Articles | Volume 15, issue 21
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7977–7999, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7977-2022
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7977–7999, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7977-2022
Model evaluation paper
07 Nov 2022
Model evaluation paper | 07 Nov 2022

Evaluation of the NAQFC driven by the NOAA Global Forecast System (version 16): comparison with the WRF-CMAQ during the summer 2019 FIREX-AQ campaign

Youhua Tang et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,056 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
860 170 26 1,056 55 4 9
  • HTML: 860
  • PDF: 170
  • XML: 26
  • Total: 1,056
  • Supplement: 55
  • BibTeX: 4
  • EndNote: 9
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 Jun 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 Jun 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,056 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 972 with geography defined and 84 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 31 Jan 2023
Download
Short summary
This paper compares two meteorological datasets for driving a regional air quality model: a regional meteorological model using WRF (WRF-CMAQ) and direct interpolation from an operational global model (GFS-CMAQ). In the comparison with surface measurements and aircraft data in summer 2019, these two methods show mixed performance depending on the corresponding meteorological settings. Direct interpolation is found to be a viable method to drive air quality models.