Articles | Volume 17, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-865-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-865-2024
Model description paper
 | 
31 Jan 2024
Model description paper |  | 31 Jan 2024

A model of the within-population variability of budburst in forest trees

Jianhong Lin, Daniel Berveiller, Christophe François, Heikki Hänninen, Alexandre Morfin, Gaëlle Vincent, Rui Zhang, Cyrille Rathgeber, and Nicolas Delpierre

Related authors

Enhancing environmental models with a new downscaling method for global radiation in complex terrain
Arsène Druel, Julien Ruffault, Hendrik Davi, André Chanzy, Olivier Marloie, Miquel De Cáceres, Florent Mouillot, Christophe François, Kamel Soudani, and Nicolas K. Martin-StPaul
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1800,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1800, 2024
Short summary
Investigating the responses of sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence, gross primary production and their inter-relationship to abiotic factors changes in a temperate deciduous forest
Hamadou Balde, Gabriel Hmimina, Yves Goulas, Gwendal Latouche, Abderrahmane Ounis, Daniel Berveiller, and Kamel Soudani
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-657,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-657, 2024
Short summary
DeepPhenoMem V1.0: Deep learning modelling of canopy greenness dynamics accounting for multi-variate meteorological memory effects on vegetation phenology
Guohua Liu, Mirco Migliavacca, Christian Reimers, Basil Kraft, Markus Reichstein, Andrew Richardson, Lisa Wingate, Nicolas Delpierre, Hui Yang, and Alexander Winkler
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-464,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-464, 2024
Short summary
Potassium limitation of forest productivity – Part 1: A mechanistic model simulating the effects of potassium availability on canopy carbon and water fluxes in tropical eucalypt stands
Ivan Cornut, Nicolas Delpierre, Jean-Paul Laclau, Joannès Guillemot, Yann Nouvellon, Otavio Campoe, Jose Luiz Stape, Vitoria Fernanda Santos, and Guerric le Maire
Biogeosciences, 20, 3093–3117, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-3093-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-3093-2023, 2023
Short summary
Potassium limitation of forest productivity – Part 2: CASTANEA-MAESPA-K shows a reduction in photosynthesis rather than a stoichiometric limitation of tissue formation
Ivan Cornut, Guerric le Maire, Jean-Paul Laclau, Joannès Guillemot, Yann Nouvellon, and Nicolas Delpierre
Biogeosciences, 20, 3119–3135, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-3119-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-3119-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Biogeosciences
Modelling boreal forest's mineral soil and peat C dynamics with the Yasso07 model coupled with the Ricker moisture modifier
Boris Ťupek, Aleksi Lehtonen, Alla Yurova, Rose Abramoff, Bertrand Guenet, Elisa Bruni, Samuli Launiainen, Mikko Peltoniemi, Shoji Hashimoto, Xianglin Tian, Juha Heikkinen, Kari Minkkinen, and Raisa Mäkipää
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5349–5367, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5349-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5349-2024, 2024
Short summary
Dynamic ecosystem assembly and escaping the “fire trap” in the tropics: insights from FATES_15.0.0
Jacquelyn K. Shuman, Rosie A. Fisher, Charles Koven, Ryan Knox, Lara Kueppers, and Chonggang Xu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4643–4671, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4643-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4643-2024, 2024
Short summary
In silico calculation of soil pH by SCEPTER v1.0
Yoshiki Kanzaki, Isabella Chiaravalloti, Shuang Zhang, Noah J. Planavsky, and Christopher T. Reinhard
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4515–4532, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4515-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4515-2024, 2024
Short summary
Simple process-led algorithms for simulating habitats (SPLASH v.2.0): robust calculations of water and energy fluxes
David Sandoval, Iain Colin Prentice, and Rodolfo L. B. Nóbrega
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4229–4309, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4229-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4229-2024, 2024
Short summary
A global behavioural model of human fire use and management: WHAM! v1.0
Oliver Perkins, Matthew Kasoar, Apostolos Voulgarakis, Cathy Smith, Jay Mistry, and James D. A. Millington
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3993–4016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3993-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3993-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Alberto, F., Bouffier, L., Louvet, J. M., Lamy, J. B., Delzon, S., and Kremer, A.: Adaptive responses for seed and leaf phenology in natural populations of sessile oak along an altitudinal gradient, J. Evol. Biol., 24, 1442–1454, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02277.x, 2011. 
Basler, D.: Evaluating phenological models for the prediction of leaf-out dates in six temperate tree species across central Europe, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 217, 10–21, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.11.007, 2016. 
Basler, D. and Korner, C.: Photoperiod sensitivity of bud burst in 14 temperate forest tree species, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 165, 73–81, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.06.001, 2012. 
Baumgarten, F., Zohner, C. M., Gessler, A., and Vitasse, Y.: Chilled to be forced: the best dose to wake up buds from winter dormancy, New Phytol., 230, 1366–1377, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17270, 2021. 
Bennie, J., Kubin, E., Wiltshire, A., Huntley, B., and Baxter, R.: Predicting spatial and temporal patterns of bud-burst and spring frost risk in north-west Europe: the implications of local adaptation to climate, Glob. Change Biol., 16, 1503–1514, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02095.x, 2010. 
Download
Short summary
Currently, the high variability of budburst between individual trees is overlooked. The consequences of this neglect when projecting the dynamics and functioning of tree communities are unknown. Here we develop the first process-oriented model to describe the difference in budburst dates between individual trees in plant populations. Beyond budburst, the model framework provides a basis for studying the dynamics of phenological traits under climate change, from the individual to the community.