Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 16, issue 16
Articles | Volume 16, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4867-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4867-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 16, issue 16
Development and technical paper
 | 
29 Aug 2023
Development and technical paper |  | 29 Aug 2023

A gridded air quality forecast through fusing site-available machine learning predictions from RFSML v1.0 and chemical transport model results from GEOS-Chem v13.1.0 using the ensemble Kalman filter

Li Fang, Jianbing Jin, Arjo Segers, Hong Liao, Ke Li, Bufan Xu, Wei Han, Mijie Pang, and Hai Xiang Lin

Viewed

Total article views: 1,517 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,128 336 53 1,517 109 41 46
  • HTML: 1,128
  • PDF: 336
  • XML: 53
  • Total: 1,517
  • Supplement: 109
  • BibTeX: 41
  • EndNote: 46
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Feb 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 13 Feb 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,517 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,446 with geography defined and 71 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 29 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
Machine learning models have gained great popularity in air quality prediction. However, they are only available at air quality monitoring stations. In contrast, chemical transport models (CTM) provide predictions that are continuous in the 3D field. Owing to complex error sources, they are typically biased. In this study, we proposed a gridded prediction with high accuracy by fusing predictions from our regional feature selection machine learning prediction (RFSML v1.0) and a CTM prediction.
Read more
Special issue
Benchmark datasets and machine learning algorithms for Earth...