Articles | Volume 15, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7977-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7977-2022
Model evaluation paper
 | 
07 Nov 2022
Model evaluation paper |  | 07 Nov 2022

Evaluation of the NAQFC driven by the NOAA Global Forecast System (version 16): comparison with the WRF-CMAQ during the summer 2019 FIREX-AQ campaign

Youhua Tang, Patrick C. Campbell, Pius Lee, Rick Saylor, Fanglin Yang, Barry Baker, Daniel Tong, Ariel Stein, Jianping Huang, Ho-Chun Huang, Li Pan, Jeff McQueen, Ivanka Stajner, Jose Tirado-Delgado, Youngsun Jung, Melissa Yang, Ilann Bourgeois, Jeff Peischl, Tom Ryerson, Donald Blake, Joshua Schwarz, Jose-Luis Jimenez, James Crawford, Glenn Diskin, Richard Moore, Johnathan Hair, Greg Huey, Andrew Rollins, Jack Dibb, and Xiaoyang Zhang

Viewed

Total article views: 1,762 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,352 368 42 1,762 101 27 33
  • HTML: 1,352
  • PDF: 368
  • XML: 42
  • Total: 1,762
  • Supplement: 101
  • BibTeX: 27
  • EndNote: 33
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 Jun 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 Jun 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,762 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,645 with geography defined and 117 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 22 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
This paper compares two meteorological datasets for driving a regional air quality model: a regional meteorological model using WRF (WRF-CMAQ) and direct interpolation from an operational global model (GFS-CMAQ). In the comparison with surface measurements and aircraft data in summer 2019, these two methods show mixed performance depending on the corresponding meteorological settings. Direct interpolation is found to be a viable method to drive air quality models.