Articles | Volume 19, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-5305-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-5305-2026
Model evaluation paper
 | 
22 Jun 2026
Model evaluation paper |  | 22 Jun 2026

Benchmarking photolysis rates with Socrates (24.11): species for Earth and exoplanets

Sophia M. Adams, James Manners, Nathan Mayne, Mei Ting Mak, and Éric Hébrard

Related authors

The Met Office Unified Model and JULES Global Atmosphere and Land 9.0 configuration
Martin R. Willett, Melissa E. Brooks, Andrew Bushell, Paul Earnshaw, Charline Marzin, Samantha Smith, Lorenzo Tomassini, Nathan Luke Abraham, Martin Best, John M. Edwards, Kalli Furtado, Catherine Hardacre, Alan J. Hewitt, Ben Johnson, Adrian Lock, Jane P. Mulcahy, James Manners, Alistair Sellar, Peter Sheridan, Warren Tennant, Kwinten Van Weverberg, Vidya Varma, and Michael Whitall
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2425,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2425, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Simulations of idealised 3D atmospheric flows on terrestrial planets using LFRic-Atmosphere
Denis E. Sergeev, Nathan J. Mayne, Thomas Bendall, Ian A. Boutle, Alex Brown, Iva Kavčič, James Kent, Krisztian Kohary, James Manners, Thomas Melvin, Enrico Olivier, Lokesh K. Ragta, Ben Shipway, Jon Wakelin, Nigel Wood, and Mohamed Zerroukat
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5601–5626, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5601-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5601-2023, 2023
Short summary
A modern-day Mars climate in the Met Office Unified Model: dry simulations
Danny McCulloch, Denis E. Sergeev, Nathan Mayne, Matthew Bate, James Manners, Ian Boutle, Benjamin Drummond, and Kristzian Kohary
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 621–657, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-621-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-621-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Adams, S., Ford, R., Hambley, M., Hobson, J., Kavčič, I., Maynard, C., Melvin, T., Müller, E., Mullerworth, S., Porter, A., Rezny, M., Shipway, B., and Wong, R.: LFRic: Meeting the challenges of scalability and performance portability in Weather and Climate models, J. Parall. Distrib. Comput., 132, 383–396, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2019.02.007, 2019. a
Adams, S., Manners, J., Mayne, N., Mak, M. T., and Hébrard, E.: Benchmarking Photolysis Rates, Zenodo [code and data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15941222, 2025. a
Akimoto, H.: Atmospheric reaction chemistry, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55870-5, 2016. a, b, c
Amundsen, D. S., Baraffe, I., Tremblin, P., Manners, J., Hayek, W., Mayne, N. J., and Acreman, D. M.: Accuracy tests of radiation schemes used in hot Jupiter global circulation models, Astron. Astrophys., 564, A59, https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201323169, 2014. a
Anderson, G. P., Clough, S. A., Kneizys, F., Chetwynd, J. H., and Shettle, E. P.: AFGL atmospheric constituent profiles (0.120 km), Environmental research papers 964, https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/html/tr/ADA175173 (last access: 23 July 2025), 1986. a, b, c
Download
Short summary
We perform calculations of photolysis reactions using an existing model but including updated input data. These reactions are important in shaping the composition of our upper atmosphere and that of other planets, for example, controlling ozone formation and destruction. The results of our model are compared with those of previous benchmarks, and rates of various reactions provided to facilitate other researchers in developing accurate schemes to capture photolysis in planetary atmospheres.
Share