Articles | Volume 18, issue 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4417-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4417-2025
Model description paper
 | 
22 Jul 2025
Model description paper |  | 22 Jul 2025

SynRad v1.0: a radar forward operator to simulate synthetic weather radar observations from volcanic ash clouds

Vishnu Nair, Anujah Mohanathan, Michael Herzog, David G. Macfarlane, and Duncan A. Robertson

Related authors

Synoptic processes of winter precipitation in the Upper Indus Basin
Jean-Philippe Baudouin, Michael Herzog, and Cameron A. Petrie
Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 1187–1207, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-1187-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-1187-2021, 2021
Short summary
Cross-validating precipitation datasets in the Indus River basin
Jean-Philippe Baudouin, Michael Herzog, and Cameron A. Petrie
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 427–450, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-427-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-427-2020, 2020
Short summary
High-resolution modelling of interactions between soil moisture and convective development in a mountain enclosed Tibetan Basin
T. Gerken, W. Babel, M. Herzog, K. Fuchs, F. Sun, Y. Ma, T. Foken, and H.-F. Graf
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 4023–4040, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4023-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4023-2015, 2015
Short summary
3-D model simulations of dynamical and microphysical interactions in pyroconvective clouds under idealized conditions
P. Reutter, J. Trentmann, A. Seifert, P. Neis, H. Su, D. Chang, M. Herzog, H. Wernli, M. O. Andreae, and U. Pöschl
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7573–7583, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7573-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7573-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
PALACE v1.0: Paranal Airglow Line And Continuum Emission model
Stefan Noll, Carsten Schmidt, Patrick Hannawald, Wolfgang Kausch, and Stefan Kimeswenger
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4353–4398, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4353-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4353-2025, 2025
Short summary
Atmospheric moisture tracking with WAM2layers v3
Peter Kalverla, Imme Benedict, Chris Weijenborg, and Ruud J. van der Ent
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4335–4352, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4335-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4335-2025, 2025
Short summary
A new set of indicators for model evaluation complementing FAIRMODE's modelling quality objective (MQO)
Alexander de Meij, Cornelis Cuvelier, Philippe Thunis, and Enrico Pisoni
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4231–4245, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4231-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4231-2025, 2025
Short summary
Impact of multiple radar wind profiler data assimilation on convective-scale short-term rainfall forecasts: OSSE studies over the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region
Juan Zhao, Jianping Guo, and Xiaohui Zheng
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4075–4101, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4075-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4075-2025, 2025
Short summary
New submodel for emissions from Explosive Volcanic ERuptions (EVER v1.1) within the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy, version 2.55.1)
Matthias Kohl, Christoph Brühl, Jennifer Schallock, Holger Tost, Patrick Jöckel, Adrian Jost, Steffen Beirle, Michael Höpfner, and Andrea Pozzer
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3985–4007, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3985-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3985-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

American Meteorological Society: “Equivalent_reflectivity_factor”, Glossary of Meteorology, http://glossary.ametsoc.org/wiki/Equivalent_reflectivity_factor (last access: 8 July 205), 2012. 
Aubry, T. J., Engwell, S., Bonadonna, C., Carazzo, G., Scollo, S., Van Eaton, A. R., Taylor, I. A., Jessop, D., Eychenne, J., Gouhier, M., Mastin, L. G., Wallace, K. L., Biass, S., Bursik, M., Grainger, R. G., Jellinek, A. M., and Schmidt, A.: The Independent Volcanic Eruption Source Parameter Archive (IVESPA, version 1.0): A new observational database to support explosive eruptive column model validation and development, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 417, 107295, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2021.107295, 2021. a
Augros, C., Caumont, O., Ducrocq, V., Gaussiat, N., and Tabary, P.: Comparisons between S-, C- and X-band polarimetric radar observations and convective-scale simulations of the HyMeX first special observing period, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 347–362, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2572, 2016. a
Bessho, K., Date, K., Hayashi, M., Ikeda, A., Imai, T., Inoue, H., Kumagai, Y., Miyakawa, T., Murata, H., Ohno, T., Okuyama, A., Oyama, R., Sasaki, Y., Shimazu, Y., Shimoji, K., Sumida, Y., Suzuki, M., Taniguchi, H., Tsuchiyama, H., Uesawa, D., Yokota, H., and Yoshida, R.: An Introduction to Himawari-8/9 – Japan’s New-Generation Geostationary Meteorological Satellites, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 94, 151–183, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2016-009, 2016. a
Bringi, V. N. and Chandrasekar, V.: Polarimetric Doppler Weather Radar: Principles and Applications, Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511541094, 2001. a, b
Download
Short summary
A numerical model that simulates the measurement processes behind the ground-based radars used to detect volcanic ash clouds is introduced. Using weather radars to detect volcanic clouds is not ideal, as fine ash particles are smaller than raindrops and remain undetected. We evaluate the performance of weather radars to study ash clouds and to identify optimal frequencies that balance the trade-off between a higher return signal and the higher path attenuation that comes at these higher frequencies.
Share