Articles | Volume 17, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7401-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7401-2024
Development and technical paper
 | 
25 Oct 2024
Development and technical paper |  | 25 Oct 2024

Recommended coupling to global meteorological fields for long-term tracer simulations with WRF-GHG

David Ho, Michał Gałkowski, Friedemann Reum, Santiago Botía, Julia Marshall, Kai Uwe Totsche, and Christoph Gerbig

Related authors

Quantifying agricultural N2O and CH4 emissions in the Netherlands using an airborne eddy covariance system
Paul Waldmann, Max Eckl, Leon Knez, Klaus-Dirk Gottschaldt, Alina Fiehn, Christian Mallaun, Michał Gałkowski, Christoph Kiemle, Ronald Hutjes, Thomas Röckmann, Huilin Chen, and Anke Roiger
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 19, 185–210, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-185-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-185-2026, 2026
Short summary
Estimation of Nocturnal Boundary Layer Height in the Central Amazon, Supported by Gas Concentration Profiles
Carla Souza, Anne C. S. Mendonça, Hella Van Asperen, Flávio A. D’Oliveira, Santiago Botía, Luís G. N. Martins, Denisi H. Hall, Raoni A. Santana, Gilberto Fisch, Leonardo R. Oliveira, Jailson R. Mata, Ranyelli Figueiredo, Bruno T. T. Portela, Carlos A. Quesada, and Cléo Q. Dias-Júnior
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6531,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6531, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
An inter-comparison of inverse models for estimating European CH4 emissions
Eleftherios Ioannidis, Antoon Meesters, Michael Steiner, Dominik Brunner, Friedemann Reum, Isabelle Pison, Antoine Berchet, Rona Thompson, Espen Sollum, Frank-Thomas Koch, Christoph Gerbig, Fenjuan Wang, Shamil Maksyutov, Aki Tsuruta, Maria Tenkanen, Tuula Aalto, Guillaume Monteil, Hong Lin, Ge Ren, Marko Scholze, and Sander Houweling
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 167–198, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-167-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-167-2026, 2026
Short summary
If the Yedoma thaws, will we notice? Quantifying detection limits of top-down methane monitoring infrastructures
Martijn M. T. A. Pallandt, Abhishek Chatterjee, Lesley E. Ott, Julia Marshall, and Mathias Göckede
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 7053–7073, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-7053-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-7053-2025, 2025
Short summary
Increasing diurnal and seasonal amplitude of atmospheric methane mole fraction in Central Siberia between 2010–2021
Dieu Anh Tran, Jordi Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Christoph Gerbig, Michał Gałkowski, Santiago Botía, Kim Faassen, and Sönke Zaehle
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 16553–16588, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-16553-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-16553-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Agusti-Panareda, A., Diamantakis, M., Bayona, V., Klappenbach, F., and Butz, A.: Improving the inter-hemispheric gradient of total column atmospheric CO2 and CH4 in simulations with the ECMWF semi-Lagrangian atmospheric global model, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1-2017, 2017. a
Ahmadov, R., Gerbig, C., Kretschmer, R., Koerner, S., Neininger, B., Dolman, A. J., and Sarrat, C.: Mesoscale covariance of transport and CO2 fluxes: Evidence from observations and simulations using the WRF-VPRM coupled atmosphere-biosphere model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D22107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008552, 2007. a, b
Ahmadov, R., McKeen, S. A., Robinson, A. L., Bahreini, R., Middlebrook, A. M., de Gouw, J. A., Meagher, J., Hsie, E.-Y., Edgerton, E., Shaw, S., and Trainer, M.: A volatility basis set model for summertime secondary organic aerosols over the eastern United States in 2006: A volatility basis set model for SOA, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D06301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016831, 2012. a
Baker, D. F., Law, R. M., Gurney, K. R., Rayner, P., Peylin, P., Denning, A. S., Bousquet, P., Bruhwiler, L., Chen, Y.-H., Ciais, P., Fung, I. Y., Heimann, M., John, J., Maki, T., Maksyutov, S., Masarie, K., Prather, M., Pak, B., Taguchi, S., and Zhu, Z.: TransCom 3 inversion intercomparison: Impact of transport model errors on the interannual variability of regional CO2 fluxes, 1988–2003: Transcom 3 – Interannual variability of CO2 sources, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 20, GB1002, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002439, 2006. a
Beck, V., Koch, T., Kretschmer, R., Marshall, J., Ahmadov, R., Gerbig, C., Pillai, D., and Heimann, M.: The WRF Greenhouse Gas Model (WRF-GHG). Technical Report No. 25, Tech. rep., Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany, https://www.bgc-jena.mpg.de/bgc-systems/uploads/Wrf-ghg/Technical Reports 2011 Beck.pdf (last access: Feburary 2020), 2011. a, b
Download
Short summary
Atmospheric model users often overlook the impact of the land–atmosphere interaction. This study accessed various setups of WRF-GHG simulations that ensure consistency between the model and driving reanalysis fields. We found that a combination of nudging and frequent re-initialization allows certain improvement by constraining the soil moisture fields and, through its impact on atmospheric mixing, improves atmospheric transport.
Share