, M., van der Werf, G. R., Wiedinmyer, C., Kaiser, J. W., Sindelarova, K., and Guenther, A.: Nine years of global hydrocarbon emissions based on source inversion of OMI formaldehyde observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10133–10158, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10133-2016, 2016. a
Burkholder, J. B., Sander, S. P., Abbatt, J. P. D., Barker, J. R., Huie, R. E., Kolb, C. E., Kurylo, M. J., Orkin, V. L., Wilmouth, D. M., and Wine, P. H.: Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Atmospheric Studies, Evaluation number 18, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, USA, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20160006735 (last access: 14 September 2026), 2015. a
Claeys, M., Graham, B., Vas, G., Wang, W., Vermeylen, R., Pashynska, V., Cafmeyer, J., Guyon, P., Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., and Maenhaut, W.: Formation of Secondary Organic Aerosols Through Photooxidation of Isoprene, Science, 303, 1173–1176, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1092805, 2004. a
Compernolle, S., Lambert, J.-C., Verhoelst, T., Langerock, B., Pinardi, G., Sha, M. K., Krause, K., Richter, A., and Vigouroux, C.: Product Validation and Intercomparison Report, Tech. Rep. Precursors_cci+_D4.1_PVIR_02_00, ESA Climate Change Initiative (CCI+) Precursors Project, https://climate.esa.int/en/projects/precursors-for-aerosols-and-ozone/ (last access: 14 September 2026), 2025. a
Darmenov, A. and da Silva, A.: The Quick Fire Emissions Dataset (QFED) – Documentation of Versions 2.1, 2.2 and 2.4, NASA Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, NASA/TM-2015-104606, 38, 183 pp., https://gmao.gsfc.nasa.gov/pubs/docs/Darmenov796.pdf (last access: 14 September 2026), 2015. a
De Smedt, I., Pinardi, G., Vigouroux, C., Compernolle, S., Bais, A., Benavent, N., Boersma, F., Chan, K.-L., Donner, S., Eichmann, K.-U., Hedelt, P., Hendrick, F., Irie, H., Kumar, V., Lambert, J.-C., Langerock, B., Lerot, C., Liu, C., Loyola, D., Piters, A., Richter, A., Rivera Cárdenas, C., Romahn, F., Ryan, R. G., Sinha, V., Theys, N., Vlietinck, J., Wagner, T., Wang, T., Yu, H., and Van Roozendael, M.: Comparative assessment of TROPOMI and OMI formaldehyde observations and validation against MAX-DOAS network column measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12561–12593, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12561-2021, 2021. a
De Smedt, I., Vlietinck, J., Yu, H., Theys, N., Danckaert, T., and Van Roozendael, M.: CCI+P HCHO tropospheric column L3 data from TROPOMI, v2, Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy [data set], https://doi.org/10.18758/Y591KDA5, 2025. a, b
Gao, F. and Han, L.: Implementing the Nelder-Mead simplex algorithm with adaptive parameters, Comput. Optim. Appl., 51, 259–277, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-010-9329-3, 2012. a
Guenther, A. B., Jiang, X., Heald, C. L., Sakulyanontvittaya, T., Duhl, T., Emmons, L. K., and Wang, X.: The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1471–1492, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012, 2012. a
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803, 2020. a
Inness, A., Ades, M., Agustí-Panareda, A., Barré, J., Benedictow, A., Blechschmidt, A.-M., Dominguez, J. J., Engelen, R., Eskes, H., Flemming, J., Huijnen, V., Jones, L., Kipling, Z., Massart, S., Parrington, M., Peuch, V.-H., Razinger, M., Remy, S., Schulz, M., and Suttie, M.: The CAMS reanalysis of atmospheric composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3515–3556, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3515-2019, 2019. a, b
Jenkin, M. E., Young, J. C., and Rickard, A. R.: The MCM v3.3.1 degradation scheme for isoprene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11433–11459, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11433-2015, 2015. a, b
Jenkin, M. E., Khan, M. A. H., Shallcross, D. E., Bergström, R., Simpson, D., Murphy, K. L. C., and Rickard, A. R.: The CRI v2.2 reduced degradation scheme for isoprene, Atmos. Environ., 212, 172–182, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.05.055, 2019. a, b
Kaiser, J., Jacob, D. J., Zhu, L., Travis, K. R., Fisher, J. A., González Abad, G., Zhang, L., Zhang, X., Fried, A., Crounse, J. D., St. Clair, J. M., and Wisthaler, A.: High-resolution inversion of OMI formaldehyde columns to quantify isoprene emission on ecosystem-relevant scales: application to the southeast US, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5483–5497, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5483-2018, 2018. a
Li, H., Ciais, P., Kumar, P., Hauglustaine, D. A., Chevallier, F., Broquet, G., Millet, D. B., Wells, K. C., Lian, J., and Zheng, B.: Global biogenic isoprene emissions 2013–2020 inferred from satellite isoprene observations, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 7035–7054, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-7035-2025, 2025. a
Li, H., Ciais, P., Kumar, P., Broquet, G., Chevallier, F., Hauglustaine, D. A., Millet, D. B., Wells, K. C., Lian, J., Bourtsoukidis, E., Zhang, K., and Zheng, B.: Contrasting Biogenic Isoprene Emission Responses to La Niña and El Niño Driven by Temperature: Insights from HCHO-Based Global Inversion, Environ. Sci. Technol., 60, 3403–3415, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c12927, 2026. a
Marais, E. A., Jacob, D. J., Kurosu, T. P., Chance, K., Murphy, J. G., Reeves, C., Mills, G., Casadio, S., Millet, D. B., Barkley, M. P., Paulot, F., and Mao, J.: Isoprene emissions in Africa inferred from OMI observations of formaldehyde columns, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6219–6235, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6219-2012, 2012. a
Millet, D. B., Jacob, D. J., Boersma, K. F., Fu, T.-M., Kurosu, T. P., Chance, K., Heald, C. L., and Guenther, A.: Spatial distribution of isoprene emissions from North America derived from formaldehyde column measurements by the OMI satellite sensor, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D02307, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008950, 2008. a
Müller, J.-F. and Stavrakou, T.: Inversion of CO and NOx emissions using the adjoint of the IMAGES model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1157–1186, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1157-2005, 2005. a
Müller, J.-F., Stavrakou, T., Bauwens, M., Compernolle, S., and Peeters, J.: Chemistry and deposition in the Model of Atmospheric composition at Global and Regional scales using Inversion Techniques for Trace gas Emissions (MAGRITTE v1.0). Part B. Dry deposition, Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2018-317, 2018a. a, b
Müller, J.-F., Stavrakou, T., Bauwens, M., George, M., Hurtmans, D., Coheur, P. F., Clerbaux, C., and Sweeney, C.: Top-Down CO Emissions Based On IASI Observations and Hemispheric Constraints on OH Levels, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 1621–1629, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076697, 2018b. a
Müller, J.-F., Stavrakou, T., and Peeters, J.: Chemistry and deposition in the Model of Atmospheric composition at Global and Regional scales using Inversion Techniques for Trace gas Emissions (MAGRITTE v1.1) – Part 1: Chemical mechanism, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2307–2356, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2307-2019, 2019. a, b, c, d, e, f, g
Müller, J.-F., Stavrakou, T., Oomen, G.-M., Opacka, B., De Smedt, I., Guenther, A., Vigouroux, C., Langerock, B., Aquino, C. A. B., Grutter, M., Hannigan, J., Hase, F., Kivi, R., Lutsch, E., Mahieu, E., Makarova, M., Metzger, J.-M., Morino, I., Murata, I., Nagahama, T., Notholt, J., Ortega, I., Palm, M., Röhling, A., Stremme, W., Strong, K., Sussmann, R., Té, Y., and Fried, A.: Bias correction of OMI HCHO columns based on FTIR and aircraft measurements and impact on top-down emission estimates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 2207–2237, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2207-2024, 2024. a, b, c
Novelli, A., Vereecken, L., Bohn, B., Dorn, H.-P., Gkatzelis, G. I., Hofzumahaus, A., Holland, F., Reimer, D., Rohrer, F., Rosanka, S., Taraborrelli, D., Tillmann, R., Wegener, R., Yu, Z., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Wahner, A., and Fuchs, H.: Importance of isomerization reactions for OH radical regeneration from the photo-oxidation of isoprene investigated in the atmospheric simulation chamber SAPHIR, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3333–3355, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3333-2020, 2020. a
Oomen, G.-M.: SICMA v1.1.0 software, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21838936, 2026. a, b
Oomen, G.-M., Müller, J.-F., Stavrakou, T., De Smedt, I., Blumenstock, T., Kivi, R., Makarova, M., Palm, M., Röhling, A., Té, Y., Vigouroux, C., Friedrich, M. M., Frieß, U., Hendrick, F., Merlaud, A., Piters, A., Richter, A., Van Roozendael, M., and Wagner, T.: Weekly derived top-down volatile-organic-compound fluxes over Europe from TROPOMI HCHO data from 2018 to 2021, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 449–474, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-449-2024, 2024. a, b, c, d
Opacka, B., Stavrakou, T., Müller, J.-F., De Smedt, I., van Geffen, J., Marais, E. A., Horner, R. P., Millet, D. B., Wells, K. C., and Guenther, A. B.: Natural emissions of VOC and NOx over Africa constrained by TROPOMI HCHO and NO2 data using the MAGRITTEv1.1 model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 2863–2894, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2863-2025, 2025. a, b
Palmer, P. I., Abbot, D. S., Fu, T.-M., Jacob, D. J., Chance, K., Kurosu, T. P., Guenther, A., Wiedinmyer, C., Stanton, J. C., Pilling, M. J., Pressley, S. N., Lamb, B., and Sumner, A. L.: Quantifying the seasonal and interannual variability of North American isoprene emissions using satellite observations of the formaldehyde column, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D12315, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006689, 2006. a
Peeters, J., Nguyen, T. L., and Vereecken, L.: HOx radical regeneration in the oxidation of isoprene, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 11, 5935, https://doi.org/10.1039/b908511d, 2009. a
Peeters, J., Müller, J.-F., Stavrakou, T., and Nguyen, V. S.: Hydroxyl Radical Recycling in Isoprene Oxidation Driven by Hydrogen Bonding and Hydrogen Tunneling: The Upgraded LIM1 Mechanism, J. Phys. Chem. A, 118, 8625–8643, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5033146, 2014. a
Sander, R.: Compilation of Henry's law constants (version 4.0) for water as solvent, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 4399–4981, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4399-2015, 2015. a
Sandu, A., Sander, R., Long, M. S., Yantosca, R. M., Lin, H., Shen, L., and Jacob, D. J.: KineticPreProcessor/KPP: The Kinetic PreProcessor (KPP) 3.0.2, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8030063, 2023. a
Sfendla, Y., Stavrakou, T., Müller, J.-F., Oomen, G.-M., Opacka, B., Danckaert, T., De Smedt, I., and Lerot, C.: Global VOC emissions quantified from inversion of TROPOMI spaceborne formaldehyde and glyoxal data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 733–767, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-733-2026, 2026. a, b, c
Sindelarova, K., Markova, J., Simpson, D., Huszar, P., Karlicky, J., Darras, S., and Granier, C.: High-resolution biogenic global emission inventory for the time period 2000–2019 for air quality modelling, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 251–270, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-251-2022, 2022. a, b
Soulie, A., Granier, C., Darras, S., Zilbermann, N., Doumbia, T., Guevara, M., Jalkanen, J.-P., Keita, S., Liousse, C., Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Hoesly, R., and Smith, S. J.: Global anthropogenic emissions (CAMS-GLOB-ANT) for the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service simulations of air quality forecasts and reanalyses, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 2261–2279, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2261-2024, 2024. a
Stavrakou, T., Müller, J.-F., De Smedt, I., Van Roozendael, M., Kanakidou, M., Vrekoussis, M., Wittrock, F., Richter, A., and Burrows, J. P.: The continental source of glyoxal estimated by the synergistic use of spaceborne measurements and inverse modelling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8431–8446, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8431-2009, 2009a. a
Stavrakou, T., Müller, J.-F., De Smedt, I., Van Roozendael, M., van der Werf, G. R., Giglio, L., and Guenther, A.: Global emissions of non-methane hydrocarbons deduced from SCIAMACHY formaldehyde columns through 2003–2006, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3663–3679, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3663-2009, 2009b. a, b
Stavrakou, T., Müller, J.-F., Bauwens, M., De Smedt, I., Van Roozendael, M., De Mazière, M., Vigouroux, C., Hendrick, F., George, M., Clerbaux, C., Coheur, P.-F., and Guenther, A.: How consistent are top-down hydrocarbon emissions based on formaldehyde observations from GOME-2 and OMI?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11861–11884, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11861-2015, 2015. a
Stavrakou, T., Müller, J. F., Bauwens, M., De Smedt, I., Van Roozendael, M., and Guenther, A.: Impact of Short-Term Climate Variability on Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions Assessed Using OMI Satellite Formaldehyde Observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 8681–8689, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078676, 2018. a, b
Sun, S., Palmer, P. I., Siddans, R., Kerridge, B. J., Ventress, L., Edtbauer, A., Ringsdorf, A., Pfannerstill, E. Y., and Williams, J.: Seasonal isoprene emission estimates over tropical South America inferred from satellite observations of isoprene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 15801–15818, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-15801-2025, 2025. a
Tilstra, L. G., de Graaf, M., Trees, V. J. H., Litvinov, P., Dubovik, O., and Stammes, P.: A directional surface reflectance climatology determined from TROPOMI observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2235–2256, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2235-2024, 2024. a
Van Roozendael, M., Boersma, F., Seo, S., Valks, P., De Smedt, I., Theys, N., Hedelt, P., Danckaert, T., Clarisse, L., Van Damme, M., Clerbaux, C., and George, M.: Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document, Tech. Rep. Precursors_cci+_D2.1_ATBD_02_04, ESA Climate Change Initiative (CCI+) Precursors Project, https://climate.esa.int/en/projects/precursors-for-aerosols-and-ozone/ (last access: 14 September 2026), 2026. a
Vigouroux, C., Langerock, B., Bauer Aquino, C. A., Blumenstock, T., Cheng, Z., De Mazière, M., De Smedt, I., Grutter, M., Hannigan, J. W., Jones, N., Kivi, R., Loyola, D., Lutsch, E., Mahieu, E., Makarova, M., Metzger, J.-M., Morino, I., Murata, I., Nagahama, T., Notholt, J., Ortega, I., Palm, M., Pinardi, G., Röhling, A., Smale, D., Stremme, W., Strong, K., Sussmann, R., Té, Y., van Roozendael, M., Wang, P., and Winkler, H.: TROPOMI–Sentinel-5 Precursor formaldehyde validation using an extensive network of ground-based Fourier-transform infrared stations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3751–3767, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3751-2020, 2020. a
Wells, K. C., Millet, D. B., Payne, V. H., Deventer, M. J., Bates, K. H., de Gouw, J. A., Graus, M., Warneke, C., Wisthaler, A., and Fuentes, J. D.: Satellite isoprene retrievals constrain emissions and atmospheric oxidation, Nature, 585, 225–233, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2664-3, 2020. a
Wennberg, P. O., Bates, K. H., Crounse, J. D., Dodson, L. G., McVay, R. C., Mertens, L. A., Nguyen, T. B., Praske, E., Schwantes, R. H., Smarte, M. D., St Clair, J. M., Teng, A. P., Zhang, X., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Gas-Phase Reactions of Isoprene and Its Major Oxidation Products, Chem. Rev., 118, 3337–3390, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00439, 2018. a, b, c, d, e, f, g
Williams, J. E., Huijnen, V., Bouarar, I., Meziane, M., Schreurs, T., Pelletier, S., Marécal, V., Josse, B., and Flemming, J.: Regional evaluation of the performance of the global CAMS chemical modeling system over the United States (IFS cycle 47r1), Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4657–4687, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4657-2022, 2022. a, b
Wiser, F., Place, B. K., Sen, S., Pye, H. O. T., Yang, B., Westervelt, D. M., Henze, D. K., Fiore, A. M., and McNeill, V. F.: AMORE-Isoprene v1.0: a new reduced mechanism for gas-phase isoprene oxidation, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1801–1821, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1801-2023, 2023. a, b
- Abstract
- Introduction
- TROPOMI HCHO data
- MAGRITTEv1.2 chemistry transport model
- Simplified chemistry model: SICMA
- Evaluation of SICMA in the MAGRITTE CTM
- Conclusions and outlook
- Code and data availability
- Author contributions
- Competing interests
- Disclaimer
- Acknowledgements
- Financial support
- Review statement
- References
- Supplement
- Abstract
- Introduction
- TROPOMI HCHO data
- MAGRITTEv1.2 chemistry transport model
- Simplified chemistry model: SICMA
- Evaluation of SICMA in the MAGRITTE CTM
- Conclusions and outlook
- Code and data availability
- Author contributions
- Competing interests
- Disclaimer
- Acknowledgements
- Financial support
- Review statement
- References
- Supplement