Articles | Volume 18, issue 13
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4137-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4137-2025
Development and technical paper
 | 
08 Jul 2025
Development and technical paper |  | 08 Jul 2025

Assessing the climate impact of an improved volcanic sulfate aerosol representation in E3SM

Ziming Ke, Qi Tang, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Xiaohong Liu, and Hailong Wang

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1612', Anonymous Referee #1, 04 Aug 2024
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Ziming Ke, 05 Feb 2025
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1612', Anonymous Referee #2, 09 Aug 2024
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Ziming Ke, 05 Feb 2025
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Ziming Ke, 05 Feb 2025

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
AR by Ziming Ke on behalf of the Authors (05 Mar 2025)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (19 Mar 2025) by Tatiana Egorova
AR by Ziming Ke on behalf of the Authors (20 Mar 2025)  Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
This study assesses volcanic aerosol representation in E3SM (Energy Exascale Earth System Model), showing that an emission-based approach moderately improves temperature variability and cloud responses compared to a prescribed forcing approach, yet significant bias persists.
Share