Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 16, issue 7
Articles | Volume 16, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2055-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2055-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 16, issue 7
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
17 Apr 2023
Methods for assessment of models |  | 17 Apr 2023

Evaluation of bias correction methods for a multivariate drought index: case study of the Upper Jhelum Basin

Rubina Ansari, Ana Casanueva, Muhammad Usman Liaqat, and Giovanna Grossi

Viewed

Total article views: 2,629 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,952 608 69 2,629 178 60 67
  • HTML: 1,952
  • PDF: 608
  • XML: 69
  • Total: 2,629
  • Supplement: 178
  • BibTeX: 60
  • EndNote: 67
Views and downloads (calculated since 05 Dec 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 05 Dec 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,629 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,524 with geography defined and 105 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 07 Jul 2025
Download
Short summary
Bias correction (BC) has become indispensable to climate model output as a post-processing step to render output more useful for impact assessment studies. The current work presents a comparison of different state-of-the-art BC methods (univariate and multivariate) and BC approaches (direct and component-wise) for climate model simulations from three initiatives (CMIP6, CORDEX, and CORDEX-CORE) for a multivariate drought index (i.e., standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index).
Read more
Share