Articles | Volume 17, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1091-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1091-2024
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
09 Feb 2024
Methods for assessment of models |  | 09 Feb 2024

Evaluation of surface shortwave downward radiation forecasts by the numerical weather prediction model AROME

Marie-Adèle Magnaldo, Quentin Libois, Sébastien Riette, and Christine Lac

Related authors

Vertical profiles of liquid water content in fog layers during the SOFOG3D experiment
Théophane Costabloz, Frédéric Burnet, Christine Lac, Pauline Martinet, Julien Delanoë, Susana Jorquera, and Maroua Fathalli
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6539–6573, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6539-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6539-2025, 2025
Short summary
An update of shallow cloud parameterization in the AROME NWP model
Adrien Marcel, Sébastien Riette, Didier Ricard, and Christine Lac
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2504,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2504, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Simulation of snow albedo and solar irradiance profile with the Two-streAm Radiative TransfEr in Snow (TARTES) v2.0 model
Ghislain Picard and Quentin Libois
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8927–8953, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8927-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8927-2024, 2024
Short summary
Combining observations and simulations to investigate the small-scale variability of surface solar irradiance under continental cumulus clouds
Zili He, Quentin Libois, Najda Villefranque, Hartwig Deneke, Jonas Witthuhn, and Fleur Couvreux
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 11391–11408, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11391-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11391-2024, 2024
Short summary
On the relationship between δO2∕N2 variability and ice sheet surface conditions in Antarctica
Romilly Harris Stuart, Amaëlle Landais, Laurent Arnaud, Christo Buizert, Emilie Capron, Marie Dumont, Quentin Libois, Robert Mulvaney, Anaïs Orsi, Ghislain Picard, Frédéric Prié, Jeffrey Severinghaus, Barbara Stenni, and Patricia Martinerie
The Cryosphere, 18, 3741–3763, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3741-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3741-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
The sensitivity of aerosol data assimilation to vertical profiles: case study of dust storm assimilation with LOTOS-EUROS v2.2
Mijie Pang, Jianbing Jin, Ting Yang, Xi Chen, Arjo Segers, Batjargal Buyantogtokh, Yixuan Gu, Jiandong Li, Hai Xiang Lin, Hong Liao, and Wei Han
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3781–3798, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3781-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3781-2025, 2025
Short summary
Knowledge-inspired fusion strategies for the inference of PM2.5 values with a neural network
Matthieu Dabrowski, José Mennesson, Jérôme Riedi, Chaabane Djeraba, and Pierre Nabat
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3707–3733, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3707-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3707-2025, 2025
Short summary
Tuning the ICON-A 2.6.4 climate model with machine-learning-based emulators and history matching
Pauline Bonnet, Lorenzo Pastori, Mierk Schwabe, Marco Giorgetta, Fernando Iglesias-Suarez, and Veronika Eyring
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3681–3706, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3681-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3681-2025, 2025
Short summary
A novel method for quantifying the contribution of regional transport to PM2.5 in Beijing (2013–2020): combining machine learning with concentration-weighted trajectory analysis
Kang Hu, Hong Liao, Dantong Liu, Jianbing Jin, Lei Chen, Siyuan Li, Yangzhou Wu, Changhao Wu, Shitong Zhao, Xiaotong Jiang, Ping Tian, Kai Bi, Ye Wang, and Delong Zhao
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3623–3634, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3623-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3623-2025, 2025
Short summary
Quantification of CO2 hotspot emissions from OCO-3 SAM CO2 satellite images using deep learning methods
Joffrey Dumont Le Brazidec, Pierre Vanderbecken, Alban Farchi, Grégoire Broquet, Gerrit Kuhlmann, and Marc Bocquet
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3607–3622, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3607-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3607-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

ACCORD: http://www.umr-cnrm.fr/accord/, last access: 11 January 2024. a
Ackerman, S. A., Holz, R., Frey, R., Eloranta, E., Maddux, B., and McGill, M.: Cloud detection with MODIS. Part II: validation, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 25, 1073–1086, 2008. a
Ahlgrimm, M. and Forbes, R.: The Impact of Low Clouds on Surface Shortwave Radiation in the ECMWF Model, Mon. Weather Rev., 140, 3783–3794, https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-11-00316.1, 2012. a, b, c
Amodei, M. and Stein, J.: Deterministic and fuzzy verification methods for a hierarchy of numerical models, Meteorol. Appl., 16, 191–203, https://doi.org/10.1002/met.101, 2009. a
Antoine, S., Honnert, R., Seity, Y., Vié, B., Burnet, F., and Martinet, P.: Evaluation of an improved AROME configuration for fog forecasts during the SOFOG3D campaign, Weather Forecast., 38, 1605–1620, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-22-0215.1, 2023. a, b
Download
Short summary
With the worldwide development of the solar energy sector, the need for reliable solar radiation forecasts has significantly increased. However, meteorological models that predict, among others things, solar radiation have errors. Therefore, we wanted to know in which situtaions these errors are most significant. We found that errors mostly occur in cloudy situations, and different errors were highlighted depending on the cloud altitude. Several potential sources of errors were identified.
Share