Arabas, S., Jaruga, A., Pawlowska, H., and Grabowski, W. W.: libcloudph++ 1.0: a single-moment bulk, double-moment bulk, and particle-based warm-rain microphysics library in C++, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1677–1707,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1677-2015, 2015.
a
Bodenschatz, E., Malinowski, S. P., Shaw, R. A., and Stratmann, F.: Can we understand clouds without turbulence?, Science, 327, 970–971,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185138, 2010.
a
Brenguier, J.-L., Burnet, F., and Geoffroy, O.: Cloud optical thickness and liquid water path – does the
k coefficient vary with droplet concentration?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9771–9786,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9771-2011, 2011.
a
Brown, A. R., Derbyshire, S., and Mason, P. J.: Large-eddy simulation of stable atmospheric boundary layers with a revised stochastic subgrid model, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 120, 1485–1512,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712052004, 1994.
a
Chang, K., Bench, J., Brege, M., Cantrell, W., Chandrakar, K., Ciochetto, D., Mazzoleni, C., Mazzoleni, L., Niedermeier, D., and Shaw, R.: A laboratory facility to study gas–aerosol–cloud interactions in a turbulent environment: The
Π chamber, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 97, 2343–2358,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00203.1, 2016.
a
Connolly, M. P., Higham, N. J., and Mary, T.: Stochastic rounding and its probabilistic backward error analysis, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 43, A566–A585,
https://doi.org/10.1137/20M1334796, 2021.
a,
b
Cuturi, M.: Sinkhorn distances: Lightspeed computation of optimal transport, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26 (NIPS 2013), Nevada, US, 5–10 December, 2292–2300,
https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2013 (last access: 24 October 2023), 2013.
a,
b
Dziekan, P. and Zmijewski, P.: University of Warsaw Lagrangian Cloud Model (UWLCM) 2.0: adaptation of a mixed Eulerian–Lagrangian numerical model for heterogeneous computing clusters, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4489–4501,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4489-2022, 2022.
a,
b
Dziekan, P., Waruszewski, M., and Pawlowska, H.: University of Warsaw Lagrangian Cloud Model (UWLCM) 1.0: a modern large-eddy simulation tool for warm cloud modeling with Lagrangian microphysics, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2587–2606,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2587-2019, 2019.
a
Eytan, E., Koren, I., Altaratz, O., Pinsky, M., and Khain, A.: Revisiting adiabatic fraction estimations in cumulus clouds: high-resolution simulations with a passive tracer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 16203–16217,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16203-2021, 2021.
a
Grabowski, W. W. and Abade, G. C.: Broadening of cloud droplet spectra through eddy hopping: Turbulent adiabatic parcel simulations, J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 1485–1493,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0043.1, 2017.
a,
b
Grabowski, W. W., Dziekan, P., and Pawlowska, H.: Lagrangian condensation microphysics with Twomey CCN activation, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 103–120,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-103-2018, 2018.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f
Grabowski, W. W., Morrison, H., Shima, S.-i., Abade, G. C., Dziekan, P., and Pawlowska, H.: Modeling of cloud microphysics: Can we do better?, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 100, 655–672,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0005.1, 2019.
a
Grant, R. E., Levenhagen, M., Olivier, S. L., DeBonis, D., Pedretti, K. T., and Laros III, J. H. L.: Standardizing Power Monitoring and Control at Exascale, Computer, 49, 38–46,
https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2016.308, 2016.
a
Hoffmann, F.: The effect of spurious cloud edge supersaturations in Lagrangian cloud models: An analytical and numerical study, Mon. Weather Rev., 144, 107–118,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0234.1, 2016.
a,
b
Hoffmann, F., Siebert, H., Schumacher, J., Riechelmann, T., Katzwinkel, J., Kumar, B., Götzfried, P., and Raasch, S.: Entrainment and mixing at the interface of shallow cumulus clouds: Results from a combination of observations and simulations, Meteorol. Z., 23, 349–368,
https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2014/0597, 2014.
a
Jarecka, D., Grabowski, W. W., Morrison, H., and Pawlowska, H.: Homogeneity of the subgrid-scale turbulent mixing in large-eddy simulation of shallow convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 2751–2767,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-042.1, 2013.
a,
b,
c
Jenny, P., Pope, S. B., Muradoglu, M., and Caughey, D. A.: A hybrid algorithm for the joint PDF equation of turbulent reactive flows, J. Comput. Phys., 166, 218–252,
https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.2000.6646, 2001.
a
Lam, M. D., Rothberg, E. E., and Wolf, M. E.: The cache performance and optimizations of blocked algorithms, Oper. Syst. Rev. (ACM), 25, 63–74,
https://doi.org/10.1145/106973.106981, 1991.
a
Lasher-Trapp, S. G., Cooper, W. A., and Blyth, A. M.: Broadening of droplet size distributions from entrainment and mixing in a cumulus cloud, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 195–220,
https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.03.199, 2005.
a
Matsushima, T., Nishizawa, S., Shima, S.-i., and Grabowski, W.: Intra-cloud Microphysical Variability Obtained from Large-eddy Simulations using the Super-droplet Method, ESS Open Archive [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10508672.1, 2021.
a,
b,
c
Matsushima, T., Nishizawa, S., and Shima, S.-i.: SCALE-SDM source code and configuration files for meter-to-submeter-scale resolution in cloud simulations, Zenodo [code],
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8103369, 2023a.
a
Matsushima, T., Nishizawa, S., and Shima, S.-i.: Supplement to the manuscript “Overcoming computational challenges to realize meter-to-submeter-scale resolution in cloud simulations using super-droplet method” (Matsushima et al., 2023), Zenodo [data set],
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8103378, 2023b.
a,
b,
c
Mellado, J.-P., Bretherton, C., Stevens, B., and Wyant, M.: DNS and LES for simulating stratocumulus: Better together, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 10, 1421–1438,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001312, 2018.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g,
h,
i
Morrison, H. and Grabowski, W. W.: Modeling supersaturation and subgrid-scale mixing with two-moment bulk warm microphysics, J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 792–812,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2374.1, 2008.
a
Morrison, H., van Lier-Walqui, M., Fridlind, A. M., Grabowski, W. W., Harrington, J. Y., Hoose, C., Korolev, A., Kumjian, M. R., Milbrandt, J. A., Pawlowska, H., Posselt, D. J., Prat, O. P., Reimel, K. J., Shima, S.-i., van Diedenhoven, B., and Xue, L.: Confronting the challenge of modeling cloud and precipitation microphysics, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2019MS001689,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001689, 2020.
a
Nakashima, H., Miyake, Y., Usui, H., and Omura, Y.: OhHelp: a scalable domain-decomposing dynamic load balancing for particle-in-cell simulations, in: ICS '09: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Supercomputing, NY, USA, 8–12 June, 90–99,
https://doi.org/10.1145/1542275.1542293, 2009.
a
Nishizawa, S., Yashiro, H., Sato, Y., Miyamoto, Y., and Tomita, H.: Influence of grid aspect ratio on planetary boundary layer turbulence in large-eddy simulations, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3393–3419,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3393-2015, 2015.
a,
b
Peyré, G. and Cuturi, M.: Computational optimal transport: With applications to data science, Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning, 11, 355–607,
https://doi.org/10.1561/2200000073, 2019.
a
Santos, S. P., Caldwell, P. M., and Bretherton, C. S.: Numerically relevant timescales in the MG2 microphysics model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2019MS001972,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001972, 2020.
a
Sato, Y., Nakajima, T., Suzuki, K., and Iguchi, T.: Application of a Monte Carlo integration method to collision and coagulation growth processes of hydrometeors in a bin-type model, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D09215,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011247, 2009.
a,
b
Sato, Y., Nishizawa, S., Yashiro, H., Miyamoto, Y., Kajikawa, Y., and Tomita, H.: Impacts of cloud microphysics on trade wind cumulus: which cloud microphysics processes contribute to the diversity in a large eddy simulation?, Prog. Earth Planet Sci., 2, 23,
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-015-0053-6, 2015.
a
Sato, Y., Shima, S.-i., and Tomita, H.: A grid refinement study of trade wind cumuli simulated by a Lagrangian cloud microphysical model: the super-droplet method, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 18, 359–365,
https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.764, 2017.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g,
h,
i,
j,
k
Sato, Y., Shima, S.-i., and Tomita, H.: Numerical Convergence of Shallow Convection Cloud Field Simulations: Comparison Between Double-Moment Eulerian and Particle-Based Lagrangian Microphysics Coupled to the Same Dynamical Core, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 10, 1495–1512,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001285, 2018.
a,
b,
c,
d
Schmitz, M. A., Heitz, M., Bonneel, N., Ngole, F., Coeurjolly, D., Cuturi, M., Peyré, G., and Starck, J.-L.: Wasserstein dictionary learning: Optimal transport-based unsupervised nonlinear dictionary learning, SIAM J. Imaging Sci., 11, 643–678,
https://doi.org/10.1137/17M1140431, 2018.
a
Schulz, B. and Mellado, J. P.: Competing effects of droplet sedimentation and wind shear on entrainment in stratocumulus, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 1830–1846,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001617, 2019.
a,
b
Seifert, A. and Rasp, S.: Potential and limitations of
machine learning for modeling warm-rain cloud microphysical processes, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2020MS002301,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002301, 2020.
a
Seiki, T. and Nakajima, T.: Aerosol effects of the condensation process on a convective cloud simulation, J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 833–853,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0195.1, 2014.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e
Shaw, R. A., Cantrell, W., Chen, S., Chuang, P., Donahue, N., Feingold, G., Kollias, P., Korolev, A., Kreidenweis, S., Krueger, S., Mellado, J. P., Niedermeier, D., and Xue, L.: Cloud–aerosol–turbulence interactions: Science priorities and concepts for a large-scale laboratory facility, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 101, E1026–E1035,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0009.1, 2020.
a
Shima, S., Sato, Y., Hashimoto, A., and Misumi, R.: Predicting the morphology of ice particles in deep convection using the super-droplet method: development and evaluation of SCALE-SDM 0.2.5-2.2.0, -2.2.1, and -2.2.2, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4107–4157,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4107-2020, 2020.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g,
h
Shima, S.-i., Kusano, K., Kawano, A., Sugiyama, T., and Kawahara, S.: The super-droplet method for the numerical simulation of clouds and precipitation: A particle-based and probabilistic microphysics model coupled with a non-hydrostatic model, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 135, 1307–1320,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.441, 2009.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f
Siebesma, A. P., Bretherton, C. S., Brown, A., Chlond, A., Cuxart, J., Duynkerke, P. G., Jiang, H., Khairoutdinov, M., Lewellen, D., Moeng, C.-H., Sanchez, E., Stevens, B., and Stevens, D. E.: A large eddy simulation intercomparison study of shallow cumulus convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 1201–1219,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)60<1201:ALESIS>2.0.CO;2, 2003.
a,
b
Sölch, I. and Kärcher, B.: A large-eddy model for cirrus clouds with explicit aerosol and ice microphysics and Lagrangian ice particle tracking, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 136, 2074–2093,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.689, 2010.
a
Stevens, B., Moeng, C.-H., Ackerman, A. S., Bretherton, C. S., Chlond, A., de Roode, S., Edwards, J., Golaz, J.-C., Jiang, H., Khairoutdinov, M., Kirkpatrick, M. P., Lewellen, D. C., Lock, A., Müller, F., Stevens, D. E., Whelan, E., and Zhu, P.: Evaluation of large-eddy simulations via observations of nocturnal marine stratocumulus, Mon. Weather Rev., 133, 1443–1462,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2930.1, 2005.
a,
b
Suzuki, K., Nakajima, T., Nakajima, T. Y., and Khain, A. P.: A study of microphysical mechanisms for correlation patterns between droplet radius and optical thickness of warm clouds with a spectral bin microphysics cloud model, J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 1126–1141,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS3283.1, 2010.
a,
b,
c
Tong, M. and Xue, M.: Simultaneous estimation of microphysical parameters and atmospheric state with simulated radar data and ensemble square root Kalman filter. Part II: Parameter estimation experiments, Mon. Weather Rev., 136, 1649–1668,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2007MWR2071.1, 2008.
a
Unterstrasser, S. and Sölch, I.: Optimisation of the simulation particle number in a Lagrangian ice microphysical model, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 695–709,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-695-2014, 2014.
a
Unterstrasser, S., Hoffmann, F., and Lerch, M.: Collection/aggregation algorithms in Lagrangian cloud microphysical models: rigorous evaluation in box model simulations, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1521–1548,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1521-2017, 2017.
a,
b,
c,
d
Unterstrasser, S., Hoffmann, F., and Lerch, M.: Collisional growth in a particle-based cloud microphysical model: insights from column model simulations using LCM1D (v1.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5119–5145,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5119-2020, 2020.
a
vanZanten, M. C., Stevens, B., Nuijens, L., Siebesma, A. P., Ackerman, A. S., Burnet, F., Cheng, A., Couvreux, F., Jiang, H., Khairoutdinov, M., Kogan, Y., Lewellen, D. C., Mechem, D., Nakamura, K., Noda, A., Shipway, B. J., Slawinska, J., Wang, S., and Wyszogrodzki, A.: Controls on precipitation and cloudiness in simulations of trade-wind cumulus as observed during RICO, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 3, M06001,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011MS000056, 2011.
a,
b,
c,
d
Wang, H., Agrusta, R., and van Hunen, J.: Advantages of a conservative velocity interpolation (CVI) scheme for particle-in-cell methods with application in geodynamic modeling, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 16, 2015–2023,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GC005824, 2015.
a
Xiao, J., Chen, J., Zheng, J., An, H., Huang, S., Yang, C., Li, F., Zhang, Z., Huang, Y., Han, W., Liu, X., Chen, D., Liu, Z., Zhuang, G., Chen, J., Li, G., Sun, X., and Chen, Q.: Symplectic structure-preserving particle-in-cell whole-volume simulation of tokamak plasmas to 111.3 trillion particles and 25.7 billion grids, in: SC '21: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, 14–19 November, 1–13,
https://doi.org/10.1145/3458817.3487398, 2021.
a,
b
Xue, L., Bera, S., Chen, S., Choudhary, H., Dixit, S., Grabowski, W. W., Jayakumar, S., Krueger, S., Kulkarni, G., Lasher-Trapp, S., Mallinson, H., Prabhakaran, T., and Shima, S.-i.: Progress and Challenges in Modeling Dynamics–Microphysics Interactions: From the Pi Chamber to Monsoon Convection, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 103, E1413–E1420,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-22-0018.1, 2022.
a
Yashiro, H., Terasaki, K., Kawai, Y., Kudo, S., Miyoshi, T., Imamura, T., Minami, K., Inoue, H., Nishiki, T., Saji, T., Satoh, M., and Tomita, H.: A 1024-member ensemble data assimilation with 3.5-km mesh global weather simulations, in: SC '20: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, IEEE, Atlanta, GA, USA, 9–19 November, 1–10,
https://doi.org/10.1109/SC41405.2020.00005, 2020.
a
