Articles | Volume 17, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-621-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-621-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Development and technical paper
| 
26 Jan 2024
Development and technical paper |
| 26 Jan 2024
| 26 Jan 2024
Computationally efficient parameter estimation for high-dimensional ocean biogeochemical models
Paul M. Rady Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
Mary E. McGuinn
Paul M. Rady Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
Katherine M. Smith
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA
Nadia Pinardi
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Kyle E. Niemeyer
School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
Nicole S. Lovenduski
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
Peter E. Hamlington
Paul M. Rady Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
Related authors
Skyler Kern, Mary E. McGuinn, Katherine M. Smith, Nadia Pinardi, Kyle E. Niemeyer, Nicole S. Lovenduski, and Peter E. Hamlington
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3795, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3795, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
The parameters that control a model's behavior determine its ability to represent a system. In this work, multiple cases test how to estimate the parameters of a model with components corresponding to both the physics and the chemical and biological processes (i.e. the biogeochemistry) of the ocean. While demonstrating how to approach this problem type, the results show estimating both sets of parameters simultaneously is better than estimating the physics then the biogeochemistry separately.
Katherine M. Smith, Skyler Kern, Peter E. Hamlington, Marco Zavatarelli, Nadia Pinardi, Emily F. Klee, and Kyle E. Niemeyer
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2419–2442, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2419-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2419-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We present a newly developed reduced-order biogeochemical flux model that is complex and flexible enough to capture open-ocean ecosystem dynamics but reduced enough to incorporate into highly resolved numerical simulations with limited additional computational cost. The model provides improved correlations between model output and field data, indicating that significant improvements in the reproduction of real-world data can be achieved with a small number of variables.
Skyler Kern, Mary E. McGuinn, Katherine M. Smith, Nadia Pinardi, Kyle E. Niemeyer, Nicole S. Lovenduski, and Peter E. Hamlington
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3795, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3795, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
The parameters that control a model's behavior determine its ability to represent a system. In this work, multiple cases test how to estimate the parameters of a model with components corresponding to both the physics and the chemical and biological processes (i.e. the biogeochemistry) of the ocean. While demonstrating how to approach this problem type, the results show estimating both sets of parameters simultaneously is better than estimating the physics then the biogeochemistry separately.
Malik J. Jordan, Emily F. Klee, Peter E. Hamlington, Nicole S. Lovenduski, and Kyle E. Niemeyer
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2901, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2901, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a method to simplify complex ocean biogeochemical models so they can run faster in computer simulations without losing important details. By adapting techniques from combustion science, we created smaller versions of a large ocean model that still accurately represent key changes in ocean biology and chemistry. This work helps make detailed ocean simulations more efficient, supporting better understanding of ocean health and climate.
Mahmud Hasan Ghani, Nadia Pinardi, Antonio Navarra, Lorenzo Mentaschi, Silvia Bianconcini, Francesco Maicu, and Francesco Trotta
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2867, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2867, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Using the same SST and the same bulk formula, but different atmospheric reanalysis and analysis surface variable datasets, we show that higher resolution (ECMWF) dataset is crucial for evaluating the heat budget closure hypothesis in the Mediterranean Sea. For the first time, we investigate the impact of extreme heat loss events in the Mediterranean Sea in the long-term mean basin-averaged heat budget.
Paolo Oddo, Mario Adani, Francesco Carere, Andrea Cipollone, Anna Chiara Goglio, Eric Jansen, Ali Aydogdu, Francesca Mele, Italo Epicoco, Jenny Pistoia, Emanuela Clementi, Nadia Pinardi, and Simona Masina
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1553, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1553, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
This study present a data assimilation scheme that combines ocean observational data with ocean model results to better understand the ocean and predict its future state. The method uses a variational approach focusing on the physical relationships between all the state vector variables errors. Testing in the Mediterranean Sea showed that a complex sea level operator based on a barotropic model works best.
Rita Lecci, Robyn Gwee, Kun Yan, Sanne Muis, Nadia Pinardi, Jun She, Martin Verlaan, Simona Masina, Wenshan Li, Hui Wang, Salvatore Causio, Antonio Novellino, Marco Alba, Etiënne Kras, Sandra Gaytan Aguilar, and Jan-Bart Calewaert
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1763, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1763, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).
Short summary
Short summary
This study explored how sea level is changing along the China-Europe Sea Route. By combining satellite and in-situ observations with advanced modeling, the research identified ongoing sea level rise and an increasing frequency of extreme water level events in some regions. These findings underscore the importance of continued monitoring and provide useful knowledge to support long-term planning, coastal resilience, and informed decision-making.
Italo R. Lopes, Ivan Federico, Michalis Vousdoukas, Luisa Perini, Salvatore Causio, Giovanni Coppini, Maurilio Milella, Nadia Pinardi, and Lorenzo Mentaschi
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1695, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1695, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We improved a computer model to simulate coastal flooding by including temporary barriers like sand dunes. We tested it where sand dunes are built seasonally to protect the shoreline for two real storms: one that broke through the dunes and another where dunes held strong. Our model showed how important it is to design these defenses carefully since even if a small part of a dune fails, a major flooding can happen. Overall, our work helps create better tools to manage and protect coastal areas.
Katherine M. Smith, Alice M. Barthel, LeAnn M. Conlon, Luke P. Van Roekel, Anthony Bartoletti, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Chengzhu Zhang, Carolyn Branecky Begeman, James J. Benedict, Gautam Bisht, Yan Feng, Walter Hannah, Bryce E. Harrop, Nicole Jeffery, Wuyin Lin, Po-Lun Ma, Mathew E. Maltrud, Mark R. Petersen, Balwinder Singh, Qi Tang, Teklu Tesfa, Jonathan D. Wolfe, Shaocheng Xie, Xue Zheng, Karthik Balaguru, Oluwayemi Garuba, Peter Gleckler, Aixue Hu, Jiwoo Lee, Ben Moore-Maley, and Ana C. Ordoñez
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1613–1633, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1613-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1613-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Version 2.1 of the U.S. Department of Energy's Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) adds the Fox-Kemper et al. (2011) mixed-layer eddy parameterization, which restratifies the ocean surface layer through an overturning streamfunction. Results include surface layer bias reduction in temperature, salinity, and sea ice extent in the North Atlantic; a small strengthening of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation; and improvements to many atmospheric climatological variables.
Seimur Shirinov, Ivan Federico, Simone Bonamano, Salvatore Causio, Nicolás Biocca, Viviana Piermattei, Daniele Piazzolla, Jacopo Alessandri, Lorenzo Mentaschi, Giovanni Coppini, Marco Marcelli, and Nadia Pinardi
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-321, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-321, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study explores the impact of submerged vegetation on wave dynamics in vulnerable coastal regions. By incorporating measurements into a numerical model, we estimate the critical role of seagrass as a natural defense system. This research advances understanding of wave-vegetation interactions, achieving a more accurate representation of marine environments while supporting restoration efforts and emphasizing the need to preserve these ecosystems for resilience.
José A. Jiménez, Gundula Winter, Antonio Bonaduce, Michael Depuydt, Giulia Galluccio, Bart van den Hurk, H. E. Markus Meier, Nadia Pinardi, Lavinia G. Pomarico, and Natalia Vazquez Riveiros
State Planet, 3-slre1, 3, https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-3-slre1-3-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-3-slre1-3-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The Knowledge Hub on Sea Level Rise (SLR) has done a scoping study involving stakeholders from government and academia to identify gaps and needs in SLR information, impacts, and policies across Europe. Gaps in regional SLR projections and uncertainties were found, while concerns were raised about shoreline erosion and emerging problems like saltwater intrusion and ineffective adaptation plans. The need for improved communication to make better decisions on SLR adaptation was highlighted.
Nadia Pinardi, Bart van den Hurk, Michael Depuydt, Thorsten Kiefer, Petra Manderscheid, Lavinia Giulia Pomarico, and Kanika Singh
State Planet, 3-slre1, 2, https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-3-slre1-2-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-3-slre1-2-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The Knowledge Hub on Sea Level Rise (KH-SLR), a joint effort between JPI Climate and JPI Oceans, addresses the critical need for science-based information on sea level changes in Europe. The KH-SLR actively involves stakeholders through a co-design process discussing the impacts, adaptation planning, and policy requirements related to SLR in Europe. Its primary output is the KH Assessment Report (KH-AR), which is described in this volume.
Bart van den Hurk, Nadia Pinardi, Alexander Bisaro, Giulia Galluccio, José A. Jiménez, Kate Larkin, Angélique Melet, Lavinia Giulia Pomarico, Kristin Richter, Kanika Singh, Roderik van de Wal, and Gundula Winter
State Planet, 3-slre1, 1, https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-3-slre1-1-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-3-slre1-1-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The Summary for Policymakers compiles findings from “Sea Level Rise in Europe: 1st Assessment Report of the Knowledge Hub on Sea Level Rise”. It covers knowledge gaps, observations, projections, impacts, adaptation measures, decision-making principles, and governance challenges. It provides information for each European basin (Mediterranean, Black Sea, North Sea, Baltic Sea, Atlantic, and Arctic) and aims to assist policymakers in enhancing the preparedness of European coasts for sea level rise.
Joshua Coupe, Nicole S. Lovenduski, Luise S. Gleason, Michael N. Levy, Kristen Krumhardt, Keith Lindsay, Charles Bardeen, Clay Tabor, Cheryl Harrison, Kenneth G. MacLeod, Siddhartha Mitra, and Julio Sepúlveda
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-94, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-94, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
We develop a new feature in the atmosphere and ocean components of the Community Earth System Model version 2. We have implemented ultraviolet (UV) radiation inhibition of photosynthesis of four marine phytoplankton functional groups represented in the Marine Biogeochemistry Library. The new feature is tested with varying levels of UV radiation. The new feature will enable an analysis of an asteroid impact’s effect on the ozone layer and how that affects the base of the marine food web.
Cara Nissen, Nicole S. Lovenduski, Mathew Maltrud, Alison R. Gray, Yohei Takano, Kristen Falcinelli, Jade Sauvé, and Katherine Smith
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6415–6435, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6415-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6415-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Autonomous profiling floats have provided unprecedented observational coverage of the global ocean, but uncertainties remain about whether their sampling frequency and density capture the true spatiotemporal variability of physical, biogeochemical, and biological properties. Here, we present the novel synthetic biogeochemical float capabilities of the Energy Exascale Earth System Model version 2 and demonstrate their utility as a test bed to address these uncertainties.
Bethany McDonagh, Emanuela Clementi, Anna Chiara Goglio, and Nadia Pinardi
Ocean Sci., 20, 1051–1066, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-20-1051-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-20-1051-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Tides in the Mediterranean Sea are typically of low amplitude, but twin experiments with and without tides demonstrate that tides affect the circulation directly at scales away from those of the tides. Analysis of the energy changes due to tides shows that they enhance existing oscillations, and internal tides interact with other internal waves. Tides also increase the mixed layer depth and enhance deep water formation in key regions. Internal tides are widespread in the Mediterranean Sea.
Roberta Benincasa, Giovanni Liguori, Nadia Pinardi, and Hans von Storch
Ocean Sci., 20, 1003–1012, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-20-1003-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-20-1003-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Ocean dynamics result from the interplay of internal processes and external inputs, primarily from the atmosphere. It is crucial to discern between these factors to gauge the ocean's intrinsic predictability and to be able to attribute a signal under study to either external factors or internal variability. Employing a simple analysis, we successfully characterized this variability in the Mediterranean Sea and compared it with the oceanic response induced by atmospheric conditions.
Genevieve L. Clow, Nicole S. Lovenduski, Michael N. Levy, Keith Lindsay, and Jennifer E. Kay
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 975–995, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-975-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-975-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Satellite observations of chlorophyll allow us to study marine phytoplankton on a global scale; yet some of these observations are missing due to clouds and other issues. To investigate the impact of missing data, we developed a satellite simulator for chlorophyll in an Earth system model. We found that missing data can impact the global mean chlorophyll by nearly 20 %. The simulated observations provide a more direct comparison to real-world data and can be used to improve model validation.
Geneviève W. Elsworth, Nicole S. Lovenduski, Kristen M. Krumhardt, Thomas M. Marchitto, and Sarah Schlunegger
Biogeosciences, 20, 4477–4490, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-4477-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-4477-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Anthropogenic climate change will influence marine phytoplankton over the coming century. Here, we quantify the influence of anthropogenic climate change on marine phytoplankton internal variability using an Earth system model ensemble and identify a decline in global phytoplankton biomass variance with warming. Our results suggest that climate mitigation efforts that account for marine phytoplankton changes should also consider changes in phytoplankton variance driven by anthropogenic warming.
Giovanni Coppini, Emanuela Clementi, Gianpiero Cossarini, Stefano Salon, Gerasimos Korres, Michalis Ravdas, Rita Lecci, Jenny Pistoia, Anna Chiara Goglio, Massimiliano Drudi, Alessandro Grandi, Ali Aydogdu, Romain Escudier, Andrea Cipollone, Vladyslav Lyubartsev, Antonio Mariani, Sergio Cretì, Francesco Palermo, Matteo Scuro, Simona Masina, Nadia Pinardi, Antonio Navarra, Damiano Delrosso, Anna Teruzzi, Valeria Di Biagio, Giorgio Bolzon, Laura Feudale, Gianluca Coidessa, Carolina Amadio, Alberto Brosich, Arnau Miró, Eva Alvarez, Paolo Lazzari, Cosimo Solidoro, Charikleia Oikonomou, and Anna Zacharioudaki
Ocean Sci., 19, 1483–1516, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-1483-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-1483-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The paper presents the Mediterranean Forecasting System evolution and performance developed in the framework of the Copernicus Marine Service.
István Dunkl, Nicole Lovenduski, Alessio Collalti, Vivek K. Arora, Tatiana Ilyina, and Victor Brovkin
Biogeosciences, 20, 3523–3538, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-3523-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-3523-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Despite differences in the reproduction of gross primary productivity (GPP) by Earth system models (ESMs), ESMs have similar predictability of the global carbon cycle. We found that, although GPP variability originates from different regions and is driven by different climatic variables across the ESMs, the ESMs rely on the same mechanisms to predict their own GPP. This shows that the predictability of the carbon cycle is limited by our understanding of variability rather than predictability.
Umesh Pranavam Ayyappan Pillai, Nadia Pinardi, Ivan Federico, Salvatore Causio, Francesco Trotta, Silvia Unguendoli, and Andrea Valentini
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3413–3433, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3413-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3413-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The study presents the application of high-resolution coastal modelling for wave hindcasting on the Emilia-Romagna coastal belt. The generated coastal databases which provide an understanding of the prevailing wind-wave characteristics can aid in predicting coastal impacts.
Julian Quick, Ryan N. King, Garrett Barter, and Peter E. Hamlington
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1941–1955, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1941-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1941-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Wake steering is an emerging wind power plant control strategy where upstream turbines are intentionally yawed out of alignment with the incoming wind, thereby steering wakes away from downstream turbines. Trade-offs between the gains in power production and fatigue loads induced by this control strategy are the subject of continuing investigation. In this study, we present an optimization approach for efficiently exploring the trade-offs between power and loading during wake steering.
Stephen G. Yeager, Nan Rosenbloom, Anne A. Glanville, Xian Wu, Isla Simpson, Hui Li, Maria J. Molina, Kristen Krumhardt, Samuel Mogen, Keith Lindsay, Danica Lombardozzi, Will Wieder, Who M. Kim, Jadwiga H. Richter, Matthew Long, Gokhan Danabasoglu, David Bailey, Marika Holland, Nicole Lovenduski, Warren G. Strand, and Teagan King
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6451–6493, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6451-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6451-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth system changes over a range of time and space scales, and some of these changes are predictable in advance. Short-term weather forecasts are most familiar, but recent work has shown that it is possible to generate useful predictions several seasons or even a decade in advance. This study focuses on predictions over intermediate timescales (up to 24 months in advance) and shows that there is promising potential to forecast a variety of changes in the natural environment.
Giorgio Micaletto, Ivano Barletta, Silvia Mocavero, Ivan Federico, Italo Epicoco, Giorgia Verri, Giovanni Coppini, Pasquale Schiano, Giovanni Aloisio, and Nadia Pinardi
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6025–6046, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6025-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6025-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The full exploitation of supercomputing architectures requires a deep revision of the current climate models. This paper presents the parallelization of the three-dimensional hydrodynamic model SHYFEM (System of HydrodYnamic Finite Element Modules). Optimized numerical libraries were used to partition the model domain and solve the sparse linear system of equations in parallel. The performance assessment demonstrates a good level of scalability with a realistic configuration used as a benchmark.
Katherine M. Smith, Skyler Kern, Peter E. Hamlington, Marco Zavatarelli, Nadia Pinardi, Emily F. Klee, and Kyle E. Niemeyer
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2419–2442, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2419-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2419-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We present a newly developed reduced-order biogeochemical flux model that is complex and flexible enough to capture open-ocean ecosystem dynamics but reduced enough to incorporate into highly resolved numerical simulations with limited additional computational cost. The model provides improved correlations between model output and field data, indicating that significant improvements in the reproduction of real-world data can be achieved with a small number of variables.
Cited articles
Adams, B. M., Eldred, M. S., Geraci, G., Hooper, R. W., Jakeman, J. D., Maupin, K. A., Monschke, J. A., Rushdi, A. A., Stephens, J. A., Swiler, L. P., Wildey, T. M., Bohnhoff, W. J., Dalbey, K. R., Ebeida, M. S., Eddy, J. P., Hough, P. D., Khalil, M., Kenneth, T. H., Ridway, E. M., Vigil, D. M., and Winokur, J. G.: Dakota, A Multilevel Parallel Object-Oriented Framework for Design Optimization, Parameter Estimation, Uncertainty Quantification, and Sensitivity Analysis: Version 6.10 User’s Manual, Tech. Rep. SAND2014-4633, Sandia National Laboratory, https://doi.org/10.2172/1177077, 2019. a
Athias, V., Mazzega, P., and Jeandel, C.: Selecting a global optimization method to estimate the oceanic particle cycling rate constants, J. Mar. Res., 58, 675–707, 2000. a
Bagniewski, W., Fennel, K., Perry, M. J., and D'Asaro, E. A.: Optimizing models of the North Atlantic spring bloom using physical, chemical and bio-optical observations from a Lagrangian float, Biogeosciences, 8, 1291–1307, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-1291-2011, 2011. a
Bianchi, D., Zavatarelli, M., Pinardi, N., Capozzi, R., Capotondi, L., Corselli, C., and Masina, S.: Simulations of ecosystem response during the sapropel S1 deposition event, Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl., 235, 265–287, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PALAEO.2005.09.032, 2006. a
Blumberg, A. F. and Mellor, G. L.: A description of a three-dimensional coastal ocean circulation model, Costal and Estuarine Science, vol. 4, American Geophysical Union, 1987. a
Computational and Information Systems Laboratory: Cheyenne: HPE/SGI ICE XA System (University Community Computing), National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, https://doi.org/10.5065/D6RX99HX, 2019. a
Doney, S. C., Lima, I., Moore, J. K., Lindsay, K., Behrenfeld, M. J., Westberry, T. K., Mahowald, N., Glover, D. M., and Takahashi, T.: Skill metrics for confronting global upper ocean ecosystem-biogeochemistry models against field and remote sensing data, J. Mar. Syst., 76, 95–112, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMARSYS.2008.05.015, 2009. a
Fennel, K., Losch, M., Schroter, J., and Wenzeï, M.: Testing a marine ecosystem model: sensitivity analysis and parameter optimization, J. Mar. Syst., 28, 45–63, 2001. a
Friedrichs, M. A. M., Dusenberry, J. A., Anderson, L. A., Armstrong, R. A., Chai, F., Christian, J. R., Doney, S. C., Dunne, J., Fujii, M., Hood, R., McGillicuddy, D. J., Moore, J. K., Schartau, M., Spitz, Y. H., and Wiggert, J. D.: Assessment of skill and portability in regional marine biogeochemical models: Role of multiple planktonic groups, J. Geophys. Res., 112, C08001, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003852, 2007. a, b
Henson, S. A., Yool, A., and Sanders, R.: Variability in efficiency of particulate organic carbon export: A model study, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 29, 33–45, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004965, 2015. a
Hurtt, G. C. and Armstrong, R. A.: A pelagic ecosystem model calibrated with BATS data, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 43, 653–683, https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0645(96)00007-0, 1996. a
Hurtt, G. C. and Armstrong, R. A.: A pelagic ecosystem model calibrated with BATS and OWSI data, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 46, 27–61, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(98)00055-7, 1999. a, b
Karl, D. M. and Lukas, R.: The Hawaii Ocean Time-series (HOT) program: Background, rationale and field implementation, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 43, 129–156, https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0645(96)00005-7, 1996. a, b, c
Kern, S., McGuinn, M. E., Smith, K. M., Pinardi, N., Niemeyer, K. E., Lovenduski, N. S., and Hamlington, P. E.: skylerjk/BFM17-Opt: Coupling BFM17 + POM1D to DAKOTA for Optimization (Updated work flow), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10049146, 2023a. a
Kern, S., McGuinn, M. E., Smith, K. M., Pinardi, N., Niemeyer, K. E., Lovenduski, N. S., and Hamlington, P. E.: skylerjk/BFM17-SA-SinglePert: One-at-a-Time Sensitivity Analysis Code for BFM17, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7786746, 2023b. a
Kern, S., McGuinn, M. E., Smith, K. M., Pinardi, N., Niemeyer, K. E., Lovenduski, N. S., and Hamlington, P. E.: BFM17 Optimization Data and Plotting Scripts (Version 2), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10049012, 2023c. a
Kidston, M., Matear, R., and Baird, M. E.: Parameter optimisation of a marine ecosystem model at two contrasting stations in the Sub-Antarctic Zone, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 58, 2301–2315, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DSR2.2011.05.018, 2011. a
Kim, H. H., Luo, Y.-W., Ducklow, H. W., Schofield, O. M., Steinberg, D. K., and Doney, S. C.: WAP-1D-VAR v1.0: development and evaluation of a one-dimensional variational data assimilation model for the marine ecosystem along the West Antarctic Peninsula, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4939–4975, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4939-2021, 2021. a
Kriest, I.: Calibration of a simple and a complex model of global marine biogeochemistry, Biogeosciences, 14, 4965–4984, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-4965-2017, 2017. a, b, c
Kriest, I., Sauerland, V., Khatiwala, S., Srivastav, A., and Oschlies, A.: Calibrating a global three-dimensional biogeochemical ocean model (MOPS-1.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 127–154, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-127-2017, 2017. a, b, c
Kuhn, A. M. and Fennel, K.: Evaluating ecosystem model complexity for the northwest North Atlantic through surrogate-based optimization, Ocean Model., 142, 101437, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OCEMOD.2019.101437, 2019. a
Kwon, E. Y. and Primeau, F.: Optimization and sensitivity study of a biogeochemistry ocean model using an implicit solver and in situ phosphate data, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 20, GB4009, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002631, 2006. a
Kwon, E. Y. and Primeau, F.: Optimization and sensitivity of a global biogeochemistry ocean model using combined in situ DIC, alkalinity, and phosphate data, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 113, 8011, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004520, 2008. a
Long, M. C., Moore, J. K., Lindsay, K., Levy, M., Doney, S. C., Luo, J. Y., Krumhardt, K. M., Letscher, R. T., Grover, M., and Sylvester, Z. T.: Simulations With the Marine Biogeochemistry Library (MARBL), J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 13, e2021MS002647, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002647, 2021. a
Mattern, J. P. and Edwards, C. A.: Simple parameter estimation for complex models – Testing evolutionary techniques on 3-dimensional biogeochemical ocean models, J. Mar. Syst., 165, 139–152, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMARSYS.2016.10.012, 2017. a
Mellor, G. L.: One-Dimensional, Ocean Surface Layer Modeling: A Problem and a Solution, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 31, 790–809, 2001. a
Mellor, G. L. and Yamada, T.: Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems, Rev. Geophys., 20, 851–875, https://doi.org/10.1029/RG020i004p00851, 1982. a, b
Meza, J. C., Oliva, R. A., Hough, P. D., and Williams, P. J.: OPT++: An Object-Oriented Toolkit for Nonlinear Optimization, ACM Trans. Math. Softw., 33, 1–27, https://doi.org/10.1145/1236463.1236467, 2007. a
Oliver, S., Cartis, C., Kriest, I., Tett, S. F. B., and Khatiwala, S.: A derivative-free optimisation method for global ocean biogeochemical models, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3537–3554, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3537-2022, 2022. a
Prieß, M., Piwonski, J., Koziel, S., Oschlies, A., and Slawig, T.: Accelerated parameter identification in a 3D marine biogeochemical model using surrogate-based optimization, Ocean Model., 68, 22–36, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2013.04.003, 2013. a
Sauerland, V., Kriest, I., Oschlies, A., and Srivastav, A.: Multiobjective Calibration of a Global Biogeochemical Ocean Model Against Nutrients, Oxygen, and Oxygen Minimum Zones, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 1285–1308, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001510, 2019. a, b
Schartau, M. and Oschlies, A.: Simultaneous data-based optimization of a 1D-ecosystem model at three locations in the North Atlantic: Part I-Method and parameter estimates, J. Mar. Res., 61, 765–793, 2003a. a
Schartau, M. and Oschlies, A.: Simultaneous data-based optimization of a 1D-ecosystem model at three locations in the North Atlantic: Part II – Standing stocks and nitrogen fluxes, J. Mar. Res., 61, 795–821, 2003b. a
Schartau, M., Oschlies, A., and Willebrand, J.: Parameter estimates of a zero-dimensional ecosystem model applying the adjoint method, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 48, 1769–1800, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(00)00161-2, 2001. a
Smith, K. M., Hamlington, P. E., and Fox-Kemper, B.: Effects of submesoscale turbulence on ocean tracers, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 121, 908–933, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC011089, 2016. a
Smith, K. M., Hamlington, P. E., Niemeyer, K. E., Fox‐Kemper, B., and Lovenduski, N. S.: Effects of Langmuir Turbulence on Upper Ocean Carbonate Chemistry, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 10, 2018MS001486, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001486, 2018. a
Smith, K. M., Kern, S., Hamlington, P. E., Zavatarelli, M., Pinardi, N., Klee, E. F., and Niemeyer, K. E.: marco-zavatarelli/BFM17-56 BFM17-56, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3839984, 2020. a
Smith, K. M., Kern, S., Hamlington, P. E., Zavatarelli, M., Pinardi, N., Klee, E. F., and Niemeyer, K. E.: BFM17 v1.0: a reduced biogeochemical flux model for upper-ocean biophysical simulations, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2419–2442, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2419-2021, 2021. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r, s, t, u, v, w, x, y, z, aa, ab, ac, ad
Spitz, Y., Moisan, J., and Abbott, M.: Configuring an ecosystem model using data from the Bermuda Atlantic Time Series (BATS), Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 48, 1733–1768, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(00)00159-4, 2001. a
Spitz, Y. H., Moisan, J. R., Abbott, M. R., and Richman, J. G.: Data assimilation and a pelagic ecosystem model: parameterization using time series observations, J. Mar. Syst., 16, 51–68, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-7963(97)00099-7, 1998. a
Steinberg, D. K., Carlson, C. A., Bates, N. R., Johnson, R. J., Michaels, A. F., and Knap, A. H.: Overview of the US JGOFS Bermuda Atlantic Time-series Study (BATS): a decade-scale look at ocean biology and biogeochemistry, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 48, 1405–1447, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(00)00148-X, 2001. a, b, c
Vichi, M., Pinardi, N., Zavatarelli, M., Matteucci, G., Marcaccio, M., Bergamini, M. C., and Frascari, F.: One-dimensional ecosystem model tests in the Po Prodelta area (Northern Adriatic Sea), Environ. Modell. Softw., 13, 471–481, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(98)00055-3, 1998. a, b
Vichi, M., Oddo, P., Zavatarelli, M., Coluccelli, A., Coppini, G., Celio, M., Fonda Umani, S., and Pinardi, N.: Calibration and validation of a one-dimensional complex marine biogeochemical flux model in different areas of the northern Adriatic shelf, Ann. Geophys., 21, 413–436, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-21-413-2003, 2003. a, b
Vichi, M., Pinardi, N., and Masina, S.: A generalized model of pelagic biogeochemistry for the global ocean ecosystem. Part I: Theory, J. Mar. Syst., 64, 89–109, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2006.03.006, 2007. a, b
Ward, B. A., Friedrichs, M. A., Anderson, T. R., and Oschlies, A.: Parameter optimisation techniques and the problem of underdetermination in marine biogeochemical models, J. Mar. Syst., 81, 34–43, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMARSYS.2009.12.005, 2010. a
Ward, B. A., Schartau, M., Oschlies, A., Martin, A. P., Follows, M. J., and Anderson, T. R.: When is a biogeochemical model too complex? Objective model reduction and selection for North Atlantic time-series sites, Prog. Oceanogr., 116, 49–65, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.POCEAN.2013.06.002, 2013. a, b, c
Short summary
Computational models are used to simulate the behavior of marine ecosystems. The models often have unknown parameters that need to be calibrated to accurately represent observational data. Here, we propose a novel approach to simultaneously determine a large set of parameters for a one-dimensional model of a marine ecosystem in the surface ocean at two contrasting sites. By utilizing global and local optimization techniques, we estimate many parameters in a computationally efficient manner.
Computational models are used to simulate the behavior of marine ecosystems. The models often...
