Articles | Volume 16, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-479-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-479-2023
Model evaluation paper
 | 
24 Jan 2023
Model evaluation paper |  | 24 Jan 2023

Cross-evaluating WRF-Chem v4.1.2, TROPOMI, APEX, and in situ NO2 measurements over Antwerp, Belgium

Catalina Poraicu, Jean-François Müller, Trissevgeni Stavrakou, Dominique Fonteyn, Frederik Tack, Felix Deutsch, Quentin Laffineur, Roeland Van Malderen, and Nele Veldeman

Viewed

Total article views: 2,273 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,764 468 41 2,273 126 32 33
  • HTML: 1,764
  • PDF: 468
  • XML: 41
  • Total: 2,273
  • Supplement: 126
  • BibTeX: 32
  • EndNote: 33
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 Sep 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 Sep 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,273 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,162 with geography defined and 111 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 14 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
High-resolution WRF-Chem simulations are conducted over Antwerp, Belgium, in June 2019 and evaluated using meteorological data and in situ, airborne, and spaceborne NO2 measurements. An intercomparison of model, aircraft, and TROPOMI NO2 columns is conducted to characterize biases in versions 1.3.1 and 2.3.1 of the satellite product. A mass balance method is implemented to provide improved emissions for simulating NO2 distribution over the study area.