Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 18, issue 18
Articles | Volume 18, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-6219-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-6219-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 18, issue 18
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
23 Sep 2025
Methods for assessment of models |  | 23 Sep 2025

Models of buoyancy-driven dykes using continuum plasticity or fracture mechanics: a comparison

Yuan Li, Timothy Davis, Adina E. Pusok, and Richard F. Katz

Viewed

Total article views: 967 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
811 130 26 967 28 19 33
  • HTML: 811
  • PDF: 130
  • XML: 26
  • Total: 967
  • Supplement: 28
  • BibTeX: 19
  • EndNote: 33
Views and downloads (calculated since 05 Dec 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 05 Dec 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 967 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 931 with geography defined and 36 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 26 Sep 2025
Download
Short summary
Magmatic dykes transport magma to the Earth's surface, sometimes causing eruptions. We advanced a model of dyking, treating it as plastic deformation in a porous medium, unlike the classic model that treats dykes as fractures in elastic solids. Comparing the two, we found the plastic model aligns with the fracture model in dyke speed and energy consumption, despite quantitative differences. This new method could be a powerful tool for understanding volcanic processes during tectonic activity.
Read more
Share
Special issue
Advances in numerical modelling of geological processes