Articles | Volume 18, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1989-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1989-2025
Development and technical paper
 | 
27 Mar 2025
Development and technical paper |  | 27 Mar 2025

A Bayesian method for predicting background radiation at environmental monitoring stations in local-scale networks

Jens Peter Karolus Wenceslaus Frankemölle, Johan Camps, Pieter De Meutter, and Johan Meyers

Related authors

An inter-comparison study on the impact of atmospheric boundary layer height on gigawatt-scale wind plant performance
Stefan Ivanell, Warit Chanprasert, Luca Lanzilao, James Bleeg, Johan Meyers, Antoine Mathieu, Søren Juhl Andersen, Rem-Sophia Mouradi, Eric Dupont, Hugo Olivares-Espinosa, and Niels Troldborg
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-88,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-88, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
A large-eddy simulation analysis of collective wind farm axial-induction set points in the presence of blockage
Théo Delvaux and Johan Meyers
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 613–630, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-613-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-613-2025, 2025
Short summary
Turbine- and farm-scale power losses in wind farms: an alternative to wake and farm blockage losses
Andrew Kirby, Takafumi Nishino, Luca Lanzilao, Thomas D. Dunstan, and Johan Meyers
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 435–450, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-435-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-435-2025, 2025
Short summary
Effect of blockage on wind turbine power and wake development
Olivier Ndindayino, Augustin Puel, and Johan Meyers
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-6,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-6, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for WES
Short summary
Source reconstruction via deposition measurements of an undeclared radiological atmospheric release
Stijn Van Leuven, Pieter De Meutter, Johan Camps, Piet Termonia, and Andy Delcloo
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4057,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4057, 2025
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Development of the CMA-GFS-AERO 4D-Var assimilation system v1.0 – Part 1: System description and preliminary experimental results
Yongzhu Liu, Xiaoye Zhang, Wei Han, Chao Wang, Wenxing Jia, Deying Wang, Zhaorong Zhuang, and Xueshun Shen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4855–4876, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4855-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4855-2025, 2025
Short summary
Optimized dynamic mode decomposition for reconstruction and forecasting of atmospheric chemistry data
Meghana Velagar, Christoph Keller, and J. Nathan Kutz
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4667–4684, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4667-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4667-2025, 2025
Short summary
Interpolating turbulent heat fluxes missing from a prairie observation on the Tibetan Plateau using artificial intelligence models
Quanzhe Hou, Zhiqiu Gao, Zexia Duan, and Minghui Yu
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4625–4641, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4625-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4625-2025, 2025
Short summary
Carbon dioxide plume dispersion simulated at the hectometer scale using DALES: model formulation and observational evaluation
Arseniy Karagodin-Doyennel, Fredrik Jansson, Bart J. H. van Stratum, Hugo Denier van der Gon, Jordi Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, and Sander Houweling
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4571–4599, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4571-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4571-2025, 2025
Short summary
Low-level jets in the North and Baltic seas: mesoscale model sensitivity and climatology using WRF V4.2.1
Bjarke T. E. Olsen, Andrea N. Hahmann, Nicolas G. Alonso-de-Linaje, Mark Žagar, and Martin Dörenkämper
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4499–4533, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4499-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4499-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Abril-Pla, O., Andreani, V., Carroll, C., Dong, L., Fonnesbeck, C. J., Kochurov, M., Kumar, R., Lao, J., Luhmann, C. C., Martin, O. A., Osthege, M., Vieira, R., Wiecki, T., and Zinkov, R.: PyMC: a modern, and comprehensive probabilistic programming framework in Python, PeerJ Computer Science, 9, e1516, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1516, 2023. a
Agentschap Digitaal Vlaanderen: Orthofotomozaïek, grootschalig, winteropnamen, kleur, 2013–2015, Vlaanderen, https://www.vlaanderen.be/datavindplaats/catalogus/ orthofotomozaiek-grootschalig-winteropnamen-kleur-2013-2015-vlaanderen, (last access: 25 March 2025), 2016. a
Arahmane, H., Dumazert, J., Barat, E., Dautremer, T., Carrel, F., Dufour, N., and Michel, M.: Statistical approach for radioactivity detection: A brief review, J. Environ. Radioactiv., 272, 107358, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2023.107358, 2024. a
Barnard, J., McCulloch, R., and Meng, X.-L.: Modeling covariance matrices in terms of standard deviations and correlations, with application to shrinkage, Stat. Sinica, 10, 1281–1311, 2000. a, b
Bergan, T. D.: Radioactive fallout in Norway from atmospheric nuclear weapons tests, J. Environ. Radioactiv., 60, 189–208, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0265-931X(01)00103-5, 2002. a
Download
Short summary
To detect anomalous radioactivity in the environment, it is paramount that we understand the natural background level. In this work, we propose a statistical model to describe the most likely background level and the associated uncertainty in a network of dose rate detectors. We train, verify, and validate the model using real environmental data. Using the model, we show that we can correctly predict the background level in a subset of the detector network during a known anomalous event.
Share