Articles | Volume 16, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4749-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4749-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Methods for assessment of models
| 
23 Aug 2023
Methods for assessment of models |
| 23 Aug 2023
| 23 Aug 2023
A method to derive Fourier–wavelet spectra for the characterization of global-scale waves in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere and its MATLAB and Python software (fourierwavelet v1.1)
Leibniz Institute of Atmospheric Physics, University of Rostock, Schlossstraße 6, 18225 Kühlungsborn, Germany
Related authors
Juliana Jaen, Toralf Renkwitz, Jorge L. Chau, Maosheng He, Peter Hoffmann, Yosuke Yamazaki, Christoph Jacobi, Masaki Tsutsumi, Vivien Matthias, and Chris Hall
Ann. Geophys., 40, 23–35, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-23-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-23-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
To study long-term trends in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere (70–100 km), we established two summer length definitions and analyzed the variability over the years (2004–2020). After the analysis, we found significant trends in the summer beginning of one definition. Furthermore, we were able to extend one of the time series up to 31 years and obtained evidence of non-uniform trends and periodicities similar to those known for the quasi-biennial oscillation and El Niño–Southern Oscillation.
Tarique A. Siddiqui, Astrid Maute, Nick Pedatella, Yosuke Yamazaki, Hermann Lühr, and Claudia Stolle
Ann. Geophys., 36, 1545–1562, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1545-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1545-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Extreme meteorological events such as SSWs induce variabilities in the ionosphere by modulating the atmospheric tides, and these variabilities can be comparable to a moderate geomagnetic storm. The equatorial electrojet (EEJ) is a narrow ribbon of current flowing over the dip equator in the ionosphere and is particularly sensitive to tidal changes. In this study, we use ground-magnetic measurements to investigate the semidiurnal solar and lunar tidal variabilities of the EEJ during SSWs.
Olawale Bolaji, Oluwafisayo Owolabi, Elijah Falayi, Emmanuel Jimoh, Afolabi Kotoye, Olumide Odeyemi, Babatunde Rabiu, Patricia Doherty, Endawoke Yizengaw, Yosuke Yamazaki, Jacob Adeniyi, Rafiat Kaka, and Kehinde Onanuga
Ann. Geophys., 35, 123–132, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-123-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-123-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Movement of plasma to higher latitudes by EIA is known to relate to eastward electric field/EEJ and thermospheric meridional neutral wind. Experiments from GPS measurements that unveil thermospheric meridional neutral wind effect on plasma transportation in the F region are very few compared with electric field/EEJ. This work includes examples of thermospheric meridional neutral wind effects on GPS TEC measurements and their roles in transportation of plasma compared to electric field/EEJ.
Juliana Jaen, Toralf Renkwitz, Jorge L. Chau, Maosheng He, Peter Hoffmann, Yosuke Yamazaki, Christoph Jacobi, Masaki Tsutsumi, Vivien Matthias, and Chris Hall
Ann. Geophys., 40, 23–35, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-23-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-23-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
To study long-term trends in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere (70–100 km), we established two summer length definitions and analyzed the variability over the years (2004–2020). After the analysis, we found significant trends in the summer beginning of one definition. Furthermore, we were able to extend one of the time series up to 31 years and obtained evidence of non-uniform trends and periodicities similar to those known for the quasi-biennial oscillation and El Niño–Southern Oscillation.
Tarique A. Siddiqui, Astrid Maute, Nick Pedatella, Yosuke Yamazaki, Hermann Lühr, and Claudia Stolle
Ann. Geophys., 36, 1545–1562, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1545-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1545-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Extreme meteorological events such as SSWs induce variabilities in the ionosphere by modulating the atmospheric tides, and these variabilities can be comparable to a moderate geomagnetic storm. The equatorial electrojet (EEJ) is a narrow ribbon of current flowing over the dip equator in the ionosphere and is particularly sensitive to tidal changes. In this study, we use ground-magnetic measurements to investigate the semidiurnal solar and lunar tidal variabilities of the EEJ during SSWs.
Olawale Bolaji, Oluwafisayo Owolabi, Elijah Falayi, Emmanuel Jimoh, Afolabi Kotoye, Olumide Odeyemi, Babatunde Rabiu, Patricia Doherty, Endawoke Yizengaw, Yosuke Yamazaki, Jacob Adeniyi, Rafiat Kaka, and Kehinde Onanuga
Ann. Geophys., 35, 123–132, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-123-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-123-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Movement of plasma to higher latitudes by EIA is known to relate to eastward electric field/EEJ and thermospheric meridional neutral wind. Experiments from GPS measurements that unveil thermospheric meridional neutral wind effect on plasma transportation in the F region are very few compared with electric field/EEJ. This work includes examples of thermospheric meridional neutral wind effects on GPS TEC measurements and their roles in transportation of plasma compared to electric field/EEJ.
Related subject area
Atmospheric sciences
A gridded air quality forecast through fusing site-available machine learning predictions from RFSML v1.0 and chemical transport model results from GEOS-Chem v13.1.0 using the ensemble Kalman filter
Plume detection and emission estimate for biomass burning plumes from TROPOMI carbon monoxide observations using APE v1.1
CHEEREIO 1.0: a versatile and user-friendly ensemble-based chemical data assimilation and emissions inversion platform for the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model
Dynamic Meteorology-induced Emissions Coupler (MetEmis) development in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ): CMAQ-MetEmis
Visual analysis of model parameter sensitivities along warm conveyor belt trajectories using Met.3D (1.6.0-multivar1)
Simulating heat and CO2 fluxes in Beijing using SUEWS V2020b: sensitivity to vegetation phenology and maximum conductance
A Python library for computing individual and merged non-CO2 algorithmic climate change functions: CLIMaCCF V1.0
The three-dimensional structure of fronts in mid-latitude weather systems in numerical weather prediction models
The development and validation of the Inhomogeneous Wind Scheme for Urban Street (IWSUS-v1)
GPU-HADVPPM V1.0: a high-efficiency parallel GPU design of the piecewise parabolic method (PPM) for horizontal advection in an air quality model (CAMx V6.10)
Variability and combination as an ensemble of mineral dust forecasts during the 2021 CADDIWA experiment using the WRF 3.7.1 and CHIMERE v2020r3 models
Breakups are complicated: an efficient representation of collisional breakup in the superdroplet method
An optimized semi-empirical physical approach for satellite-based PM2.5 retrieval: embedding machine learning to simulate complex physical parameters
Sensitivity of tropospheric ozone to halogen chemistry in the chemistry–climate model LMDZ-INCA vNMHC
Segmentation of XCO2 images with deep learning: application to synthetic plumes from cities and power plants
Evaluating precipitation distributions at regional scales: a benchmarking framework and application to CMIP5 and 6 models
The Fire Inventory from NCAR version 2.5: an updated global fire emissions model for climate and chemistry applications
An approach to refining the ground meteorological observation stations for improving PM2.5 forecasts in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region
Assessment of WRF (v 4.2.1) dynamically downscaled precipitation on subdaily and daily timescales over CONUS
Convective-gust nowcasting based on radar reflectivity and a deep learning algorithm
Self-nested large-eddy simulations in PALM model system v21.10 for offshore wind prediction under different atmospheric stability conditions
How does cloud-radiative heating over the North Atlantic change with grid spacing, convective parameterization, and microphysics scheme in ICON version 2.1.00?
Updated isoprene and terpene emission factors for the Interactive BVOC (iBVOC) emission scheme in the United Kingdom Earth System Model (UKESM1.0)
Technical descriptions of the experimental dynamical downscaling simulations over North America by the CAM–MPAS variable-resolution model
Intercomparison of the weather and climate physics suites of a unified forecast–climate model system (GRIST-A22.7.28) based on single-column modeling
Halogen chemistry in volcanic plumes: a 1D framework based on MOCAGE 1D (version R1.18.1) preparing 3D global chemistry modelling
PyFLEXTRKR: a flexible feature tracking Python software for convective cloud analysis
CLGAN: a generative adversarial network (GAN)-based video prediction model for precipitation nowcasting
Long-term evaluation of surface air pollution in CAMSRA and MERRA-2 global reanalyses over Europe (2003–2020)
Emulating aerosol optics with randomly generated neural networks
Development of an ecophysiology module in the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model version 12.2.0 to represent biosphere–atmosphere fluxes relevant for ozone air quality
Comparison of ozone formation attribution techniques in the northeastern United States
Improving trajectory calculations by FLEXPART 10.4+ using single-image super-resolution
Data fusion uncertainty-enabled methods to map street-scale hourly NO2 in Barcelona: a case study with CALIOPE-Urban v1.0
Forecasting tropical cyclone tracks in the northwestern Pacific based on a deep-learning model
Emulating lateral gravity wave propagation in a global chemistry-climate model (EMAC v2.55.2) through horizontal flux redistribution
Modelling concentration heterogeneities in streets using the street-network model MUNICH
Accelerating models for multiphase chemical kinetics through machine learning with polynomial chaos expansion and neural networks
A machine learning emulator for Lagrangian particle dispersion model footprints: a case study using NAME
An optimisation method to improve modelling of wet deposition in atmospheric transport models: applied to FLEXPART v10.4
Improving the representation of shallow cumulus convection with the simplified-higher-order-closure–mass-flux (SHOC+MF v1.0) approach
ISAT v2.0: an integrated tool for nested-domain configurations and model-ready emission inventories for WRF-AQM
Estimation of CH4 emission based on an advanced 4D-LETKF assimilation system
Accelerated estimation of sea-spray-mediated heat flux using Gaussian quadrature: case studies with a coupled CFSv2.0-WW3 system
AMORE-Isoprene v1.0: a new reduced mechanism for gas-phase isoprene oxidation
A method for generating a quasi-linear convective system suitable for observing system simulation experiments
The second Met Office Unified Model–JULES Regional Atmosphere and Land configuration, RAL2
J-GAIN v1.0: A flexible tool to incorporate aerosol formation rates obtained by molecular models into large-scale models
IAQMS-street v2.0: a two-way coupled regional-urban–street-network model system for Beijing, China
A dynamic ammonia emission model and the online coupling with WRF–Chem (WRF–SoilN–Chem v1.0): development and regional evaluation in China
Li Fang, Jianbing Jin, Arjo Segers, Hong Liao, Ke Li, Bufan Xu, Wei Han, Mijie Pang, and Hai Xiang Lin
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4867–4882, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4867-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4867-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Machine learning models have gained great popularity in air quality prediction. However, they are only available at air quality monitoring stations. In contrast, chemical transport models (CTM) provide predictions that are continuous in the 3D field. Owing to complex error sources, they are typically biased. In this study, we proposed a gridded prediction with high accuracy by fusing predictions from our regional feature selection machine learning prediction (RFSML v1.0) and a CTM prediction.
Manu Goudar, Juliëtte C. S. Anema, Rajesh Kumar, Tobias Borsdorff, and Jochen Landgraf
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4835–4852, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4835-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4835-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A framework was developed to automatically detect plumes and compute emission estimates with cross-sectional flux method (CFM) for biomass burning events in TROPOMI CO datasets using Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite active fire data. The emissions were more reliable when changing plume height in downwind direction was used instead of constant injection height. The CFM had uncertainty even when the meteorological conditions were accurate; thus there is a need for better inversion models.
Drew C. Pendergrass, Daniel J. Jacob, Hannah Nesser, Daniel J. Varon, Melissa Sulprizio, Kazuyuki Miyazaki, and Kevin W. Bowman
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4793–4810, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4793-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4793-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We have built a tool called CHEEREIO that allows scientists to use observations of pollutants or gases in the atmosphere, such as from satellites or surface stations, to update supercomputer models that simulate the Earth. CHEEREIO uses the difference between the model simulations of the atmosphere and real-world observations to come up with a good guess for the actual composition of our atmosphere, the true emissions of various pollutants, and whatever else they may want to study.
Bok H. Baek, Carlie Coats, Siqi Ma, Chi-Tsan Wang, Yunyao Li, Jia Xing, Daniel Tong, Soontae Kim, and Jung-Hun Woo
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4659–4676, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4659-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4659-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
To enable the direct feedback effects of aerosols and local meteorology in an air quality modeling system without any computational bottleneck, we have developed an inline meteorology-induced emissions coupler module within the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Community Multiscale Air Quality modeling system to dynamically model the complex MOtor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES) on-road mobile emissions inline without a separate dedicated emissions processing model like SMOKE.
Christoph Neuhauser, Maicon Hieronymus, Michael Kern, Marc Rautenhaus, Annika Oertel, and Rüdiger Westermann
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4617–4638, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4617-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4617-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Numerical weather prediction models rely on parameterizations for sub-grid-scale processes, which are a source of uncertainty. We present novel visual analytics solutions to analyze interactively the sensitivities of a selected prognostic variable to multiple model parameters along trajectories regarding similarities in temporal development and spatiotemporal relationships. The proposed workflow is applied to cloud microphysical sensitivities along coherent strongly ascending trajectories.
Yingqi Zheng, Minttu Havu, Huizhi Liu, Xueling Cheng, Yifan Wen, Hei Shing Lee, Joyson Ahongshangbam, and Leena Järvi
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4551–4579, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4551-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4551-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The performance of the Surface Urban Energy and Water Balance Scheme (SUEWS) is evaluated against the observed surface exchanges (fluxes) of heat and carbon dioxide in a densely built neighborhood in Beijing. The heat flux modeling is noticeably improved by using the observed maximum conductance and by optimizing the vegetation phenology modeling. SUEWS also performs well in simulating carbon dioxide flux.
Simone Dietmüller, Sigrun Matthes, Katrin Dahlmann, Hiroshi Yamashita, Abolfazl Simorgh, Manuel Soler, Florian Linke, Benjamin Lührs, Maximilian M. Meuser, Christian Weder, Volker Grewe, Feijia Yin, and Federica Castino
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4405–4425, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4405-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4405-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Climate-optimized aircraft trajectories avoid atmospheric regions with a large climate impact due to aviation emissions. This requires spatially and temporally resolved information on aviation's climate impact. We propose using algorithmic climate change functions (aCCFs) for CO2 and non-CO2 effects (ozone, methane, water vapor, contrail cirrus). Merged aCCFs combine individual aCCFs by assuming aircraft-specific parameters and climate metrics. Technically this is done with a Python library.
Andreas A. Beckert, Lea Eisenstein, Annika Oertel, Tim Hewson, George C. Craig, and Marc Rautenhaus
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4427–4450, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4427-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4427-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate the benefit of objective 3-D front detection with modern interactive visual analysis techniques for case studies of extra-tropical cyclones and comparisons of frontal structures between different numerical weather prediction models. The 3-D frontal structures show agreement with 2-D fronts from surface analysis charts and augment them in the vertical dimension. We see great potential for more complex studies of atmospheric dynamics and for operational weather forecasting.
Zhenxin Liu, Yuanhao Chen, Yuhang Wang, Cheng Liu, Shuhua Liu, and Hong Liao
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4385–4403, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4385-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4385-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The heterogeneous layout of urban buildings leads to the complex wind field in and over the urban canopy. Large discrepancies between the observations and the current simulations result from misunderstanding the character of the wind field. The Inhomogeneous Wind Scheme in Urban Street (IWSUS) was developed to simulate the heterogeneity of the wind speed in a typical street and then improve the simulated energy budget in the lower atmospheric layer over the urban canopy.
Kai Cao, Qizhong Wu, Lingling Wang, Nan Wang, Huaqiong Cheng, Xiao Tang, Dongqing Li, and Lanning Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4367–4383, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4367-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4367-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Offline performance experiment results show that the GPU-HADVPPM on a V100 GPU can achieve up to 1113.6 × speedups to its original version on an E5-2682 v4 CPU. A series of optimization measures are taken, and the CAMx-CUDA model improves the computing efficiency by 128.4 × on a single V100 GPU card. A parallel architecture with an MPI plus CUDA hybrid paradigm is presented, and it can achieve up to 4.5 × speedup when launching eight CPU cores and eight GPU cards.
Laurent Menut
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4265–4281, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4265-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4265-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study analyzes forecasts that were made in 2021 to help trigger measurements during the CADDIWA experiment. The WRF and CHIMERE models were run each day, and the first goal is to quantify the variability of the forecast as a function of forecast leads and forecast location. The possibility of using the different leads as an ensemble is also tested. For some locations, the correlation scores are better with this approach. This could be tested on operational forecast chains in the future.
Emily de Jong, John Ben Mackay, Oleksii Bulenok, Anna Jaruga, and Sylwester Arabas
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4193–4211, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4193-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4193-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In clouds, collisional breakup occurs when two colliding droplets splinter into new, smaller fragments. Particle-based modeling approaches often do not represent breakup because of the computational demands of creating new droplets. We present a particle-based breakup method that preserves the computational efficiency of these methods. In a series of simple demonstrations, we show that this representation alters cloud processes in reasonable and expected ways.
Caiyi Jin, Qiangqiang Yuan, Tongwen Li, Yuan Wang, and Liangpei Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4137–4154, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4137-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4137-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The semi-empirical physical approach derives PM2.5 with strong physical significance. However, due to the complex optical characteristic, the physical parameters are difficult to express accurately. Thus, combining the atmospheric physical mechanism and machine learning, we propose an optimized model. It creatively embeds the random forest model into the physical PM2.5 remote sensing approach to simulate a physical parameter. Our method shows great optimized performance in the validations.
Cyril Caram, Sophie Szopa, Anne Cozic, Slimane Bekki, Carlos A. Cuevas, and Alfonso Saiz-Lopez
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4041–4062, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4041-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4041-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We studied the role of halogenated compounds (containing chlorine, bromine and iodine), emitted by natural processes (mainly above the oceans), in the chemistry of the lower layers of the atmosphere. We introduced this relatively new chemistry in a three-dimensional climate–chemistry model and looked at how this chemistry will disrupt the ozone. We showed that the concentration of ozone decreases by 22 % worldwide and that of the atmospheric detergent, OH, by 8 %.
Joffrey Dumont Le Brazidec, Pierre Vanderbecken, Alban Farchi, Marc Bocquet, Jinghui Lian, Grégoire Broquet, Gerrit Kuhlmann, Alexandre Danjou, and Thomas Lauvaux
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3997–4016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3997-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3997-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Monitoring of CO2 emissions is key to the development of reduction policies. Local emissions, from cities or power plants, may be estimated from CO2 plumes detected in satellite images. CO2 plumes generally have a weak signal and are partially concealed by highly variable background concentrations and instrument errors, which hampers their detection. To address this problem, we propose and apply deep learning methods to detect the contour of a plume in simulated CO2 satellite images.
Min-Seop Ahn, Paul A. Ullrich, Peter J. Gleckler, Jiwoo Lee, Ana C. Ordonez, and Angeline G. Pendergrass
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3927–3951, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3927-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3927-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce a framework for regional-scale evaluation of simulated precipitation distributions with 62 climate reference regions and 10 metrics and apply it to evaluate CMIP5 and CMIP6 models against multiple satellite-based precipitation products. The common model biases identified in this study are mainly associated with the overestimated light precipitation and underestimated heavy precipitation. These biases persist from earlier-generation models and have been slightly improved in CMIP6.
Christine Wiedinmyer, Yosuke Kimura, Elena C. McDonald-Buller, Louisa K. Emmons, Rebecca R. Buchholz, Wenfu Tang, Keenan Seto, Maxwell B. Joseph, Kelley C. Barsanti, Annmarie G. Carlton, and Robert Yokelson
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3873–3891, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3873-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3873-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Fire INventory from NCAR (FINN) provides daily global estimates of emissions from open fires based on satellite detections of hot spots. This version has been updated to apply MODIS and VIIRS satellite fire detection and better represents both large and small fires. FINNv2.5 generates more emissions than FINNv1 and is in general agreement with other fire emissions inventories. The new estimates are consistent with satellite observations, but uncertainties remain regionally and by pollutant.
Lichao Yang, Wansuo Duan, and Zifa Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3827–3848, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3827-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3827-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
An approach is proposed to refine a ground meteorological observation network to improve the PM2.5 forecasts in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region. A cost-effective observation network is obtained and makes the relevant PM2.5 forecasts assimilate fewer observations but achieve the forecasting skill comparable to or higher than that obtained by assimilating all ground station observations, suggesting that many of the current ground stations can be greatly scattered to avoid much unnecessary work.
Abhishekh Kumar Srivastava, Paul Aaron Ullrich, Deeksha Rastogi, Pouya Vahmani, Andrew Jones, and Richard Grotjahn
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3699–3722, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3699-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3699-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Stakeholders need high-resolution regional climate data for applications such as assessing water availability and mountain snowpack. This study examines 3 h and 24 h historical precipitation over the contiguous United States in the 12 km WRF version 4.2.1-based dynamical downscaling of the ERA5 reanalysis. WRF improves precipitation characteristics such as the annual cycle and distribution of the precipitation maxima, but it also displays regionally and seasonally varying precipitation biases.
Haixia Xiao, Yaqiang Wang, Yu Zheng, Yuanyuan Zheng, Xiaoran Zhuang, Hongyan Wang, and Mei Gao
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3611–3628, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3611-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3611-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Due to the small-scale and nonstationary nature of convective wind gusts (CGs), reliable CG nowcasting has remained unattainable. Here, we developed a deep learning model — namely CGsNet — for 0—2 h of quantitative CG nowcasting, first achieving minute—kilometer-level forecasts. Based on the CGsNet model, the average surface wind speed (ASWS) and peak wind gust speed (PWGS) predictions are obtained. Experiments indicate that CGsNet exhibits higher accuracy than the traditional method.
Maria Krutova, Mostafa Bakhoday-Paskyabi, Joachim Reuder, and Finn Gunnar Nielsen
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3553–3564, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3553-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3553-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Local refinement of the grid is a powerful method allowing us to reduce the computational time while preserving the accuracy in the area of interest. Depending on the implementation, the local refinement may introduce unwanted numerical effects into the results. We study the wind speed common to the wind turbine operational speeds and confirm strong alteration of the result when the heat fluxes are present, except for the specific refinement scheme used.
Sylvia Sullivan, Behrooz Keshtgar, Nicole Albern, Elzina Bala, Christoph Braun, Anubhav Choudhary, Johannes Hörner, Hilke Lentink, Georgios Papavasileiou, and Aiko Voigt
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3535–3551, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3535-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3535-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Clouds absorb and re-emit infrared radiation from Earth's surface and absorb and reflect incoming solar radiation. As a result, they change atmospheric temperature gradients that drive large-scale circulation. To better simulate this circulation, we study how the radiative heating and cooling from clouds depends on model settings like grid spacing; whether we describe convection approximately or exactly; and the level of detail used to describe small-scale processes, or microphysics, in clouds.
James Weber, James A. King, Katerina Sindelarova, and Maria Val Martin
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3083–3101, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3083-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3083-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The emissions of volatile organic compounds from vegetation (BVOCs) influence atmospheric composition and contribute to certain gases and aerosols (tiny airborne particles) which play a role in climate change. BVOC emissions are likely to change in the future due to changes in climate and land use. Therefore, accurate simulation of BVOC emission is important, and this study describes an update to the simulation of BVOC emissions in the United Kingdom Earth System Model (UKESM).
Koichi Sakaguchi, L. Ruby Leung, Colin M. Zarzycki, Jihyeon Jang, Seth McGinnis, Bryce E. Harrop, William C. Skamarock, Andrew Gettelman, Chun Zhao, William J. Gutowski, Stephen Leak, and Linda Mearns
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3029–3081, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3029-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3029-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We document details of the regional climate downscaling dataset produced by a global variable-resolution model. The experiment is unique in that it follows a standard protocol designed for coordinated experiments of regional models. We found negligible influence of post-processing on statistical analysis, importance of simulation quality outside of the target region, and computational challenges that our model code faced due to rapidly changing super computer systems.
Xiaohan Li, Yi Zhang, Xindong Peng, Baiquan Zhou, Jian Li, and Yiming Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2975–2993, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2975-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2975-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The weather and climate physics suites used in GRIST-A22.7.28 are compared using single-column modeling. The source of their discrepancies in terms of modeling cloud and precipitation is explored. Convective parameterization is found to be a key factor responsible for the differences. The two suites also have intrinsic differences in the interaction between microphysics and other processes, resulting in different cloud features and time step sensitivities.
Virginie Marécal, Ronan Voisin-Plessis, Tjarda Jane Roberts, Alessandro Aiuppa, Herizo Narivelo, Paul David Hamer, Béatrice Josse, Jonathan Guth, Luke Surl, and Lisa Grellier
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2873–2898, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2873-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2873-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We implemented a halogen volcanic chemistry scheme in a one-dimensional modelling framework preparing for further use in a three-dimensional global chemistry-transport model. The results of the simulations for an eruption of Mt Etna in 2008, including various sensitivity tests, show a good consistency with previous modelling studies.
Zhe Feng, Joseph Hardin, Hannah C. Barnes, Jianfeng Li, L. Ruby Leung, Adam Varble, and Zhixiao Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2753–2776, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2753-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2753-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
PyFLEXTRKR is a flexible atmospheric feature tracking framework with specific capabilities to track convective clouds from a variety of observations and model simulations. The package has a collection of multi-object identification algorithms and has been optimized for large datasets. This paper describes the algorithms and demonstrates applications for tracking deep convective cells and mesoscale convective systems from observations and model simulations at a wide range of scales.
Yan Ji, Bing Gong, Michael Langguth, Amirpasha Mozaffari, and Xiefei Zhi
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2737–2752, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2737-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2737-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Formulating short-term precipitation forecasting as a video prediction task, a novel deep learning architecture (convolutional long short-term memory generative adversarial network, CLGAN) is proposed. A benchmark dataset is built on minute-level precipitation measurements. Results show that with the GAN component the model generates predictions sharing statistical properties with observations, resulting in it outperforming the baseline in dichotomous and spatial scores for heavy precipitation.
Aleksander Lacima, Hervé Petetin, Albert Soret, Dene Bowdalo, Oriol Jorba, Zhaoyue Chen, Raúl F. Méndez Turrubiates, Hicham Achebak, Joan Ballester, and Carlos Pérez García-Pando
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2689–2718, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2689-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2689-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding how air pollution varies across space and time is of key importance for the safeguarding of human health. This work arose in the context of the project EARLY-ADAPT, for which the Barcelona Supercomputing Center developed an air pollution database covering all of Europe. Through different statistical methods, we compared two global pollution models against measurements from ground stations and found significant discrepancies between the observed and the modeled surface pollution.
Andrew Geiss, Po-Lun Ma, Balwinder Singh, and Joseph C. Hardin
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2355–2370, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2355-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2355-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Atmospheric aerosols play a critical role in Earth's climate, but it is too computationally expensive to directly model their interaction with radiation in climate simulations. This work develops a new neural-network-based parameterization of aerosol optical properties for use in the Energy Exascale Earth System Model that is much more accurate than the current one; it also introduces a unique model optimization method that involves randomly generating neural network architectures.
Joey C. Y. Lam, Amos P. K. Tai, Jason A. Ducker, and Christopher D. Holmes
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2323–2342, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2323-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2323-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a new component within an atmospheric chemistry model to better simulate plant ecophysiological processes relevant for ozone air quality. We showed that it reduces simulated biases in plant uptake of ozone in prior models. The new model enables us to explore how future climatic changes affect air quality via affecting plants, examine ozone–vegetation interactions and feedbacks, and evaluate the impacts of changing atmospheric chemistry and climate on vegetation productivity.
Qian Shu, Sergey L. Napelenok, William T. Hutzell, Kirk R. Baker, Barron H. Henderson, Benjamin N. Murphy, and Christian Hogrefe
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2303–2322, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2303-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2303-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Source attribution methods are generally used to determine culpability of precursor emission sources to ambient pollutant concentrations. However, source attribution of secondarily formed pollutants such as ozone and its precursors cannot be explicitly measured, making evaluation of source apportionment methods challenging. In this study, multiple apportionment approach comparisons show common features but still reveal wide variations in predicted sector contribution and species dependency.
Rüdiger Brecht, Lucie Bakels, Alex Bihlo, and Andreas Stohl
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2181–2192, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2181-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2181-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We use neural-network-based single-image super-resolution to improve the upscaling of meteorological wind fields to be used for particle dispersion models. This deep-learning-based methodology improves the standard linear interpolation typically used in particle dispersion models. The improvement of wind fields leads to substantial improvement in the computed trajectories of the particles.
Alvaro Criado, Jan Mateu Armengol, Hervé Petetin, Daniel Rodriguez-Rey, Jaime Benavides, Marc Guevara, Carlos Pérez García-Pando, Albert Soret, and Oriol Jorba
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2193–2213, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2193-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2193-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This work aims to derive and evaluate a general statistical post-processing tool specifically designed for the street scale that can be applied to any urban air quality system. Our data fusion methodology corrects NO2 fields based on continuous hourly observations and experimental campaigns. This study enables us to obtain exceedance probability maps of air quality standards. In 2019, 13 % of the Barcelona area had a 70 % or higher probability of exceeding the annual legal NO2 limit of 40 µg/m3.
Liang Wang, Bingcheng Wan, Shaohui Zhou, Haofei Sun, and Zhiqiu Gao
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2167–2179, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2167-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2167-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The past 24 h TC trajectories and meteorological field data were used to forecast TC tracks in the northwestern Pacific from hours 6–72 based on GRU_CNN, which we proposed in this paper and which has better prediction results than traditional single deep-learning methods. The historical steering flow of cyclones has a significant effect on improving the accuracy of short-term forecasting, while, in long-term forecasting, the SST and geopotential height will have a particular impact.
Roland Eichinger, Sebastian Rhode, Hella Garny, Peter Preusse, Petr Pisoft, Aleš Kuchar, Patrick Jöckel, Astrid Kerkweg, and Bastian Kern
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-270, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-270, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Dynamical model biases result from the columnar approach of gravity wave (GW) schemes, but parallel decomposition makes horizontal GW propagation computationally unfeasible. In the global model EMAC, we approximate it by GW redistribution at one altitude using tailor-made redistribution maps generated with a ray-tracer. More spread-out GW drag helps reconciling the model with observations and closing the 60S GW gap. Polar vortex dynamics are improved, enhancing climate model credibility.
Thibaud Sarica, Alice Maison, Yelva Roustan, Matthias Ketzel, Steen Solvang Jensen, Youngseob Kim, Christophe Chaillou, and Karine Sartelet
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-70, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-70, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
A new version of the Model of Urban Network of Intersecting Canyons and Highways (MUNICH) is developed to represent heterogeneities of concentrations in streets. The street volume is discretized vertically and horizontally to limit the artificial dilution of emissions and concentrations. This new version is applied to street networks in Copenhagen and Paris. The comparisons to observations are improved, with higher concentrations of pollutants emitted by traffic at the bottom of the street.
Thomas Berkemeier, Matteo Krüger, Aryeh Feinberg, Marcel Müller, Ulrich Pöschl, and Ulrich K. Krieger
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2037–2054, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2037-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2037-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Kinetic multi-layer models (KMs) successfully describe heterogeneous and multiphase atmospheric chemistry. In applications requiring repeated execution, however, these models can be too expensive. We trained machine learning surrogate models on output of the model KM-SUB and achieved high correlations. The surrogate models run orders of magnitude faster, which suggests potential applicability in global optimization tasks and as sub-modules in large-scale atmospheric models.
Elena Fillola, Raul Santos-Rodriguez, Alistair Manning, Simon O'Doherty, and Matt Rigby
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1997–2009, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1997-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1997-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Lagrangian particle dispersion models are used extensively for the estimation of greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes using atmospheric observations. However, these models do not scale well as data volumes increase. Here, we develop a proof-of-concept machine learning emulator that can produce outputs similar to those of the dispersion model, but 50 000 times faster, using only meteorological inputs. This works demonstrates the potential of machine learning to accelerate GHG estimations across the globe.
Stijn Van Leuven, Pieter De Meutter, Johan Camps, Piet Termonia, and Andy Delcloo
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-357, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-357, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Precipitation collects airborne particles and deposits these on the ground. This process is called wet deposition and greatly determines how airborne radioactive particles (released routinely or accidental) contaminate the surface. In this work we present a new method to improve the calculation of wet deposition in computer models. We apply this method to the existing model FLEXPART by simulating the Fukushima nuclear accident (2011), and show that it improves the simulation of wet deposition.
Maria J. Chinita, Mikael Witte, Marcin J. Kurowski, Joao Teixeira, Kay Suselj, Georgios Matheou, and Peter Bogenschutz
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1909–1924, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1909-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1909-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Low clouds are one of the largest sources of uncertainty in climate prediction. In this paper, we introduce the first version of the unified turbulence and shallow convection parameterization named SHOC+MF developed to improve the representation of shallow cumulus clouds in the Simple Cloud-Resolving E3SM Atmosphere Model (SCREAM). Here, we also show promising preliminary results in a single-column model framework for two benchmark cases of shallow cumulus convection.
Kun Wang, Chao Gao, Kai Wu, Kaiyun Liu, Haofan Wang, Mo Dan, Xiaohui Ji, and Qingqing Tong
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1961–1973, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1961-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1961-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study establishes an easy-to-use and integrated framework for a model-ready emission inventory for the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF)–Air Quality Numerical Model (AQM). A free tool called the ISAT (Inventory Spatial Allocation Tool) was developed based on this framework. ISAT helps users complete the workflow from the WRF nested-domain configuration to a model-ready emission inventory for AQM with a regional emission inventory and a shapefile for the target region.
Jagat S. H. Bisht, Prabir K. Patra, Masayuki Takigawa, Takashi Sekiya, Yugo Kanaya, Naoko Saitoh, and Kazuyuki Miyazaki
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1823–1838, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1823-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1823-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we estimated CH4 fluxes using an advanced 4D-LETKF method. The system was tested and optimized using observation system simulation experiments (OSSEs), where a known surface emission distribution is retrieved from synthetic observations. The availability of satellite measurements has increased, and there are still many missions focused on greenhouse gas observations that have not yet launched. The technique being referred to has the potential to improve estimates of CH4 fluxes.
Ruizi Shi and Fanghua Xu
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1839–1856, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1839-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1839-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Based on the Gaussian quadrature method, a fast algorithm of sea-spray-mediated heat flux is developed. Compared with the widely used single-radius algorithm, the new fast algorithm shows a better agreement with the full spectrum integral of spray flux. The new fast algorithm is evaluated in a coupled modeling system, and the simulations of sea surface temperature, wind speed and wave height are improved. Thereby, the new fast algorithm has great potential to be used in coupled modeling systems.
Forwood Wiser, Bryan K. Place, Siddhartha Sen, Havala O. T. Pye, Benjamin Yang, Daniel M. Westervelt, Daven K. Henze, Arlene M. Fiore, and V. Faye McNeill
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1801–1821, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1801-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1801-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a reduced model of atmospheric isoprene oxidation, AMORE-Isoprene 1.0. It was created using a new Automated Model Reduction (AMORE) method designed to simplify complex chemical mechanisms with minimal manual adjustments to the output. AMORE-Isoprene 1.0 has improved accuracy and similar size to other reduced isoprene mechanisms. When included in the CRACMM mechanism, it improved the accuracy of EPA’s CMAQ model predictions for the northeastern USA compared to observations.
Jonathan D. Labriola, Jeremy A. Gibbs, and Louis J. Wicker
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1779–1799, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1779-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1779-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Observing system simulation experiments (OSSEs) are simulated case studies used to understand how different assimilated weather observations impact forecast skill. This study introduces the methods used to create an OSSE for a tornadic quasi-linear convective system event. These steps provide an opportunity to simulate a realistic high-impact weather event and can be used to encourage a more diverse set of OSSEs.
Mike Bush, Ian Boutle, John Edwards, Anke Finnenkoetter, Charmaine Franklin, Kirsty Hanley, Aravindakshan Jayakumar, Huw Lewis, Adrian Lock, Marion Mittermaier, Saji Mohandas, Rachel North, Aurore Porson, Belinda Roux, Stuart Webster, and Mark Weeks
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1713–1734, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1713-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1713-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Building on the baseline of RAL1, the RAL2 science configuration is used for regional modelling around the UM partnership and in operations at the Met Office. RAL2 has been tested in different parts of the world including Australia, India and the UK. RAL2 increases medium and low cloud amounts in the mid-latitudes compared to RAL1, leading to improved cloud forecasts and a reduced diurnal cycle of screen temperature. There is also a reduction in the frequency of heavier precipitation rates.
Daniel Yazgi and Tinja Olenius
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1464, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1464, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present flexible tools to implement aerosol formation rate predictions in climate and chemical transport models. New-particle formation is a significant but uncertain factor affecting aerosol numbers, and an active field within molecular modeling which provides data for assessing formation rates for different chemical species. We introduce tools to generate and interpolate formation rate look-up tables for user-defined data, thus enabling easy inclusion and testing of formation schemes.
Tao Wang, Hang Liu, Jie Li, Shuai Wang, Youngseob Kim, Yele Sun, Wenyi Yang, Huiyun Du, Zhe Wang, and Zifa Wang
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-5, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-5, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
This paper developed a two-way coupled module in latest version of a regional-urban-street-network model IAQMS-street v2.0, the mass flux from streets to background is considered. Test cases are defined to evaluate the performance of IAQMS-street v2.0 in Beijing by comparing it with that simulated by IAQMS-street v1.0 and regional model. The contribution of local emissions and the influence of on-road vehicle-control measures on air quality are evaluated by using IAQMS-street v2.0.
Chuanhua Ren, Xin Huang, Tengyu Liu, Yu Song, Zhang Wen, Xuejun Liu, Aijun Ding, and Tong Zhu
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1641–1659, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1641-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1641-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Ammonia in the atmosphere has wide impacts on the ecological environment and air quality, and its emission from soil volatilization is highly sensitive to meteorology, making it challenging to be well captured in models. We developed a dynamic emission model capable of calculating ammonia emission interactively with meteorological and soil conditions. Such a coupling of soil emission with meteorology provides a better understanding of ammonia emission and its contribution to atmospheric aerosol.
Cited articles
Akmaev, R., Fuller-Rowell, T., Wu, F., Forbes, J., Zhang, X., Anghel, A.,
Iredell, M., Moorthi, S., and Juang, H.-M.: Tidal variability in the lower
thermosphere: Comparison of Whole Atmosphere Model (WAM) simulations with
observations from TIMED, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L03810, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032584,
2008. a, b
Alexander, S. P. and Shepherd, M. G.: Planetary wave activity in the polar lower stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 707–718, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-707-2010, 2010. a
Baldwin, M. P., Ayarzagüena, B., Birner, T., Butchart, N., Butler, A. H.,
Charlton-Perez, A. J., Domeisen, D. I., Garfinkel, C. I., Garny, H., Gerber,
E. P., Hegglin, M. I., Langematz, U., and Pedatella, N. M.: Sudden stratospheric warmings, Rev. Geophys., 59,
e2020RG000708, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020RG000708, 2021. a
Black, R. X., and McDaniel, B. A.: The dynamics of Northern Hemisphere stratospheric final warming events, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 2932–2946, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3981.1, 2007. a
Butler, A. H., Seidel, D. J., Hardiman, S. C., Butchart, N., Birner, T., and
Match, A.: Defining sudden stratospheric warmings, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96,
1913–1928, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00173.1, 2015. a
Chandran, A., Garcia, R., Collins, R., and Chang, L.: Secondary planetary waves
in the middle and upper atmosphere following the stratospheric sudden warming
event of January 2012, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 1861–1867,
https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50373, 2013. a
Chang, L. C., Palo, S. E., and Liu, H.-L.: Short-term variability in the
migrating diurnal tide caused by interactions with the quasi 2 day wave, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D12112, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014996, 2011. a
Davis, R. N., Chen, Y.-W., Miyahara, S., and Mitchell, N. J.: The climatology, propagation and excitation of ultra-fast Kelvin waves as observed by meteor radar, Aura MLS, TRMM and in the Kyushu-GCM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1865–1879, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1865-2012, 2012. a
Day, K. A., Hibbins, R. E., and Mitchell, N. J.: Aura MLS observations of the westward-propagating s=1, 16-day planetary wave in the stratosphere, mesosphere and lower thermosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4149–4161, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4149-2011, 2011. a
Espy, P., Hibbins, R., Riggin, D., and Fritts, D.: Mesospheric planetary waves
over Antarctica during 2002, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L21804,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023886, 2005. a
Fan, Y., Huang, C. M., Zhang, S. D., Huang, K. M., and Gong, Y.: Long-Term
Study of Quasi-16-day Waves Based on ERA5 Reanalysis Data and EOS MLS
Observations From 2005 to 2020, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 127,
e2021JA030030, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA030030, 2022. a, b
Farge, M.: Wavelet transforms and their applications to turbulence,
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 24, 395–458,
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.24.010192.002143, 1992. a
Fejer, B., Olson, M., Chau, J., Stolle, C., Lühr, H., Goncharenko, L.,
Yumoto, K., and Nagatsuma, T.: Lunar-dependent equatorial ionospheric
electrodynamic effects during sudden stratospheric warmings, J. Geophys.
Res.-Space, 115, A00G03, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015273, 2010. a
Forbes, J., Hagan, M., Miyahara, S., Vial, F., Manson, A., Meek, C., and
Portnyagin, Y. I.: Quasi 16-day oscillation in the mesosphere and lower
thermosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100, 9149–9163,
https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD02157, 1995a. a
Forbes, J., Zhang, X., Palo, S., Russell, J., Mertens, C., and Mlynczak, M.:
Tidal variability in the ionospheric dynamo region, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 113, A02310, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012737, 2008. a
Forbes, J. M.: Atmospheric tides: 1. Model description and results for the
solar diurnal component, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 87, 5222–5240,
https://doi.org/10.1029/JA087iA07p05222, 1982a. a
Forbes, J. M.: Atmospheric tide: 2. The solar and lunar semidiurnal components,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 87, 5241–5252,
https://doi.org/10.1029/JA087iA07p05241, 1982b. a
Forbes, J. M.: Middle atmosphere tides, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 46, 1049–1067,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9169(84)90008-4, 1984. a
Forbes, J. M.: Tidal and planetary waves, The Upper Mesosphere and Lower
Thermosphere: A Review of Experiment and Theory, Geophys. Monogr. Ser., 87,
67–87, https://doi.org/10.1029/GM087p0067, 1995. a
Forbes, J. M. and Zhang, X.: Quasi-10-day wave in the atmosphere, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 120, 11–079, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023327, 2015. a, b
Forbes, J. M. and Zhang, X.: The quasi-6 day wave and its interactions with
solar tides, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 122, 4764–4776,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA023954, 2017. a
Forbes, J. M., Zhang, X., Palo, S. E., Russell, J., Mertens, C. J., and
Mlynczak, M.: Kelvin waves in stratosphere, mesosphere and lower thermosphere
temperatures as observed by TIMED/SABER during 2002–2006, Earth Planet. Space, 61, 447–453, https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03353161, 2009. a
Forbes, J. M., Zhang, X., Maute, A., and Hagan, M. E.: Zonally symmetric
oscillations of the thermosphere at planetary wave periods, J.
Geophys. Res.-Space, 123, 4110–4128,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2018JA025258, 2018. a
Frigo, M. and Johnson, S. G.: FFTW: An adaptive software architecture for the
FFT, in: Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics,
Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP'98 (Cat. No. 98CH36181), IEEE, vol. 3,
1381–1384,https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.1998.681704, 1998. a
Fritts, D. C. and Alexander, M. J.: Gravity wave dynamics and effects in the
middle atmosphere, Rev. Geophys., 41, 1003, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001RG000106,
2003. a
Fuller-Rowell, T., Wu, F., Akmaev, R., Fang, T.-W., and Araujo-Pradere, E.: A
whole atmosphere model simulation of the impact of a sudden stratospheric
warming on thermosphere dynamics and electrodynamics, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 115, A00G08, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015524, 2010. a
Fuller-Rowell, T., Wang, H., Akmaev, R., Wu, F., Fang, T.-W., Iredell, M., and
Richmond, A.: Forecasting the dynamic and electrodynamic response to the
January 2009 sudden stratospheric warming, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L13102,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047732, 2011. a
Gan, Q., Oberheide, J., and Pedatella, N. M.: Sources, sinks, and propagation
characteristics of the quasi 6-day wave and its impact on the residual mean
circulation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 9152–9170,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028553, 2018. a
Gan, Q., Eastes, R. W., Burns, A. G., Wang, W., Qian, L., Solomon, S. C.,
Codrescu, M. V., and McClintock, W. E.: New observations of large-scale waves
coupling with the ionosphere made by the GOLD Mission: Quasi-16-day wave
signatures in the F-region OI 135.6-nm nightglow during sudden stratospheric
warmings, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 125, e2020JA027880,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA027880, 2020. a
Gan, Q., Oberheide, J., Goncharenko, L., Qian, L., Yue, J., Wang, W.,
McClintock, W. E., and Eastes, R. W.: GOLD Synoptic Observations of
Quasi-6-Day Wave Modulations of Post-Sunset Equatorial Ionization Anomaly
During the September 2019 Antarctic Sudden Stratospheric Warming, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL103386, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL103386,
2023. a
Gasperini, F.: SD WACCM-X v2.1, Climate Data Gateway
at NCAR [data set], https://doi.org/10.26024/5b58-nc53, 2019. a
Gasperini, F., Forbes, J., Doornbos, E., and Bruinsma, S.: Wave coupling
between the lower and middle thermosphere as viewed from TIMED and GOCE, J.
Geophys. Res.-Space, 120, 5788–5804, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021300,
2015. a
Gasperini, F., Forbes, J. M., Doornbos, E. N., and Bruinsma, S. L.: Kelvin wave
coupling from TIMED and GOCE: Inter/intra-annual variability and solar
activity effects, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 171,
176–187, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2017.08.034, 2018. a
Gasperini, F., Liu, H., and McInerney, J.: Preliminary evidence of
Madden-Julian Oscillation effects on ultrafast tropical waves in the
thermosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 125, e2019JA027649,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027649, 2020. a
Gelaro, R., McCarty, W., Suárez, M. J., Todling, R., Molod, A., Takacs, L.,
Randles, C. A., Darmenov, A., Bosilovich, M. G., Reichle, R., Wargan, K., Coy, L., Cullather, R., Draper, C., Akella, S., Buchard, V., Conaty, A., da Silva, A. M., Gu, W., Kim, G.-K., Koster, R., Lucchesi, R., Merkova, D., Nielsen, J. E., Partyka, G., Pawson, S., Putman, W., Rienecker, M., Schubert, S. D., Sienkiewcz, M., and Zhao, B.: The
modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications, version 2
(MERRA-2), J. Climate, 30, 5419–5454, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1, 2017. a
Goncharenko, L., Chau, J., Liu, H.-L., and Coster, A.: Unexpected connections
between the stratosphere and ionosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L10101,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043125, 2010a. a
Goncharenko, L., Coster, A., Chau, J., and Valladares, C.: Impact of sudden
stratospheric warmings on equatorial ionization anomaly, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 115, A00G07, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015400, 2010b. a
Goncharenko, L. P., Harvey, V. L., Greer, K. R., Zhang, S.-R., and Coster,
A. J.: Longitudinally dependent low-latitude ionospheric disturbances linked
to the Antarctic sudden stratospheric warming of September 2019, J. Geophys.
Res.-Space, 125, e2020JA028199, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028199, 2020. a
Goncharenko, L. P., Harvey, V. L., Liu, H., and Pedatella, N. M.: Sudden
Stratospheric Warming Impacts on the Ionosphere–Thermosphere System: A
Review of Recent Progress, Ionosphere Dynamics and Applications,
369–400, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119815617.ch16, 2021. a
Gu, S.-Y., Li, T., Dou, X., Wu, Q., Mlynczak, M., and Russell Iii, J.:
Observations of quasi-two-day wave by TIMED/SABER and TIMED/TIDI, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 118, 1624–1639, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50191, 2013. a
Gu, S.-Y., Dou, X., Lei, J., Li, T., Luan, X., Wan, W., and Russell III, J.:
Ionospheric response to the ultrafast Kelvin wave in the MLT region, J.
Geophys. Res.-Space, 119, 1369–1380, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JA019086,
2014. a
Gu, S.-Y., Liu, H.-L., Dou, X., and Li, T.: Influence of the sudden stratospheric warming on quasi-2-day waves, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4885–4896, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4885-2016, 2016. a
Gu, S.-Y., Dou, X.-K., Yang, C.-Y., Jia, M., Huang, K.-M., Huang, C.-M., and
Zhang, S.-D.: Climatology and anomaly of the quasi-two-day wave behaviors
during 2003–2018 austral summer periods, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 124, 544–556, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA026047, 2019. a
Gu, S.-Y., Teng, C.-K.-M., Li, N., Jia, M., Li, G., Xie, H., Ding, Z., and Dou,
X.: Multivariate analysis on the ionospheric responses to planetary waves
during the 2019 Antarctic SSW event, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 126,
e2020JA028588, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028588, 2021. a
Hagan, M. and Forbes, J.: Migrating and nonmigrating diurnal tides in the
middle and upper atmosphere excited by tropospheric latent heat release, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos, 107, ACL–6, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001236, 2002. a
Harada, Y., Goto, A., Hasegawa, H., Fujikawa, N., Naoe, H., and Hirooka, T.: A
major stratospheric sudden warming event in January 2009, J. Atmos. Sci., 67,
2052–2069, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS3320.1, 2010. a
He, M., Chau, J. L., Forbes, J. M., Thorsen, D., Li, G., Siddiqui, T. A.,
Yamazaki, Y., and Hocking, W. K.: Quasi-10-day wave and semidiurnal tide
nonlinear interactions during the Southern Hemispheric SSW 2019 observed in
the Northern Hemispheric mesosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47,
e2020GL091453, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091453, 2020a. a
He, M., Yamazaki, Y., Hoffmann, P., Hall, C. M., Tsutsumi, M., Li, G., and
Chau, J. L.: Zonal Wave Number Diagnosis of Rossby Wave-Like Oscillations
Using Paired Ground-Based Radars, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125,
e2019JD031 599, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031599, 2020b. a
He, M., Chau, J. L., Forbes, J. M., Zhang, X., Englert, C. R., Harding, B. J.,
Immel, T. J., Lima, L. M., Bhaskar Rao, S. V., Ratnam, M. V., Li, G., Harlander, J. M., Marr, K. D., and Makela, J. J.:
Quasi-2-day wave in low-latitude atmospheric winds as viewed from the ground
and space during January–March, 2020, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48,
e2021GL093466, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093466, 2021. a
Hibbins, R., Espy, P. J., Orsolini, Y., Limpasuvan, V., and Barnes, R.:
SuperDARN observations of semidiurnal tidal variability in the MLT and the
response to sudden stratospheric warming events, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 124, 4862–4872, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD030157, 2019. a
Hirooka, T. and Hirota, I.: Normal mode Rossby waves observed in the upper
stratosphere. Part II: Second antisymmetric and symmetric modes of zonal
wavenumbers 1 and 2, J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 536–548,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1985)042<0536:NMRWOI>2.0.CO;2, 1985. a
Hirota, I. and Hirooka, T.: Normal mode Rossby waves observed in the upper
stratosphere. Part I: First symmetric modes of zonal wavenumbers 1 and 2, J.
Atmos. Sci., 41, 1253–1267,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041<1253:NMRWOI>2.0.CO;2, 1984. a
Holton, J. R. and Lindzen, R. S.: A note on “Kelvin” waves in the
atmosphere, Mon. Weather Rev., 96, 385–386,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1968)096<0385:ANOKWI>2.0.CO;2, 1968. a
Huang, C., Li, W., Zhang, S., Chen, G., Huang, K., and Gong, Y.: Investigation
of dominant traveling 10-day wave components using long-term MERRA-2
database, Earth Planet. Space, 73, 1–12,
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-021-01410-7, 2021. a
Immel, T., Sagawa, E., England, S., Henderson, S., Hagan, M., Mende, S., Frey,
H., Swenson, C., and Paxton, L.: Control of equatorial ionospheric morphology
by atmospheric tides, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L15108, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026161,
2006. a
Jin, H., Miyoshi, Y., Fujiwara, H., Shinagawa, H., Terada, K., Terada, N.,
Ishii, M., Otsuka, Y., and Saito, A.: Vertical connection from the
tropospheric activities to the ionospheric longitudinal structure simulated
by a new Earth's whole atmosphere-ionosphere coupled model, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 116, A01316, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015925, 2011. a
Jin, H., Miyoshi, Y., Pancheva, D., Mukhtarov, P., Fujiwara, H., and Shinagawa,
H.: Response of migrating tides to the stratospheric sudden warming in 2009
and their effects on the ionosphere studied by a whole atmosphere-ionosphere
model GAIA with COSMIC and TIMED/SABER observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 117, A10323, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JA017650, 2012. a, b, c
Kasahara, A.: Normal modes of ultralong waves in the atmosphere, Mon. Weather
Rev., 104, 669–690, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1976)104<0669:NMOUWI>2.0.CO;2,
1976. a
Kasahara, A. and Puri, K.: Spectral representation of three-dimensional global
data by expansion in normal mode functions, Mon. Weather Rev., 109,
37–51, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1981)109<0037:SROTDG>2.0.CO;2, 1981. a
Kikuchi, K.: An introduction to combined Fourier–wavelet transform and its
application to convectively coupled equatorial waves, Clim. Dynam., 43,
1339–1356, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1949-8, 2014. a, b, c
Kikuchi, K. and Wang, B.: Spatiotemporal wavelet transform and the multiscale
behavior of the Madden–Julian oscillation, J. Climate, 23, 3814–3834,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI2693.1, 2010. a, b
Kobayashi, S., Ota, Y., Harada, Y., Ebita, A., Moriya, M., Onoda, H., Onogi,
K., Kamahori, H., Kobayashi, C., Endo, H., Miyaoka, K., and Takahashi, K.: The JRA-55 reanalysis:
General specifications and basic characteristics, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn.
Ser. II, 93, 5–48, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2015-001, 2015. a
Laštovička, J.: Forcing of the ionosphere by waves from below, J.
Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 68, 479–497, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2005.01.018,
2006. a
Lee, W., Song, I.-S., Kim, J.-H., Kim, Y. H., Jeong, S.-H., Eswaraiah, S., and
Murphy, D.: The observation and SD-WACCM simulation of planetary wave
activity in the middle atmosphere during the 2019 Southern Hemispheric sudden
stratospheric warming, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 126, e2020JA029094,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA029094, 2021. a
Lieberman, R., Riggin, D., Ortland, D., Oberheide, J., and Siskind, D.: Global
observations and modeling of nonmigrating diurnal tides generated by
tide-planetary wave interactions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120,
11419–11437, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023739, 2015. a
Lieberman, R. S. and Riggin, D.: High resolution Doppler imager observations of
Kelvin waves in the equatorial mesosphere and lower thermosphere, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 102, 26117–26130, https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD02902, 1997. a
Lim, E.-P., Hendon, H. H., Butler, A. H., Garreaud, R. D., Polichtchouk, I.,
Shepherd, T. G., Scaife, A., Comer, R., Coy, L., Newman, P. A., hompson, D. W. J., and Nakamuara, H.: The
2019 Antarctic sudden stratospheric warming, SPARC Newsletter, 54, 10–13,
https://www.sparc-climate.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2017/12/SPARCnewsletter_Jan2020_WEB.pdf (last access: 18 August 2023),
2020. a
Lim, E.-P., Hendon, H. H., Butler, A. H., Thompson, D. W., Lawrence, Z. D.,
Scaife, A. A., Shepherd, T. G., Polichtchouk, I., Nakamura, H., Kobayashi,
C., Comer, R., Coy, L., Dowdy, A., Garreaud, R. D., Newman, P. A., and Wang, G.: The 2019 Southern Hemisphere stratospheric polar vortex weakening
and its impacts, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 102, E1150–E1171,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0112.1, 2021. a
Lin, J., Lin, C., Rajesh, P., Yue, J., Lin, C., and Matsuo, T.: Local-time and
vertical characteristics of quasi-6-day oscillation in the ionosphere during
the 2019 Antarctic sudden stratospheric warming, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47,
e2020GL090345, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090345, 2020. a
Lindzen, R. S. and Chapman, S.: Atmospheric tides, Space Sci. Rev., 10, 3–188,
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00171584, 1969. a
Liu, G., England, S. L., and Janches, D.: Quasi two-, three-, and six-day
planetary-scale wave oscillations in the upper atmosphere observed by
TIMED/SABER over ∼17 years during 2002–2018, J. Geophys.
Res.-Space, 124, 9462–9474, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA026918, 2019. a
Liu, G., Lieberman, R. S., Harvey, V. L., Pedatella, N. M., Oberheide, J.,
Hibbins, R. E., Espy, P. J., and Janches, D.: Tidal variations in the
mesosphere and lower thermosphere before, during, and after the 2009 sudden
stratospheric warming, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 126,
e2020JA028827, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028827, 2021. a
Liu, G., Janches, D., Ma, J., Lieberman, R. S., Stober, G., Moffat-Griffin, T.,
Mitchell, N. J., Kim, J.-H., Lee, C., and Murphy, D. J.: Mesosphere and lower
thermosphere winds and tidal variations during the 2019 Antarctic Sudden
Stratospheric Warming, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 127,
e2021JA030177, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA030177, 2022. a
Liu, H.-L.: Variability and predictability of the space environment as related
to lower atmosphere forcing, Space Weather, 14, 634–658,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016SW001450, 2016. a
Liu, H.-L., Talaat, E., Roble, R., Lieberman, R., Riggin, D., and Yee, J.-H.:
The 6.5-day wave and its seasonal variability in the middle and upper
atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D21112, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004795,
2004. a
Liu, H.-L., McInerney, J., Santos, S., Lauritzen, P., Taylor, M., and
Pedatella, N.: Gravity waves simulated by high-resolution whole atmosphere
community climate model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 9106–9112,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062468, 2014. a
Liu, H.-L., Bardeen, C. G., Foster, B. T., Lauritzen, P., Liu, J., Lu, G.,
Marsh, D. R., Maute, A., McInerney, J. M., Pedatella, N. M., Qian, L., Richmond, A. D., Roble, R. G., Solomon, S. C., Vitt, F. M., and Wang, W.:
Development and validation of the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model
with thermosphere and ionosphere extension (WACCM-X 2.0), J. Adv. Model.
Earth Sy., 10, 381–402, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS001232, 2018. a
Longuet-Higgins, M. S.: The eigenfunctions of Laplace's tidal equation over a
sphere, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 262, 511–607,
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1968.0003, 1968. a
Luo, J., Ma, Z., Gong, Y., Zhang, S., Xiao, Q., Huang, C., and Huang, K.:
Record-Strong Eastward Propagating 4-Day Wave in the Southern Hemisphere
Observed During the 2019 Antarctic Sudden Stratospheric Warming, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 50, e2022GL102704, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL102704, 2023. a
Ma, Z., Gong, Y., Zhang, S., Zhou, Q., Huang, C., Huang, K., Luo, J., Yu, Y.,
and Li, G.: Study of a Quasi 4-Day Oscillation During the 2018/2019 SSW Over
Mohe, China, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 125, e2019JA027687,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027687, 2020. a
Ma, Z., Gong, Y., Zhang, S., Xiao, Q., Xue, J., Huang, C., and Huang, K.:
Understanding the Excitation of Quasi-6-Day Waves in Both Hemispheres During
the September 2019 Antarctic SSW, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127,
e2021JD035984, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035984, 2022. a
Madden, R. A.: Large-scale, free Rossby waves in the atmosphere – An update,
Tellus A, 59, 571–590, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2007.00257.x, 2007. a, b
Mallat, S.: A wavelet tour of signal processing, Elsevier,
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-466606-1.X5000-4, 1999. a, b
Manney, G. L., Schwartz, M. J., Krüger, K., Santee, M. L., Pawson, S., Lee,
J. N., Daffer, W. H., Fuller, R. A., and Livesey, N. J.: Aura Microwave Limb
Sounder observations of dynamics and transport during the record-breaking
2009 Arctic stratospheric major warming, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L12815,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038586, 2009. a
Marques, C. A. F., Marta-Almeida, M., and Castanheira, J. M.: Three-dimensional normal mode functions: open-access tools for their computation in isobaric coordinates (p-3DNMF.v1), Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2763–2781, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2763-2020, 2020. a
Matsuno, T.: Quasi-geostrophic motions in the equatorial area, J. Meteorol.
Soc. Jpn. Ser. II, 44, 25–43, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1965.44.1_25, 1966. a
Matthias, V., Hoffmann, P., Rapp, M., and Baumgarten, G.: Composite analysis
of the temporal development of waves in the polar MLT region during
stratospheric warmings, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr.
Phys., 90, 86–96, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2012.04.004, 2012. a
Matthias, V., Stober, G., Kozlovsky, A., Lester, M., Belova, E., and Kero, J.: Vertical structure of the Arctic spring transition in the middle atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD034353, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034353, 2021. a
Maute, A.: Thermosphere-ionosphere-electrodynamics general circulation model
for the ionospheric connection explorer: TIEGCM-ICON, Space Sci. Rev.,
212, 523–551, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-017-0330-3, 2017. a
McDonald, A., Hibbins, R., and Jarvis, M.: Properties of the quasi 16 day wave
derived from EOS MLS observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D06112,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014719, 2011. a
Mechoso, C. R. and Hartmann, D. L.: An observational study of traveling
planetary waves in the Southern Hemisphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 39, 1921–1935,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1982)039<1921:AOSOTP>2.0.CO;2, 1982. a
Meyer, C. K. and Forbes, J.: A 6.5-day westward propagating planetary wave:
Origin and characteristics, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
102, 26173–26178, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD01464, 1997. a
Meyers, S. D., Kelly, B. G., and O'Brien, J. J.: An introduction to wavelet
analysis in oceanography and meteorology: With application to the dispersion
of Yanai waves, Mon. Weather Rev., 121, 2858–2866,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1993)121<2858:AITWAI>2.0.CO;2, 1993. a
Mitra, G., Guharay, A., Batista, P. P., and Buriti, R.: Impact of the September
2019 Minor Sudden Stratospheric Warming on the Low-Latitude Middle
Atmospheric Planetary Wave Dynamics, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127,
e2021JD035538, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035538, 2022. a
Miyoshi, Y.: Temporal variation of nonmigrating diurnal tide and its relation
with the moist convective activity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L11815,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026072, 2006. a
Miyoshi, Y. and Fujiwara, H.: Day-to-day variations of migrating diurnal tide
simulated by a GCM from the ground surface to the exobase, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 30, 1789, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017695, 2003. a
Miyoshi, Y. and Fujiwara, H.: Excitation mechanism of intraseasonal oscillation
in the equatorial mesosphere and lower thermosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D14108, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006993, 2006. a
Miyoshi, Y. and Fujiwara, H.: Gravity waves in the thermosphere simulated by a
general circulation model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D01101,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008874, 2008. a
Miyoshi, Y. and Yamazaki, Y.: Excitation mechanism of ionospheric 6-day
oscillation during the 2019 September sudden stratospheric warming event, J.
Geophys. Res.-Space, 125, e2020JA028283,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028283, 2020. a, b
Miyoshi, Y., Pancheva, D., Mukhtarov, P., Jin, H., Fujiwara, H., and Shinagawa,
H.: Excitation mechanism of non-migrating tides, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys.,
156, 24–36, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2017.02.012, 2017. a
Moldwin, M.: An introduction to space weather, Cambridge University Press,
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801365, 2022. a
Moudden, Y. and Forbes, J.: Quasi-two-day wave structure, interannual
variability, and tidal interactions during the 2002–2011 decade, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 119, 2241–2260, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020563, 2014. a
Mukhtarov, P., Andonov, B., Borries, C., Pancheva, D., and Jakowski, N.:
Forcing of the ionosphere from above and below during the Arctic winter of
2005/2006, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 72, 193–205,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2009.11.008, 2010. a
Noguchi, S., Kuroda, Y., Kodera, K., and Watanabe, S.: Robust enhancement of
tropical convective activity by the 2019 Antarctic sudden stratospheric
warming, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL088743,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088743, 2020. a
Oberheide, J., Forbes, J., Häusler, K., Wu, Q., and Bruinsma, S.:
Tropospheric tides from 80 to 400 km: Propagation, interannual variability,
and solar cycle effects, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D00I05,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012388, 2009. a
Oberheide, J., Forbes, J., Zhang, X., and Bruinsma, S.: Climatology of upward
propagating diurnal and semidiurnal tides in the thermosphere, J. Geophys.
Res.-Space, 116, D00I05, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA016784, 2011. a
Palo, S., Forbes, J., Zhang, X., Russell III, J., and Mlynczak, M.: An eastward
propagating two-day wave: Evidence for nonlinear planetary wave and tidal
coupling in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L07807,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027728, 2007. a
Pancheva, D. and Mukhtarov, P.: Strong evidence for the tidal control on the
longitudinal structure of the ionospheric F-region, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L14105,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044039, 2010. a
Pancheva, D., Mukhtarov, P., and Siskind, D. E.: The quasi-6-day waves in
NOGAPS-ALPHA forecast model and their climatology in MLS/Aura measurements
(2005–2014), J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 181, 19–37,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2018.10.008, 2018. a
Pedatella, N., Liu, H.-L., and Hagan, M.: Day-to-day migrating and nonmigrating
tidal variability due to the six-day planetary wave, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 117, A06301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JA017581, 2012a. a
Pedatella, N., Liu, H.-L., Richmond, A., Maute, A., and Fang, T.-W.:
Simulations of solar and lunar tidal variability in the mesosphere and lower
thermosphere during sudden stratosphere warmings and their influence on the
low-latitude ionosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 117, A08326,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JA017792, 2012b. a
Pedatella, N., Liu, H.-L., Sassi, F., Lei, J., Chau, J., and Zhang, X.:
Ionosphere variability during the 2009 SSW: Influence of the lunar
semidiurnal tide and mechanisms producing electron density variability, J.
Geophys. Res.-Space, 119, 3828–3843, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA019849,
2014. a, b
Pedatella, N., Chau, J., Schmidt, H., Goncharenko, L., Stolle, C., Hocke, K.,
Harvey, V., Funke, B., and Siddiqui, T.: How Sudden stratospheric warmings
affect the whole atmosphere, EOS, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EO092441, 2018. a
Pfister, L.: Baroclinic instability of easterly jets with applications to the
summer mesosphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 313–330,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1985)042<0313:BIOEJW>2.0.CO;2, 1985. a
Pogoreltsev, A., Fedulina, I., Mitchell, N., Muller, H., Luo, Y., Meek, C., and
Manson, A.: Global free oscillations of the atmosphere and secondary
planetary waves in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere region during
August/September time conditions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107,
ACL–24, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001535, 2002. a
Qin, Y., Gu, S.-Y., and Dou, X.: A New Mechanism for the Generation of
Quasi-6-Day and Quasi-10-Day Waves During the 2019 Antarctic Sudden
Stratospheric Warming, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2021JD035568,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035568, 2021a. a
Qin, Y., Gu, S.-Y., Dou, X., Teng, C.-K.-M., and Li, H.: On the Westward
Quasi-8-Day Planetary Waves in the Middle Atmosphere During Arctic Sudden
Stratospheric Warmings, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126,
e2021JD035071, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035071, 2021b. a
Qin, Y., Gu, S.-Y., Teng, C.-K.-M., Dou, X.-K., Yu, Y., and Li, N.:
Comprehensive study of the climatology of the quasi-6-day wave in the MLT
region based on Aura/MLS observations and SD-WACCM-X simulations, J. Geophys.
Res.-Space, 126, e2020JA028454, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028454,
2021c. a
Qin, Y., Gu, S.-Y., Dou, X., Teng, C.-K.-M., and Yang, Z.: Secondary 12-Day
Planetary Wave in the Mesospheric Water Vapor During the 2016/2017 Unusual
Canadian Stratospheric Warming, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49,
e2021GL097024, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097024, 2022a. a
Qin, Y., Gu, S.-Y., Dou, X., Teng, C.-K.-M., Yang, Z., and Sun, R.: Southern
Hemisphere Response to the Secondary Planetary Waves Generated During the
Arctic Sudden Stratospheric Final Warmings: Influence of the Quasi-Biennial
Oscillation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2022JD037730,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037730, 2022b. a, b
Rao, J., Garfinkel, C. I., White, I. P., and Schwartz, C.: The Southern
Hemisphere minor sudden stratospheric warming in September 2019 and its
predictions in S2S models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125,
e2020JD032723, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032723, 2020. a
Safieddine, S., Bouillon, M., Paracho, A.-c., Jumelet, J., Tence, F., Pazmino,
A., Goutail, F., Wespes, C., Bekki, S., Boynard, A., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Coheur, P.-F., Hurtmans, D., and Clerbaux, C.: Antarctic ozone
enhancement during the 2019 sudden stratospheric warming event, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 47, e2020GL087810, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087810, 2020. a
Sakazaki, T. and Hamilton, K.: An array of ringing global free modes discovered
in tropical surface pressure data, J. Atmos. Sci., 77,
2519–2539, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-20-0053.1, 2020. a
Salby, M. L.: The 2-day wave in the middle atmosphere: Observations and theory,
J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 86, 9654–9660, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC086iC10p09654,
1981a. a
Salby, M. L.: Rossby normal modes in nonuniform background configurations. Part
I: Simple fields, J. Atmos. Sci., 38, 1803–1826,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1981)038<1803:RNMINB>2.0.CO;2, 1981b. a
Salby, M. L.: Rossby normal modes in nonuniform background configurations. Part
II. Equinox and solstice conditions, J. Atmos. Sci., 38, 1827–1840,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1981)038<1827:RNMINB>2.0.CO;2, 1981c. a, b
Salby, M. L.: Survey of planetary-scale traveling waves: The state of theory
and observations, Rev. Geophys., 22, 209–236, https://doi.org/10.1029/RG022i002p00209,
1984. a
Salby, M. L. and Callaghan, P. F.: Seasonal amplification of the 2-day wave:
Relationship between normal mode and instability, J. Atmos. Sci., 58,
1858–1869, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<1858:SAOTDW>2.0.CO;2, 2001. a
Sassi, F., Garcia, R., and Hoppel, K.: Large-scale Rossby normal modes during
some recent Northern Hemisphere winters, J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 820–839,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-0103.1, 2012. a
Sassi, F., Liu, H.-L., Ma, J., and Garcia, R. R.: The lower thermosphere during
the Northern Hemisphere winter of 2009: A modeling study using high-altitude
data assimilation products in WACCM-X, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118,
8954–8968, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50632, 2013. a
Sassi, F., Liu, H.-L., and Emmert, J. T.: Traveling planetary-scale waves in
the lower thermosphere: Effects on neutral density and composition during
solar minimum conditions, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 121, 1780–1801,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA022082, 2016. a
Schunk, R. and Sojka, J. J.: Ionosphere-thermosphere space weather issues, J.
Atmos. Terr. Phys., 58, 1527–1574, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9169(96)00029-3, 1996. a
Siddiqui, T.: WACCM-X simulations – 2009 SSW, Mendeley Data V1 [data set], https://doi.org/10.17632/47pnw8pgmk.1, 2020. a
Siddiqui, T., Maute, A., and Pedatella, N.: On the importance of interactive
ozone chemistry in Earth-system models for studying mesophere-lower
thermosphere tidal changes during sudden stratospheric warmings, J. Geophys.
Res.-Space, 124, 10690–10707, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027193, 2019. a
Siddiqui, T., Yamazaki, Y., Stolle, C., Maute, A., Laštovička, J.,
Edemskiy, I., Mošna, Z., and Sivakandan, M.: Understanding the total
electron content variability over Europe during 2009 and 2019 SSWs, J.
Geophys. Res.-Space, 126, e2020JA028751,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028751, 2021. a, b
Siddiqui, T. A., Maute, A., Pedatella, N., Yamazaki, Y., Lühr, H., and Stolle, C.: On the variability of the semidiurnal solar and lunar tides of the equatorial electrojet during sudden stratospheric warmings, Ann. Geophys., 36, 1545–1562, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1545-2018, 2018. a
Siddiqui, T. A., Chau, J. L., Stolle, C., and Yamazaki, Y.: Migrating solar
diurnal tidal variability during Northern and Southern Hemisphere Sudden
Stratospheric Warmings, Earth Planet. Space, 74, 1–17,
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-022-01661-y, 2022. a, b
Smith, A. K.: Global dynamics of the MLT, Surv. Geophys., 33,
1177–1230, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-012-9196-9, 2012. a
Sobhkhiz-Miandehi, S., Yamazaki, Y., Arras, C., Miyoshi, Y., and Shinagawa, H.:
Comparison of the tidal signatures in sporadic E and vertical ion convergence
rate, using FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC radio occultation observations and GAIA model,
Earth Planet. Space, 74, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-022-01637-y, 2022. a
Sridharan, S., Sathishkumar, S., and Gurubaran, S.: Variabilities of mesospheric tides and equatorial electrojet strength during major stratospheric warming events, Ann. Geophys., 27, 4125–4130, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-4125-2009, 2009. a
Stening, R., Forbes, J., Hagan, M., and Richmond, A.: Experiments with a lunar
atmospheric tidal model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102,
13465–13471, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00778, 1997. a
Stober, G., Baumgarten, K., McCormack, J. P., Brown, P., and Czarnecki, J.: Comparative study between ground-based observations and NAVGEM-HA analysis data in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere region, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11979–12010, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11979-2020, 2020. a
Torrence, C: Torrence & Compo Wavelet Analysis Software, GitHub [code], https://github.com/ct6502/wavelets, last access: 18 August 2023. a
Wang, H., Akmaev, R., Fang, T.-W., Fuller-Rowell, T., Wu, F., Maruyama, N., and
Iredell, M.: First forecast of a sudden stratospheric warming with a coupled
whole-atmosphere/ionosphere model IDEA, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 119,
2079–2089, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JA019481, 2014. a
Wang, J. C., Palo, S. E., Forbes, J., Marino, J., Moffat-Griffin, T., and
Mitchell, N.: Unusual quasi 10-day planetary wave activity and the
ionospheric response during the 2019 Southern Hemisphere sudden stratospheric
warming, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 126, e2021JA029286,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029286, 2021a. a
Wang, J. C., Palo, S. E., Liu, H.-L., and Siskind, D.: Day-to-Day Variability
of Diurnal Tide in the Mesosphere and Lower Thermosphere Driven From Below,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 126, e2019JA027759,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027759, 2021b. a
Wargan, K., Weir, B., Manney, G. L., Cohn, S. E., and Livesey, N. J.: The
anomalous 2019 Antarctic ozone hole in the GEOS Constituent Data Assimilation
System with MLS observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125,
e2020JD033335, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033335, 2020. a
Wells, D. E., Vaníček, P., and Pagiatakis, S. D.: Least squares
spectral analysis revisited, Tech. rep., Department of Surveying Engineering,
University of New Brunswick Fredericton, N.B., Canada,
https://gge.ext.unb.ca/Pubs/TR84.pdf (last access: 18 August 2023), 1985. a
Wheeler, M. and Kiladis, G. N.: Convectively coupled equatorial waves: Analysis
of clouds and temperature in the wavenumber–frequency domain, J. Atmos.
Sci., 56, 374–399, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<0374:CCEWAO>2.0.CO;2,
1999. a
Wu, D. L., Hays, P., Skinner, W., Marshall, A., Burrage, M., Lieberman, R., and
Ortland, D.: Observations of the quasi 2-day wave from the High Resolution
Doppler Imager on UARS, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 2853–2856,
https://doi.org/10.1029/93GL03008, 1993. a
Wu, D. L., Hays, P., and Skinner, W.: Observations of the 5-day wave in the
mesosphere and lower thermosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 2733–2736,
https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL02660, 1994. a
Wu, D. L., Hays, P. B., and Skinner, W. R.: A least squares method for spectral
analysis of space-time series, J. Atmos. Sci., 52,
3501–3511, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<3501:ALSMFS>2.0.CO;2, 1995. a
Xiong, J., Wan, W., Ding, F., Liu, L., Ning, B., and Niu, X.: Coupling between
mesosphere and ionosphere over Beijing through semidiurnal tides during the
2009 sudden stratospheric warming, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 118, 2511–2521, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50280, 2013. a
Yamazaki, Y.: Quasi-6-day wave effects on the equatorial ionization anomaly
over a solar cycle, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 123, 9881–9892,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA026014, 2018. a
Yamazaki, Y.: Matlab and Python software to compute Fourier- wavelet spectra
(fourierwavelet v1.1) using longitude-time data for studying global-scale
atmospheric waves, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8033686, 2023. a
Yamazaki, Y. and Yasunobu, M.: Simulation data from GAIA (Ground-to-topside model of Atmosphere and Ionosphere for Aeronomy) for the September 2019 sudden stratospheric warming event, GFZ Data Services [data set], https://doi.org/10.5880/GFZ.2.3.2020.004, 2020. a
Yamazaki, Y. and Matthias, V.: Large-amplitude quasi-10-day waves in the middle
atmosphere during final warmings, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124,
9874–9892, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030634, 2019. a, b, c, d
Yamazaki, Y., Matthias, V., Miyoshi, Y., Stolle, C., Siddiqui, T.,
Kervalishvili, G., Laštovička, J., Kozubek, M., Ward, W.,
Themens, D. R., Kristoffersen, S., and Alken, P.: September 2019 Antarctic sudden stratospheric
warming: Quasi-6-day wave burst and ionospheric effects, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
47, e2019GL086577, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086577, 2020a. a, b, c
Yamazaki, Y., Miyoshi, Y., Xiong, C., Stolle, C., Soares, G., and Yoshikawa,
A.: Whole atmosphere model simulations of ultrafast Kelvin wave effects in
the ionosphere and thermosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 125,
e2020JA027939, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA027939, 2020b. a
Yamazaki, Y., Matthias, V., and Miyoshi, Y.: Quasi-4-Day Wave: Atmospheric
Manifestation of the First Symmetric Rossby Normal Mode of Zonal Wavenumber
2, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2021JD034855,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD034855, 2021. a, b
Yamazaki, Y., Harding, B. J., Qiu, L., Stolle, C., Siddiqui, T., Miyoshi, Y.,
Englert, C. R., and England, S.: Monthly climatologies of zonal-mean and
tidal winds in the thermosphere as observed by ICON/MIGHTI during April
2020–March 2022, Earth Space Sci., 10, e2023EA002962,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EA002962, 2023. a
Yano, J.-I. and Jakubiak, B.: Wavelet-based verification of the quantitative
precipitation forecast, Dynam. Atmos. Oceans, 74, 14–29,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2016.02.001, 2016. a
Yano, J.-I., Moncrieff, M. W., and Wu, X.: Wavelet analysis of simulated
tropical convective cloud systems. Part II: Decomposition of convective-scale
and mesoscale structure, J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 868–876,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<0868:WAOSTC>2.0.CO;2, 2001a. a
Yano, J.-I., Moncrieff, M. W., Wu, X., and Yamada, M.: Wavelet analysis of
simulated tropical convective cloud systems. Part I: Basic analysis, J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 850–867,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<0850:WAOSTC>2.0.CO;2, 2001b. a
Yano, J.-I., Bechtold, P., Redelsperger, J.-L., and Guichard, F.:
Wavelet-compressed representation of deep moist convection, Mon. Weather
Rev., 132, 1472–1486,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<1472:WRODMC>2.0.CO;2, 2004. a
Yiğit, E. and Medvedev, A. S.: Internal wave coupling processes in
Earth’s atmosphere, Adv. Space Res., 55, 983–1003,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2014.11.020, 2015.
a
Yin, S., Ma, Z., Gong, Y., Zhang, S., and Li, G.: Response of quasi-10-day
waves in the MLT region to the sudden stratospheric warming in March 2020,
Adv. Space Res., 71, 298–305, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2022.10.054, 2022. a
Yu, F. R., Huang, K. M., Zhang, S. D., Huang, C. M., Yi, F., Gong, Y., Wang,
R., Li, G., and Ning, B.: Quasi 10-and 16-day wave activities observed
through meteor radar and MST radar during stratospheric final warming in 2015
spring, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 6040–6056,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030630, 2019. a
Yue, J., Liu, H.-L., and Chang, L. C.: Numerical investigation of the quasi 2
day wave in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D05111, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016574, 2012. a
Yue, X., Schreiner, W. S., Lei, J., Rocken, C., Hunt, D. C., Kuo, Y.-H., and
Wan, W.: Global ionospheric response observed by COSMIC satellites during the
January 2009 stratospheric sudden warming event, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 115, A00G09, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015466, 2010. a
Žagar, N., Kasahara, A., Terasaki, K., Tribbia, J., and Tanaka, H.: Normal-mode function representation of global 3-D data sets: open-access software for the atmospheric research community, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1169–1195, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1169-2015, 2015. a
Zhang, X. and Forbes, J. M.: Lunar tide in the thermosphere and weakening of
the northern polar vortex, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 8201–8207,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062103, 2014. a
Zhang, X., Forbes, J. M., Hagan, M. E., Russell III, J. M., Palo, S. E.,
Mertens, C. J., and Mlynczak, M. G.: Monthly tidal temperatures 20–120 km
from TIMED/SABER, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 111, A10S08,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011504, 2006. a
Zhao, Y., Taylor, M. J., Pautet, P.-D., Moffat-Griffin, T., Hervig, M. E.,
Murphy, D. J., French, W., Liu, H.-L., Pendleton Jr, W. R., and Russell III,
J.: Investigating an unusually large 28-day oscillation in mesospheric
temperature over Antarctica using ground-based and satellite measurements, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 8576–8593, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030286,
2019. a
Zhou, X., Yue, X., Yu, Y., and Hu, L.: Day-To-Day Variability of the MLT DE3
Using Joint Analysis on Observations From TIDI-TIMED and a Meteor Radar
Meridian Chain, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127,
e2021JD035794, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035794, 2022. a
Short summary
The Earth's atmosphere can support various types of global-scale waves. Some waves propagate eastward and others westward, and they can have different zonal wavenumbers. The Fourier–wavelet analysis is a useful technique for identifying different components of global-scale waves and their temporal variability. This paper introduces an easy-to-implement method to derive Fourier–wavelet spectra from 2-D space–time data. Application examples are presented using atmospheric models.
The Earth's atmosphere can support various types of global-scale waves. Some waves propagate...
