Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 15, issue 23
Articles | Volume 15, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8899-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8899-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 15, issue 23
Model evaluation paper
 | 
13 Dec 2022
Model evaluation paper |  | 13 Dec 2022

Evaluation of high-resolution predictions of fine particulate matter and its composition in an urban area using PMCAMx-v2.0

Brian T. Dinkelacker, Pablo Garcia Rivera, Ioannis Kioutsioukis, Peter J. Adams, and Spyros N. Pandis

Viewed

Total article views: 1,615 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,139 416 60 1,615 144 48 57
  • HTML: 1,139
  • PDF: 416
  • XML: 60
  • Total: 1,615
  • Supplement: 144
  • BibTeX: 48
  • EndNote: 57
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Jul 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Jul 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,615 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,546 with geography defined and 69 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 22 Feb 2025
Download
Short summary
The performance of a chemical transport model in reproducing PM2.5 concentrations and composition was evaluated at the finest scale using measurements from regulatory sites as well as a network of low-cost monitors. Total PM2.5 mass is reproduced well by the model during the winter when compared to regulatory measurements, but in the summer PM2.5 is underpredicted, mainly due to difficulties in reproducing regional secondary organic aerosol levels.
Read more
Share