Articles | Volume 18, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7297-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7297-2025
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
15 Oct 2025
Methods for assessment of models |  | 15 Oct 2025

Comparison of calibration methods of a PICO basal ice shelf melt module implemented in the GRISLI v2.0 ice sheet model

Maxence Menthon, Pepijn Bakker, Aurélien Quiquet, Didier M. Roche, and Ronja Reese

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Review of egusphere-2025-777', Xylar Asay-Davis, 12 May 2025
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Maxence Menthon, 20 Jun 2025
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-777', Clara Burgard, 25 May 2025
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Maxence Menthon, 20 Jun 2025

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
AR by Maxence Menthon on behalf of the Authors (22 Jun 2025)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (25 Jun 2025) by Qiang Wang
RR by Xylar Asay-Davis (26 Jun 2025)
RR by Clara Burgard (09 Jul 2025)
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (13 Jul 2025) by Qiang Wang
AR by Maxence Menthon on behalf of the Authors (25 Jul 2025)  Author's response   Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
Here, we implement a basal ice shelf melt module (PICO – Postdam Ice-shelf Cavity mOdel) in an ice sheet model (GRISLI) and test six simple statistical methods to calibrate this module. We show that calculating the mean absolute error of bins best fits the observational datasets under multiple conditions and without using temperature corrections. Additionally, we show that calibration at a smaller scale than all Antarctic ice shelves is not needed. Finally, we assess the impact with future projections until 2300.
Share