Articles | Volume 19, issue 15
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-7389-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-7389-2026
Model description paper
 | 
11 Aug 2026
Model description paper |  | 11 Aug 2026

GLIDE-SOL: a GPU-accelerated global lightweight infrastructure for diagnostic environmental modeling with SOLWEIG

Andrea Zonato, Harsh G. Kamath, Naveen Sudharsan, Luca Monaco, Jonas Kittner, Luise Wolf, Matthias Demuzere, Ariane Middel, Benjamin Bechtel, and Massimo Milelli

Related authors

Process-based upgrades to the WRF multi-layer green-roof scheme (WRF-MLGR v2.0) and evaluation against field observations
Alireza Saeedi, Maria Martinez Mendoza, Eric Scott Krayenhoff, James Voogt, Andrea Zonato, Sylvie Leroyer, and Claudia Wagner-Riddle
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-984,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-984, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
The Dual Effect of Urban Areas on Supercell Storms
Francesco De Martin, Christopher Rozoff, Andrea Zonato, Stefano Alessandrini, and Silvana Di Sabatino
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-815,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-815, 2026
Short summary
MLUCM BEP + BEM: an offline one-dimensional multi-layer urban canopy model based on the BEP + BEM scheme
Gianluca Pappaccogli, Andrea Zonato, Alberto Martilli, Riccardo Buccolieri, and Piero Lionello
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 7129–7145, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7129-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7129-2025, 2025
Short summary
Local spatial variability in the occurrence of summer precipitation in the Sør Rondane Mountains, Antarctica
Alfonso Ferrone, Étienne Vignon, Andrea Zonato, and Alexis Berne
The Cryosphere, 17, 4937–4956, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4937-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4937-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Adinolfi, M., Raffa, M., Reder, A., and Mercogliano, P.: Investigation on potential and limitations of ERA5 Reanalysis downscaled on Italy by a convection-permitting model, Clim. Dynam., 61, 4319–4342, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06803-w, 2023. a
Aydin, Y., Janke, J., and Middleton, R.: A comparative review of microclimate and thermal comfort models: RayMan, ENVI-met, SOLWEIG, and STEVE, Sustain. Cities Soc., 46, 101–126, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.12.019, 2019. a
Bernard, J., Lindberg, F., and Oswald, S.: URock 2023a: an open-source GIS-based wind model for complex urban settings, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5703–5727, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5703-2023, 2023. a, b, c, d
Bolton, D.: The computation of equivalent potential temperature, Mon. Weather Rev., 108, 1046–1053, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1980)108<1046:TCOEPT>2.0.CO;2, 1980. a
Briegel, F., Wehrle, J., Schindler, D., and Christen, A.: High-resolution multi-scaling of outdoor human thermal comfort and its intra-urban variability based on machine learning, Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1667–1688, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1667-2024, 2024. a, b, c
Download
Short summary
Cities need fast, reliable heat-stress maps to plan cooling measures and protect people. We built an automated workflow that gathers global public data, runs an outdoor comfort model much faster on graphics processing units, and adds simple corrections for wind and night-time warming. Tested in Dortmund against many sensors, errors fell from about ten to under three °C.
Share