Articles | Volume 16, issue 18
Development and technical paper
19 Sep 2023
Development and technical paper |  | 19 Sep 2023

A comparison of Eulerian and Lagrangian methods for vertical particle transport in the water column

Tor Nordam, Ruben Kristiansen, Raymond Nepstad, Erik van Sebille, and Andy M. Booth

Related authors

Numerical integrators for Lagrangian oceanography
Tor Nordam and Rodrigo Duran
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5935–5957,,, 2020
Short summary
The effect of vertical mixing on the horizontal drift of oil spills
Johannes Röhrs, Knut-Frode Dagestad, Helene Asbjørnsen, Tor Nordam, Jørgen Skancke, Cathleen E. Jones, and Camilla Brekke
Ocean Sci., 14, 1581–1601,,, 2018
Short summary

Related subject area

Numerical methods
GeoINR 1.0: an implicit neural network approach to three-dimensional geological modelling
Michael Hillier, Florian Wellmann, Eric A. de Kemp, Boyan Brodaric, Ernst Schetselaar, and Karine Bédard
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6987–7012,,, 2023
Short summary
AutoQS v1: automatic parametrization of QuickSampling based on training images analysis
Mathieu Gravey and Grégoire Mariethoz
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5265–5279,,, 2023
Short summary
Sweep Interpolation: A Fourth-Order Accurate Cost Effective Scheme in the Global Environmental Multiscale Model
Mohammad Mortezazadeh, Jean-Francois Cossette, Ashu Dastoor, Jean de Grandpré, Irena Ivanova, and Abdessamad Qaddouri
EGUsphere,,, 2023
Short summary
Implementation and application of ensemble optimal interpolation on an operational chemistry weather model for improving PM2.5 and visibility predictions
Siting Li, Ping Wang, Hong Wang, Yue Peng, Zhaodong Liu, Wenjie Zhang, Hongli Liu, Yaqiang Wang, Huizheng Che, and Xiaoye Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4171–4191,,, 2023
Short summary
A dynamical core based on a discontinuous Galerkin method for higher-order finite-element sea ice modeling
Thomas Richter, Véronique Dansereau, Christian Lessig, and Piotr Minakowski
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3907–3926,,, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Abuhegazy, M., Talaat, K., Anderoglu, O., and Poroseva, S. V.: Numerical investigation of aerosol transport in a classroom with relevance to COVID-19, Phys. Fluids, 32, 103311,, 2020. a
Benson, D. A., Aquino, T., Bolster, D., Engdahl, N., Henri, C. V., and Fernandez-Garcia, D.: A comparison of Eulerian and Lagrangian transport and non-linear reaction algorithms, Adv. Water Resour., 99, 15–37,, 2017. a
Billingsley, P.: Probability and measure, John Wiley & Sons, New York Chichester Brisbane Toronto, ISBN 0471031739, 1979. a, b
Craig, P. D. and Banner, M. L.: Modeling wave-enhanced turbulence in the ocean surface layer, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 24, 2546–2559,<2546:MWETIT>2.0.CO;2, 1994. a
Cui, F., Boufadel, M. C., Geng, X., Gao, F., Zhao, L., King, T., and Lee, K.: Oil Droplets Transport Under a Deep-Water Plunging Breaker: Impact of Droplet Inertia, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 123, 9082–9100,, 2018. a
Short summary
We describe and compare two common methods, Eulerian and Lagrangian models, used to simulate the vertical transport of material in the ocean. They both solve the same transport problems but use different approaches for representing the underlying equations on the computer. The main focus of our study is on the numerical accuracy of the two approaches. Our results should be useful for other researchers creating or using these types of transport models.