Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 16, issue 3
Articles | Volume 16, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-885-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-885-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 16, issue 3
Model description paper
 | 
03 Feb 2023
Model description paper |  | 03 Feb 2023

Isoprene and monoterpene simulations using the chemistry–climate model EMAC (v2.55) with interactive vegetation from LPJ-GUESS (v4.0)

Ryan Vella, Matthew Forrest, Jos Lelieveld, and Holger Tost

Viewed

Total article views: 1,902 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,374 474 54 1,902 42 40
  • HTML: 1,374
  • PDF: 474
  • XML: 54
  • Total: 1,902
  • BibTeX: 42
  • EndNote: 40
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Jul 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Jul 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,902 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,832 with geography defined and 70 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 29 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
Biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) are released by vegetation and have a major impact on atmospheric chemistry and aerosol formation. Non-interacting vegetation constrains the majority of numerical models used to estimate global BVOC emissions, and thus, the effects of changing vegetation on emissions are not addressed. In this work, we replace the offline vegetation with dynamic vegetation states by linking a chemistry–climate model with a global dynamic vegetation model.
Read more
Special issue
The Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) (ACP/GMD inter-journal...