Articles | Volume 17, issue 13
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5167-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5167-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model evaluation paper
| 
05 Jul 2024
Model evaluation paper |
| 05 Jul 2024
| 05 Jul 2024
Simulation of marine stratocumulus using the super-droplet method: numerical convergence and comparison to a double-moment bulk scheme using SCALE-SDM 5.2.6-2.3.1
Chongzhi Yin
China Meteorological Administration Aerosol–Cloud and Precipitation Key Laboratory/Collaborative Innovation Centre on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
Shin-ichiro Shima
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Graduate School of Information Science, University of Hyogo, Kobe, Japan
RIKEN Center for Computational Science, Kobe, Japan
Lulin Xue
National Center for Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307, USA
Chunsong Lu
China Meteorological Administration Aerosol–Cloud and Precipitation Key Laboratory/Collaborative Innovation Centre on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
Related authors
Chongzhi Yin, Shin-Ichiro Shima, and Chunsong Lu
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 9993–10022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-9993-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-9993-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We developed and tested a way to trace selected cloud particles in a simulation, including how they grow and merge. One run identifies particles that meet chosen conditions, and a second reconstructs only their saved histories. In a three-dimensional test, the saved data were estimated to be one-fifth of what would be needed to keep all particle histories. Larger reductions are possible when fewer particles are selected, making such studies more practical in large simulations.
Yufei Chu, Jun A. Zhang, Guo Lin, Hanqin Guo, Lulin Xue, Weiwei Li, Hyeyum Hailey Shin, Min Deng, Lan Jin, and Flynn McGinnity
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4928, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4928, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
Short summary
Atmospheric stability near the ground controls clouds, pollution and mixing, but is rarely measured continuously. We show it can be estimated from routine surface and boundary-layer measurements, and – more importantly – we introduce a way to tell in advance whether such an estimate will still work at a different location. The method identifies which measurements are responsible when it fails, and whether the failure is due to random noise or a genuine difference in local conditions.
Chongzhi Yin, Shin-Ichiro Shima, and Chunsong Lu
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 9993–10022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-9993-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-9993-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We developed and tested a way to trace selected cloud particles in a simulation, including how they grow and merge. One run identifies particles that meet chosen conditions, and a second reconstructs only their saved histories. In a three-dimensional test, the saved data were estimated to be one-fifth of what would be needed to keep all particle histories. Larger reductions are possible when fewer particles are selected, making such studies more practical in large simulations.
Timothy W. Juliano, Florian Tornow, Ann M. Fridlind, Andrew S. Ackerman, Gregory S. Elsaesser, Bart Geerts, Christian P. Lackner, David Painemal, Israel Silber, Mikhail Ovchinnikov, Gunilla Svensson, Michael Tjernström, Peng Wu, Alejandro Baró Pérez, Peter Bogenschutz, Dmitry Chechin, Kamal Kant Chandrakar, Jan Chylik, Andrey Debolskiy, Rostislav Fadeev, Anu Gupta, Luisa Ickes, Michail Karalis, Martin Köhler, Branko Kosović, Peter Kuma, Weiwei Li, Evgeny Mortikov, Hugh Morrison, Roel A. J. Neggers, Anna Possner, Tomi Raatikainen, Lea Raillard, Sami Romakkaniemi, Niklas Schnierstein, Shin-ichiro Shima, Nikita Silin, Mikhail Tolstykh, Étienne Vignon, Lulin Xue, Meng Zhang, and Xue Zheng
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 13267–13302, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-13267-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-13267-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Models struggle to capture cloud and precipitation processes and their radiative effects in marine cold-air outbreaks. We use a quasi-Lagrangian framework to compare large-eddy simulation (LES) and single-column model (SCM) output with field and satellite observations. With fixed droplet and ice numbers, LES and SCM agree in liquid-only tests. In mixed-phase conditions, LES plausibly capture cloud thinning and breakup, while SCMs largely remain overcast and thereby miss cloud radiative effects.
Sylwester Arabas, Agnieszka Żaba, Daria Klimaszewska, Emma C. Ware, Clare E. Singer, Manhal Alhilali, Jason Barr, Daniel G. Partridge, Shin-ichiro Shima, and Robert Wood
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3906, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3906, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
The paper focuses on the use of Python and its package ecosystem for modeling the dynamics of atmospheric aerosol and cloud droplets. We highlight that concise code and high-level abstractions (incl. programmatic expression of physical units) can be used without performance tradeoffs. The paper features two cloud-microphysics classics: an adiabatic parcel model and a Monte-Carlo coagulation solver. The presented code constitutes a single Jupyter notebook that can be executed "in the cloud".
Clara J. A. Bayley, Ann Kristin Naumann, Florian Poydenot, Raphaela Vogel, Bjorn Stevens, and Shin-Ichiro Shima
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 6121–6142, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-6121-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-6121-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We are developing a model called CLEO, a type of “Superdroplet Model” (SDM) for cloud microphysics, to try to overcome some of the issues faced by climate models which are caused by errors in cloud modelling. Here we describe the equations for cloud microphysics CLEO uses and how we solve them, such as to see how water-droplets move around and grow/shrink in the atmosphere. We also provide some demonstrations of the microphysical processes we model to show that CLEO works as intended.
Jiaxing Zhang, Suying Yang, Chunsong Lu, Yiran Peng, Guan Ming, and Jinbei Li
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3376, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3376, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Using aircraft measurements from three ocean field campaigns, we studied how low-level marine clouds change when the lower atmosphere becomes disconnected from the cloud layer above. This usually makes clouds thinner and less reflective. Dry air from above speeds cloud loss, while moist air helps clouds persist and form larger droplets. Depending on moisture and rainfall, clouds may dissipate, persist, or recover. These results improve understanding of how marine clouds affect climate.
Sisi Chen, Lulin Xue, Michelle Harrold, Sarah Tessendorf, Jamie Wolff, Nick Dawson, and Darcy Jacobson
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3289, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3289, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Glaciogenic seeding is used in winter mountains to enhance snowpack and address water scarcity. Liquid propane seeding, a type of glaciogenic seeding, generates ice in relatively warm conditions where silver iodide is less effective, yet no models exist to simulate its impacts. We built a liquid propane seeding module in a weather model and tested it over idealized mountains. Simulations show snow enhancement is strongest where clouds are rich in supercooled liquid and rain formation is weak.
Shang Wu, David C. Wong, Jiandong Wang, Yuzhi Jin, Junjun Li, and Chunsong Lu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 7261–7285, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-7261-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-7261-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
High-resolution weather and climate simulations produce massive amounts of data, creating major storage challenges. This study explores a method that reduces unnecessary numerical detail by keeping only a limited number of significant digits. The results show that substantial data reduction can be achieved while preserving key physical features.
Yufei Chu, Guo Lin, Min Deng, Lulin Xue, Weiwei Li, Hyeyum Hailey Shin, Jun A. Zhang, Hanqing Guo, and Zhien Wang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 1415–1434, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-1415-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-1415-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a new machine learning approach to estimate the height of the mixing layer in the lower atmosphere, which is important for predicting weather and air quality. By using daily temperature and heat patterns, the model learns how the atmosphere changes throughout the day. It gives accurate results across different locations and seasons, helping improve future climate and weather forecasts through better understanding of surface–atmosphere interactions.
Timothy W. Juliano, Florian Tornow, Ann M. Fridlind, Andrew S. Ackerman, Gregory S. Elsaesser, Bart Geerts, Christian P. Lackner, David Painemal, Israel Silber, Mikhail Ovchinnikov, Gunilla Svensson, Michael Tjernström, Peng Wu, Alejandro Baró Pérez, Peter Bogenschutz, Dmitry Chechin, Kamal Kant Chandrakar, Jan Chylik, Andrey Debolskiy, Rostislav Fadeev, Anu Gupta, Luisa Ickes, Michail Karalis, Martin Köhler, Branko Kosović, Peter Kuma, Weiwei Li, Evgeny Mortikov, Hugh Morrison, Roel A. J. Neggers, Anna Possner, Tomi Raatikainen, Sami Romakkaniemi, Niklas Schnierstein, Shin-ichiro Shima, Nikita Silin, Mikhail Tolstykh, Lulin Xue, Meng Zhang, and Xue Zheng
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6217, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6217, 2026
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Models struggle to capture cloud and precipitation processes and their radiative effects in marine cold-air outbreaks. We use a quasi-Lagrangian framework to compare large-eddy simulation (LES) and single-column model (SCM) output with field and satellite observations. With fixed droplet and ice numbers, LES and SCM agree in liquid-only tests. In mixed-phase conditions, LES plausibly capture cloud thinning and breakup, while SCMs largely remain overcast and thereby miss cloud radiative effects.
Jialu Xu, Yingjie Zhang, Yuying Wang, Xing Yan, Bin Zhu, Chunsong Lu, Yuanjian Yang, Yele Sun, Junhui Zhang, Xiaofan Zuo, Zhanghanshu Han, and Rui Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 18599–18616, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-18599-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-18599-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We conducted a year-long study in Nanjing to explore how the height of the atmospheric boundary layer affects fine particle pollution. We found that low boundary layers in winter trap pollutants like nitrate and primary particles, while higher layers in summer help form secondary pollutants like sulfate and organic aerosols. These findings show that boundary layer dynamics are key to understanding and managing seasonal air pollution.
Meilian Chen, Xiaoqin Jing, Jiaojiao Li, Jing Yang, Xiaobo Dong, Bart Geerts, Yan Yin, Baojun Chen, Lulin Xue, Mengyu Huang, Ping Tian, and Shaofeng Hua
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 7581–7596, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7581-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7581-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Several recent studies have reported complete cloud glaciation induced by airborne-based glaciogenic cloud seeding over plains. Since turbulence is an important factor to maintain clouds in a mixed phase, it is hypothesized that turbulence may have an impact on the seeding effect. This hypothesis is evident in the present study, which shows that turbulence can accelerate the impact of airborne glaciogenic seeding of stratiform clouds.
Sisi Chen, Lulin Xue, Sarah A. Tessendorf, Thomas Chubb, Andrew Peace, Suzanne Kenyon, Johanna Speirs, Jamie Wolff, and Bill Petzke
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6703–6724, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6703-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6703-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study aims to investigate how cloud seeding affects snowfall in Australia's Snowy Mountains. By running simulations with different setups, we found that seeding impact varies greatly with weather conditions. Seeding increased snow in stable weather but sometimes reduced it in stormy weather. This helps us to better understand when seeding works best to boost water supplies.
Ruiyu Song, Bin Zhu, Lina Sha, Peng Qian, Fei Wang, Chunsong Lu, Yan Yin, and Yuying Wang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-43, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-43, 2025
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines how anthropogenic aerosols affect rainfall during the early summer in China’s Yangtze River Delta. Using the WRF-Chem model, we found that moderate emissions increase rainfall by boosting cloud formation. However, high emissions reduce rainfall due to smaller cloud droplets, which hinder their growth. These findings highlight the complex impact of aerosol concentrations on precipitation and provide valuable data for future research on aerosol-cloud-precipitation interactions.
Ruyi Zhang, Limin Zhou, Shin-ichiro Shima, and Huawei Yang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6761–6774, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6761-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6761-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Solar activity weakly ionises Earth's atmosphere, charging cloud droplets. Electro-coalescence is when oppositely charged droplets stick together. We introduce an analytical expression of electro-coalescence probability and use it in a warm-cumulus-cloud simulation. Results show that charge cases increase rain and droplet size, with the new method outperforming older ones. The new method requires longer computation time, but its impact on rain justifies inclusion in meteorology models.
Toshiki Matsushima, Seiya Nishizawa, and Shin-ichiro Shima
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6211–6245, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6211-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6211-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A particle-based cloud model was developed for meter- to submeter-scale resolution in cloud simulations. Our new cloud model's computational performance is superior to a bin method and comparable to a two-moment bulk method. A highlight of this study is the 2 m resolution shallow cloud simulations over an area covering ∼10 km2. This model allows for studying turbulence and cloud physics at spatial scales that overlap with those covered by direct numerical simulations and field studies.
Sisi Chen, Lulin Xue, Sarah Tessendorf, Kyoko Ikeda, Courtney Weeks, Roy Rasmussen, Melvin Kunkel, Derek Blestrud, Shaun Parkinson, Melinda Meadows, and Nick Dawson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 5217–5231, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5217-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5217-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The possible mechanism of effective ice growth in the cloud-top generating cells in winter orographic clouds is explored using a newly developed ultra-high-resolution cloud microphysics model. Simulations demonstrate that a high availability of moisture and liquid water is critical for producing large ice particles. Fluctuations in temperature and moisture down to millimeter scales due to cloud turbulence can substantially affect the growth history of the individual cloud particles.
Yabin Gou, Haonan Chen, Hong Zhu, and Lulin Xue
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 2439–2463, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2439-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2439-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This article investigates the complex precipitation microphysics associated with super typhoon Lekima using a host of in situ and remote sensing observations, including rain gauge and disdrometer data, as well as polarimetric radar observations. The impacts of precipitation microphysics on multi-source data consistency and radar precipitation estimation are quantified. It is concluded that the dynamical precipitation microphysical processes must be considered in radar precipitation estimation.
Istvan Geresdi, Lulin Xue, Sisi Chen, Youssef Wehbe, Roelof Bruintjes, Jared A. Lee, Roy M. Rasmussen, Wojciech W. Grabowski, Noemi Sarkadi, and Sarah A. Tessendorf
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 16143–16159, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16143-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16143-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
By releasing soluble aerosols into the convective clouds, cloud seeding potentially enhances rainfall. The seeding impacts are hard to quantify with observations only. Numerical models that represent the detailed physics of aerosols, cloud and rain formation are used to investigate the seeding impacts on rain enhancement under different natural aerosol backgrounds and using different seeding materials. Our results indicate that seeding may enhance rainfall under certain conditions.
Cited articles
Abade, G. C., Grabowski, W. W., and Pawlowska, H.: Broadening of cloud droplet spectra through eddy hopping: Turbulent entraining parcel simulations, J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 3365–3379, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0078.1, 2018.
Ackerman, A. S., VanZanten, M. C., Stevens, B., Savic-Jovcic, V., Bretherton, C. S., Chlond, A., Golaz, J.-C., Jiang, H., Khairoutdinov, M., and Krueger, S. K.: Large-eddy simulations of a drizzling, stratocumulus-topped marine boundary layer, Mon. Weather Rev., 137, 1083–1110, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2582.1, 2009.
Alfonso, L. and Raga, G. B.: The impact of fluctuations and correlations in droplet growth by collision–coalescence revisited – Part 1: Numerical calculation of post-gel droplet size distribution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6895–6905, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6895-2017, 2017.
Arabas, S. and Shima, S.-I.: Large-eddy simulations of trade wind cumuli using particle-based microphysics with Monte Carlo coalescence, J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 2768–2777, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0295.1, 2013.
Arabas, S., Jaruga, A., Pawlowska, H., and Grabowski, W. W.: libcloudph++ 1.0: a single-moment bulk, double-moment bulk, and particle-based warm-rain microphysics library in C++, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1677–1707, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1677-2015, 2015.
Arakawa, A. and Lamb, V. R.: Computational design of the basic dynamical processes of the UCLA general circulation model, Methods in Computational Physics: Advances in Research and Applications, 17, 173–265, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-460817-7.50009-4, 1977.
Bony, S. and Dufresne, J. L.: Marine boundary layer clouds at the heart of tropical cloud feedback uncertainties in climate models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L20806, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023851, 2005.
Bony, S., Colman, R., Kattsov, V. M., Allan, R. P., Bretherton, C. S., Dufresne, J.-L., Hall, A., Hallegatte, S., Holland, M. M., and Ingram, W.: How well do we understand and evaluate climate change feedback processes?, J. Climate, 19, 3445–3482, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3819.1, 2006.
Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster, P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., and Lohmann, U.: Clouds and aerosols, in: Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 571–657, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016, 2013.
Chandrakar, K. K., Morrison, H., and Witte, M.: Evolution of Droplet Size Distributions During the Transition of an Ultraclean Stratocumulus Cloud System to Open Cell Structure: An LES Investigation Using Lagrangian Microphysics, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL100511, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL100511, 2022.
Cheng, A., Xu, K. M., and Stevens, B.: Effects of resolution on the simulation of boundary-layer clouds and the partition of kinetic energy to subgrid scales, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 2, 3, https://doi.org/10.3894/JAMES.2010.2.3, 2010.
Dziekan, P. and Pawlowska, H.: Stochastic coalescence in Lagrangian cloud microphysics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 13509–13520, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13509-2017, 2017.
Dziekan, P., Waruszewski, M., and Pawlowska, H.: University of Warsaw Lagrangian Cloud Model (UWLCM) 1.0: a modern large-eddy simulation tool for warm cloud modeling with Lagrangian microphysics, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2587–2606, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2587-2019, 2019.
Dziekan, P., Jensen, J. B., Grabowski, W. W., and Pawlowska, H.: Impact of Giant Sea Salt Aerosol Particles on Precipitation in Marine Cumuli and Stratocumuli: Lagrangian Cloud Model Simulations. J. Atmos. Sci., 78, 4127–4142, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-21-0041.1, 2021.
Geresdi, I., Xue, L., and Rasmussen, R.: Evaluation of orographic cloud seeding using a bin microphysics scheme: Two-dimensional approach, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 56, 1443–1462, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0045.1, 2017.
Grabowski, W. W. and Abade, G. C.: Broadening of cloud droplet spectra through eddy hopping: Turbulent adiabatic parcel simulations, J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 1485–1493, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0043.1, 2017.
Grabowski, W. W., Dziekan, P., and Pawlowska, H.: Lagrangian condensation microphysics with Twomey CCN activation, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 103–120, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-103-2018, 2018.
Grabowski, W. W., Morrison, H., Shima, S.-I., Abade, G. C., Dziekan, P., and Pawlowska, H.: Modeling of cloud microphysics: Can we do better?, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 100, 655–672, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0005.1, 2019.
Hoffmann, F.: The Effect of Spurious Cloud Edge Supersaturations in Lagrangian Cloud Models: An Analytical and Numerical Study, Mon. Weather Rev., 144, 107–118, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0234.1, 2016.
Hoffmann, F. and Feingold, G.: Entrainment and Mixing in Stratocumulus: Effects of a New Explicit Subgrid-Scale Scheme for Large-Eddy Simulations with Particle-Based Microphysics, J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 1955–1973, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0318.1, 2019.
Hoffmann, F., Yamaguchi, T., and Feingold, G.: Inhomogeneous mixing in Lagrangian cloud models: Effects on the production of precipitation embryos, J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 113–133, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0087.1, 2019.
Jaruga, A. and Pawlowska, H.: libcloudph++ 2.0: aqueous-phase chemistry extension of the particle-based cloud microphysics scheme, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3623–3645, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3623-2018, 2018.
Kawai, H. and Shige, S.: Marine Low Clouds and Their Parameterization in Climate Models, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. Ser. II, 98, 1097–1127, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2020-059, 2020.
Kessler, E.: On the distribution and continuity of water substance in atmospheric circulations, in: On the distribution and continuity of water substance in atmospheric circulations, Springer, Boston, MA., 1–84, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-935704-36-2_1, 1969.
Khain, A., Ovtchinnikov, M., Pinsky, M., Pokrovsky, A., and Krugliak, H.: Notes on the state-of-the-art numerical modeling of cloud microphysics, Atmos. Res., 55, 159–224, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(00)00064-8, 2000.
Khain, A., Beheng, K., Heymsfield, A., Korolev, A., Krichak, S., Levin, Z., Pinsky, M., Phillips, V., Prabhakaran, T., and Teller, A.: Representation of microphysical processes in cloud-resolving models: Spectral (bin) microphysics versus bulk parameterization, Rev. Geophys., 53, 247–322, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000468, 2015.
Koren, B.: A robust upwind discretization method for advection, diffusion and source terms, Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica, Amsterdam, 1993.
Kurowski, M. J., P. Malinowski, S., and W. Grabowski, W.: A numerical investigation of entrainment and transport within a stratocumulus-topped boundary layer, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 135, 77–92, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.354, 2009.
Lilly, D. K.: On the numerical simulation of buoyant convection, Tellus, 14, 148–172, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1962.tb00128.x, 1962.
Lin, Y.-L., Farley, R. D., and Orville, H. D.: Bulk parameterization of the snow field in a cloud model, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 22, 1065–1092, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1983)022<1065:BPOTSF>2.0.CO;2, 1983.
Lohmann, U.: Possible aerosol effects on ice clouds via contact nuclei, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 647–656, 2002.
Lu, C., Zhu, L., Liu, Y., Mei, F., Fast, J. D., Pekour, M. S., Luo, S., Xu, X., He, X., Li, J., and Gao, S.: Observational study of relationships between entrainment rate, homogeneity of mixing, and cloud droplet relative dispersion, Atmos. Res., 293, 106900, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2023.106900, 2023.
Lynn, B. H., Khain, A. P., Dudhia, J., Rosenfeld, D., Pokrovsky, A., and Seifert, A.: Spectral (bin) microphysics coupled with a mesoscale model (MM5). Part I: Model description and first results, Mon. Weather Rev., 133, 44–58, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-2840.1, 2005.
Matheou, G.: Turbulence structure in a stratocumulus cloud, Atmosphere, 9, 392, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9100392, 2018.
Matheou, G. and Teixeira, J.: Sensitivity to physical and numerical aspects of large-eddy simulation of stratocumulus, Mon. Weather Rev., 147, 2621–2639, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0294.1, 2019.
Matheou, G., Chung, D., and Teixeira, J.: On the synergy between numerics and subgrid scale modeling in LES of stratified flows: Grid convergence of a stratocumulus-topped boundary layer, International Symposium on Stratified Flows, San Diego, CA, 31 August 2016, https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3rx2n92v (last access: 19 June 2024), 2016.
Mellado, J.-P., Bretherton, C., Stevens, B., and Wyant, M.: DNS and LES for simulating stratocumulus: Better together, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 10, 1421–1438, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001312, 2018.
Milbrandt, J. and Yau, M.: A multimoment bulk microphysics parameterization. Part I: Analysis of the role of the spectral shape parameter, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 3051–3064, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3534.1, 2005.
Morrison, H. and Grabowski, W. W.: An improved representation of rimed snow and conversion to graupel in a multicomponent bin microphysics scheme, J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 1337–1360, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3250.1, 2010.
Morrison, H., Witte, M., Bryan, G. H., Harrington, J. Y., and Lebo, Z. J.: Broadening of modeled cloud droplet spectra using bin microphysics in an Eulerian spatial domain, J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 4005–4030, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0055.1, 2018.
Morrison, H., van Lier-Walqui, M., Fridlind, A. M., Grabowski, W. W., Harrington, J. Y., Hoose, C., Korolev, A., Kumjian, M. R., Milbrandt, J. A., Pawlowska, H., Posselt, D. J., Prat, O. P., Reimel, K. J., Shima, S.-I., van Diedenhoven, B., and Xue, L.: Confronting the Challenge of Modeling Cloud and Precipitation Microphysics, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2019MS001689, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001689, 2020.
NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies: GCSS LES Intercomparison Based on Flight RF02, in: GCSS-DIME, DYCOMS-II Field Campaign, NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies [data set], https://gcss-dime.giss.nasa.gov/wg1/dycoms-ii/modsim_dycoms-ii_gcss7-rf02.html (last access: 19 June 2024), 2018.
Naumann, A. K. and Seifert, A.: A Lagrangian drop model to study warm rain microphysical processes in shallow cumulus, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 7, 1136–1154, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015MS000456, 2015.
Nishizawa, S., Yashiro, H., Sato, Y., Miyamoto, Y., and Tomita, H.: Influence of grid aspect ratio on planetary boundary layer turbulence in large-eddy simulations, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3393–3419, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3393-2015, 2015.
Noh, Y., Oh, D., Hoffmann, F., and Raasch, S.: A Cloud Microphysics Parameterization for Shallow Cumulus Clouds Based on Lagrangian Cloud Model Simulations, J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 4031–4047, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0080.1, 2018.
Nowak, J. L., Siebert, H., Szodry, K.-E., and Malinowski, S. P.: Coupled and decoupled stratocumulus-topped boundary layers: turbulence properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10965–10991, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10965-2021, 2021.
Pedersen, J. G., Malinowski, S. P., and Grabowski, W. W.: Resolution and domain-size sensitivity in implicit large-eddy simulation of the stratocumulus-topped boundary layer, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 8, 885–903, 2016.
Richter, D. H., MacMillan, T., and Wainwright, C.: A Lagrangian Cloud Model for the Study of Marine Fog, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 181, 523–542, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-020-00595-w, 2021.
Rogers, R. R. and Yau, M. K.: A Short Course in Cloud Physics, 3rd edn., Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington, MA, ISBN 9780750632157, 1989.
Sato, Y., Nishizawa, S., Yashiro, H., Miyamoto, Y., Kajikawa, Y., and Tomita, H.: Impacts of cloud microphysics on trade wind cumulus: which cloud microphysics processes contribute to the diversity in a large eddy simulation?, Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, 2, 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-015-0053-6, 2015.
Sato, Y., Shima, S. I., and Tomita, H.: A grid refinement study of trade wind cumuli simulated by a Lagrangian cloud microphysical model: the super-droplet method, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 18, 359–365, https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.764, 2017.
Sato, Y., Shima, S. I., and Tomita, H.: Numerical Convergence of Shallow Convection Cloud Field Simulations: Comparison Between Double-Moment Eulerian and Particle-Based Lagrangian Microphysics Coupled to the Same Dynamical Core, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 10, 1495–1512, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001285, 2018.
Schoeffler, P.: Dissipation, dispersion and stability of numerical schemes for advection and diffusion, SMHI, Report No. 34, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Norrköping, Sweden, ISSN 0347-2116., 1982.
Schoenberg Ferrier, B.: A double-moment multiple-phase four-class bulk ice scheme. Part I: Description, J. Atmos. Sci., 51, 249–280, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051%3C0249:ADMMPF%3E2.0.CO;2, 1994.
Schwenkel, J., Hoffmann, F., and Raasch, S.: Improving collisional growth in Lagrangian cloud models: development and verification of a new splitting algorithm, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3929–3944, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3929-2018, 2018.
Seifert, A.: On the parameterization of evaporation of raindrops as simulated by a one-dimensional rainshaft model, J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 3608–3619, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAS2586.1, 2008.
Seifert, A. and Beheng, K. D.: A double-moment parameterization for simulating autoconversion, accretion and selfcollection, Atmos. Res., 59, 265–281, 2001.
Seifert, A. and Beheng, K. D.: A two-moment cloud microphysics parameterization for mixed-phase clouds. Part 1: Model description, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 92, 45–66, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-005-0112-4, 2006.
Seifert, A. and Rasp, S.: Potential and Limitations of Machine Learning for Modeling Warm-Rain Cloud Microphysical Processes, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2020MS002301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002301, 2020.
Seiki, T. and Nakajima, T.: Aerosol effects of the condensation process on a convective cloud simulation, J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 833–853, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0195.1, 2014.
Shima, S., Sato, Y., Hashimoto, A., and Misumi, R.: Predicting the morphology of ice particles in deep convection using the super-droplet method: development and evaluation of SCALE-SDM 0.2.5-2.2.0, -2.2.1, and -2.2.2, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4107–4157, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4107-2020, 2020.
Shima, S.-I.: Estimation of the Computational Cost of Super-Droplet Method (Fast Algorithms in Computational Fluids: theory and applications), Kyoto University Research Information Repository, RIMS Kokyuroku, 1606, 110–118, 2008.
Shima, S.-I., Kusano, K., Kawano, A., Sugiyama, T., and Kawahara, S.: The super-droplet method for the numerical simulation of clouds and precipitation: A particle-based and probabilistic microphysics model coupled with a non-hydrostatic model, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 135, 1307–1320, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.441, 2009.
Smagorinsky, J.: General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. The basic experiment, Mon. Weather Rev., 91, 99–164, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1963)091%3C0099:GCEWTP%3E2.3.CO;2, 1963.
Smoluchowski, M.: Drei Vorträge über Diffusion, Brownsche Molekularbewegung und Koagulation von Kolloidteilchen, Z. Phys., 17, 557–585, 1916.
Stephens, G. L.: Cloud feedbacks in the climate system: A critical review, J. Climate, 18, 237–273, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-3243.1, 2005.
Stevens, B., Lenschow, D. H., Vali, G., Gerber, H., Bandy, A., Blomquist, B., Brenguier, J.-L., Bretherton, C., Burnet, F., and Campos, T.: Dynamics and chemistry of marine stratocumulus—DYCOMS-II, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 84, 579–594, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-84-5-579, 2003.
Stevens, B., Moeng, C.-H., Ackerman, A. S., Bretherton, C. S., Chlond, A., de Roode, S., Edwards, J., Golaz, J.-C., Jiang, H., and Khairoutdinov, M.: Evaluation of large-eddy simulations via observations of nocturnal marine stratocumulus, Mon. Weather Rev., 133, 1443–1462, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2930.1, 2005.
Stevens, D. and Bretherton, C.: Effects of resolution on the simulation of stratocumulus entrainment, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 425–439, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712555403, 1999.
Twomey, S.: The nuclei of natural cloud formation part II: The supersaturation in natural clouds and the variation of cloud droplet concentration, Geofisica Pural e Applicata, 43, 243–249, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01993560, 1959.
Unterstrasser, S., Hoffmann, F., and Lerch, M.: Collisional growth in a particle-based cloud microphysical model: insights from column model simulations using LCM1D (v1.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5119–5145, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5119-2020, 2020.
Wicker, L. J. and Skamarock, W. C.: Time-splitting methods for elastic models using forward time schemes, Mon. Weather Rev., 130, 2088–2097, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130%3C2088:TSMFEM%3E2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Wood, R.: Stratocumulus clouds, Mon. Weather Rev., 140, 2373–2423, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00121.1, 2012.
Xu, X., Lu, C., Liu, Y., Luo, S., Zhou, X., Endo, S., Zhu, L., and Wang, Y.: Influences of an entrainment–mixing parameterization on numerical simulations of cumulus and stratocumulus clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 5459–5475, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5459-2022, 2022.
Xue, L., Teller, A., Rasmussen, R., Geresdi, I., and Pan, Z.: Effects of aerosol solubility and regeneration on warm-phase orographic clouds and precipitation simulated by a detailed bin microphysical scheme, J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 3336–3354, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3511.1, 2010.
Xue, L., Teller, A., Rasmussen, R., Geresdi, I., Pan, Z., and Liu, X.: Effects of aerosol solubility and regeneration on mixed-phase orographic clouds and precipitation, J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 1994–2010, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-098.1, 2012.
Yamaguchi, T. and Randall, D. A.: Cooling of entrained parcels in a large-eddy simulation, J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 1118–1136, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-080.1, 2012.
Yang, F., Hoffmann, F., Shaw, R. A., Ovchinnikov, M., and Vogelmann, A. M.: An Intercomparison of Large-Eddy Simulations of a Convection Cloud Chamber Using Haze-Capable Bin and Lagrangian Cloud Microphysics Schemes, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 15, e2022MS003270, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022MS003270, 2023.
Yin, C.: wangyouyue/GMD_2024_code_Yin: SCALE-SDM_Yin2024_v1.0.4, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10688645, 2024a.
Yin, C.: Supplement to the article “Simulation of marine stratocumulus using the super-droplet method: Numerical convergence and comparison to a double-moment bulk scheme”, Zenodo [video], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10688359, 2024b.
Zelinka, M. D., Myers, T. A., McCoy, D. T., Po-Chedley, S., Caldwell, P. M., Ceppi, P., Klein, S. A., and Taylor, K. E.: Causes of higher climate sensitivity in CMIP6 models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL085782, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085782, 2020.
Short summary
We investigate numerical convergence properties of a particle-based numerical cloud microphysics model (SDM) and a double-moment bulk scheme for simulating a marine stratocumulus case, compare their results with model intercomparison project results, and present possible explanations for the different results of the SDM and the bulk scheme. Aerosol processes can be accurately simulated using SDM, and this may be an important factor affecting the behavior and morphology of marine stratocumulus.
We investigate numerical convergence properties of a particle-based numerical cloud microphysics...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint