Articles | Volume 17, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7915-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7915-2024
Model evaluation paper
 | 
07 Nov 2024
Model evaluation paper |  | 07 Nov 2024

Do data-driven models beat numerical models in forecasting weather extremes? A comparison of IFS HRES, Pangu-Weather, and GraphCast

Leonardo Olivetti and Gabriele Messori

Related authors

Advances and prospects of deep learning for medium-range extreme weather forecasting
Leonardo Olivetti and Gabriele Messori
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2347–2358, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2347-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2347-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Quantification of CO2 hotspot emissions from OCO-3 SAM CO2 satellite images using deep learning methods
Joffrey Dumont Le Brazidec, Pierre Vanderbecken, Alban Farchi, Grégoire Broquet, Gerrit Kuhlmann, and Marc Bocquet
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3607–3622, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3607-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3607-2025, 2025
Short summary
Diagnosis of winter precipitation types using the spectral bin model (version 1DSBM-19M): comparison of five methods using ICE-POP 2018 field experiment data
Wonbae Bang, Jacob T. Carlin, Kwonil Kim, Alexander V. Ryzhkov, Guosheng Liu, and GyuWon Lee
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3559–3581, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3559-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3559-2025, 2025
Short summary
Improving winter condition simulations in SURFEX-TEB v9.0 with a multi-layer snow model and ice
Gabriel Colas, Valéry Masson, François Bouttier, Ludovic Bouilloud, Laura Pavan, and Virve Karsisto
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3453–3472, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3453-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3453-2025, 2025
Short summary
UA-ICON with the NWP physics package (version ua-icon-2.1): mean state and variability of the middle atmosphere
Markus Kunze, Christoph Zülicke, Tarique A. Siddiqui, Claudia C. Stephan, Yosuke Yamazaki, Claudia Stolle, Sebastian Borchert, and Hauke Schmidt
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3359–3385, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3359-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3359-2025, 2025
Short summary
Integrated Methane Inversion (IMI) 2.0: an improved research and stakeholder tool for monitoring total methane emissions with high resolution worldwide using TROPOMI satellite observations
Lucas A. Estrada, Daniel J. Varon, Melissa Sulprizio, Hannah Nesser, Zichong Chen, Nicholas Balasus, Sarah E. Hancock, Megan He, James D. East, Todd A. Mooring, Alexander Oort Alonso, Joannes D. Maasakkers, Ilse Aben, Sabour Baray, Kevin W. Bowman, John R. Worden, Felipe J. Cardoso-Saldaña, Emily Reidy, and Daniel J. Jacob
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3311–3330, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3311-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3311-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Abrahams, A., Schlegel, R. W., and Smit, A. J.: Variation and Change of Upwelling Dynamics Detected in the World’s Eastern Boundary Upwelling Systems, Frontiers in Marine Science, 8, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.626411, 2021. a
Arellano, M.: PRACTITIONERS’ CORNER: Computing Robust Standard Errors for Within-groups Estimators, Oxford B. Econ. Stat., 49, 431–434, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1987.mp49004006.x, 1987. a
Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y.: Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing, J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 57, 289–300, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2346101 (last access: 28 October 2024​​​​​​​), 1995. a
Beucler, T., Pritchard, M., Gentine, P., and Rasp, S.: Towards Physically-Consistent, Data-Driven Models of Convection, in: IGARSS 2020–2020 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 26 September–2 October 2020, Waikoloa, HI, USA, online, 3987–3990, https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS39084.2020.9324569, 2020. a
Bi, K., Xie, L., Zhang, H., Chen, X., Gu, X., and Tian, Q.: Pangu-Weather: A 3D High-Resolution Model for Fast and Accurate Global Weather Forecast, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.02556, 2022. a
Download
Short summary
Data-driven models are becoming a viable alternative to physics-based models for weather forecasting up to 15 d into the future. However, it is unclear whether they are as reliable as physics-based models when forecasting weather extremes. We evaluate their performance in forecasting near-surface cold, hot, and windy extremes globally. We find that data-driven models can compete with physics-based models and that the choice of the best model mainly depends on the region and type of extreme.
Share