Articles | Volume 17, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4447-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4447-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Development and technical paper
| 
29 May 2024
Development and technical paper |
| 29 May 2024
| 29 May 2024
Implementation of a Simple Actuator Disk for Large-Eddy Simulation in the Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF-SADLES v1.2) for wind turbine wake simulation
Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen, Allégaten 70, 5007 Bergen, Norway
Bergen Offshore Wind Centre, Allégaten 55, 5007 Bergen, Norway
Mostafa Bakhoday-Paskyabi
Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen, Allégaten 70, 5007 Bergen, Norway
Bergen Offshore Wind Centre, Allégaten 55, 5007 Bergen, Norway
Mohammadreza Mohammadpour-Penchah
Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen, Allégaten 70, 5007 Bergen, Norway
Bergen Offshore Wind Centre, Allégaten 55, 5007 Bergen, Norway
now at: WindSim AS, Tollbodgaten 22, 3111 Tønsberg, Norway
Related authors
Hai Bui, Mostafa Bakhoday-Paskyabi, and Joachim Reuder
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-91, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-91, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Strong low-altitude winds, known as low-level jets (LLJs), significantly impact offshore wind turbines. We analyzed LLJs at the FINO1 site using LiDAR observations and reanalysis data. Our results show that models tend to underestimate LLJ intensity. To address this, we introduced a new method to characterize wind profiles and applied a correction to 50 years of reanalysis data, yielding a more accurate long-term representation of these wind features.
Xu Ning and Mostafa Bakhoday-Paskyabi
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4390, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4390, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Ocean waves shape winds close to the surface and extend their impact throughout the atmospheric boundary layer. In this study, we built a new modeling tool that allows simulations to follow the moving wave surface itself. By testing different wave and wind conditions, we show how waves change air motion, turbulence, and energy exchange above the ocean. This approach improves our ability to represent air–sea interactions, with implications for weather studies and offshore wind energy.
Xu Ning and Mostafa Bakhoday-Paskyabi
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 1101–1122, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1101-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1101-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Waves interact with the overlying wind field by modifying the stresses at the atmosphere–ocean interface. We develop and employ a parameterization method of wave-induced stresses in the numerical simulation of an offshore wind farm in a stable atmospheric boundary layer. This work demonstrates how swells change the kinetic energy transport and induce wind veer and wake deflection, leading to significant variations in the power output of wind turbines at different positions of the wind farm.
Hai Bui, Mostafa Bakhoday-Paskyabi, and Joachim Reuder
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-91, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-91, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Strong low-altitude winds, known as low-level jets (LLJs), significantly impact offshore wind turbines. We analyzed LLJs at the FINO1 site using LiDAR observations and reanalysis data. Our results show that models tend to underestimate LLJ intensity. To address this, we introduced a new method to characterize wind profiles and applied a correction to 50 years of reanalysis data, yielding a more accurate long-term representation of these wind features.
Mostafa Bakhoday Paskyabi
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1631–1645, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1631-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1631-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The exchange of momentum and energy between the atmosphere and ocean depends on air–sea processes, especially wave-related ones. Precision in representing these interactions is vital for offshore wind turbine and farm design and operation. The development of a reliable wave–turbulence decomposition method to remove wave-induced interference from single-height wind measurements is essential for these applications and enhances our grasp of wind coherence within the wave boundary layer.
Maria Krutova and Mostafa Bakhoday-Paskyabi
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-79, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-79, 2023
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
Wind turbine wake studies often rely on engineering models, which consist of simple analytical expressions. We review an atmospheric event resulting in a strong wind flow change within tens of minutes and apply several wake models to see how they respond to new conditions. We find that two models are consistent with their predictions, and one of them, the super-Gaussian model, predicts the wake shape particularly well; more attention should be paid to its development and implementation.
Maria Krutova, Mostafa Bakhoday-Paskyabi, Joachim Reuder, and Finn Gunnar Nielsen
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3553–3564, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3553-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3553-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Local refinement of the grid is a powerful method allowing us to reduce the computational time while preserving the accuracy in the area of interest. Depending on the implementation, the local refinement may introduce unwanted numerical effects into the results. We study the wind speed common to the wind turbine operational speeds and confirm strong alteration of the result when the heat fluxes are present, except for the specific refinement scheme used.
Maria Krutova, Mostafa Bakhoday-Paskyabi, Joachim Reuder, and Finn Gunnar Nielsen
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 849–873, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-849-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-849-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We described a new automated method to separate the wind turbine wake from the undisturbed flow. The method relies on the wind speed distribution in the measured wind field to select one specific threshold value and split the measurements into wake and background points. The purpose of the method is to reduce the amount of data required – the proposed algorithm does not need precise information on the wind speed or direction and can run on the image instead of the measured data.
Cited articles
Anderson, C.: Wind turbines: Theory and practice, Cambridge University Press, 2020. a
Ardillon, E., Paskyabi, M. B., Cousin, A., Dimitrov, N., Dupoiron, M., Eldevik, S., Fekhari, E., Ferreira, C., Guiton, M., Jezequel, B., Joulin, P.-A., Lovera, A., Mayol, L., and Penchah, M. R.: Turbine loading and wake model uncertainty, Deliverable D3.2 for HIPERWIND project, https://www.hiperwind.eu/ (last access: 23 May 2024), 2023. a
Arthur, R. S., Mirocha, J. D., Marjanovic, N., Hirth, B. D., Schroeder, J. L., Wharton, S., and Chow, F. K.: Multi-scale simulation of wind farm performance during a frontal passage, Atmosphere, 11, 245, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11030245, 2020. a
Avissar, R. and Schmidt, T.: An evaluation of the scale at which ground-surface heat flux patchiness affects the convective boundary layer using large-eddy simulations, J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 2666–2689, 1998. a
Bakhoday-Paskyabi, M., Krutova, M., Bui, H., and Ning, X.: Multiscale Simulation of Offshore Wind Variability During Frontal Passage: Brief Implication on Turbines’ Wakes and Load, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2362, p. 012003, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2362/1/012003, 2022b. a, b
Baldauf, M., Seifert, A., Förstner, J., Majewski, D., Raschendorfer, M., and Reinhardt, T.: Operational convective-scale numerical weather prediction with the COSMO model: Description and sensitivities, Mon. Weather Rev., 139, 3887–3905, 2011. a
Breton, S.-P., Sumner, J., Sørensen, J. N., Hansen, K. S., Sarmast, S., and Ivanell, S.: A survey of modelling methods for high-fidelity wind farm simulations using large eddy simulation, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 375, 20160097, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0097, 2017. a, b
Bui, H.: WRF-v4.3.1 and PALM-v21.10, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8054487, 2023a. a
Bui, H.: Simple Actuator Disc for Large Eddy Simulation (SADLES), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10803669, 2023b. a, b
Bui, H. and Bakhoday-Paskyabi, M.: Mesoscale Simulation of Open Cellular Convection: Roles of Model Resolutions and Physics Parameterizations, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2362, p. 012006, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2362/1/012006, 2022. a
Burton, T., Jenkins, N., Sharpe, D., and Bossanyi, E.: Wind energy handbook, John Wiley & Sons, Online ISBN 9781119992714, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119992714, 2011. a
Calaf, M., Meneveau, C., and Meyers, J.: Large eddy simulation study of fully developed wind-turbine array boundary layers, Phys. Fluids, 22, 015110, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3291077, 2010. a
Churchfield, M., Wang, Q., Scholbrock, A., Herges, T., Mikkelsen, T., and Sjöholm, M.: Using high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics to help design a wind turbine wake measurement experiment, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 753, 032009, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/753/3/032009, 2016. a
Crespo, A. and Herna, J.: Turbulence characteristics in wind-turbine wakes, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 61, 71–85, 1996. a
Deardorff, J. W.: Stratocumulus-capped mixed layers derived from a three-dimensional model, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 18, 495–527, 1980. a
Fleming, P. A., Gebraad, P. M., Lee, S., van Wingerden, J.-W., Johnson, K., Churchfield, M., Michalakes, J., Spalart, P., and Moriarty, P.: Evaluating techniques for redirecting turbine wakes using SOWFA, Renew. Energ., 70, 211–218, 2014. a
Gaertner, E., Rinker, J., Sethuraman, L., Zahle, F., Anderson, B., Barter, G. E., Abbas, N. J., Meng, F., Bortolotti, P., Skrzypinski, W., Scott, G. N., Feil, R., Bredmose, H., Dykes, K., Shields, M., Allen, C., and Viselli, A.: IEA wind TCP task 37: definition of the IEA 15-megawatt offshore reference wind turbine, Tech. rep., National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), Golden, CO (United States), https://doi.org/10.2172/1603478, 2020. a
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz‐Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J-N.: Complete ERA5 from 1940: Fifth generation of ECMWF atmospheric reanalyses of the global climate, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Data Store (CDS) [data set], https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.143582cf, 2017. a
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, 2020. a, b
Hong, S.-Y., Noh, Y., and Dudhia, J.: A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes, Mon. Weather Rev., 134, 2318–2341, 2006. a
Iacono, M. J., Delamere, J. S., Mlawer, E. J., Shephard, M. W., Clough, S. A., and Collins, W. D.: Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 113, D13103, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009944, 2008. a
Jonkman, J., Butterfield, S., Musial, W., and Scott, G.: Definition of a 5-MW reference wind turbine for offshore system development, Tech. rep., National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), Golden, CO (United States), 2009. a
Krč, P., Resler, J., Sühring, M., Schubert, S., Salim, M. H., and Fuka, V.: Radiative Transfer Model 3.0 integrated into the PALM model system 6.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3095–3120, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3095-2021, 2021. a
Kumer, V.-M., Reuder, J., and Furevik, B. R.: A comparison of LiDAR and radiosonde wind measurements, Enrgy. Proced., 53, 214–220, 2014. a
Larsén, X. G. and Fischereit, J.: A case study of wind farm effects using two wake parameterizations in WRF (V3.7.1) in the presence of low level jets, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4668613, 2021. a, b, c, d
Ledoux, J., Riffo, S., and Salomon, J.: Analysis of the blade element momentum theory, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 81, 2596–2621, 2021. a
Lee, J. C. Y. and Lundquist, J. K.: Evaluation of the wind farm parameterization in the Weather Research and Forecasting model (version 3.8.1) with meteorological and turbine power data, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4229–4244, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4229-2017, 2017. a
Lin, D., Khan, B., Katurji, M., Bird, L., Faria, R., and Revell, L. E.: WRF4PALM v1.0: a mesoscale dynamical driver for the microscale PALM model system 6.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2503–2524, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2503-2021, 2021. a
Maronga, B., Gryschka, M., Heinze, R., Hoffmann, F., Kanani-Sühring, F., Keck, M., Ketelsen, K., Letzel, M. O., Sühring, M., and Raasch, S.: The Parallelized Large-Eddy Simulation Model (PALM) version 4.0 for atmospheric and oceanic flows: model formulation, recent developments, and future perspectives, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2515–2551, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2515-2015, 2015. a, b
Maronga, B., Banzhaf, S., Burmeister, C., Esch, T., Forkel, R., Fröhlich, D., Fuka, V., Gehrke, K. F., Geletič, J., Giersch, S., Gronemeier, T., Groß, G., Heldens, W., Hellsten, A., Hoffmann, F., Inagaki, A., Kadasch, E., Kanani-Sühring, F., Ketelsen, K., Khan, B. A., Knigge, C., Knoop, H., Krč, P., Kurppa, M., Maamari, H., Matzarakis, A., Mauder, M., Pallasch, M., Pavlik, D., Pfafferott, J., Resler, J., Rissmann, S., Russo, E., Salim, M., Schrempf, M., Schwenkel, J., Seckmeyer, G., Schubert, S., Sühring, M., von Tils, R., Vollmer, L., Ward, S., Witha, B., Wurps, H., Zeidler, J., and Raasch, S.: Overview of the PALM model system 6.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1335–1372, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1335-2020, 2020. a, b
Mirocha, J., Kosovic, B., Aitken, M., and Lundquist, J.: Implementation of a generalized actuator disk wind turbine model into the weather research and forecasting model for large-eddy simulation applications, J. Renew. Sust. Energ., 6, 013104, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4861061, 2014. a, b, c, d, e, f
Moeng, C.-H. and Wyngaard, J. C.: Spectral analysis of large-eddy simulations of the convective boundary layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 3573–3587, 1988. a
Mukul Tewari, N., Tewari, M., Chen, F., Wang, W., Dudhia, J., LeMone, M., Mitchell, K., Ek, M., Gayno, G., Wegiel, J., and Cuenca, R. H.: Implementation and verification of the unified NOAH land surface model in the WRF model (Formerly Paper Number 17.5), in: Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Weather Analysis and Forecasting/16th Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction, Seattle, WA, USA, vol. 14, 11–15, 2004. a
Muñoz-Esparza, D., Kosović, B., Van Beeck, J., and Mirocha, J.: A stochastic perturbation method to generate inflow turbulence in large-eddy simulation models: Application to neutrally stratified atmospheric boundary layers, Phys. Fluids, 27, 035102, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4913572, 2015. a
Ning, X., Paskyabi, M. B., Bui, H. H., and Penchah, M. M.: Evaluation of sea surface roughness parameterization in meso-to-micro scale simulation of the offshore wind field, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 242, 105592, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2023.105592, 2023. a
Onel, H. C. and Tuncer, I. H.: Short-Term Numerical Forecasting of Near-Ground Wind Fields Using OpenFOAM Coupled With WRF, in: AIAA SCITECH 2023 Forum, p. 1737, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2023-1737, 2023. a
Pryor, S. C., Shepherd, T. J., Volker, P. J., Hahmann, A. N., and Barthelmie, R. J.: “Wind Theft” from onshore wind turbine arrays: sensitivity to wind farm parameterization and resolution, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 59, 153–174, 2020. a
Quarton, D. and Ainslie, J.: Turbulence in wind turbine wakes, Wind Eng., 14, 15–23, 1990. a
Rankine, W. J. M.: On the mechanical principles of the action of propellers, Transactions of the Institution of Naval Architects, 6, 13–39, 1865. a
Saiki, E. M., Moeng, C.-H., and Sullivan, P. P.: Large-eddy simulation of the stably stratified planetary boundary layer, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 95, 1–30, 2000. a
Salim, M. H., Schlünzen, K. H., Grawe, D., Boettcher, M., Gierisch, A. M. U., and Fock, B. H.: The microscale obstacle-resolving meteorological model MITRAS v2.0: model theory, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3427–3445, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3427-2018, 2018. a
Salim, M. H., Schubert, S., Resler, J., Krč, P., Maronga, B., Kanani-Sühring, F., Sühring, M., and Schneider, C.: Importance of radiative transfer processes in urban climate models: a study based on the PALM 6.0 model system, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 145–171, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-145-2022, 2022. a
Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Liu, Z., Berner, J., Wang, W., Powers, J. G., Duda, M. G., Barker, D. M., and Huang, X.-Y.: A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Model Version 4.3, NCAR Technical Notes NCAR/TN-556+STR, https://doi.org/10.5065/1dfh-6p97, 2021. a
Thompson, G., Field, P. R., Rasmussen, R. M., and Hall, W. D.: Explicit forecasts of winter precipitation using an improved bulk microphysics scheme. Part II: Implementation of a new snow parameterization, Mon. Weather Rev., 136, 5095–5115, 2008. a
Volker, P. J. H., Badger, J., Hahmann, A. N., and Ott, S.: The Explicit Wake Parametrisation V1.0: a wind farm parametrisation in the mesoscale model WRF, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3715–3731, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3715-2015, 2015. a, b
Vollmer, L., van Dooren, M., Trabucchi, D., Schneemann, J., Steinfeld, G., Witha, B., Trujillo, J., and Kühn, M.: First comparison of LES of an offshore wind turbine wake with dual-Doppler lidar measurements in a German offshore wind farm, J. Phys. Confe. Ser., 625, p. 012001, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117913, 2015. a, b
Wang, Q., Luo, K., Yuan, R., Wang, S., Fan, J., and Cen, K.: A multiscale numerical framework coupled with control strategies for simulating a wind farm in complex terrain, Energy, 203, 117913, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/625/1/012001, 2020. a
Witha, B., Steinfeld, G., and Heinemann, D.: High-resolution offshore wake simulations with the LES model PALM, in: Wind energy-impact of turbulence, Springer, 175–181, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54696-9_26, 2014. a, b, c
Wyngaard, J. C.: Toward numerical modeling in the “Terra Incognita”, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1816–1826, 2004. a
Zhang, C., Wang, Y., and Hamilton, K.: Improved representation of boundary layer clouds over the southeast Pacific in ARW-WRF using a modified Tiedtke cumulus parameterization scheme, Mon. Weather Rev., 139, 3489–3513, 2011. a
Short summary
We developed a new wind turbine wake model, the Simple Actuator Disc for Large Eddy Simulation (SADLES), integrated with the widely used Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. WRF-SADLES accurately simulates wind turbine wakes at resolutions of a few dozen meters, aligning well with idealized simulations and observational measurements. This makes WRF-SADLES a promising tool for wind energy research, offering a balance between accuracy, computational efficiency, and ease of implementation.
We developed a new wind turbine wake model, the Simple Actuator Disc for Large Eddy Simulation...
