Validating the Nernst–Planck transport model under reaction-driven flow conditions using RetroPy v1.0

Huang, Po-Wei; Flemisch, Bernd; Qin, Chao-Zhong; Saar, Martin O.; Ebigbo, Anozie

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4767-2023

Articles | Volume 16, issue 16

https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4767-2023

© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4767-2023

© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Articles | Volume 16, issue 16

Development and technical paper

|

24 Aug 2023

Development and technical paper |

| 24 Aug 2023

Validating the Nernst–Planck transport model under reaction-driven flow conditions using RetroPy v1.0

Po-Wei Huang, Bernd Flemisch, Chao-Zhong Qin, Martin O. Saar, and Anozie Ebigbo

Download

Final revised paper (published on 24 Aug 2023)
Preprint (discussion started on 30 Nov 2022)

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

RC1:
'Comment on egusphere-2022-1205', Lucjan Sapa, 04 Jan 2023

In report.pdf

Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1205-RC1
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Po-Wei Huang, 12 Jan 2023
  
  Dear Professor Sapa,
  We thank you for the efforts you took to review our paper and provide critical comments. We have carefully addressed the comments, especially in explaining the derivation of the electric field. The references you provided are relevant and helpful, and we have cited them. The domain dimensions of the experiment are included in the abstract, and the jump operator is defined. We hope the revisions meet your standards.
  Please find the detailed reply to your comments in the attachment.
  Sincerely,
  
  Po-Wei Huang
  
  powei.huang@erdw.ethz.ch
  
  Postdoctoral Researcher, Geothermal Energy and Geofluids Group,
  
  Institute of Geophysics, ETH Zurich
  
  Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1205-AC1
RC2:
'Comment on egusphere-2022-1205', Anonymous Referee #2, 30 May 2023

Please include also the changes indicated during the first iteration of the review.

Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1205-RC2
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Po-Wei Huang, 06 Jun 2023
  
  Dear Reviewer,
  
  We thank you for reviewing our paper and giving us encouraging comments. We took all your comments into consideration, particularly in clarifying the initial molar concentrations of all simulations.
  In the supplement, we provide point-by-point responses. All modifications of the manuscript have been highlighted in red.
  Sincerely,
  
  Po-Wei Huang
  
  powei.huang@erdw.ethz.ch
  
  Postdoctoral Researcher, Geothermal Energy and Geofluids Group,
  
  Institute of Geophysics, ETH Zurich
  
  Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1205-AC2

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload

AR by Po-Wei Huang on behalf of the Authors (10 Jun 2023) Author's response Author's tracked changes Manuscript

ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (12 Jun 2023) by Sylwester Arabas

RR by Lucjan Sapa (03 Jul 2023)

ED: Publish as is (10 Jul 2023) by Sylwester Arabas

AR by Po-Wei Huang on behalf of the Authors (11 Jul 2023) Manuscript

Short summary

Water in natural environments consists of many ions. Ions are electrically charged and exert electric forces on each other. We discuss whether the electric forces are relevant in describing mixing and reaction processes in natural environments. By comparing our computer simulations to lab experiments in literature, we show that the electric interactions between ions can play an essential role in mixing and reaction processes, in which case they should not be neglected in numerical modeling.

Validating the Nernst–Planck transport model under reaction-driven flow conditions using RetroPy v1.0

Download

Interactive discussion

Peer review completion

Suggestions for revision or reasons for rejection