Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 18, issue 4
Articles | Volume 18, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-905-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-905-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 18, issue 4
Development and technical paper
 | 
18 Feb 2025
Development and technical paper |  | 18 Feb 2025

The real challenges for climate and weather modelling on its way to sustained exascale performance: a case study using ICON (v2.6.6)

Panagiotis Adamidis, Erik Pfister, Hendryk Bockelmann, Dominik Zobel, Jens-Olaf Beismann, and Marek Jacob

Viewed

Total article views: 2,339 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,811 471 57 2,339 65 90
  • HTML: 1,811
  • PDF: 471
  • XML: 57
  • Total: 2,339
  • BibTeX: 65
  • EndNote: 90
Views and downloads (calculated since 02 May 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 02 May 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,339 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,310 with geography defined and 29 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Discussed (final revised paper)

Latest update: 19 Jul 2025
Download
Short summary
In this paper, we investigated performance indicators of the climate model ICON (ICOsahedral Nonhydrostatic) on different compute architectures to answer the question of how to generate high-resolution climate simulations. Evidently, it is not enough to use more computing units of the conventionally used architectures; higher memory throughput is the most promising approach. More potential can be gained from single-node optimization rather than simply increasing the number of compute nodes.
Read more
Share