Articles | Volume 17, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1497-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1497-2024
Development and technical paper
 | 
20 Feb 2024
Development and technical paper |  | 20 Feb 2024

Spatial spin-up of precipitation in limited-area convection-permitting simulations over North America using the CRCM6/GEM5.0 model

François Roberge, Alejandro Di Luca, René Laprise, Philippe Lucas-Picher, and Julie Thériault

Related authors

Leveraging a Disdrometer Network to Develop a Probabilistic Precipitation Phase Model in Eastern Canada
Alexis Bédard-Therrien, François Anctil, Julie M. Thériault, Olivier Chalifour, Fanny Payette, Alexandre Vidal, and Daniel F. Nadeau
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-78,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-78, 2024
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
Does a convection-permitting regional climate model bring new perspectives on the projection of Mediterranean floods?
Nils Poncet, Philippe Lucas-Picher, Yves Tramblay, Guillaume Thirel, Humberto Vergara, Jonathan Gourley, and Antoinette Alias
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1163–1183, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1163-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1163-2024, 2024
Short summary
Effect of Secondary Ice Production Processes on the Simulation of ice pellets using the Predicted Particle Properties microphysics scheme
Mathieu Lachapelle, Mélissa Cholette, and Julie M. Thériault
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-594,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-594, 2024
Short summary
Atmospheric and surface observations during the Saint John River Experiment on Cold Season Storms (SAJESS)
Hadleigh D. Thompson, Julie M. Thériault, Stephen J. Déry, Ronald E. Stewart, Dominique Boisvert, Lisa Rickard, Nicolas R. Leroux, Matteo Colli, and Vincent Vionnet
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5785–5806, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5785-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5785-2023, 2023
Short summary
Producing reliable hydrologic scenarios from raw climate model outputs without resorting to meteorological observations
Simon Ricard, Philippe Lucas-Picher, Antoine Thiboult, and François Anctil
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2375–2395, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2375-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2375-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
A spatiotemporally separated framework for reconstructing the sources of atmospheric radionuclide releases
Yuhan Xu, Sheng Fang, Xinwen Dong, and Shuhan Zhuang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4961–4982, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4961-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4961-2024, 2024
Short summary
A parameterization scheme for the floating wind farm in a coupled atmosphere–wave model (COAWST v3.7)
Shaokun Deng, Shengmu Yang, Shengli Chen, Daoyi Chen, Xuefeng Yang, and Shanshan Cui
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4891–4909, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4891-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4891-2024, 2024
Short summary
RoadSurf 1.1: open-source road weather model library
Virve Eveliina Karsisto
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4837–4853, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4837-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4837-2024, 2024
Short summary
Calibrating and validating the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) urban cooling model: case studies in France and the United States
Perrine Hamel, Martí Bosch, Léa Tardieu, Aude Lemonsu, Cécile de Munck, Chris Nootenboom, Vincent Viguié, Eric Lonsdorf, James A. Douglass, and Richard P. Sharp
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4755–4771, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4755-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4755-2024, 2024
Short summary
The ddeq Python library for point source quantification from remote sensing images (version 1.0)
Gerrit Kuhlmann, Erik Koene, Sandro Meier, Diego Santaren, Grégoire Broquet, Frédéric Chevallier, Janne Hakkarainen, Janne Nurmela, Laia Amorós, Johanna Tamminen, and Dominik Brunner
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4773–4789, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4773-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4773-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Ahrens, B. and Leps, N.: Sensitivity of Convection Permitting Simulations to Lateral Boundary Conditions in Idealized Experiments, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 13, e2021MS002519, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002519, 2021. 
Antic, S., Laprise, R., Denis, B., and de Elía, R.: Testing the downscaling ability of a one-way nested regional climate model in regions of complex topography, Clim. Dynam., 23, 473–493, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-004-0438-5, 2004. 
Bechtold, P., Bazile, E., Guichard, F., Mascart, P., and Richard, E.: A mass-flux convection scheme for regional and global models, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 127, 869–886, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712757309, 2001. 
Bélair, S., Mailhot, J., Girard, C., and Vaillancourt, P.: Boundary Layer and Shallow Cumulus Clouds in a Medium-Range Forecast of a Large-Scale Weather System, Mon. Weather Rev., 133, 1938–1960, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2958.1, 2005. 
Download
Short summary
Our study addresses a challenge in dynamical downscaling using regional climate models, focusing on the lack of small-scale features near the boundaries. We introduce a method to identify this “spatial spin-up” in precipitation simulations. Results show spin-up distances up to 300 km, varying by season and driving variable. Double nesting with comprehensive variables (e.g. microphysical variables) offers advantages. Findings will help optimize simulations for better climate projections.