Bonnaire, T., Urfin, R., Biroli, G., and Mézard, M.: Why Diffusion Models Don't Memorize: The Role of Implicit Dynamical Regularization in Training, arXiv [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.17638, 2025.
a
Calcagno, P., Chilès, J.-P., Courrioux, G., and Guillen, A.: Geological modelling from field data and geological knowledge: Part I. Modelling method coupling 3D potential-field interpolation and geological rules, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 171, 147–157,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2008.06.013, 2008.
a,
b
Caumon, G., Collon-Drouaillet, P., Le Carlier de Veslud, C., Viseur, S., and Sausse, J.: Surface-based 3D modeling of geological structures, Math. Geosci., 41, 927–945,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-009-9244-2, 2009.
a
Caumon, G., Gray, G., Antoine, C., and Titeux, M.-O.: Three-dimensional implicit stratigraphic model building from remote sensing data on tetrahedral meshes: theory and application to a regional model of La Popa Basin, NE Mexico, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 51, 1613–1621,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2207727, 2013.
a,
b,
c
Chapelle, O., Scholkopf, B., and Zien, A.: Semi-supervised learning (Chapelle, O. et al., Eds.; 2006) [book reviews], IEEE T. Neural Networ., 20, 542–542,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2009.2015974, 2009.
a
Chilès, J., Aug, C., Guillen, A., and Lees, T.: Modelling the geometry of geological units and its uncertainty in 3D from structural data: the potential-field method, in: Orebody Modelling and Strategic Mine Planning – Uncertainty and Risk Management Models, edited by: Dimitrakopoulos, R., 2nd edn., Spectrum Series, vol. 14, The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne, Australia,
https://hal.science/hal-00796180 (last access: 12 August 2026), 2007. a
Choi, J., Kim, S., Jeong, Y., Gwon, Y., and Yoon, S.: ILVR: Conditioning Method for Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models, 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Montreal, QC, Canada, 2021, 14347–14356,
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.01410, 2021.
a
Cowan, E. J., Beatson, R. K., Fright, W. R., McLennan, T. J., and Mitchell, T. J.: Rapid geological modelling, in: Applied Structural Geology for Mineral Exploration and Mining, International Symposium, Kalgoorlie, Australia, 23–25 September 2002, Australian Institute of Geoscientists,
https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:160034199 (last access: 12 August 2026), 2002.
a,
b
Dao, Q., Phung, H., Nguyen, B., and Tran, A.: Flow matching in latent space, arXiv [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.08698, 2023.
a
de la Varga, M., Schaaf, A., and Wellmann, F.: GemPy 1.0: open-source stochastic geological modeling and inversion, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1–32,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1-2019, 2019.
a,
b
Fan, W., Azevedo, L., Liu, G., Chen, Q., Wu, X., and Li, Y.: Automatic reconstruction of 3D geological models based on Recurrent Neural Network and predictive learning, Comput. Geosci., 105996,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2025.105996, 2025.
a
Frank, T.: Advanced visualization and modeling of tetrahedral meshes, Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn, ISBN 978-3-88579-411-0, 2007. a
Garayt, C., Desassis, N., Blusseau, S., Gibert, P.-M., Langanay, J., and Romary, T.: Two-dimensional stochastic structural geomodeling with deep generative adversarial networks, Math. Geosci., 57, 1095–1114,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-025-10188-3, 2025.
a
Gat, I., Remez, T., Shaul, N., Kreuk, F., Chen, R. T., Synnaeve, G., Adi, Y., and Lipman, Y.: Discrete flow matching, Adv. Neur. In., 37, 133345–133385,
https://doi.org/10.52202/079017-4239, 2024.
a
Gillberg, T., Bruaset, A. M., Hjelle, Ø., and Sourouri, M.: Parallel solutions of static Hamilton-Jacobi equations for simulations of geological folds, Journal of Mathematics in Industry, 4, 10,
https://doi.org/10.1186/2190-5983-4-10, 2014.
a
Giraud, J., Lindsay, M., Jessell, M., and Ogarko, V.: Towards plausible lithological classification from geophysical inversion: honouring geological principles in subsurface imaging, Solid Earth, 11, 419–436,
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-419-2020, 2020.
a
Giraud, J., Caumon, G., Grose, L., Ogarko, V., and Cupillard, P.: Integration of automatic implicit geological modelling in deterministic geophysical inversion, Solid Earth, 15, 63–89,
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-63-2024, 2024.
a
Grose, L., Ailleres, L., Laurent, G., and Jessell, M.: LoopStructural 1.0: time-aware geological modelling, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3915–3937,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3915-2021, 2021.
a
Guo, J., Wu, L., Zhou, W., Li, C., and Li, F.: Section-constrained local geological interface dynamic updating method based on the HRBF surface, J. Struct. Geol., 107, 64–72,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2017.11.017, 2018.
a,
b
Guo, Z., Wu, X., Liang, L., Sheng, H., Chen, N., and Bi, Z.: Cross-domain foundation model adaptation: Pioneering computer vision models for geophysical data analysis, Journal of Geophysical Research: Machine Learning and Computation, 2, e2025JH000601,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JH000601, 2025.
a
Guo, Z., Wu, X., Dou, Y., Gao, H., and Caumon, G.: Code from “Latent-Compression-Free Generative Diffusion with Geological Priors and Geophysical Regularization for Implicit Structural Modeling”, Zenodo [code],
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20508635, 2026.
a
Heo, B., Park, S., Han, D., and Yun, S.: Rotary position embedding for vision transformer, in: European Conference on Computer Vision, Springer, 289–305,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72684-2_17, 2024.
a,
b
Hillier, M., Wellmann, F., Brodaric, B., de Kemp, E., and Schetselaar, E.: Three-dimensional structural geological modeling using graph neural networks, Math. Geosci., 53, 1725–1749,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-021-09945-x, 2021.
a
Hillier, M., Wellmann, F., de Kemp, E. A., Brodaric, B., Schetselaar, E., and Bédard, K.: GeoINR 1.0: an implicit neural network approach to three-dimensional geological modelling, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6987–7012,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6987-2023, 2023.
a
Houlding, S.: 3D Geoscience Modeling: Computer Techniques for Geological Characterization, 3D Geoscience Modeling: Computer Techniques for Geological Characterization, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 9783540580157,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79012-6, 1994.
a
Irakarama, M., Thierry-Coudon, M., Zakari, M., and Caumon, G.: Finite element implicit 3D subsurface structural modeling, Comput. Aided Design, 149, 103267,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2022.103267, 2022.
a
Kamath, A. V., Thiele, S. T., Moulard, M., Grose, L., Tolosana-Delgado, R., Hillier, M. J., Wellmann, F., and Gloaguen, R.: Curlew 1.0: Spatio-temporal implicit geological modelling with neural fields in python, Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 3455–3475,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-3455-2026, 2026.
a
Karras, T., Aittala, M., Aila, T., and Laine, S.: Elucidating the design space of diffusion-based generative models, Adv. Neur. In., 35, 26565–26577,
https://doi.org/10.52202/068431-1926, 2022.
a
Lajaunie, C., Courrioux, G., and Manuel, L.: Foliation fields and 3D cartography in geology: principles of a method based on potential interpolation, Math. Geol., 29, 571–584,
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02775087, 1997.
a
Lee, D., Ovanger, O., Eidsvik, J., Aune, E., Skauvold, J., and Hauge, R.: Latent diffusion model for conditional reservoir facies generation, Comput. Geosci., 194, 105750,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2024.105750, 2025.
a
Lin, L., Li, C., Wei, H., Zhong, Z., Wang, X., Li, Q., and Gorman, A.: An improved parametric 3D geologic modeling framework for seismic structure identification using deep learning in complex geologic settings, Geophysics, 90, IM81–IM102,
https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2024-0532.1, 2025.
a
Lipman, Y., Chen, R. T., Ben-Hamu, H., Nickel, M., and Le, M.: Flow matching for generative modeling, arXiv [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.02747, 2022.
a,
b
Liu, S., Qin, C., Yin, H., Yan, Q., Duan, Z.-P., Li, C., Lyu, J., Guo, C.-L., and Li, C.: Improving Reconstruction of Representation Autoencoder, arXiv [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.08620, 2026.
a
Ma, N., Goldstein, M., Albergo, M. S., Boffi, N. M., Vanden-Eijnden, E., and Xie, S.: Sit: Exploring flow and diffusion-based generative models with scalable interpolant transformers, in: European Conference on Computer Vision, Springer, 23–40,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72980-5_2, 2024.
a,
b
MacCormack, K. E., Rokosh, D., and Branscombe, P.: Chapter 5: The Alberta Geological Survey 3D Geological Modelling Program, Alberta Energy Regulator/Alberta Geological Survey,
https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:208368942 (last access: 12 August 2026), 2019. a
Maxelon, M., Renard, P., Courrioux, G., Brändli, M., and Mancktelow, N.: A workflow to facilitate three-dimensional geometrical modelling of complex poly-deformed geological units, Comput. Geosci., 35, 644–658,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2008.06.005, 2009.
a
Nichol, A. Q. and Dhariwal, P.: Improved denoising diffusion probabilistic models, in: International conference on machine learning, 8162–8171, PMLR, arXiv [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2102.09672, 2021.
a
Osher, S.: A level set formulation for the solution of the Dirichlet problem for Hamilton–Jacobi equations, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 24, 1145–1152,
https://doi.org/10.1137/0524066, 1993.
a
Pizzella, L., Alais, R., Lopez, S., Freulon, X., and Rivoirard, J.: Taking better advantage of fold axis data to characterize anisotropy of complex folded structures in the implicit modeling framework, Math. Geosci., 54, 95–130,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-021-09950-0, 2022.
a,
b
Ren, A., Wu, L., Xu, J., Xing, Y., Qiu, Q., and Xie, Z.: A deep learning method for 3D geological modeling using ET4DD with offset-attention mechanism, Comput. Geosci., 200, 105929,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2025.105929, 2025.
a
Renaudeau, J., Malvesin, E., Maerten, F., and Caumon, G.: Implicit structural modeling by minimization of the bending energy with moving least squares functions, Math. Geosci., 51, 693–724,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-019-09789-6, 2019.
a,
b
Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., and Ommer, B.: High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 10684–10695,
https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01042, 2022.
a,
b
Shah, K., Kalavasis, A., Klivans, A. R., and Daras, G.: Does generation require memorization? Creative diffusion models using ambient diffusion, arXiv [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.21278, 2025.
a
Sheng, H., Wu, X., Si, X., Li, J., Zhang, S., and Duan, X.: Seismic foundation model: A next generation deep-learning model in geophysics, Geophysics, 90, IM59–IM79,
https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2024-0262.1, 2025.
a
Sohl-Dickstein, J., Weiss, E., Maheswaranathan, N., and Ganguli, S.: Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics, in: International conference on machine learning, ICML'15, arXiv [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1503.03585, 2015.
a
Song, B., Kwon, S. M., Zhang, Z., Hu, X., Qu, Q., and Shen, L.: Solving inverse problems with latent diffusion models via hard data consistency, arXiv [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.08123, 2023.
a
Su, J., Ahmed, M., Lu, Y., Pan, S., Bo, W., and Liu, Y.: Roformer: Enhanced transformer with rotary position embedding, Neurocomputing, 568, 127063,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2023.127063, 2024.
a
van de Geijn, C., Lüddecke, T., Turishcheva, P., and Ecker, A. S.: A Circular Argument: Does RoPE need to be Equivariant for Vision?, arXiv [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.08368, 2025.
a
Vollgger, S. A., Cruden, A. R., Ailleres, L., and Cowan, E. J.: Regional dome evolution and its control on ore-grade distribution: Insights from 3D implicit modelling of the Navachab gold deposit, Namibia, Ore Geol. Rev., 69, 268–284,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2015.02.020, 2015.
a
Wang, S., Cai, Z., Si, X., and Cui, Y.: A three-dimensional geological structure modeling framework and its application in machine learning, Math. Geosci., 55, 163–200,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-022-10027-9, 2023.
a
Wellmann, F. and Caumon, G.: 3-D Structural geological models: Concepts, methods, and uncertainties, in: Advances in geophysics, Elsevier, vol. 59, 1–121,
https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agph.2018.09.001, 2018.
a,
b
Wu, X., Geng, Z., Shi, Y., Pham, N., Fomel, S., and Caumon, G.: Building realistic structure models to train convolutional neural networks for seismic structural interpretation, Geophysics, 85, WA27–WA39,
https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2019-0375.1, 2020.
a
Wu, X., Ma, J., Si, X., Bi, Z., Yang, J., Gao, H., Xie, D., Guo, Z., and Zhang, J.: Sensing prior constraints in deep neural networks for solving exploration geophysical problems, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 120, e2219573120,
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2219573120, 2023.
a,
b
Yang, L., Hyde, D., Grujic, O., Scheidt, C., and Caers, J.: Assessing and visualizing uncertainty of 3D geological surfaces using level sets with stochastic motion, Comput. Geosci., 122, 54–67,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2018.10.006, 2019.
a
Zhang, B., Xu, Z., Wei, X., Song, L., Shah, S. Y. A., Khan, U., Du, L., and Li, X.: Deep subsurface pseudo-lithostratigraphic modeling based on three-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D CNN) using inversed geophysical properties and shallow subsurface geological model, Lithosphere, 2024, lithosphere_2023_273,
https://doi.org/10.2113/2024/lithosphere_2023_273, 2024.
a
Zheglova, P., Lelièvre, P. G., and Farquharson, C. G.: Multiple level-set joint inversion of traveltime and gravity data with application to ore delineation: A synthetic study, Geophysics, 83, R13–R30,
https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2016-0675.1, 2018.
a
Zhong, D.-Y., Wang, L.-G., Bi, L., and Jia, M.-T.: Implicit modeling of complex orebody with constraints of geological rules, T. Nonferr. Metal. Soc., 29, 2392–2399,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(19)65145-9, 2019.
a,
b
Zhou, Z., Chen, D., Wang, C., Chen, C., and Lyu, S.: Simple and fast distillation of diffusion models, Adv. Neur. In., 37, 40831–40860,
https://doi.org/10.52202/079017-1291, 2024.
a
