Articles | Volume 16, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7059-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7059-2023
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
05 Dec 2023
Methods for assessment of models |  | 05 Dec 2023

An emulation-based approach for interrogating reactive transport models

Angus Fotherby, Harold J. Bradbury, Jennifer L. Druhan, and Alexandra V. Turchyn

Related authors

Proglacial methane emissions driven by meltwater and groundwater flushing in a high Arctic glacial catchment
Gabrielle Emma Kleber, Leonard Magerl, Alexandra V. Turchyn, Mark Trimmer, Yizhu Zhu, and Andrew Hodson
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1273,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1273, 2024
Short summary
Reviews and syntheses: Review of proxies for low-oxygen paleoceanographic reconstructions
Babette Hoogakker, Catherine Davis, Yi Wang, Stepanie Kusch, Katrina Nilsson-Kerr, Dalton Hardisty, Allison Jacobel, Dharma Reyes Macaya, Nicolaas Glock, Sha Ni, Julio Sepúlveda, Abby Ren, Alexandra Auderset, Anya Hess, Katrina Meissner, Jorge Cardich, Robert Anderson, Christine Barras, Chandranath Basak, Harold Bradbury, Inda Brinkmann, Alexis Castillo, Madelyn Cook, Kassandra Costa, Constance Choquel, Paula Diz, Jonas Donnenfield, Felix Elling, Zeynep Erdem, Helena Filipsson, Sebastian Garrido, Julia Gottschalk, Anjaly Govindankutty Menon, Jeroen Groeneveld, Christian Hallman, Ingrid Hendy, Rick Hennekam, Wanyi Lu, Jean Lynch-Stieglitz, Lelia Matos, Alfredo Martínez-García, Giulia Molina, Práxedes Muñoz, Simone Moretti, Jennifer Morford, Sophie Nuber, Svetlana Radionovskaya, Morgan Raven, Christopher Somes, Anja Studer, Kazuyo Tachikawa, Raúl Tapia, Martin Tetard, Tyler Vollmer, Shuzhuang Wu, Yan Zhang, Xin-Yuan Zheng, and Yuxin Zhou
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2981,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2981, 2024
Short summary
Mountain permafrost in the Central Pyrenees: insights from the Devaux ice cave
Miguel Bartolomé, Gérard Cazenave, Marc Luetscher, Christoph Spötl, Fernando Gázquez, Ánchel Belmonte, Alexandra V. Turchyn, Juan Ignacio López-Moreno, and Ana Moreno
The Cryosphere, 17, 477–497, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-477-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-477-2023, 2023
Short summary
Sub-permafrost methane seepage from open-system pingos in Svalbard
Andrew J. Hodson, Aga Nowak, Mikkel T. Hornum, Kim Senger, Kelly Redeker, Hanne H. Christiansen, Søren Jessen, Peter Betlem, Steve F. Thornton, Alexandra V. Turchyn, Snorre Olaussen, and Alina Marca
The Cryosphere, 14, 3829–3842, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3829-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3829-2020, 2020
Short summary
Modeling transient soil moisture limitations on microbial carbon respiration
Yuchen Liu, Matthew J. Winnick, Hsiao-Tieh Hsu, Corey R. Lawrence, Kate Maher, and Jennifer L. Druhan
Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2018-10,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2018-10, 2018
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
Impacts of spatial heterogeneity of anthropogenic aerosol emissions in a regionally refined global aerosol–climate model
Taufiq Hassan, Kai Zhang, Jianfeng Li, Balwinder Singh, Shixuan Zhang, Hailong Wang, and Po-Lun Ma
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3507–3532, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3507-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3507-2024, 2024
Short summary
cfr (v2024.1.26): a Python package for climate field reconstruction
Feng Zhu, Julien Emile-Geay, Gregory J. Hakim, Dominique Guillot, Deborah Khider, Robert Tardif, and Walter A. Perkins
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3409–3431, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3409-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3409-2024, 2024
Short summary
NEWTS1.0: Numerical model of coastal Erosion by Waves and Transgressive Scarps
Rose V. Palermo, J. Taylor Perron, Jason M. Soderblom, Samuel P. D. Birch, Alexander G. Hayes, and Andrew D. Ashton
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3433–3445, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3433-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3433-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluation of isoprene emissions from the coupled model SURFEX–MEGANv2.1
Safae Oumami, Joaquim Arteta, Vincent Guidard, Pierre Tulet, and Paul David Hamer
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3385–3408, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3385-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3385-2024, 2024
Short summary
A comprehensive Earth system model (AWI-ESM2.1) with interactive icebergs: effects on surface and deep-ocean characteristics
Lars Ackermann, Thomas Rackow, Kai Himstedt, Paul Gierz, Gregor Knorr, and Gerrit Lohmann
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3279–3301, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3279-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3279-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Abd, A. S. and Abushaikha, A. S.: Reactive transport in porous media: a review of recent mathematical efforts in modeling geochemical reactions in petroleum subsurface reservoirs, SN Appl. Sci., 3, 401, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04396-9, 2021. 
Ahmmed, B., Mudunuru, M. K., Karra, S., James, S. C., and Vesselinov, V. V.: A comparative study of machine learning models for predicting the state of reactive mixing, J. Comput. Phys., 432, 110147, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110147, 2021. 
Anderson, R. T., Vrionis, H. A., Ortiz-Bernad, I., Resch, C. T., Long, P. E., Dayvault, R., Karp, K., Marutzky, S., Metzler, D. R., Peacock, A., White, D. C., Lowe, M., and Lovley, D. R.: Stimulating the In Situ Activity of Geobacter Species To Remove Uranium from the Groundwater of a Uranium-Contaminated Aquifer, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69, 5884–5891, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.10.5884-5891.2003, 2003. 
Arora, B., Dwivedi, D., Faybishenko, B., Wainwright, H. M., and Jana, R. B.: 10. Understanding and Predicting Vadose Zone Processes, in: Reviews in Mineralogy & Geochemistry, vol. 85, edited by: Druhan, J. L. and Tournassat, C., De Gruyter, 303–328, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501512001-011, 2020. 
Bain, J. G., Blowes, D. W., Robertson, W. D., and Frind, E. O.: Modelling of sulfide oxidation with reactive transport at a mine drainage site, J. Contam. Hydrol., 41, 23–47, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7722(99)00069-8, 2000. 
Download
Short summary
We demonstrate how, given a simulation of fluid and rock interacting, we can emulate the system using machine learning. This means that, for a given initial condition, we can predict the final state, avoiding the simulation step once the model has been trained. We present a workflow for applying this approach to any fluidrock simulation and showcase two applications to different fluidrock simulations. This approach has applications for improving model development and sensitivity analyses.