Articles | Volume 15, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-771-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-771-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Representation of the autoconversion from cloud to rain using a weighted ensemble approach: a case study using WRF v4.1.3
Jinfang Yin
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather (LaSW), Chinese Academy of
Meteorological Sciences (CAMS), Beijing 100081, China
Xudong Liang
State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather (LaSW), Chinese Academy of
Meteorological Sciences (CAMS), Beijing 100081, China
Hong Wang
Guangzhou Institute of Tropical and Marine Meteorology, China
Meteorological Administration (CMA), Guangzhou 510080, China
Haile Xue
State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather (LaSW), Chinese Academy of
Meteorological Sciences (CAMS), Beijing 100081, China
Related authors
Chongjian Liu, Jinfang Yin, Xiaomin Wei, Xiaogong Sun, and Guofu Zhu
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2981, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2981, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics (NPG).
Short summary
Short summary
The numerical weather prediction (NWP) is facing the challenge of development bottleneck, and this article, via a comprehensive review on application of catastrophe theory to the atmospheric science for revealing the fundamental logic why the physics-based NWP methodology would be about to approach its end with some remedial measures suggested for avoiding its finality to occur, might be helpful to promote the enhancement of NWP forecasting accuracy so as to break its development bottleneck.
Jinfang Yin, Feng Li, Mingxin Li, Rudi Xia, Xinghua Bao, Jisong Sun, and Xudong Liang
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1719–1735, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1719-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1719-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
A persistent severe rainfall event occurred over North China in July 2023, which was regarded as one of the most extreme episodes globally during that year. The extreme rainfall was significantly underestimated by forecasters at that time. Flooding from this event affected 1.3 million people, causing severe human casualties and economic losses. We examined the convective initiation and subsequent persistent heavy rainfall based on simulations with the Weather Research and Forecasting model.
Chongjian Liu, Jinfang Yin, Xiaomin Wei, Xiaogong Sun, and Guofu Zhu
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2981, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2981, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics (NPG).
Short summary
Short summary
The numerical weather prediction (NWP) is facing the challenge of development bottleneck, and this article, via a comprehensive review on application of catastrophe theory to the atmospheric science for revealing the fundamental logic why the physics-based NWP methodology would be about to approach its end with some remedial measures suggested for avoiding its finality to occur, might be helpful to promote the enhancement of NWP forecasting accuracy so as to break its development bottleneck.
Jinfang Yin, Feng Li, Mingxin Li, Rudi Xia, Xinghua Bao, Jisong Sun, and Xudong Liang
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1719–1735, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1719-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1719-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
A persistent severe rainfall event occurred over North China in July 2023, which was regarded as one of the most extreme episodes globally during that year. The extreme rainfall was significantly underestimated by forecasters at that time. Flooding from this event affected 1.3 million people, causing severe human casualties and economic losses. We examined the convective initiation and subsequent persistent heavy rainfall based on simulations with the Weather Research and Forecasting model.
Jinfang Yin, Xudong Liang, Yanxin Xie, Feng Li, Kaixi Hu, Lijuan Cao, Feng Chen, Haibo Zou, Feng Zhu, Xin Sun, Jianjun Xu, Geli Wang, Ying Zhao, and Juanjuan Liu
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2329–2346, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2329-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2329-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A collection of regional reanalysis datasets has been produced. However, little attention has been paid to East Asia, and there are no long-term, physically consistent regional reanalysis data available. The East Asia Reanalysis System was developed using the WRF model and GSI data assimilation system. A 39-year (1980–2018) reanalysis dataset is available for the East Asia region, at a high temporal (of 3 h) and spatial resolution (of 12 km), for mesoscale weather and regional climate studies.
Cited articles
Bao, X., Wu, L., Zhang, S., Li, Q., Lin, L., Zhao, B., Wu, D., Xia, W., and
Xu, B.: Distinct Raindrop Size Distributions of Convective Inner- and
Outer-Rainband Rain in Typhoon Maria (2018), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125,
e2020JD032482, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032482, 2020.
Beheng, K. D.: A parameterization of warm cloud microphysical conversion
processes, Atmos. Res., 33, 193–206,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8095(94)90020-5, 1994.
Berry, E. X.: Modification of the warm rain process, Preprints, First
National Conference on Weather Modification, Albany, NY, USA, 28 April–1 May, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 81–88, http://merlin.lib.umsystem.edu/record=b1539470~S1 (last access: January 2022), 1968.
Berry, E. X. and Reinhardt, R. L.: An Analysis of Cloud Drop Growth by
Collection Part II. Single Initial Distributions, J. Atmos. Sci., 31,
1825–1831, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1974)031<1825:aaocdg>2.0.co;2, 1974.
Caro, D., Wobrock, W., Flossmann, A. I., and Chaumerliac, N.: A two-moment
parameterization of aerosol nucleation and impaction scavenging for a warm
cloud microphysics: description and results from a two-dimensional
simulation, Atmos. Res., 70, 171–208, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2004.01.002, 2004.
Chandrakar, K. K., Cantrell, W., and Shaw, R. A.: Influence of Turbulent
Fluctuations on Cloud Droplet Size Dispersion and Aerosol Indirect Effects,
J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 3191–3209, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0006.1,
2018.
Chen, S.-H. and Sun, W.-Y.: A One-dimensional Time Dependent Cloud Model, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 80, 99–118, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.80.99, 2002.
Cotton, W. R.: Numerical Simulation of Precipitation Development in
Supercooled Cumuli – Part I, Mon. Weather Rev., 100, 757–763,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1972)100<0757:NSOPDI>2.3.CO;2, 1972.
Doswell, C. A.: Severe Convective Storms – An Overview, Meteor.
Mon., 50, 1–26, https://doi.org/10.1175/0065-9401-28.50.1, 2001.
Dudhia, J.: Numerical Study of Convection Observed during the Winter Monsoon
Experiment Using a Mesoscale Two-Dimensional Model, J. Atmos. Sci., 46,
3077–3107, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1989)046<3077:NSOCOD>2.0.CO;2, 1989.
Falk, N. M., Igel, A. L., and Igel, M. R.: The relative impact of ice fall
speeds and microphysics parameterization complexity on supercell evolution,
Mon. Weather Rev., 147, 2403–2415, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0417.1,
2019.
Flatøy, F.: Comparison of two parameterization schemes for cloud and
precipitation processes, Tellus A, 44, 41–53,
https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v44i1.14942, 1992.
Franklin, C. N.: A Warm Rain Microphysics Parameterization that Includes the
Effect of Turbulence, J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 1795–1816,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2556.1, 2008.
Franklin, C. N., Holland, G. J., and May, P. T.: Sensitivity of Tropical
Cyclone Rainbands to Ice-Phase Microphysics, Mon. Weather Rev., 133, 2473–2493,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2989.1, 2005.
Freeman, S. W., Igel, A. L., and van den Heever, S. C.: Relative
sensitivities of simulated rainfall to fixed shape parameters and collection
efficiencies, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 145, 2181–2201,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3550, 2019.
Fu, H. and Lin, Y.: A Kinematic Model for Understanding Rain Formation
Efficiency of a Convective Cell, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 4395–4422,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001707, 2019.
Ghosh, S. and Jonas, P. R.: On the application of the classic Kessler and
Berry schemes in Large Eddy Simulation models with a particular emphasis on
cloud autoconversion, the onset time of precipitation and droplet
evaporation, Ann. Geophys., 16, 628–637,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-998-0628-2, 1999.
Gilmore, M. S. and Straka, J. M.: The Berry and Reinhardt Autoconversion
Parameterization: A Digest, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 47, 375–396,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAMC1573.1, 2008.
Gilmore, M. S., Straka, J. M., and Rasmussen, E. N.: Precipitation
uncertainty due to variations in precipitation particle parameters within a
simple microphysics scheme, Mon. Weather Rev., 132, 2610–2627,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2810.1, 2004.
Grabowski, W. W.: Extracting Microphysical Impacts in Large-Eddy Simulations
of Shallow Convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 4493–4499,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0231.1, 2014.
Grabowski, W. W., Wu, X., and Moncrieff, M. W.: Cloud Resolving Modeling of
Tropical Cloud Systems during Phase III of GATE. Part III: Effects of Cloud
Microphysics, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 2384–2402,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<2384:CRMOTC>2.0.CO;2, 1999.
Grabowski, W. W., Morrison, H., Shima, S.-I., Abade, G. C., Dziekan, P., and
Pawlowska, H.: Modeling of Cloud Microphysics: Can We Do Better?, B.
Am. Meteorol. Soc., 100, 655–672, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0005.1,
2019.
Griffin, B. M. and Larson, V. E.: Analytic upscaling of a local microphysics
scheme. Part II: Simulations, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 139, 58–69,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.1966, 2013.
Hong, S.-Y., Noh, Y., and Dudhia, J.: A new vertical diffusion package with
an explicit treatment of entrainment processes, Mon. Weather Rev., 134,
2318–2341, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3199.1, 2006.
Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y. H., Griggs, D. J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P. J., Dai, X., Maskell, K., and Johnson, C. A. (Eds.): Climate Change 2001: The
Scientific Basis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 49 pp., 052-1014956, 2001.
Hsieh, W. C., Jonsson, H., Wang, L. P., Buzorius, G., Flagan, R. C.,
Seinfeld, J. H., and Nenes, A.: On the representation of droplet coalescence
and autoconversion: Evaluation using ambient cloud droplet size
distributions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D07201, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010502, 2009.
Iacobellis, S. F. and Somerville, R. C. J.: Evaluating parameterizations of
the autoconversion process using a single-column model and Atmospheric
Radiation Measurement Program measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111,
D02203, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006296, 2006.
Janjić, Z. I.: The step-mountain eta coordinate model: further
developments of the convection, viscous sublayer, and turbulence closure
schemes, Mon. Weather Rev., 122, 927–945,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122<0927:TSMECM>2.0.CO;2, 1994.
Jing, X., Suzuki, K., and Michibata, T.: The Key Role of Warm Rain
Parameterization in Determining the Aerosol Indirect Effect in a Global
Climate Model, J. Climate, 32, 4409–4430,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0789.1, 2019.
Kain, J. S.: The Kain–Fritsch Convective Parameterization: An Update, J.
Appl. Meteorol., 43, 170–181,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2004)043<0170:TKCPAU>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Kessler, E.: On the Distribution and Continuity of Water Substance in
Atmospheric Circulations, Meteor. Mon., 10, American Meteorological Society, Boston, MA, USA, ISBN 978-1-935704-36-2, 1969.
Khain, A. P., Beheng, K. D., Heymsfield, A., Korolev, A., Krichak, S. O.,
Levin, Z., Pinsky, M., Phillips, V., Prabhakaran, T., Teller, A., van den
Heever, S. C., and Yano, J. I.: Representation of microphysical processes in
cloud-resolving models: Spectral (bin) microphysics versus bulk
parameterization, Rev. Geophys., 53, 2014RG000468,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000468, 2015.
Khairoutdinov, M. and Kogan, Y.: A New Cloud Physics Parameterization in a
Large-Eddy Simulation Model of Marine Stratocumulus, Mon. Weather Rev., 128,
229–243, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128<0229:ANCPPI>2.0.CO;2, 2000.
Kogan, Y. and Ovchinnikov, M.: Formulation of Autoconversion and Drop
Spectra Shape in Shallow Cumulus Clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 77, 711–722,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-19-0134.1, 2019.
Kong, F. and Yau, M. K.: An explicit approach to microphysics in MC2,
Atmos. Ocean, 35, 257–291, https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.1997.9649594,
1997.
Krueger, S. K., Fu, Q., Liou, K. N., and Chin, H.-N. S.: Improvements of an
Ice-Phase Microphysics Parameterization for Use in Numerical Simulations of
Tropical Convection, J. Appl. Meteorol., 34, 281–287,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450-34.1.281, 1995.
Lee, H. and Baik, J.-J.: A physically based autoconversion parameterization,
J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 1599–1616, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0207.1,
2017.
Lei, H., Guo, J., Chen, D., and Yang, J.: Systematic Bias in the Prediction
of Warm-Rain Hydrometeors in the WDM6 Microphysics Scheme and Modifications,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD030756,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030756, 2020.
Lewis, J. M.: Roots of Ensemble Forecasting, Mon. Weather Rev., 133, 1865–1885,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2949.1, 2005.
Li, M., Luo, Y., Zhang, D.-L., Chen, M., Wu, C., Yin, J., and Ma, R.:
Analysis of a record-breaking rainfall event associated with a monsoon
coastal megacity of south China using multi-source data, IEEE T. Geosci.
Remote, 59, 6404–6414, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2020.3029831, 2020.
Li, X.-Y., Brandenburg, A., Svensson, G., Haugen, N. E. L., Mehlig, B., and
Rogachevskii, I.: Condensational and Collisional Growth of Cloud Droplets in
a Turbulent Environment, J. Atmos. Sci., 77, 337–353,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-19-0107.1, 2019.
Lin, B., Zhang, J., and Lohmann, U.: A New Statistically based
Autoconversion rate Parameterization for use in Large-Scale Models, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, 4750, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001484, 2002.
Liu, Y. and Daum, P. H.: Parameterization of the Autoconversion Process. Part
I: Analytical Formulation of the Kessler-Type Parameterizations, J. Atmos.
Sci., 61, 1539–1548, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<1539:POTAPI>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Liu, Y., Daum, P. H., McGraw, R., and Wood, R.: Parameterization of the
Autoconversion Process. Part II: Generalization of Sundqvist-Type
Parameterizations, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 1103–1109,
https://doi.org/10.1175/jas3675.1, 2006.
Manton, M. J. and Cotton, W. R.: Parameterization of the Atmospheric Surface
Layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 34, 331–334,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1977)034<0331:POTASL>2.0.CO;2, 1977a.
Manton, M. J. and Cotton, W. R.: Formulation of Approximate Equations for
Modeling Moist Deep Convection on the Mesoscale, Atmospheric Science Paper
266, Colorado State University, 62 pp., 1977b.
McCumber, M., Tao, W.-K., Simpson, J., Penc, R., and Soong, S.-T.:
Comparison of Ice-Phase Microphysical Parameterization Schemes Using
Numerical Simulations of Tropical Convection, J. Appl. Meteorol., 30,
985–1004, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450-30.7.985, 1991.
Michibata, T. and Takemura, T.: Evaluation of autoconversion schemes in a
single model framework with satellite observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 9570–9590, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023818, 2015.
Mlawer, E. J., Taubman, S. J., Brown, P. D., Iacono, M. J., and Clough, S.
A.: Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated
correlated-k model for the longwave, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102,
16663–16682, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00237, 1997.
Morrison, H., Thompson, G., and Tatarskii, V.: Impact of Cloud Microphysics
on the Development of Trailing Stratiform Precipitation in a Simulated
Squall Line: Comparison of One-and Two-Moment Schemes, Mon. Weather Rev., 137, 991–1007, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2556.1, 2009.
Morrison, H., van Lier-Walqui, M., Fridlind, A. M., Grabowski, W. W.,
Harrington, J. Y., Hoose, C., Korolev, A., Kumjian, M. R., Milbrandt, J. A.,
Pawlowska, H., Posselt, D. J., Prat, O. P., Reimel, K. J., Shima, S.-I., van
Diedenhoven, B., and Xue, L.: Confronting the Challenge of Modeling Cloud
and Precipitation Microphysics, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2019MS001689,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001689, 2020.
Naeger, A. R., Colle, B. A., Zhou, N., and Molthan, A.: Evaluating Warm and
Cold Rain Processes in Cloud Microphysical Schemes Using OLYMPEX Field
Measurements, Mon. Weather Rev., 148, 2163–2190,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-19-0092.1, 2020.
National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Weather Service/NOAA/U.S. Department of Commerce: NCEP FNL Operational Model Global Tropospheric Analyses, continuing from July 1999, Research Data Archive at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Computational and Information Systems Laboratory [data set], https://doi.org/10.5065/D65Q4T4Z, 2015.
Niu, G.-Y., Yang, Z.-L., Mitchell, K. E., Chen, F., Ek, M. B., Barlage, M.,
Kumar, A., Manning, K., Niyogi, D., Rosero, E., Tewari, M., and Xia, Y.: The
community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options
(Noah-MP): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale
measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D12109,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015139, 2011.
Onishi, R., Matsuda, K., and Takahashi, K.: Lagrangian Tracking Simulation
of Droplet Growth in Turbulence–Turbulence Enhancement of Autoconversion
Rate, J. Atmos. Sci., 72, 2591–2607,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0292.1, 2015.
Pawlowska, H. and Brenguier, J. L.: A study of the microphysical structure of stratocumulus clouds, Proc. 12th International Commission on Clouds and Precipitation, Zurich, Switzerland, 19–23 August 1996, edited by: Jones, P. R., Page Bros., Norwich, U.K., 123–126, 1996.
Posselt, D. J., He, F., Bukowski, J., and Reid, J. S.: On the Relative
Sensitivity of a Tropical Deep Convective Storm to Changes in Environment
and Cloud Microphysical Parameters, J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 1163–1185,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0181.1, 2019.
Randall, D. A., Bitz, C. M., Danabasoglu, G., Denning, A. S., Gent, P. R.,
Gettelman, A., Griffies, S. M., Lynch, P., Morrison, H., Pincus, R., and
Thuburn, J.: 100 Years of Earth System Model Development, Meteor. Mon.,
59, 12.11–12.66, https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-18-0018.1, 2019.
Reen, B.: A brief guide to observation nudging in WRF, available at:
https://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/docs/ObsNudgingGuide.pdf (last access: January 2022), 2016.
Reisner, J., Rasmussen, R. M., and Bruintjes, R. T.: Explicit forecasting of
supercooled liquid water in winter storms using the MM5 mesoscale model,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 124, 1071–1107,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712454804, 1998.
Rutledge, S. A. and Hobbs, P. V.: The Mesoscale and Microscale Structure and
Organization of Clouds and Precipitation in Midlatitude Cyclones. XII: A
Diagnostic Modeling Study of Precipitation Development in Narrow
Cold-Frontal Rainbands, J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 2949–2972,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041<2949:TMAMSA>2.0.CO;2, 1984.
Schultz, P.: An Explicit Cloud Physics Parameterization for Operational
Numerical Weather Prediction, Mon. Weather Rev., 123, 3331–3343,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1995)123<3331:AECPPF>2.0.CO;2, 1995.
Seifert, A. and Beheng, K. D.: A double-moment parameterization for
simulating autoconversion, accretion and selfcollection, Atmos. Res., 59–60,
265–281, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(01)00126-0, 2001.
Seifert, A., Nuijens, L., and Stevens, B.: Turbulence effects on warm-rain
autoconversion in precipitating shallow convection, Q. J. Roy. Meteor.
Soc., 136, 1753–1762, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.684, 2010.
Silverman, B. A. and Glass, M.: A Numerical Simulation of Warm Cumulus
Clouds: Part I. Parameterized vs Non-Parameterized Microphysics, J. Atmos.
Sci., 30, 1620–1637, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1973)030<1620:ANSOWC>2.0.CO;2, 1973.
Simpson, J. and Wiggert, V.: Models of precipitating cumulus towers, Mon.
Weather Rev., 97, 471–489, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1969)097<0471:MOPCT>2.3.CO;2, 1969.
Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Duda, M. G., Fowler, L. D., Park, S.-H., and
Ringler, T. D.: A Multiscale Nonhydrostatic Atmospheric Model Using
Centroidal Voronoi Tesselations and C-Grid Staggering, Mon. Weather Rev., 140, 3090–3105, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00215.1, 2012.
Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Liu, Z., Berner,
J., Wang, W., Powers, J. G., Duda, M. G., Barker, D. M., and Huang, X.-Y.: A
Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 4, NCAR Tech. Note
NCAR/TN-556+STR, 145 pp., https://doi.org/10.5065/1dfh-6p97, 2019 (data available at: https://doi.org/10.5065/D6MK6B4K).
Sundqvist, H., Berge, E., and Kristjánsson, J. E.: Condensation and
Cloud Parameterization Studies with a Mesoscale Numerical Weather Prediction
Model, Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 1641–1657,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<1641:cacpsw>2.0.co;2, 1989.
Tao, W.-K. and Simpson, J.: Goddard Cumulus Ensemble Model. Part I: Model
Description, Terr. Atmos. Ocean. Sci., 4, 35–72,
https://doi.org/10.3319/TAO.1993.4.1.35(A), 1993.
Tapiador, F. J., Sánchez, J.-L., and García-Ortega, E.: Empirical
values and assumptions in the microphysics of numerical models, Atmos. Res.,
215, 214–238, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.09.010, 2019.
Thompson, G., Rasmussen, R. M., and Manning, K.: Explicit Forecasts of
Winter Precipitation Using an Improved Bulk Microphysics Scheme. Part I:
Description and Sensitivity Analysis, Mon. Weather Rev., 132, 519–542,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<0519:EFOWPU>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Thompson, G., Field, P. R., Rasmussen, R. M., and Hall, W. D.: Explicit
Forecasts of Winter Precipitation Using an Improved Bulk Microphysics
Scheme. Part II: Implementation of a New Snow Parameterization, Mon. Weather
Rev., 136, 5095–5115, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2387.1, 2008.
Wellmann, C., Barrett, A. I., Johnson, J. S., Kunz, M., Vogel, B., Carslaw, K. S., and Hoose, C.: Comparing the impact of environmental conditions and microphysics on the forecast uncertainty of deep convective clouds and hail, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2201–2219, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2201-2020, 2020.
White, B., Gryspeerdt, E., Stier, P., Morrison, H., Thompson, G., and Kipling, Z.: Uncertainty from the choice of microphysics scheme in convection-permitting models significantly exceeds aerosol effects, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 12145–12175, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12145-2017, 2017.
Wood, R.: Drizzle in Stratiform Boundary Layer Clouds. Part II:
Microphysical Aspects, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 3034–3050,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3530.1, 2005.
Wood, R. and Blossey, P. N.: Comments on “Parameterization of the
Autoconversion Process. Part I: Analytical Formulation of the Kessler-Type
Parameterizations”, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 3003–3006,
https://doi.org/10.1175/jas3524.1, 2005.
Wood, R., Field, P. R., and Cotton, W. R.: Autoconversion rate bias in
stratiform boundary layer cloud parameterizations, Atmos. Res., 65, 109–128,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(02)00071-6, 2002.
Xiao, H., Yin, Y., Zhao, P., Wan, Q., and Liu, X.: Effect of Aerosol
Particles on Orographic Clouds: Sensitivity to Autoconversion Schemes,
Adv. Atmos. Sci., 37, 229–238,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-019-9037-6, 2020.
Yin, J., Wang, D., and Zhai, G.: An attempt to improve Kessler-type
parameterization of warm cloud microphysical conversion processes using
CloudSat observations, J. Meteorol. Res., 29, 82–92,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-015-4091-1, 2015.
Yin, J., Zhang, D.-L., Luo, Y., and Ma, R.: On the Extreme Rainfall Event of
7 May 2017 Over the Coastal City of Guangzhou. Part I: Impacts of
Urbanization and Orography, Mon. Weather Rev., 148, 955–979,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-19-0212.1, 2020.
Yin, J., Liang, X., Wang, H., and Xue, H.: Representation of the Autoconversion from Cloud to Rain, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5052639, 2021.
Yin, J.-F., Wang, D.-H., Liang, Z.-M., Liu, C.-J., Zhai, G.-Q., and Wang,
H.: Numerical Study of the Role of Microphysical Latent Heating and Surface
Heat Fluxes in a Severe Precipitation Event in the Warm Sector over Southern
China, Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 77–90,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-017-0061-0, 2018.
Yuter, S. E. and Houze, R. A.: Three-Dimensional Kinematic and Microphysical
Evolution of Florida Cumulonimbus. Part II: Frequency Distributions of
Vertical Velocity, Reflectivity, and Differential Reflectivity, Mon. Weather
Rev., 123, 1941–1963, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1995)123<1941:TDKAME>2.0.CO;2, 1995.
Zhang, Y., Li, J., Yu, R., Zhang, S., Liu, Z., Huang, J., and Zhou, Y.: A
Layer-Averaged Nonhydrostatic Dynamical Framework on an Unstructured Mesh
for Global and Regional Atmospheric Modeling: Model Description, Baseline
Evaluation, and Sensitivity Exploration, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11,
1685–1714, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001539, 2019.
Short summary
An ensemble (EN) approach was designed to improve autoconversion (ATC) from cloud water to rainwater in cloud microphysics schemes. One unique feature of the EN approach is that the ATC rate is a mean value based on the calculations from several widely used ATC schemes. The ensemble approach proposed herein appears to help improve the representation of cloud and precipitation processes in weather and climate models.
An ensemble (EN) approach was designed to improve autoconversion (ATC) from cloud water to...