Articles | Volume 16, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7059-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7059-2023
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
05 Dec 2023
Methods for assessment of models |  | 05 Dec 2023

An emulation-based approach for interrogating reactive transport models

Angus Fotherby, Harold J. Bradbury, Jennifer L. Druhan, and Alexandra V. Turchyn

Related authors

Reviews and syntheses: Review of proxies for low-oxygen paleoceanographic reconstructions
Babette A.A. Hoogakker, Catherine Davis, Yi Wang, Stephanie Kusch, Katrina Nilsson-Kerr, Dalton S. Hardisty, Allison Jacobel, Dharma Reyes Macaya, Nicolaas Glock, Sha Ni, Julio Sepúlveda, Abby Ren, Alexandra Auderset, Anya V. Hess, Katrin J. Meissner, Jorge Cardich, Robert Anderson, Christine Barras, Chandranath Basak, Harold J. Bradbury, Inda Brinkmann, Alexis Castillo, Madelyn Cook, Kassandra Costa, Constance Choquel, Paula Diz, Jonas Donnenfield, Felix J. Elling, Zeynep Erdem, Helena L. Filipsson, Sebastián Garrido, Julia Gottschalk, Anjaly Govindankutty Menon, Jeroen Groeneveld, Christian Hallmann, Ingrid Hendy, Rick Hennekam, Wanyi Lu, Jean Lynch-Stieglitz, Lélia Matos, Alfredo Martínez-García, Giulia Molina, Práxedes Muñoz, Simone Moretti, Jennifer Morford, Sophie Nuber, Svetlana Radionovskaya, Morgan Reed Raven, Christopher J. Somes, Anja S. Studer, Kazuyo Tachikawa, Raúl Tapia, Martin Tetard, Tyler Vollmer, Xingchen Wang, Shuzhuang Wu, Yan Zhang, Xin-Yuan Zheng, and Yuxin Zhou
Biogeosciences, 22, 863–957, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-863-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-863-2025, 2025
Short summary
Proglacial methane emissions driven by meltwater and groundwater flushing in a high-Arctic glacial catchment
Gabrielle E. Kleber, Leonard Magerl, Alexandra V. Turchyn, Stefan Schloemer, Mark Trimmer, Yizhu Zhu, and Andrew Hodson
Biogeosciences, 22, 659–674, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-659-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-659-2025, 2025
Short summary
Mountain permafrost in the Central Pyrenees: insights from the Devaux ice cave
Miguel Bartolomé, Gérard Cazenave, Marc Luetscher, Christoph Spötl, Fernando Gázquez, Ánchel Belmonte, Alexandra V. Turchyn, Juan Ignacio López-Moreno, and Ana Moreno
The Cryosphere, 17, 477–497, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-477-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-477-2023, 2023
Short summary
Sub-permafrost methane seepage from open-system pingos in Svalbard
Andrew J. Hodson, Aga Nowak, Mikkel T. Hornum, Kim Senger, Kelly Redeker, Hanne H. Christiansen, Søren Jessen, Peter Betlem, Steve F. Thornton, Alexandra V. Turchyn, Snorre Olaussen, and Alina Marca
The Cryosphere, 14, 3829–3842, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3829-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3829-2020, 2020
Short summary
Modeling transient soil moisture limitations on microbial carbon respiration
Yuchen Liu, Matthew J. Winnick, Hsiao-Tieh Hsu, Corey R. Lawrence, Kate Maher, and Jennifer L. Druhan
Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2018-10,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2018-10, 2018
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
The real challenges for climate and weather modelling on its way to sustained exascale performance: a case study using ICON (v2.6.6)
Panagiotis Adamidis, Erik Pfister, Hendryk Bockelmann, Dominik Zobel, Jens-Olaf Beismann, and Marek Jacob
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 905–919, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-905-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-905-2025, 2025
Short summary
Improving the representation of major Indian crops in the Community Land Model version 5.0 (CLM5) using site-scale crop data
Kangari Narender Reddy, Somnath Baidya Roy, Sam S. Rabin, Danica L. Lombardozzi, Gudimetla Venkateswara Varma, Ruchira Biswas, and Devavat Chiru Naik
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 763–785, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-763-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-763-2025, 2025
Short summary
Evaluation of CORDEX ERA5-forced NARCliM2.0 regional climate models over Australia using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model version 4.1.2
Giovanni Di Virgilio, Fei Ji, Eugene Tam, Jason P. Evans, Jatin Kala, Julia Andrys, Christopher Thomas, Dipayan Choudhury, Carlos Rocha, Yue Li, and Matthew L. Riley
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 703–724, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-703-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-703-2025, 2025
Short summary
Design, evaluation, and future projections of the NARCliM2.0 CORDEX-CMIP6 Australasia regional climate ensemble
Giovanni Di Virgilio, Jason P. Evans, Fei Ji, Eugene Tam, Jatin Kala, Julia Andrys, Christopher Thomas, Dipayan Choudhury, Carlos Rocha, Stephen White, Yue Li, Moutassem El Rafei, Rishav Goyal, Matthew L. Riley, and Jyothi Lingala
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 671–702, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-671-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-671-2025, 2025
Short summary
Amending the algorithm of aerosol–radiation interactions in WRF-Chem (v4.4)
Jiawang Feng, Chun Zhao, Qiuyan Du, Zining Yang, and Chen Jin
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 585–603, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-585-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-585-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Abd, A. S. and Abushaikha, A. S.: Reactive transport in porous media: a review of recent mathematical efforts in modeling geochemical reactions in petroleum subsurface reservoirs, SN Appl. Sci., 3, 401, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04396-9, 2021. 
Ahmmed, B., Mudunuru, M. K., Karra, S., James, S. C., and Vesselinov, V. V.: A comparative study of machine learning models for predicting the state of reactive mixing, J. Comput. Phys., 432, 110147, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110147, 2021. 
Anderson, R. T., Vrionis, H. A., Ortiz-Bernad, I., Resch, C. T., Long, P. E., Dayvault, R., Karp, K., Marutzky, S., Metzler, D. R., Peacock, A., White, D. C., Lowe, M., and Lovley, D. R.: Stimulating the In Situ Activity of Geobacter Species To Remove Uranium from the Groundwater of a Uranium-Contaminated Aquifer, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69, 5884–5891, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.10.5884-5891.2003, 2003. 
Arora, B., Dwivedi, D., Faybishenko, B., Wainwright, H. M., and Jana, R. B.: 10. Understanding and Predicting Vadose Zone Processes, in: Reviews in Mineralogy & Geochemistry, vol. 85, edited by: Druhan, J. L. and Tournassat, C., De Gruyter, 303–328, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501512001-011, 2020. 
Bain, J. G., Blowes, D. W., Robertson, W. D., and Frind, E. O.: Modelling of sulfide oxidation with reactive transport at a mine drainage site, J. Contam. Hydrol., 41, 23–47, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7722(99)00069-8, 2000. 
Download
Short summary
We demonstrate how, given a simulation of fluid and rock interacting, we can emulate the system using machine learning. This means that, for a given initial condition, we can predict the final state, avoiding the simulation step once the model has been trained. We present a workflow for applying this approach to any fluidrock simulation and showcase two applications to different fluidrock simulations. This approach has applications for improving model development and sensitivity analyses.
Share