Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 16, issue 20
Articles | Volume 16, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5895-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5895-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 16, issue 20
Model evaluation paper
 | 
20 Oct 2023
Model evaluation paper |  | 20 Oct 2023

Key factors for quantitative precipitation nowcasting using ground weather radar data based on deep learning

Daehyeon Han, Jungho Im, Yeji Shin, and Juhyun Lee

Viewed

Total article views: 2,012 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,383 570 59 2,012 38 42
  • HTML: 1,383
  • PDF: 570
  • XML: 59
  • Total: 2,012
  • BibTeX: 38
  • EndNote: 42
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Jan 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Jan 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,012 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,942 with geography defined and 70 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
To identify the key factors affecting quantitative precipitation nowcasting (QPN) using deep learning (DL), we carried out a comprehensive evaluation and analysis. We compared four key factors: DL model, length of the input sequence, loss function, and ensemble approach. Generally, U-Net outperformed ConvLSTM. Loss function and ensemble showed potential for improving performance when they synergized well. The length of the input sequence did not significantly affect the results.
Read more