Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 18, issue 20
Articles | Volume 18, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7297-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7297-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 18, issue 20
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
15 Oct 2025
Methods for assessment of models |  | 15 Oct 2025

Comparison of calibration methods of a PICO basal ice shelf melt module implemented in the GRISLI v2.0 ice sheet model

Maxence Menthon, Pepijn Bakker, Aurélien Quiquet, Didier M. Roche, and Ronja Reese

Viewed

Total article views: 2,567 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,384 135 48 2,567 80 76 104
  • HTML: 2,384
  • PDF: 135
  • XML: 48
  • Total: 2,567
  • Supplement: 80
  • BibTeX: 76
  • EndNote: 104
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Apr 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 14 Apr 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,567 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,519 with geography defined and 48 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 22 Dec 2025
Download
Short summary
Here, we implement a basal ice shelf melt module (PICO – Postdam Ice-shelf Cavity mOdel) in an ice sheet model (GRISLI) and test six simple statistical methods to calibrate this module. We show that calculating the mean absolute error of bins best fits the observational datasets under multiple conditions and without using temperature corrections. Additionally, we show that calibration at a smaller scale than all Antarctic ice shelves is not needed. Finally, we assess the impact with future projections until 2300.
Read more
Share
Special issue
Improving the contribution of the land cryosphere to sea level...